Passive eDNA collection enhances aquatic biodiversity analysis

Taberlet, P., Bonin, A., Zinger, L, & Coissac, E. Environmental DNA, for Biodiversity Research and Monitoring (Oxford Univ. Press, 2018).

Jo, T., Arimoto, M., Murakami, H., Masuda, R. & Minamoto, T. Particle size distribution of environmental DNA from the nuclei of marine fish. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 9947–9956 (2019).

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Wilcox, T. M., McKelvey, K. S., Young, M. K., Lowe, W. H. & Schwartz, M. K. Environmental DNA particle size distribution from Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis). Conserv. Genet. Resour. 7, 639–641 (2015).

Article  Google Scholar 

Thomsen, P. F. & Willerslev, E. Environmental DNA – an emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity. Biol. Conserv. 183, 4–18 (2015).

Article  Google Scholar 

Seymour, M. et al. Executing multi-taxa eDNA ecological assessment via traditional metrics and interactive networks. Sci. Total Environ. 729, 138801 (2020).

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Jarman, S. N., Berry, O. & Bunce, M. The value of environmental DNA biobanking for long-term biomonitoring. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1192–1193 (2018).

PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Jeunen, G.-J. et al. Species-level biodiversity assessment using marine environmental DNA metabarcoding requires protocol optimization and standardization. Ecol. Evol. 9, 1323–1335 (2019).

PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Turner, C. R. et al. Particle size distribution and optimal capture of aqueous microbial eDNA. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5, 676–684 (2014).

Article  Google Scholar 

Koziol, A. et al. Environmental DNA metabarcoding studies are critically affected by substrate selection. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 19, 366–376 (2019).

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Tsuji, S., Takahara, T., Doi, H., Shibata, N. & Yamanaka, H. The detection of aquatic macroorganisms using environmental DNA analysis – a review of methods for collection, extraction, and detection. Environ. DNA 1, 99–108 (2019).

Article  Google Scholar 

Shu, L., Ludwig, A. & Peng, Z. Standards for methods utilizing environmental DNA for detection of fish species. Genes 11, 296 (2020).

CAS  PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Deiner, K., Walser, J.-C., Mächler, E. & Altermatt, F. Choice of capture and extraction methods affect detection of freshwater biodiversity from environmental DNA. Biol. Conserv. 183, 53–63 (2015).

Article  Google Scholar 

Jeunen, G.-J. et al. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding reveals strong discrimination among diverse marine habitats connected by water movement. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 19, 426–438 (2019).

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Thomas, A. C., Howard, J., Nguyen, P. L., Seimon, T. A. & Goldberg, C. S. ANDeTM: a fully integrated environmental DNA sampling system. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 1379–1385 (2018).

Article  Google Scholar 

Schumer, G. et al. Utilizing environmental DNA for fish eradication effectiveness monitoring in streams. Biol. Invasions 21, 3415–3426 (2019).

Article  Google Scholar 

Zinger, L. et al. DNA metabarcoding – need for robust experimental designs to draw sound ecological conclusions. Mol. Ecol. 28, 1857–1862 (2019).

PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Bessey, C. et al. Maximizing fish detection with eDNA metabarcoding. Environ. DNA 2, 493–504, https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.74 (2020).

Article  Google Scholar 

Harrison, J. B., Sunday, J. M. & Rogers, S. M. Predicting the fate of eDNA in the environment and implications for studying biodiversity. Proc. R. Soc. Ser. B 286, 20191409 (2019).

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Seymour, M. et al. Acidity promotes degradation of multi-species environmental DNA in lotic mesocosms. Commun. Biol. 1, https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-017-0005-3 (2018).

Deiner, K. & Altermatt, F. Transport distance of invertebrate environmental DNA in a natural river. PLoS ONE 9, e88786 (2014).

PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Mächler, E., Deiner, K., Spahn, F. & Altermatt, F. Fishing in the water: effect of sampled water volume on environmental DNA-based detection of macroinvertebrates. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 305–312 (2016).

PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Hanfling, B. et al. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of lake fish communities reflects long-term data from established survey methods. Mol. Ecol. 25, 3101–3119 (2016).

PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Cantera, I. et al. Optimizing environmental DNA sampling effort for fish inventories in tropical streams and rivers. Sci. Rep. 9, 3085 (2019).

PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

McQuillan, J. S. & Robidart, J. C. Molecular-biological sensing in aquatic environments: recent developments and emerging capabilities. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 45, 43–50 (2017).

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Schabacker, J. C. et al. Increased eDNA detection sensitivity using a novel high-volume water sampling method. Environ. DNA 2, 244–251 (2020).

Article  Google Scholar 

Mariani, S., Baillie, C., Colosimo, G. & Riesgo, A. Sponges as natural environmental DNA samples. Curr. Biol. 29, R395–R402 (2019).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Keesing, J., Webber, B.L. & Hardiman, L. Ashmore Reef Marine Park Environmental Assessment. Final report to director of National Park (2020).

Kirtane, A., Atkinson, J. D. & Sassoubre, L. Design and validation of passive environmental DNA samplers using granular activated carbon and montmorillonite clay. Environ. Sci. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c01863 (2020).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Taberlet, P., Coissac, E., Hajibabaei, M. & Rieseberg, L. H. Environmental DNA. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 21, 1789–1793 (2012).

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Fonseca, V. G. Pitfalls in relative abundance estimation using eDNA metabarcoding. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 18, 923–926 (2018).

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Lamb, P. D. et al. How quantitative is metabarcoding: a meta-analytical approach. Mol. Ecol. 28, 420–430 (2019).

PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Derocles, S. A. P. et al. Biomonitoring for the 21st century: integrating next-generation sequencing into ecological network analysis. Adv. Ecol. Res. 58, 1–62 (2018).

Article  Google Scholar 

Prosser, J. I. Replicate or lie. Environ. Microbiol. 12, 1806–1810 (2010).

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

MacKenzie, D. I. What are the issues with presence-absence data for wildlife managers? J. Wildl. Manag. 69, 849–860 (2005).

Article  Google Scholar 

Liang, Z. & Keeley, A. Filtration recovery of extracellular DNA from environmental water samples. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 9324–9331 (2013).

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Renshaw, M. A., Olds, B. P., Jerde, C. L., McVeigh, M. M. & Lodge, D. M. The room temperature preservation of filtered environmental DNA samples and assimilation into a phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol DNA extraction. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 15, 168–176 (2015).

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Eichmiller, J. J., Miller, L. M. & Sorensen, P. W. Optimizing techniques to capture and extract environmental DNA for detection and quantification of fish. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 16, 56–68 (2016).

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Majaneva, M. et al. Environmental DNA filtration techniques affect recovered biodiversity. Sci. Rep. 8, 4682 (2018).

PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Stier, A. C., Bolker, B. M. & Osenberg, C. W. Using rarefaction to isolate the effects of patch size and sampling effort on beta diversity. Ecosphere 7, e01612 (2016).

Article  Google Scholar 

Yates, M. C., Fraser, D. J. & Derry, A. M. Meta-analysis supports further refinement of eDNA for monitoring aquatic species-specific abundance in nature. Environ. DNA 1, 5–13 (2019).

Article  Google Scholar 

Strickland, G. J. & Roberts, J. H. Utility of eDNA and occupancy models for monitoring an endangered fish across diverse riverine habitats. Hydrobiologia 826, 129–144 (2019).

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Deagle, B. E. et al. Counting with DNA metabarcoding studies: how should we convert sequence reads to dietary data? Mol. Ecol. 28, 391–406 (2019).

Shogren, A. J. et al. Controls on eDNA movement in streams: transport, retention, and resuspension. Sci. Rep. 7, 5065 (2017).

PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Berry, T. E. et al. DNA metabarcoding for diet analysis and biodiversity: a case study using the endangered Australian sea lion (Neophoca cinerea). Ecol. Evol. 7, 5435–5453 (2017).

PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Deagle, B. E. et al. Studying seabird diet through genetic analysis of faeces: a case study on Macaroni penguins (Eudyptes chrysolophus). PLoS ONE 2, e831 (2007).

PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Murray, D. C., Coghlan, M. L. & Bunce, M. From benchtop to desktop: important considerations when designing amplicon sequencing workflows. PLoS ONE 10, e0124671 (2015).

PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Benson, D. A. et al. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D32–D37 (2014).

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410 (1990).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Paradis, E. APE 5.0: an environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R. Bioinformatics 35, 526–528 (2019).

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Baselga, A. & Orme, C. D. L. Betapart: an R package for the study of beta diversity. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 808–812 (2012).

Article  Google Scholar 

Dixon, P. VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology. J. Veg. Sci. 14, 927–930 (2003).

Article  Google Scholar 

Herve, M. RVAideMemoire, testing and plotting procedures for biostatistics. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/RVAideMemoire/index.html (2018).