in

Current contrasting population trends among North American hummingbirds

[adace-ad id="91168"]
  • 1.

    United Nations Environment Programme. Making Peace With Nature (Tech. Rep, United Nations Environment Programme, 2021).

  • 2.

    Newbold, T. et al. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520, 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14324 (2015).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Urban, M. C. Accelerating extinction risk from climate change. Science. (80-. ) 348, 571–573. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa4984 (2015).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Rosenberg, K. V. et al. Decline of the North American avifauna. Science. (80-. ) 366, 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw1313 (2019).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Jetz, W., Wilcove, D. S. & Dobson, A. P. Projected impacts of climate and land-use change on the global diversity of birds. PLoS Biol. 5, 1211–1219. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050157 (2007).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Abrahamczyk, S. & Renner, S. S. The temporal build-up of hummingbird/plant mutualisms in North America and temperate South America. BMC Evol. Biol.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-015-0388-z (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Grant, V. & Grant, K. A. A Hummingbird-Pollinated Species of Boraginaceae in the Arizona Flora. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 66, 917–919. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.66.3.917 (1970).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Ratto, F. et al. Global importance of vertebrate pollinators for plant reproductive success: A meta-analysis. Front. Ecol. Environ. 16, 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1763 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    McGuire, J. A. et al. Molecular phylogenetics and the diversification of hummingbirds. Curr. Biol. 24, 910–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.016 (2014).

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Sauer, J. R., Link, W. A., Fallon, J. E., Pardieck, K. L. & Ziolkowski, D. J. The North American breeding bird survey 1966–2011: Summary analysis and species accounts. N. Am. Fauna 79, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3996/nafa.79.0001 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Bairlein, F. Migratory birds under threat. Science (80-. ). 354, 547–548. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah6647 (2016).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Battey, C. J. Ecological release of the Anna’s Hummingbird during a Northern range expansion. Am. Nat. 194, 306–315. https://doi.org/10.1086/704249 (2019).

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Clark, C. J. EBird records show substantial growth of the Allen’s Hummingbird (Selasphorus sasin sedentarius) population in urban Southern California. Condor 119, 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1650/CONDOR-16-153.1 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Sleeter, B. M. et al. Land-cover change in the conterminous United States from 1973 to 2000. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 733–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.006 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Gallant, A. L., Loveland, T. R., Sohl, T. L. & Napton, D. E. Using an ecoregion framework to analyze land-cover and land-use dynamics. Environ. Manag.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0145-3 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Williamson, S. L. A Field Guide to Hummingbirds of North America (Peterson Field Guide Series) (Houghton Mifflin Company, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Panjabi, A. O. et al. Avian Conservation Assessment Database Handbook Version 2021. Tech. Rep. (Partners in Flight Technical Series, Bird Conservancy of the Rockies, 2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Gillespie, C., Contreras-Martinez, S., Bishop, C. & Alexander, J. Rufous Hummingbird: State of the Science and Conservation : simplebooklet.com. Tech. Rep., (Western Hummingbird Partnership, 2020).

  • 19.

    International Union for Conservation of Nature. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Tech. Rep. (IUCN Species Survival Commission, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Lehikoinen, A. Climate change, phenology and species detectability in a monitoring scheme. Popul. Ecol. 55, 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-012-0359-9 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Massimino, D., Harris, S. J. & Gillings, S. Phenological mismatch between breeding birds and their surveyors and implications for estimating population trends. J. Ornithol. 162, 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-020-01821-5 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    McGrath, L. J., van Riper III, C. & Fontaine, J. J. Flower power: Tree flowering phenology as a settlement cue for migrating birds. J. Anim. Ecol. 78, 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01464.x (2009).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Jones, T. & Cresswell, W. The phenology mismatch hypothesis: Are declines of migrant birds linked to uneven global climate change?. J. Anim. Ecol. 79, 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01610.x (2010).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Courter, J. R. Changes in spring arrival dates of rufous hummingbirds (Selasphorus rufus) In Western North America in the past century. Wilson J. Ornithol. 129, 535–544. https://doi.org/10.1676/16-133.1 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Rooney, T. Deer impacts on forest ecosystems: A North American perspective. Forestry 74, 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/74.3.201 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Côté, S. D., Rooney, T. P., Tremblay, J.-P., Dussault, C. & Waller, D. M. Ecological impacts of deer overabundance. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35, 113–147. https://doi.org/10.2307/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.30000006 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Decalesta, D. S. Effect of white-tailed deer on songbirds within managed forests in Pennsylvania. J. Wildl. Manag. 58, 711–718 (1994).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    English, S. G. et al. Neonicotinoid pesticides exert metabolic effects on avian pollinators. Sci. Rep. 11, 2914. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82470-3 (2021).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Bishop, C. A. et al. Determination of neonicotinoids and butenolide residues in avian and insect pollinators and their ambient environment in Western Canada (2017, 2018). Sci. Total Environ. 737, 139386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139386 (2020).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Graves, E. E. et al. Analysis of insecticide exposure in California hummingbirds using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26, 15458–15466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04903-x (2019).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Hill, G. E., Sargent, R. R. & Sargent, M. B. Recent change in the winter distribution of Rufous Hummingbirds. Auk 115, 240–245. https://doi.org/10.2307/4089135 (1998).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    Smith, A. C. & Edwards, B. P. M. North American Breeding Bird Survey status and trend estimates to inform a wide range of conservation needs, using a flexible Bayesian hierarchical generalized additive model. Condor 123, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithapp/duaa065 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 33.

    Wilson, S. et al. Prioritize diversity or declining species? Trade-offs and synergies in spatial planning for the conservation of migratory birds in the face of land cover change. Biol. Conserv. 239, 108285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108285 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 34.

    Toledo-Aceves, T., Meave, J. A., González-Espinosa, M. & Ramírez-Marcial, N. Tropical montane cloud forests: Current threats and opportunities for their conservation and sustainable management in Mexico. J. Environ. Manag. 92, 974–981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.007 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science (80-. ). 342, 850–853. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.1244693 (2013).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    Westerling, A. L. Increasing western US forest wildfire activity: Sensitivity to changes in the timing of spring. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.https://doi.org/10.1098/RSTB.2015.0178 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 37.

    Neeraja, U. V., Rajendrakumar, S., Saneesh, C. S., Dyda, V. & Knight, T. M. Fire alters diversity, composition, and structure of dry tropical forests in the Eastern Ghats. Ecol. Evol. 11, 6593–6603. https://doi.org/10.1002/ECE3.7514 (2021).

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 38.

    Courter, J. R., Johnson, R. J., Bridges, W. C. & Hubbard, K. G. Assessing migration of Ruby-throated Hummingbirds (Archilochus colubris) at broad spatial and temporal scales at broad spatial and temporal scales. Auk 130, 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1525/auk.2012.12058 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 39.

    Greig, E. I., Wood, E. M. & Bonter, D. N. Winter range expansion of a hummingbird is associated with urbanization and supplementary feeding. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0256 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 40.

    Jepson, W. L. & Hickman, J. C. The Jepson manual: Higher plants of California (University of California Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • 41.

    Scarfe, A. & Finlay, J. C. Rapid second nesting by Anna’s Hummingbird near its Northern breeding limit. West. Birds 32, 131–133 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • 42.

    Bibby, C. J., Burgess, N. D. & Hill, D. A. Bird Census Techniques (Academic Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    Thogmartin, W. E. et al. A review of the population estimation approach of the North American landbird conservation plan. Auk 123, 892–904. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/123.3.892 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    Carter, M. F., Hunter, W. C., Pashley, D. N. & Rosenberg, K. V. Setting conservation priorities for landbirds in the United States: The partners in flight approach. Auk 117, 541–548. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/117.2.541 (2000).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 45.

    Sauer, J. R. & Link, W. A. Analysis of the North American breeding bird survey using hierarchical models. Auk 128, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1525/auk.2010.09220 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 46.

    Sauer, J. R., Niven, D. K., Pardieck, K. L., Ziolkowski, D. J. & Link, W. A. Expanding the North American Breeding Bird Survey analysis to include additional species and regions. J. Fish Wildl. Manag. 8, 154–172. https://doi.org/10.3996/102015-JFWM-109 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Stanton, J. C., Blancher, P., Rosenberg, K. V., Panjabi, A. O. & Thogmartin, W. E. Estimating uncertainty of North American landbird population sizes. Avian Conserv. Ecol.https://doi.org/10.5751/ACE-01331-140104 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 48.

    Schuster, R. et al. Optimizing the conservation of migratory species over their full annual cycle. Nat. Commun.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09723-8 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 49.

    Johnston, A. et al. Abundance models improve spatial and temporal prioritization of conservation resources. Ecol. Appl. 25, 1749–1756. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-1826.1 (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 50.

    Robbins, C., Bystrak, D. & Geissler, P. The Breeding Bird Survey: Its First Fifteen Years, 1965–1979. Tech. Rep. (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1986).

  • 51.

    R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.0.3) [Computer software] (2020).

  • 52.

    Smith, A. C., Hudson, M.-A., Aponte, V. & Francis, C. North American Breeding Bird Survey—Canadian Trends Website. Data-version 2017 (2019).

  • 53.

    Edwards, B. P. M. & Smith, A. C. bbsBayes: An R package for hierarchical Bayesian analysis of North American breeding bird survey data. J. Open Res. Softw.https://doi.org/10.5334/JORS.329 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 54.

    North American Bird Conservation Initiative. Bird Conservation Region Descriptions. Tech. Rep. (U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2000).

    Google Scholar 


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    The use of multi-criteria method in the process of threat assessment to the environment

    3 Questions: Daniel Cohn on the benefits of high-efficiency, flexible-fuel engines for heavy-duty trucking