in

LCA analysis of conventional and organic onion production in Poland


Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of onion production technologies under conventional and organic farming systems, focusing on their environmental impacts. The research covered onion cultivation in southern Poland—a region that is not only one of the country’s leading production areas, but also among the largest in Europe. A “cradle-to-gate” approach was applied, since at this stage of production considerable technological differences exist between the two cultivation systems. The analysis considered the type of field operations, the machines used and their operating time, the amounts of fertilizers, pesticides, fuel, and water consumed. Onion yield was measured, and the results were related both to cultivation area (1 ha) and production volume (1 Mg). To identify the environmental relationships of all inputs and outputs within the LCA scope and to estimate their impacts, the software package SimaPro (version 8.1.0.60) was applied. The results demonstrated greater negative environmental impact of individual operations in conventional onion cultivation compared to organic farming, regardless of the chosen functional unit. Critical processes were identified in terms of environmental burden: harvesting in both systems, and mineral fertilization in the case of conventional cultivation.

Similar content being viewed by others

Comparative life cycle assessment of environmental impacts and economic feasibility of tomato cultivation systems in northern plains of India

Synergistic effects of organic fertilizer and copper-calcium nanoparticles on onion growth and storage under arid conditions

Coupled RecurDyn-EDEM simulation and experimental analysis of a precision fertilization device

Subjects

  • Ecology
  • Environmental sciences
  • Plant sciences

Funding

This work was funded by Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Poland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Zbigniew Kowalczyk.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download ZIP )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kowalczyk, Z., Kuboń, M. LCA analysis of conventional and organic onion production in Poland.
Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-62074-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-62074-5

Keywords

  • Life cycle assessment
  • Onion cultivation
  • Conventional and organic farming
  • Environmental impacts


Source: Ecology - nature.com

A multi-objective decision support system for zone-specific fertilizer recommendation using soil fertility prediction models

Assessment of the precipitation deficit for rain-fed winter wheat in the Mediterranean coastal zone using the Agricultural Standardized Precipitation Index

Back to Top