Montoya, J. M., Pimm, S. L. & Solé, R. V. Ecological networks and their fragility. Nature 442, 259–264 (2006).
Faust, K. & Raes, J. Microbial interactions: from networks to models. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 538–550 (2012).
Pržulj, N. & Malod-Dognin, N. Network analytics in the age of big data. Science 353, 123–124 (2016).
Berry, D. & Widder, S. Deciphering microbial interactions and detecting keystone species with co-occurrence networks. Front. Microbiol. 5, 219 (2014).
Okuyama, T. & Holland, J. N. Network structural properties mediate the stability of mutualistic communities. Ecol. Lett. 11, 208–216 (2008).
Landi, P., Minoarivelo, H. O., Brännström, Å., Hui, C. & Dieckmann, U. Complexity and stability of ecological networks: a review of the theory. Popul. Ecol. 60, 319–345 (2018).
Hillebrand, H. et al. Decomposing multiple dimensions of stability in global change experiments. Ecol. Lett. 21, 21–30 (2018).
Toju, H. et al. Species-rich networks and eco-evolutionary synthesis at the metacommunity level. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0024 (2017).
Montesinos-Navarro, A., Hiraldo, F., Tella, J. L. & Blanco, G. Network structure embracing mutualism–antagonism continuums increases community robustness. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1661–1669 (2017).
Ullah, H., Nagelkerken, I., Goldenberg, S. U. & Fordham, D. A. Climate change could drive marine food web collapse through altered trophic flows and cyanobacterial proliferation. PLoS Biol. 16, e2003446 (2018).
Dunne, J. A., Williams, R. J. & Martinez, N. D. Food-web structure and network theory: the role of connectance and size. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 12917–12922 (2002).
Thébault, E. & Fontaine, C. Stability of ecological communities and the architecture of mutualistic and trophic networks. Science 329, 853–856 (2010).
García-Palacios, P., Gross, N., Gaitán, J. & Maestre, F. T. Climate mediates the biodiversity–ecosystem stability relationship globally. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 8400–8405 (2018).
IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Xue, K. et al. Tundra soil carbon is vulnerable to rapid microbial decomposition under climate warming. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 595–600 (2016).
Brown, J. H., Gillooly, J. F., Allen, A. P., Savage, V. M. & West, G. B. Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 85, 1771–1789 (2004).
Guo, X. et al. Climate warming leads to divergent succession of grassland microbial communities. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 813–818 (2018).
Xu, X., Sherry, R. A., Niu, S., Li, D. & Luo, Y. Net primary productivity and rain-use efficiency as affected by warming, altered precipitation, and clipping in a mixed-grass prairie. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 2753–2764 (2013).
Guo, X. et al. Climate warming accelerates temporal scaling of grassland soil microbial biodiversity. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 612–619 (2019).
Zhou, J. et al. Functional molecular ecological networks. mBio 1, e00169–10 (2010).
Barabási, A.-L. & Oltvai, Z. N. Network biology: understanding the cell’s functional organization. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5, 101–113 (2004).
D’Amen, M., Mod, H. K., Gotelli, N. J. & Guisan, A. Disentangling biotic interactions, environmental filters, and dispersal limitation as drivers of species co-occurrence. Ecography 41, 1233–1244 (2018).
Barner, A. K., Coblentz, K. E., Hacker, S. D. & Menge, B. A. Fundamental contradictions among observational and experimental estimates of non-trophic species interactions. Ecology 99, 557–566 (2018).
Goberna, M. et al. Incorporating phylogenetic metrics to microbial co-occurrence networks based on amplicon sequences to discern community assembly processes. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 19, 1552–1564 (2019).
Carr, A., Diener, C., Baliga, N. S. & Gibbons, S. M. Use and abuse of correlation analyses in microbial ecology. ISME J. 13, 2647–2655 (2019).
Morton, J. T. et al. Establishing microbial composition measurement standards with reference frames. Nat. Commun. 10, 2719 (2019).
Fuhrman, J. A. Microbial community structure and its functional implications. Nature 459, 193–199 (2009).
Herren, C. M. & McMahon, K. D. Cohesion: a method for quantifying the connectivity of microbial communities. ISME J. 11, 2426–2438 (2017).
Zhou, J., Deng, Y., Luo, F., He, Z. & Yang, Y. Phylogenetic molecular ecological network of soil microbial communities in response to elevated CO2. mBio 2, e00122–11 (2011).
Banerjee, S., Schlaeppi, K. & van der Heijden, M. G. A. Keystone taxa as drivers of microbiome structure and functioning. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 567–576 (2018).
Zelikova, T. J. et al. Long-term exposure to elevated CO2 enhances plant community stability by suppressing dominant plant species in a mixed-grass prairie. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 15456–15461 (2014).
Douglas, G. M. et al. PICRUSt2 for prediction of metagenome functions. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 685–688 (2020).
MacArthur, R. Fluctuations of animal populations and a measure of community stability. Ecology 36, 533–536 (1955).
May, R. M. Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems (Princeton Univ. Press, 2019).
Guo, X. et al. Gene-informed decomposition model predicts lower soil carbon loss due to persistent microbial adaptation to warming. Nat. Commun. 11, 4897 (2020).
Melillo, J. M. et al. Long-term pattern and magnitude of soil carbon feedback to the climate system in a warming world. Science 358, 101–105 (2017).
Zhou, J. et al. Microbial mediation of carbon-cycle feedbacks to climate warming. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 106–110 (2012).
Galiana, N. et al. The spatial scaling of species interaction networks. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 782–790 (2018).
Bastolla, U. et al. The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity. Nature 458, 1018–1020 (2009).
Cardinale, B. J. et al. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486, 59–67 (2012).
Li, D., Zhou, X., Wu, L., Zhou, J. & Luo, Y. Contrasting responses of heterotrophic and autotrophic respiration to experimental warming in a winter annual-dominated prairie. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 3553–3564 (2013).
Treves, D. S., Xia, B., Zhou, J. & Tiedje, J. M. A two-species test of the hypothesis that spatial isolation influences microbial diversity in soil. Microb. Ecol. 45, 20–28 (2003).
Zhou, J., Xia, B., Huang, H., Palumbo, A. V. & Tiedje, J. M. Microbial diversity and heterogeneity in sandy subsurface soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 1723–1734 (2004).
Zhou, J. et al. Spatial and resource factors influencing high microbial diversity in soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 326–334 (2002).
O’Brien, S. L. et al. Spatial scale drives patterns in soil bacterial diversity. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 2039–2051 (2016).
Penton, C. R., Gupta, V. V. S. R., Yu, J. & Tiedje, J. M. Size matters: assessing optimum soil sample size for fungal and bacterial community structure analyses using high throughput sequencing of rRNA gene amplicons. Front. Microbiol. 7, 824 (2016).
Zhou, J., Bruns, M. A. & Tiedje, J. M. DNA recovery from soils of diverse composition. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62, 316–322 (1996).
Hurt, R. A. et al. Simultaneous recovery of RNA and DNA from soils and sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67, 4495–4503 (2001).
Peiffer, J. A. et al. Diversity and heritability of the maize rhizosphere microbiome under field conditions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 6548–6553 (2013).
Wu, L. et al. Phasing amplicon sequencing on Illumina Miseq for robust environmental microbial community analysis. BMC Microbiol. 15, 125 (2015).
Wen, C. et al. Evaluation of the reproducibility of amplicon sequencing with Illumina MiSeq platform. PLoS ONE 12, e0176716 (2017).
Zhou, J. et al. High-throughput metagenomic technologies for complex microbial community analysis: open and closed formats. mBio 6, e02288–14 (2015).
Zhou, J. et al. Reproducibility and quantitation of amplicon sequencing-based detection. ISME J. 5, 1303–1313 (2011).
Luo, F. et al. Constructing gene co-expression networks and predicting functions of unknown genes by random matrix theory. BMC Bioinformatics 8, 299 (2007).
Luo, F., Zhong, J., Yang, Y., Scheuermann, R. H. & Zhou, J. Application of random matrix theory to biological networks. Phys. Lett. A 357, 420–423 (2006).
Deng, Y. et al. Molecular ecological network analyses. BMC Bioinformatics 13, 113 (2012).
Shi, S. et al. The interconnected rhizosphere: high network complexity dominates rhizosphere assemblages. Ecol. Lett. 19, 926–936 (2016).
Mehta, M. L. Random Matrices 2nd edn (Elsevier, 2004).
Plerou, V., Gopikrishnan, P., Rosenow, B., Amaral, L. A. N. & Stanley, H. E. Universal and non-universal properties of cross-correlations in financial time series. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1471–1474 (1999).
Aitchison, J. The statistical analysis of compositional data. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 44, 139–160 (1982).
Gloor, G. B., Macklaim, J. M., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V. & Egozcue, J. J. Microbiome datasets are compositional: and this is not optional. Front. Microbiol. 8, 2224 (2017).
Pawlowsky-Glahn, V. & Egozcue, J. J. Compositional data and their analysis: an introduction. Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ. 264, 1–10 (2006).
Friedman, J. & Alm, E. J. Inferring correlation networks from genomic survey data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002687 (2012).
Watts, S. C., Ritchie, S. C., Inouye, M. & Holt, K. E. FastSpar: rapid and scalable correlation estimation for compositional data. Bioinformatics 35, 1064–1066 (2019).
Weiss, S. et al. Correlation detection strategies in microbial data sets vary widely in sensitivity and precision. ISME J. 10, 1669–1681 (2016).
R: a language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019).
Goslee, S. C. & Urban, D. L. The ecodist package for dissimilarity-based analysis of ecological data. J. Stat. Softw. 22, 1–19 (2007).
Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. Version 2.5-6 (2019).
Lima-Mendez, G. et al. Determinants of community structure in the global plankton interactome. Science 348, 1262073 (2015).
Yuan, M.M. et al. Mengting-Maggie-Yuan/warming-network-complexity-stability: warming-network-complexity-stability-v1.0. Version 1.0 (Zenodo, 2021); https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4383469
He, Z. et al. GeoChip 3.0 as a high-throughput tool for analyzing microbial community composition, structure and functional activity. ISME J. 4, 1167–1179 (2010).
He, Z. et al. GeoChip: a comprehensive microarray for investigating biogeochemical, ecological and environmental processes. ISME J. 1, 67–77 (2007).
Ning, D., Deng, Y., Tiedje, J. M. & Zhou, J. A general framework for quantitatively assessing ecological stochasticity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 16892–16898 (2019).
Zhou, J. & Ning, D. Stochastic community assembly: does it matter in microbial ecology? Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 81, e00002–e00017 (2017).
Csárdi, G. & Nepusz, T. The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJ. Complex Syst. 1695, 1–9 (2006).
Maslov, S. & Sneppen, K. Specificity and stability in topology of protein networks. Science 296, 910–913 (2002).
Almeida‐Neto, M., Guimarães, P., Guimarães, P. R., Loyola, R. D. & Ulrich, W. A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement. Oikos 117, 1227–1239 (2008).
Guimerà, R. & Nunes Amaral, L. A. Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks. Nature 433, 895–900 (2005).
Olesen, J. M., Bascompte, J., Dupont, Y. L. & Jordano, P. The modularity of pollination networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 19891–19896 (2007).
Banerjee, S., Schlaeppi, K. & van der Heijden, M. G. A. Reply to ‘can we predict microbial keystones?’. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 194 (2019).
Röttjers, L. & Faust, K. Can we predict keystones? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 193 (2019).
Langfelder, P. & Horvath, S. Eigengene networks for studying the relationships between co-expression modules. BMC Syst. Biol. 1, 54 (2007).
Hautier, Y. et al. Eutrophication weakens stabilizing effects of diversity in natural grasslands. Nature 508, 521–525 (2014).
Hui, C., McGeoch, M. A., Harrison, A. E. S. & Bronstein, E. J. L. Zeta diversity as a concept and metric that unifies incidence-based biodiversity patterns. Am. Nat. 184, 684–694 (2014).
Shi, Z. et al. Functional gene array-based ultrasensitive and quantitative detection of microbial populations in complex communities. mSystems 4, e00296–19 (2019).
Sun, S., Jones, R. B. & Fodor, A. A. Inference-based accuracy of metagenome prediction tools varies across sample types and functional categories. Microbiome 8, 46 (2020).
Source: Ecology - nature.com