Adams DC, Church JO (2008) Amphibians do not follow Bergmann’s rule. Evol: Int J Org Evol 62(2):413–420
Alho J, Herczeg G, Laugen A, Räsänen K, Laurila A, Merilä J (2011) Allen’s rule revisited: quantitative genetics of extremity length in the common frog along a latitudinal gradient. J Evol Biol 24(1):59–70
Allen JA (1877) The influence of physical conditions in the genesis of species. Radic Rev 1:108–140
Amado TF, Bidau CJ, Olalla-Tárraga MÁ (2019) Geographic variation of body size in New World anurans: energy and water in a balance. Ecography 42(3):456–466
Ashton KG (2002) Do amphibians follow Bergmann’s rule? Can J Zool 80(4):708–716
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67(1):1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Belden LK, Rubbo MJ, Wingfield JC, Kiesecker JM (2007) Searching for the physiological mechanism of density dependence: does corticosterone regulate tadpole responses to density? Physiol Biochem Zool 80(4):444–451
Berven KA (1982a) The genetic basis of altitudinal variation in the wood frog Rana sylvatica II. An experimental analysis of larval development. Oecologia 52(3):360–369
Berven KA (1982b) The genetic basis of altitudinal variation in the wood frog Rana sylvatica. I. An experimental analysis of life history traits. Evolution 36(5):962–983
Berven KA (1990) Factors affecting population fluctuations in larval and adult stages of the wood frog (Rana sylvatica). Ecology 71(4):1599–1608
Berven KA (2009) Density dependence in the terrestrial stage of wood frogs: evidence from a 21-year population study. Copeia 2009(2):328–338
Berven KA, Gill DE (1983) Interpreting geographic-variation in life-history traits. Am Zool 23(1):85–97
Bijlsma R, Loeschcke V (2012) Genetic erosion impedes adaptive responses to stressful environments. Evol Appl 5(2):117–129
Bjornstad ON (2020) ncf: spatial covariance functions. R package version 1.2-9. https://cran.r-project.org/package=ncf
Castellano S, Balletto E (2002) Is the partial Mantel test inadequate? Evolution 56(9):1871–1873
Chaparro-Pedraza PC, de Roos AM (2020) Density-dependent effects of mortality on the optimal body size to shift habitat: Why smaller is better despite increased mortality risk. Evolution 74(5):831–841
Conover DO, Schultz ET (1995) Phenotypic similarity and the evolutionary significance of countergradient variation. Trends Ecol Evol 10(6):248–252
Cordero GA, Epps CW (2012) From desert to rainforest: phenotypic variation in functionally important traits of bushy-tailed woodrats (Neotoma cinerea) across two climatic extremes. J Mamm Evol 19(2):135–153
Costanzo JP, do Amaral MCF, Rosendale AJ, Lee RE (2013) Hibernation physiology, freezing adaptation and extreme freeze tolerance in a northern population of the wood frog. J Exp Biol 216(18):3461–3473
Crespi EJ, Warne RW (2013) Environmental conditions experienced during the tadpole stage alter post-metamorphic glucocorticoid response to stress in an amphibian. Integr Comp Biol 53(6):989–1001
Dahl E, Orizaola G, Nicieza AG, Laurila A (2012) Time constraints and flexibility of growth strategies: geographic variation in catch‐up growth responses in amphibian larvae. J Anim Ecol 81(6):1233–1243
Davenport JM, Hossack BR (2016) Reevaluating geographic variation in life‐history traits of a widespread Nearctic amphibian. J Zool 299(4):304–310
Denver RJ (1997) Environmental stress as a developmental cue: corticotropin-releasing hormone is a proximate mediator of adaptive phenotypic plasticity in amphibian metamorphosis. Horm Behav 31(2):169–179
DeWitt TJ, Scheiner SM (2004) Phenotypic plasticity: functional and conceptual approaches. Oxford University Press, New York, NY USA
Dorcas ME, Gibbons JW (2008) Frogs and Toads of the Southeast. University of Georgia Press, Athens, GA, USA
Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S, Buchmann C, Carl G, Carré G et al. (2013) Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36(1):27–46
Duncan SI, Crespi EJ, Mattheus NM, Rissler LJ (2015) History matters more when explaining genetic diversity within the context of the core–periphery hypothesis. Mol Ecol 24(16):4323–4336
Elith J, Phillips SJ, Hastie T, Dudík M, Chee YE, Yates CJ (2011) A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity Distrib 17(1):43–57
Fitzpatrick MJ, Zuckerberg B, Pauli JN, Kearney MR, Thompson KL, Werner LC et al. (2019) Modeling the distribution of niche space and risk for a freeze‐tolerant ectotherm, Lithobates sylvaticus. Ecosphere 10(7):e02788
Fox J, Weisberg S (2019) An R Companion to Applied Regression, 3rd Edition. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
GBIF.org (2014) GBIF Occurrence Download. https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.e3k4ag
Gouveia SF, Correia I (2016) Geographical clines of body size in terrestrial amphibians: water conservation hypothesis revisited. J Biogeogr 43(10):2075–2084
Hahn DA, Martin AR, Porter SD (2008) Body size, but not cooling rate, affects supercooling points in the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. Environ Entomol 37(5):1074–1080
Hangartner S, Laurila A, Rasanen K (2012) Adaptive divergence in moor frog (Rana arvalis) populations along an acidification gradient: inferences from Q(st) -F(st) correlations. Evolution 66(3):867–881
Hijmans R, Cameron S, Parra J, Jones P, Jarvis A, Richardson K (2005) WorldClim version 1.3. University of California, Berkeley
Holderegger R, Kamm U, Gugerli F (2006) Adaptive vs. neutral genetic diversity: implications for landscape genetics. Landsc Ecol 21(6):797–807
Kawakami T, Morgan TJ, Nippert JB, Ocheltree TW, Keith R, Dhakal P et al. (2011) Natural selection drives clinal life history patterns in the perennial sunflower species, Helianthus maximiliani. Mol Ecol 20(11):2318–2328
Kierepka E, Latch E (2015) Performance of partial statistics in individual‐based landscape genetics. Mol Ecol Resour 15(3):512–525
Kingsolver JG, Diamond SE (2011) Phenotypic selection in natural populations: what limits directional selection? Am Naturalist 177(3):346–357
Kingsolver JG, Pfennig DW (2004) Individual-level selection as a cause of cope’s rule of phyletic size increase. Evolution 58(7):1608–1612
Laugen AT, Laurila A, Jönsson KI, Söderman F, Merilä J (2005) Do common frogs (Rana temporaria) follow Bergmann’s rule? Evol Ecol Res 7(5):717–731
Laugen AT, Laurila A, Räsänen K, Merilä J (2003) Latitudinal countergradient variation in the common frog (Rana temporaria) development rates–evidence for local adaptation. J Evol Biol 16(5):996–1005
Laurila A, Karttunen S, Merila J (2002) Adaptive phenotypic plasticity and genetics of larval life histories in two Rana temporaria populations. Evolution 56(3):617–627
Lee-Yaw JA, Irwin JT, Green DM (2008) Postglacial range expansion from northern refugia by the wood frog, Rana sylvatica. Mol Ecol 17(3):867–884
Leinonen T, Cano JM, Mäkinen H, Merilä J (2006) Contrasting patterns of body shape and neutral genetic divergence in marine and lake populations of threespine sticklebacks. J Evol Biol 19(6):1803–1812
Leinonen T, McCairns RJ, O’Hara RB, Merila J (2013a) Q(ST)-F(ST) comparisons: evolutionary and ecological insights from genomic heterogeneity. Nat Rev Genet 14(3):179–190
Leinonen T, McCairns RS, O’hara RB, Merilä J (2013b) Q ST–F ST comparisons: evolutionary and ecological insights from genomic heterogeneity. Nat Rev Genet 14(3):179
Lenker MA, Savage AE, Becker CG, Rodriguez D, Zamudio KR (2014) Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis infection dynamics vary seasonally in upstate New York, USA. Dis Aquat Organ 111(1):51–60
Lind M, Johansson F (2011) Testing the role of phenotypic plasticity for local adaptation: growth and development in time‐constrained Rana temporaria populations. J Evol Biol 24(12):2696–2704
Lind MI, Ingvarsson PK, Johansson H, Hall D, Johansson F (2011) Gene flow and selection on phenotypic plasticity in an island system of Rana temporaria. Evolution 65(3):684–697
Lindgren B, Laurila A (2009) Physiological variation along a geographical gradient: is growth rate correlated with routine metabolic rate in Rana temporaria tadpoles? Biol J Linn Soc 98(1):217–224
Lomolino MV, Heaney LR (2004) Frontiers of biogeography: new directions in the geography of nature. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA
Manis ML, Claussen DL (1986) Environmental and genetic influences on the thermal physiology of Rana sylvatica. J Therm Biol 11(1):31–36
Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27(2 Part 1):209–220
Martof BS, Humphries RL (1959) Geographic variation in the wood frog Rana sylvatica. Am Midl Naturalist 61(2):350–389
Merilä J, Crnokrak P (2001) Comparison of genetic differentiation at marker loci and quantitative traits. J Evol Biol 14(6):892–903
Merilä J, Laurila A, Laugen AT, Räsänen K, Pahkala M (2000) Plasticity in age and size at metamorphosis in Rana temporaria‐comparison of high and low latitude populations. Ecography 23(4):457–465
Mitchell-Olds T, Willis JH, Goldstein DB (2007) Which evolutionary processes influence natural genetic variation for phenotypic traits? Nat Rev Genet 8(11):845–856
Morrison C, Hero JM (2003) Geographic variation in life‐history characteristics of amphibians: a review. J Anim Ecol 72(2):270–279
Mueller LD (1997) Theoretical and empirical examination of density-dependent selection. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28(1):269–288
Muir AP, Biek R, Thomas R, Mable BK (2014) Local adaptation with high gene flow: temperature parameters drive adaptation to altitude in the common frog (Rana temporaria). Mol Ecol 23(3):561–574
Nosil P, Vines TH, Funk DJ (2005) Reproductive isolation caused by natural selection against immigrants from divergent habitats. Evolution 59(4):705–719
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’hara R et al. (2019) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
Olalla-Tárraga MÁ, Rodríguez MÁ (2007) Energy and interspecific body size patterns of amphibian faunas in Europe and North America: anurans follow Bergmann’s rule, urodeles its converse. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16(5):606–617
Orizaola G, Quintela M, Laurila A (2010) Climatic adaptation in an isolated and genetically impoverished amphibian population. Ecography 33(4):730–737
Padgham M, Sumner MD (2020) geodist: fast, dependency-free geodesic distance calculations. R package version 0.0.6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=geodist
Palo JU, O’Hara RB, Laugen AT, Laurila A, Primmer CR, Merila J (2003) Latitudinal divergence of common frog (Rana temporaria) life history traits by natural selection: evidence from a comparison of molecular and quantitative genetic data. Mol Ecol 12(7):1963–1978
Peters RH, Peters RH (1986) The ecological implications of body size, vol 2. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA
Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190(3-4):231–259
Pigliucci M (2001) Phenotypic plasticity: beyond nature and nurture. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MA, USA
Powell R, Conant R, Collins JT (2016) Peterson field guide to reptiles and amphibians of eastern and central North America. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York, NY, USA
R Core Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
Raufaste N, Rousset F (2001) Are partial Mantel tests adequate? Evolution 55(8):1703–1705
Rice KC, Jung RE (2004) Water-quality and amphibian population data for Maryland, Washington, DC, and Virginia, 2001–2004. US Geological Survey
Richter-Boix A, Quintela M, Kierczak M, Franch M, Laurila A (2013) Fine-grained adaptive divergence in an amphibian: genetic basis of phenotypic divergence and the role of nonrandom gene flow in restricting effective migration among wetlands. Mol Ecol 22(5):1322–1340
Richter-Boix A, Teplitsky C, Rogell B, Laurila A (2010) Local selection modifies phenotypic divergence among Rana temporaria populations in the presence of gene flow. Mol Ecol 19(4):716–731
Richter‐Boix A, Katzenberger M, Duarte H, Quintela M, Tejedo M, Laurila A (2015) Local divergence of thermal reaction norms among amphibian populations is affected by pond temperature variation. Evolution 69(8):2210–2226
Rissler LJ (2016) Union of phylogeography and landscape genetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(29):8079–8086
Roff D (1980) Optimizing development time in a seasonal environment: the ‘ups and downs’ of clinal variation. Oecologia 45(2):202–208
Santos M, Borash DJ, Joshi A, Bounlutay N, Mueller LD (1997) Density‐dependent natural selection in Drosophila: evolution of growth rate and body size. Evolution 51(2):420–432
Schemske DW, Bierzychudek P (2007) Spatial differentiation for flower color in the desert annual Linanthus parryae: was Wright right? Evol: Int J Org Evol 61(11):2528–2543
Schueler FW (1975) Geographic variation in the size of Rana septentrionalis in Quebec, Ontario, and Manitoba. J Herpetol 9(2):177–185
Semlitsch RD, Scott DE, Pechmann JHK (1988) Time and size at metamorphosis related to adult fitness in Ambystoma talpoideum. Ecology 69(1):184–192
Shafer AB, Wolf JB (2013) Widespread evidence for incipient ecological speciation: a meta‐analysis of isolation‐by‐ecology. Ecol Lett 16(7):940–950
Sheridan JA, Caruso NM, Apodaca JJ, Rissler LJ (2018) Shifts in frog size and phenology: testing predictions of climate change on a widespread anuran using data from prior to rapid climate warming. Ecol Evol 8(2):1316–1327
Smith-Gill SJ, Berven KA (1979) Predicting amphibian metamorphosis. Am Naturalist 113(4):563–585
Spitze K (1993) Population structure in Daphnia obtusa: quantitative genetic and allozymic variation. Genetics 135(2):367–374
Stevens CE, Paszkowski CA (2004) Using chorus-size ranks from call surveys to estimate reproductive activity of the wood frog (Rana sylvatica). J Herpetol 38(3):404–410
Therneau TM (2020) coxme: Mixed effects cox models. R package version 2.2-16. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=coxme
Thomassen HA, Cheviron ZA, Freedman AH, Harrigan RJ, Wayne RK, Smith TB (2010) Spatial modelling and landscape‐level approaches for visualizing intra‐specific variation. Mol Ecol 19(17):3532–3548
Van Buskirk J (2017) Spatially heterogeneous selection in nature favors phenotypic plasticity in anuran larvae. Evolution 71(6):1670–1685
Venables W, Ripley B (2002) Modern Applied Statistics with S. 4th Edition. Springer, New York, NY, USA
Wang IJ, Bradburd GS (2014) Isolation by environment. Mol Ecol 23(23):5649–5662
Wang IJ, Summers K (2010) Genetic structure is correlated with phenotypic divergence rather than geographic isolation in the highly polymorphic strawberry poison‐dart frog. Mol Ecol 19(3):447–458
Warne RW, Crespi EJ (2015) Larval growth rate and sex determine resource allocation and stress responsiveness across life stages in juvenile frogs. J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol 323(3):191–201
Weber MM, Stevens RD, Diniz‐Filho JAF, Grelle CEV (2017) Is there a correlation between abundance and environmental suitability derived from ecological niche modelling? A meta‐analysis. Ecography 40(7):817–828
Weir L (2001) NAAMP unified protocol: call surveys. North American Amphibian Monitoring Program. Patuxtent Wildlife Research Center, Patuxtent, MA, USA
Whitlock MC (2008) Evolutionary inference from QST. Mol Ecol 17(8):1885–1896
Whitlock MC, Guillaume F (2009) Testing for spatially divergent selection: comparing QST to FST. Genetics 183(3):1055–1063
Whitlock MC, Phillips PC (2000) The exquisite corpse: a shifting view of the shifting balance. Trends Ecol Evol 15(9):347–348
Wilbur HM (1976) Density‐dependent aspects of metamorphosis in Ambystoma and Rana sylvatica. Ecology 57(6):1289–1296
Wilbur HM, Collins JP (1973) Ecological aspects of amphibian metamorphosis. Science 182(4119):1305–1314
Wright S (1943) Isolation by distance. Genetics 28(2):114
Source: Ecology - nature.com
