Abstract
This study evaluates the potential of species distribution models to predict habitat suitability for the floodplain mosquito Aedes vexans, with a particular focus on ephemeral breeding habitats such as flood-prone areas. These habitats are essential for oviposition, yet have not been explicitly incorporated as predictors in existing modelling approaches. Flood hazard was included as an environmental predictor to represent the species’ dependence on transient water bodies. However, initial model runs showed only a marginal contribution of this predictor to overall model performance. We demonstrate that this weak contribution was not due to the ecological irrelevance of ephemeral habitats, but instead resulted from strong sampling biases in the occurrence data, which were predominantly concentrated in urban environments. To address this issue, we applied spatial thinning and environmental filtering to reduce spatial clustering and the overrepresentation of environmentally similar regions. Using Maxent, we compared candidate models with and without bias correction across multiple environmentally stratified test datasets. Our results show that correcting for sampling bias improved model accuracy more than the inclusion of an additional habitat-relevant predictor alone. The final model produced more reliable suitability predictions, particularly in flood-prone and previously under-sampled areas.
Subjects
- Ecology
- Environmental sciences
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This work was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Regional Identity (BMEL) through the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE) under Grant 2819107B22. The funder had no role in the conceptualization, design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information. (download PDF )
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pothmann, P., Kampen, H., Werner, D. et al. Accounting for spatial and environmental sampling bias in a species distribution model of Aedes vexans (Diptera: Culicidae).
Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-61202-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-61202-5
Keywords
- Presence-only modelling
- Habitat suitability mapping
- Bias correction
- Citizen science data
- Ecological niche modelling
Source: Ecology - nature.com
