in

Effectiveness of protected areas influenced by socio-economic context

[adace-ad id="91168"]
  • Tittensor, D. P. et al. A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets. Science 346, 241–243 (2014).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • IPBES Secretariat Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science—Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES, 2019).

  • Bruner, A. G., Gullison, R. E., Rice, R. E. & Fonseca, G. A. Bda Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science 291, 125–128 (2001).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Geldmann, J., Joppa, L. N. & Burgess, N. D. Mapping change in human pressure globally on land and within protected areas. Conserv. Biol. 28, 1604–1616 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurance, W. F. et al. Averting biodiversity collapse in tropical forest protected areas. Nature 489, 290–293 (2012).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Conference of the Parties, The Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020 and the Aichi Biodiversity Targets, COP-10 Decision X/2 (CBD, 2010).

  • Protected Planet Report 2018 (UNEP-WCMC IUCN & NGS, 2018).

  • Craigie, I. D. et al. Large mammal population declines in Africa’s protected areas. Biol. Conserv. 143, 2221–2228 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Joppa, L. N., Bailie, J. E. M. & Robinson, J. G. Protected Areas: Are They Safeguarding Biodiversity?. (Wiley Blackwell, 2016).

    Book 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rada, S. et al. Protected areas do not mitigate biodiversity declines: a case study on butterflies. Divers. Distrib. 25, 217–224 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jetz, W., McPherson, J. M. & Guralnick, R. P. Integrating biodiversity distribution knowledge: toward a global map of life. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 151–159 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Geldmann, J. et al. Effectiveness of terrestrial protected areas in reducing habitat loss and population declines. Biol. Conserv. 161, 230–238 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindsvater, H. K. et al. Overcoming the data crisis in biodiversity conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33, 676–688 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, W. J., Pullin, A. S., Dolman, P. M. & Knight, T. M. The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 305–308 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, P. J. & Pattanayak, S. K. Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments. PLoS Biol. 4, 482–488 (2006).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Polaina, E., González-Suárez, M. & Revilla, E. Socioeconomic correlates of global mammalian conservation status. Ecosphere 6, 1–34. (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, P. J. & Pressey, R. L. Measuring the difference made by conservation initiatives: protected areas and their environmental and social impacts. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Biol. Sci. 370, 20140270 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Geldmann, J., Manica, A., Burgess, N. D., Coad, L. & Balmford, A. A global-level assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas at resisting anthropogenic pressures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 23209–23215 (2019).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis, M. D. & Ostrom, E. Social-ecological system framework: initial changes and continuing challenges. Ecol. Soc. 19, 30 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, M. D. et al. Wildlife population trends in protected areas predicted by national socio-economic metrics and body size. Nat. Commun. 7, 12747 (2016).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Palomo, I. et al. Incorporating the social-ecological approach in protected areas in the anthropocene. BioScience 64, 181–191 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Poteete, A. R., Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice (Princeton Univ. Press, 2010).

  • Wilson, D. S., Ostrom, E. & Cox, M. E. Generalizing the core design principles for the efficacy of groups. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 90, S21–S32 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tebet, G., Trimble, M. & Pereira Medeiros, R. Using Ostrom’s principles to assess institutional dynamics of conservation: lessons from a marine protected area in Brazil. Mar. Policy 88, 174–181 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ban, N. C. et al. Social and ecological effectiveness of large marine protected areas. Glob. Environ. Change 43, 82–91 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischman, F. D. et al. Governing large-scale social-ecological systems: lessons from five cases. Int. J. Commons 8, 428–456 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Faff, R., Ho, Y. K., Lin, W. & Yap, C. M. Diminishing marginal returns from R&D investment: evidence from manufacturing firms. Appl. Econ. 45, 611–622 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. A. et al. Capacity shortfalls hinder the performance of marine protected areas globally. Nature 543, 665–669 (2017).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S. & Polanía-Reyes, S. Economic incentives and social preferences: substitutes or complements? J. Econ. Lit. 50, 368–425 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, K., Mulder, L. & Simpson, B. The detrimental effects of sanctions on intragroup trust: comparing punishments and rewards. Soc. Psychol. Q. 77, 253–272 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacifici, M. et al. Assessing species vulnerability to climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 215–225. (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, M. Accelerating extinction risk from climate change. Science 348, 571–573 (2015).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, G. M. et al. Effects of air pollution on ecosystems and biological diversity in the eastern United States. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1162, 99–135 (2009).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus, T., Snape, J. & Lazorchak, J. The impact of chemical pollution on biodiversity and ecosystem services: the need for an improved understanding. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 8, 575–576 (2012).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Benítez-López, A. et al. The impact of hunting on tropical mammal and bird populations. Science 356, 180–183 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabrese, A. et al. Conservation status of Asian elephants: the influence of habitat and governance. Biodivers. Conserv. 26, 2067–2081 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, L. J., Khadka, K. K., Van Den Hoek, J. & Naithani, K. J. Human–elephant conflict: a review of current management strategies and future directions. Front. Ecol. Evol. 6, 235 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaassen, R. H. G. et al. When and where does mortality occur in migratory birds? Direct evidence from long-term satellite tracking of raptors. J. Anim. Ecol. 83, 176–184 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Güneralp, P. & Seto, K. C. Futures of global urban expansion: uncertainties and implications for biodiversity conservation. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 014025 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherry, T.W., Johnson, M.D. & Strong, A. in Birds of Two Worlds. The Ecology and Evolution of Migration (eds Greenberg, R. & Marra, P. P.) 414–425 (The John Hopkins Univ. Press, 2005).

  • Sanderson, F. J., Donald, P. F., Pain, D. J., Burfield, I. J. & Van Bommel, F. P. Long-term population declines in Afro-Palearctic migrant birds. Biol. Conserv. 131, 93–105 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Runge, C. A. et al. Protected areas and global conservation of migratory birds. Science 350, 1255–1258 (2015).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Balme, G. A., Slotow, R. & Hunter, L. T. B. Edge effects and the impact of non-protected areas in carnivore conservation: leopards in the Phinda-Mkhuze Complex, South Africa. Anim. Conserv. 13, 315–323 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, J. M., Blowes, S. A., Knight, T. M., Gerstner, K. & May, F. Ecosystem decay exacerbates biodiversity loss with habitat loss. Nature 584, 238–243 (2020).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990).

  • Lacroix, K. & Richards, G. An alternative policy evaluation of the British Columbia carbon tax: broadening the application of Elinor Ostrom’s design principles for managing common-pool resources. Ecol. Soc. 20, 38 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, N. J. et al. Mainstreaming the social sciences in conservation. Conserv. Biol. 31, 56–66 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. The Economics of Biodiversity: The Dasgupta Review (HM Treasury, 2021).

  • Resasco, J. Meta-analysis on a decade of testing corridor efficacy: what new have we learned? Curr. Landsc. Ecol. Rep. 4, 61–69 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrade, G. S. M. & Rhodes, J. R. Protected areas and local communities: an inevitable partnership toward successful conservation strategies? Ecol. Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05216-170414 (2012).

  • Morell, V. Massive wolf kill disrupts long-running Yellowstone Park study. Science 375, 482–482 (2022).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, G. & Geldmann, J. Exceptional responders in conservation. Conserv. Biol. 32, 576–583 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wauchope, H. S. et al. Protected areas have a mixed impact on waterbirds, but management helps. Nature 605, 103–107 (2022).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social–ecological systems. Science 325, 419–422 (2009).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, M. A., Waring, T. M. & Salerno, J. D. Designing cultural multilevel selection research for sustainability science. Sustainability Sci. 13, 9–19 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, P. A. et al. The performance of African protected areas for lions and their prey. Biol. Conserv. 209, 137–149 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) (IUCN & UNEP‐WCMC, 2018); https://www.protectedplanet.net/en/search-areas?geo_type=country&filters%5Bdb_type%5D%5B%5D=wdpa

  • Coad, L. et al. Measuring impact of protected area management interventions: current and future use of the global database of protected area management effectiveness. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 370, 20140281 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Geldmann, J. et al. A global analysis of management capacity and ecological outcomes in terrestrial protected areas. Conserv. Lett. 11, e12434 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Living Planet Database (LPD) (Zoological Society of London, 2018); http://www.livingplanetindex.org

  • Kühl, H., Williamson, L., Sanz, C. M., Morgan, D. & Boesch, C. Launch of A.P.E.S. database. Gorilla Journal 34, 20–21 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koerner, S. E., Poulsen, J. R., Blanchard, E. J., Okouyi, J. & Clark, C. J. Vertebrate community composition and diversity declines along a defaunation gradient radiating from rural villages in Gabon. J. Appl. Ecol. 54, 805–814 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, H. et al. Lion (Panthera leo) populations are declining rapidly across Africa, except in intensively managed areas. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 14894–14899 (2015).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, D., Levy, R., Scheepers, C. & Tily, H. J. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. J. Mem. Lang. 68, 1–43 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schielzeth, H. & Forstmeier, W. Conclusions beyond support: overconfident estimates in mixed models. Behav. Ecol. 20, 416–420 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • McElreath, R. in Statistical Rethinking: A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan (CRC Press, 2016).

  • Bürkner, P. C. (2017). brms: an R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. J. Stat. Software https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01 (2017).

  • Schielzeth, H. Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 103–113 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019).

  • Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B. B., Stern, H. S. S. & Rubin, D. B. B. Bayesian Data Analysis (CRC Press, 2014).

  • Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) (UNEP-WCMC & IUCN, 2019); www.protectedplanet.net

  • Chamberlain, S. rphylopic: Get ‘Silhouettes’ of ‘Organisms’ from ‘Phylopic’. R version 0.3.3.91 https://github.com/sckott/rphylopic (2022).


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Power, laws, and planning

    Disentangling influence over group speed and direction reveals multiple patterns of influence in moving meerkat groups