in

Invasion front dynamics of interactive populations in environments with barriers

[adace-ad id="91168"]
  • 1.

    Williamson, M. & Griffiths, B. Biological invasions (Springer, New York, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Ricciardi, A. et al. Invasion science: a horizon scan of emerging challenges and opportunities. Trends Ecol. Evolut. 32, 464–474 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Van Saarloos, W. Front propagation into unstable states. Phys. Rep. 386, 29–222 (2003).

    MATH 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    OMalley, L., Korniss, G. & Caraco, T. Ecological invasion, roughened fronts, and a competitors extreme advance: integrating stochastic spatial-growth models. Bull. Math. Biol. 71, 1160–1188 (2009).

    MathSciNet 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Lewis, M. A., Petrovskii, S. V. & Potts, J. R. The mathematics behind biological invasions Vol. 44 (Springer, New York, 2016).

    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Fisher, R. A. The wave of advance of advantageous genes. Ann. Eugenics 7, 355–369 (1937).

    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Lavergne, S. & Molofsky, J. Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104, 3883–3888 (2007).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Korolev, K. S., Xavier, J. B. & Gore, J. Turning ecology and evolution against cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 14, 371–380 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Wolf, K. et al. Physical limits of cell migration: control by ecm space and nuclear deformation and tuning by proteolysis and traction force. J. Cell Biol. 201, 1069–1084 (2013).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Lu, P., Takai, K., Weaver, V. M. & Werb, Z. Extracellular matrix degradation and remodeling in development and disease. Cold Spring Harbor Persp. Biol. 3, a005058 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Wirtz, D., Konstantopoulos, K. & Searson, P. C. The physics of cancer: the role of physical interactions and mechanical forces in metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11, 512–522 (2011).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Spill, F., Reynolds, D. S., Kamm, R. D. & Zaman, M. H. Impact of the physical microenvironment on tumor progression and metastasis. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 40, 41–48 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100, 57–70 (2000).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144, 646–674 (2011).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Azimzade, Y. & Saberi, A. A. Short-range migration can alter evolutionary dynamics in solid tumors. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2019, 103502 (2019).

    MathSciNet 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    West, J., Schenck, R., Gatenbee, C., Robertson-Tessi, M. & Anderson, A. R. Tissue structure accelerates evolution: premalignant sweeps precede neutral expansion. bioRxiv 542019 (2019).

  • 17.

    Maley, C. C. et al. Classifying the evolutionary and ecological features of neoplasms. Nat. Rev. Cancer 17, 605–619 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Cleary, A. S., Leonard, T. L., Gestl, S. A. & Gunther, E. J. Tumour cell heterogeneity maintained by cooperating subclones in wnt-driven mammary cancers. Nature 508, 113–117 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Shahriari, K. et al. Cooperation among heterogeneous prostate cancer cells in the bone metastatic niche. Oncogene (2016).

  • 20.

    Calbo, J. et al. A functional role for tumor cell heterogeneity in a mouse model of small cell lung cancer. Cancer Cell 19, 244–256 (2011).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Martín-Pardillos, A. et al. The role of clonal communication and heterogeneity in breast cancer. BMC Cancer 19, 1–26 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Kim, T.-M. et al. Subclonal genomic architectures of primary and metastatic colorectal cancer based on intratumoral genetic heterogeneity. Clin. Cancer Res. 21, 4461–4472 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Yachida, S. et al. Distant metastasis occurs late during the genetic evolution of pancreatic cancer. Nature 467, 1114 (2010).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Campbell, P. J. et al. The patterns and dynamics of genomic instability in metastatic pancreatic cancer. Nature 467, 1109 (2010).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Capp, J.-P. et al. Group phenotypic composition in cancer. Elife 10, e63518 (2021).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Murray, J. D. Mathematical biology I: an introduction (2003).

  • 27.

    Mikhailov, A., Schimansky-Geier, L. & Ebeling, W. Stochastic motion of the propagating front in bistable media. Phys. Lett. A 96, 453–456 (1983).

    MathSciNet 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    Hatzikirou, H., Brusch, L., Schaller, C., Simon, M. & Deutsch, A. Prediction of traveling front behavior in a lattice-gas cellular automaton model for tumor invasion. Comput. Math. Appl. 59, 2326–2339 (2010).

    MathSciNet 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Azimzade, Y., Sasar, M. & Maleki, I. Invasion front dynamics in disordered environments. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–10 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Azimzade, Y., Saberi, A. A. & Sahimi, M. Effect of heterogeneity and spatial correlations on the structure of a tumor invasion front in cellular environments. Phys. Rev. E 100, 062409 (2019).

    PubMed 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Rapin, G. et al. Roughness and dynamics of proliferating cell fronts as a probe of cell-cell interactions. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–9 (2021).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    Pérez-Beteta, J. et al. Tumor surface regularity at mr imaging predicts survival and response to surgery in patients with glioblastoma. Radiology 171051 (2018).

  • 33.

    Pérez-Beteta, J. et al. Morphological mri-based features provide pretreatment survival prediction in glioblastoma. Eur. Radiol. 1–10 (2018).

  • 34.

    Brú, A. et al. Super-rough dynamics on tumor growth. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4008 (1998).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Brú, A., Albertos, S., Subiza, J. L., García-Asenjo, J. L. & Brú, I. The universal dynamics of tumor growth. Biophys. J. 85, 2948–2961 (2003).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    Huergo, M., Pasquale, M., González, P., Bolzán, A. & Arvia, A. Growth dynamics of cancer cell colonies and their comparison with noncancerous cells. Phys. Rev. E 85, 011918 (2012).

    CAS 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 37.

    Munn, L. L. Dynamics of tissue topology during cancer invasion and metastasis. Phys. Biol. 10, 065003 (2013).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 38.

    Dey, B., Sekhar, G. R. & Mukhopadhyay, S. K. In vivo mimicking model for solid tumor towards hydromechanics of tissue deformation and creation of necrosis. J. Biol. Phys. 1–40 (2018).

  • 39.

    Block, M., Schöll, E. & Drasdo, D. Classifying the expansion kinetics and critical surface dynamics of growing cell populations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 248101 (2007).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 40.

    Moglia, B., Guisoni, N. & Albano, E. V. Interfacial properties in a discrete model for tumor growth. Phys. Rev. E 87, 032713 (2013).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 41.

    Moglia, B., Albano, E. V. & Guisoni, N. Pinning-depinning transition in a stochastic growth model for the evolution of cell colony fronts in a disordered medium. Phys. Rev. E 94, 052139 (2016).

    PubMed 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 42.

    Scianna, M. & Preziosi, L. A hybrid model describing different morphologies of tumor invasion fronts. Math. Model. Nat. Phenom. 7, 78–104 (2012).

    MathSciNet 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    Azimzade, Y., Saberi, A. A. & Sahimi, M. Role of the interplay between the internal and external conditions in invasive behavior of tumors. Sci. Rep. 8, 5968 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    Ben-Jacob, E. et al. Generic modelling of cooperative growth patterns in bacterial colonies. Nature 368, 46 (1994).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 45.

    Family, F. & Vicsek, T. Dynamics of fractal surfaces (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991).

    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • 46.

    Vicsek, T. Fractal growth phenomena (World scientific, Singapore, 1992).

    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Swanson, K. R., Bridge, C., Murray, J. & Alvord, E. C. Jr. Virtual and real brain tumors: using mathematical modeling to quantify glioma growth and invasion. J. Neurol. Sci. 216, 1–10 (2003).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 48.

    Metzcar, J., Wang, Y., Heiland, R. & Macklin, P. A review of cell-based computational modeling in cancer biology. JCO Clin. Cancer Inform. 2, 1–13 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 49.

    Azimzade, Y., Saberi, A. A. & Gatenby, R. A. Superlinear growth reveals the allee effect in tumors. Phys. Rev. E 103, 042405 (2021).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 50.

    Anderson, A. R., Weaver, A. M., Cummings, P. T. & Quaranta, V. Tumor morphology and phenotypic evolution driven by selective pressure from the microenvironment. Cell 127, 905–915 (2006).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Biofilm matrix cloaks bacterial quorum sensing chemoattractants from predator detection

    Resolving the structure of phage–bacteria interactions in the context of natural diversity