Abstract
The rejection of the Anthropocene by geological institutions in March 2024 marked a decisive moment in debates about this proposed geological epoch dominated by human activities, which have extended beyond geology over the years. While the decision reaffirmed the Holocene as the current geological epoch, rather than the Anthropocene, it left unresolved broader questions concerning the coordination of knowledge across disciplines needed to address the current ecological crisis. The purpose of this paper is to examine the rejection of the Anthropocene and to propose new horizons for Anthropocene research, structured in two parts. First, it analyzes the arguments advanced in the rejection, and places them in dialogue with the proposal of the Anthropocene Epoch, to assess the broader implications across other fields. Second, it proposes to develop a new research direction on the Anthropocene under the term “Anthropocenology”, by defining its scope, situating it within existing research, and outlining its transdisciplinary project. The analysis suggests that the rejection of the Anthropocene by geological institutions, like any decision, does not preclude further discussion, and that research on the Anthropocene can continue beyond this outcome. Anthropocenology is therefore proposed as a transdisciplinary project aimed at strengthening research and dialogue between the geological sciences, Earth system sciences, and the humanities, in the wake of the rejection, in order to better grasp the complexity of the Anthropocene and to contribute to the reorganization of knowledge that it calls for.
Similar content being viewed by others
Why the geosciences are becoming increasingly vital to the interpretation of the human evolutionary record
Microbotanical residues for the study of early hominin tools
Geomorphological assessment of the preservation of archaeological tell sites
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank all the researchers involved in the “Education in the Anthropocene” project for their enthusiasm and kindness: Nathanaël Wallenhorst, Renaud Hétier, François Prouteau, Maxime Bordes, Samuel Pinheiro, Raizza Lopes, and many more. I would also like to acknowledge the financial support provided by Angers Loire Développement (ALDEV), Université Catholique de l’Ouest (UCO), and Maison des Sciences Humaines de Bordeaux (MSHBx) for this research on the Anthropocene.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Ethics approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Colombo, F. The Anthropocene and its rejection: toward an Anthropocenology.
Humanit Soc Sci Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-08202-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-08202-y
Source: Ecology - nature.com
