in

Phenotypic plasticity of fungal traits in response to moisture and temperature

[adace-ad id="91168"]
  • 1.

    Wallenstein MD, Hall EK. A trait-based framework for predicting when and where microbial adaptation to climate change will affect ecosystem functioning. Biogeochemistry. 2012;109:35–47.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Behm JE, Kiers ET. A phenotypic plasticity framework for assessing intraspecific variation in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal traits. J Ecol. 2014;102:315–27.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Relyea RA. Phenotypic plasticity in the interactions and evolution of species. Ecology. 2005;86:321–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Matesanz S, Gianoli E, Valladares F. Global change and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1206:35–55.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Nicotra AB, Atkin OK, Bonser SP, Davidson AM, Finnegan EJ, Mathesius U, et al. Plant phenotypic plasticity in a changing climate. Trends Plant Sci. 2010;15:684–92.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Suding KN, Lavorel S, Chapin FS, Cornelissen JHC, Díaz S, Garnier E, et al. Scaling environmental change through the community-level: a trait-based response-and-effect framework for plants. Glob Chang Biol. 2008;14:1125–40.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Sultan SE. Phenotypic plasticity for plant development, function and life history. Trends Plant Sci. 2000;5:537–42.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Chevin LM, Gallet R, Gomulkiewicz R, Holt RD, Fellous S Phenotypic plasticity in evolutionary rescue experiments. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2013;368:20120089.

  • 9.

    Valladares F, Matesanz S, Guilhaumon F, Araújo MB, Balaguer L, Benito-Garzón M, et al. The effects of phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation on forecasts of species range shifts under climate change. Ecol Lett. 2014;17:1351–64.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Slepecky RA, Starmer WT. Phenotypic plasticity in fungi: a review with observations on Aureobasidium pullulans. Mycologia. 2009;101:823–32.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Grimbergen AJ, Siebring J, Solopova A, Kuipers OP. Microbial bet-hedging: the power of being different. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2015;25:67–72.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Rong M, Zheng X, Ye M, Bai J, Xie X, Jin Y, et al. Phenotypic plasticity of staphylococcus aureus in liquid medium containing vancomycin. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1–11.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Schmidt K, van Oosterhout C, Collins S, Mock T. The role of phenotypic plasticity and epigenetics in experimental evolution with phytoplankton. Perspect Phycol. 2016;3:29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Graham EB, Crump AR, Kennedy DW, Arntzen E, Fansler S, Purvine SO, et al. Multi’omics comparison reveals metabolome biochemistry, not microbiome composition or gene expression, corresponds to elevated biogeochemical function in the hyporheic zone. Sci Total Environ. 2018;642:742–53.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Treseder KK, Lennon JT. Fungal traits that drive ecosystem dynamics on land. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2015;79:243–62.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Frac M, Hannula SE, Belka M, Jȩdryczka M. Fungal biodiversity and their role in soil health. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Ritz K, Young IM. Interactions between soil structure and fungi. Mycologist. 2004;18:52–59.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Kwon MJ, Haraguchi A, Kang H. Long-term water regime differentiates changes in decomposition and microbial properties in tropical peat soils exposed to the short-term drought. Soil Biol Biochem. 2013;60:33–44.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Sardans J, Peñuelas J. Drought decreases soil enzyme activity in a Mediterranean Quercus ilex L. forest. Soil Biol Biochem. 2005;37:455–61.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Hsu JP, Chen TH, Wang HH. A kinetic study of the growth of a Rhizopus colony. J Theor Biol. 1989;140:445–51.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Baath E. Estimation of fungal growth rates in soil using 14C-acetate incorporation into ergosterol. Soil Biol Biochem. 2001;33:2011–8.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Querejeta JI. Soil water retention and availability as influenced by mycorrhizal symbiosis: consequences for individual plants, communities, and ecosystems. Mycorrhizal mediation of soil. Elsevier; 2017. p. 299–317.

  • 23.

    Tisdall JM. Fungal hyphae and structural stability of soil. Aust J Soil Res. 1991;29:729–43.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Augé RM, Stodola AJW, Tims JE, Saxton AM. Moisture retention properties of a mycorrhizal soil. Plant Soil. 2001;230:87–97.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Chevin LM, Lande R, Mace GM. Adaptation, plasticity, and extinction in a changing environment: towards a predictive theory. PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e1000357.

  • 26.

    Rodriguez C, Dominguez A. The growth characteristics of Saccharomycopsis lipolytica: morphology and induction of mycelium formation. Can J Microbiol. 1984;30:605–12.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    De Vries FT, Liiri ME, Bjørnlund L, Bowker MA, Christensen S, Setälä HM, et al. Land use alters the resistance and resilience of soil food webs to drought. Nat Clim Chang. 2012;2:276–80.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    Xiong J, Peng F, Sun H, Xue X, Chu H. Divergent responses of soil fungi functional groups to short-term warming. Microb Ecol. 2014;68:708–15.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Chevin LM, Collins S, Lefèvre F. Phenotypic plasticity and evolutionary demographic responses to climate change: taking theory out to the field. Funct Ecol. 2013;27:967–79.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Beier S, Rivers AR, Moran MA, Obernosterer I. Phenotypic plasticity in heterotrophic marine microbial communities in continuous cultures. ISME J. 2015;9:1141–51.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Hall EK, Singer GA, Kainz MJ, Lennon JT. Evidence for a temperature acclimation mechanism in bacteria: an empirical test of a membrane-mediated trade-off. Funct Ecol. 2010;24:898–908.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    Lennon JT, Aanderud ZT, Lehmkuhl BK Jr, Mapping DRS. the niche space of soil microorganisms using taxonomy and traits. Ecology. 2016;93:1867–79.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 33.

    Glassman SI, Weihe C, Li J, Albright M, Looby CI, Martiny AC, et al. Decomposition responses to climate depend on microbial community composition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:11994–9.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 34.

    Bárcenas‐Moreno G, Gómez‐Brandón M, Rousk J, Bååth E. Adaptation of soil microbial communities to temperature: comparison of fungi and bacteria in a laboratory experiment. Glob Chang Biol. 2009;15:2950–7.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Geisseler D, Horwath WR, Scow KM. Soil moisture and plant residue addition interact in their effect on extracellular enzyme activity. Pedobiologia. 2011;54:71–78.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    Allison SD, Romero-Olivares AL, Lu L, Taylor JW, Treseder KK. Temperature acclimation and adaptation of enzyme physiology in Neurospora discreta. Fungal Ecol. 2018;35:78–86.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 37.

    Cross D, Kenerley CM. Modelling the growth of Trichoderma virens with limited sampling of digital images. J Appl Microbiol. 2004;97:486–94.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 38.

    Ramin KI, Allison SD. Bacterial tradeoffs in growth rate and extracellular enzymes. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1–10.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 39.

    Martiny AC, Treseder K, Pusch G. Phylogenetic conservatism of functional traits in microorganisms. ISME J. 2013;7:830–8.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 40.

    Evans SE, Wallenstein MD. Climate change alters ecological strategies of soil bacteria. Ecol Lett. 2014;17:155–64.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 41.

    Amend AS, Martiny AC, Allison SD, Berlemont R, Goulden ML, Lu Y, et al. Microbial response to simulated global change is phylogenetically conserved and linked with functional potential. ISME J. 2016;10:109–18.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 42.

    A’Bear AD, Jones TH, Kandeler E, Boddy L. Interactive effects of temperature and soil moisture on fungal-mediated wood decomposition and extracellular enzyme activity. Soil Biol Biochem. 2014;70:151–8.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    Alster CJ, German DP, Lu Y, Allison SD. Microbial enzymatic responses to drought and to nitrogen addition in a southern California grassland. Soil Biol Biochem. 2013;64:68–79.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    Alster CJ, Weller ZD, von Fischer JC. A meta‐analysis of temperature sensitivity as a microbial trait. Glob Chang Biol. 2018;24:4211–4224.

  • 45.

    Schneider T, Keiblinger KM, Schmid E, Sterflinger-Gleixner K, Ellersdorfer G, Roschitzki B, et al. Who is who in litter decomposition Metaproteomics reveals major microbial players and their biogeochemical functions. ISME J. 2012;6:1749–62.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 46.

    Luo L, Meng H, Gu JD. Microbial extracellular enzymes in biogeochemical cycling of ecosystems. J Environ Manage. 2017;197:539–49.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Haas L. Conquests and historical identities in California, 1769–1936. 1995. University of California Press.

  • 48.

    KIZH Nation. KIZH NATION (Pronounced Keech), Gabrieleño Band Of Mission Indians. https://gabrielenoindians.org/. Accessed 23 Sep 2020.

  • 49.

    Kimball S, Goulden ML, Suding KN, Parker S. Altered water and nitrogen input shifts succession in a southern California coastal sage community. Ecol Appl. 2014;24:1390–404.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 50.

    Potts DL, Suding KN, Winston GC, Rocha AV, Goulden ML. Ecological effects of experimental drought and prescribed fire in a southern California coastal grassland. J Arid Environ. 2012;81:59–66.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 51.

    Martiny JB, Martiny AC, Weihe C, Lu Y, Berlemont R, Brodie EL, et al. Microbial legacies alter decomposition in response to simulated global change. ISME J. 2017;11:490–9.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 52.

    White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds). Pcr protocols: a guide to methods and applications. 1990. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, California, USA; London, England, Uk., pp 315–22.

  • 53.

    Gardes M, Bruns TD. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes ‐ application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol. 1993;2:113–8.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 54.

    Matulich KL, Weihe C, Allison SD, Amend AS, Berlemont R, Goulden ML, et al. Temporal variation overshadows the response of leaf litter microbial communities to simulated global change. ISME J. 2015;9:2477–89.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 55.

    Connor EW, Sandy M, Hawkes CV. Microbial tools in agriculture require an ecological context: Stress-dependent non-additive symbiont interactions. Agron J. 2017;109:917–26.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 56.

    Sinsabaugh RL, Carreiro MM, Alvarez S. Enzyme and microbial dynamics of litter decomposition. Enzymes in the Environment activity ecology and applications. Marcel Dekker, New York, Basel 2002; 249–65.

  • 57.

    Wohl DL, McArthur JV. Aquatic actinomycete-fungal interactions and their effects on organic matter decomposition: a microcosm stu in the dy. Microb Ecol. 2001;42:446–57.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 58.

    Alster CJ, Allison SD, Glassman SI, Martiny A, Treseder K. Exploring trait trade-offs for fungal decomposers in a Southern California grassland. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:665.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 59.

    Allison SD, Lu Y, Weihe C, Goulden ML, Martiny AC, Treseder KK, et al. Microbial abundance and composition influence litter decomposition response to environmental change. Ecology. 2013;94:714–25.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 60.

    Shen Q, Kirschbaum MUF, Hedley MJ, Arbestain MC. Testing an alternative method for estimating the length of fungal hyphae using photomicrography and image processing. PLoS One. 2016;11:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • 61.

    Killham K. Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry. By EA PAUL and FE CLARK. 23×15 cm. Pp. xiii+340 with 108 text-figures. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press: 2nd Edition, 1996. Price h/b: £29.95, ISBN 0 12 546806 7. New Phytol. 1998;138: 563–6.

  • 62.

    Sylvia DM 3 Quantification of external hyphae of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Methods in microbiology. 1992. Elsevier, pp 53–65.

  • 63.

    Bakken LR, Olsen RA. Buoyant densities and dry-matter contents of microorganisms: conversion of a measured biovolume into biomass. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983;45:1188–95.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 64.

    R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2020. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

  • 65.

    Lenth RV. Response-surface methods in R, using RSM. J Stat Softw. 2009;32:1–17.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 66.

    Khuri AI. A general overview of response surface methodology. Biometrics Biostat Int J. 2017;5:87–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • 67.

    Aydar AY. Utilization of response surface methodology in optimization of extraction of plant materials. Statistical approaches with emphasis on design of experiments applied to chemical processes. InTech; 2018. p. 157–69.

  • 68.

    Brasil JL, Martins LC, Ev RR, Dupont J, Dias SLP, Sales JAA, et al. Factorial design for optimization of flow-injection preconcentration procedure for copper(II) determination in natural waters, using 2-aminomethylpyridine grafted silica gel as adsorbent and spectrophotometric detection. Int J Environ Anal Chem. 2005;85:475–91.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 69.

    Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments, ninth. 2017. Wiley.

  • 70.

    Lenth R. emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R Package version 133, 2019. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans

  • 71.

    Pagel M. Inferring historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature. 1999;401:877–84.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 72.

    Blomberg SP, Garland T, Ives AR. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: Behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution. 2003;57:717–45.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 73.

    Revell LJ. phytools: An R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol Evol. 2012;3:217–23.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 74.

    Krause S, Le Roux X, Niklaus PA, Van Bodegom PM, Lennon JT, Bertilsson S, et al. Trait-based approaches for understanding microbial biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:251.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 75.

    Green JL, Bohannan BJM, Whitaker RJ. Microbial biogeography: from taxonomy to traits. Science. 2008;320:1039–43.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 76.

    García FC, Bestion E, Warfield R, Yvon-Durochera G. Changes in temperature alter the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:10989–94.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 77.

    Pold G, DeAngelis KM. Up against the wall: the effects of climate warming on soil microbial diversity and the potential for feedbacks to the carbon cycle. Diversity. 2013;5:409–25.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 78.

    Nielsen UN, Wall DH, Six J. Soil biodiversity and the environment. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2015;40:63–90.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 79.

    Griffiths BS, Ritz K, Bardgett RD, Cook R, Christensen S, Ekelund F, et al. Ecosystem response of pasture soil communities to fumigation-induced microbial diversity reductions: An examination of the biodiversity-ecosystem function relationship. Oikos. 2000;90:279–94.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 80.

    Goberna M, Navarro-Cano JA, Valiente-Banuet A, García C, Verdú M. Abiotic stress tolerance and competition-related traits underlie phylogenetic clustering in soil bacterial communities. Ecol Lett. 2014;17:1191–201.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 81.

    Mayfield MM, Levine JM. Opposing effects of competitive exclusion on the phylogenetic structure of communities. Ecol Lett. 2010;13:1085–93.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 82.

    Morrison EW, Pringle A, Van Diepen LTA, Frey SD. Simulated nitrogen deposition favors stress-tolerant fungi with low potential for decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem. 2018;125:75–85.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 83.

    Romero-Olivares AL, Meléndrez-Carballo G, Lago-Lestón A. Soil metatranscriptomes under long-term experimental warming and drying: fungi allocate resources to cell metabolic maintenance rather than decay. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 84.

    Malik AA, Martiny JBH, Brodie EL, Allison SD, Martiny AC. Defining trait-based microbial strategies with consequences for soil carbon cycling under climate change. ISME J. 2020;14:2236–47.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 85.

    Bradford MA. Thermal adaptation of decomposer communities in warming soils. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:4.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 86.

    Alster CJ, von Fischer JC, Allison SD, Treseder KK. Embracing a new paradigm for temperature sensitivity of soil microbes. Glob Chang Biol. 2020;26:1–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 87.

    Rafiq M, Hassan N, Rehman M, Hasan F. Adaptation mechanisms and applications of psychrophilic fungi. In: Tiquia-Arashiro SM, Grube M (eds). Fungi in extreme environments: ecological role and biotechnological significance. 2019. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 157–74.

  • 88.

    Alster CJ, Baas P, Wallenstein MD, Johnson NG, von Fischer JC. Temperature sensitivity as a microbial trait using parameters from macromolecular rate theory. Front Microbiol 2016;7:1821.

  • 89.

    Angilletta Jr MJ, Angilletta MJ. Thermal adaptation: a theoretical and empirical synthesis. 2009. Oxford University Press.

  • 90.

    Wallenstein M, Allison SD, Ernakovich J, Steinweg JM, Sinsabaugh R. Controls on the temperature sensitivity of soil enzymes: a key driver of in situ enzyme activity rates. Soil Enzymology. 2011. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 245–58.

  • 91.

    Allison SD, Weintraub MN, Gartner TB, Waldrop MP. Evolutionary-economic principles as regulators of soil enzyme production and ecosystem function. Soil Enzymology. 2011. Springer, pp 229–43.


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    2000 years of agriculture in the Atacama desert lead to changes in the distribution and concentration of iron in maize

    Bioclimatic and anthropogenic variables shape the occurrence of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis over a large latitudinal gradient