in

Advancing aquatic ecological risk assessment through AI-driven prediction of chemical exposure and toxicity in freshwater and marine fish


Abstract

Increasing evidence on the massive biodiversity loss caused by chemical pollution highlights the urgent need to understand the internal exposure and resulting risk of chemicals to aquatic species. Current ecological risk assessment frameworks face challenges in addressing the diversity of physiological and biochemical characteristics of aquatic organisms. Here we pioneer the intelligent high-throughput multi-species physiologically based toxicokinetic (HM-PBTK) model by developing AI-driven models for multi-species physiological and biochemical parameters. The HM-PBTK model precisely quantifies tissue-specific internal exposure and predicts in vivo toxicity for neutral and ionizable chemicals across 151 freshwater and marine fish species. In an oestrogenic-effect case study, 85% of toxicity predictions were within fivefold of the corresponding observations. We further developed a user-friendly platform enabling comprehensive ‘exposure–toxicity’ predictions for chemicals by simply setting up exposure scenarios. Our study helps to explore the risks of chemical pollution to aquatic ecosystem, ultimately contributing to the protection of aquatic biodiversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Development, evaluation and application of the HM-PBTK model.
Fig. 2: Composition of the multimodal dataset.
Fig. 3: Construction methodology and performance characterization of multimodal models for multi-species physiological parameters.
Fig. 4: Construction methodology and performance characterization of multimodal models for multi-species biochemical parameter.
Fig. 5: Construction methodology and performance characterization of the HM-PBTK model.
Fig. 6: Application of the HM-PBTK model to ADME process simulation of highly detected chemicals in freshwater and marine species under real exposure scenarios and QIVIVE of oestrogenic effects on VTG induction.
Fig. 7: Workflow and functions of the IERP platform.

Similar content being viewed by others

Curated mode-of-action data and effect concentrations for chemicals relevant for the aquatic environment

Progress and challenges in exploring aquatic microbial communities using non-targeted metabolomics

Mathematical modelling and control approach for sustainable ecosystems in mitigating the impact of pollutants on aquatic species in rivers

Data availability

Data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information. Data are also available via figshare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28521698 (ref. 59). Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The source code for the HM-PBTK model is available via GitHub at https://github.com/Hanpeiling/HM-PBTK.

References

  1. Ruan, T. et al. Identification and prioritization of environmental organic pollutants: from an analytical and toxicological perspective. Chem. Rev. 123, 10584–10640 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chemical Abstracts Service Home Page. Chemical Abstracts Service https://www.cas.org/cas-data/cas-registry (accessed 5 December 2023).

  3. Jaureguiberry, P. et al. The direct drivers of recent global anthropogenic biodiversity loss. Sci. Adv. 8, 9982 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  4. EU biodiversity strategy for 2030: bringing nature back into our lives. European Commission https://environment.ec.europa.eu/strategy/biodiversity-strategy-2030_en (accessed 8 October 2024).

  5. Sigmund, G. et al. Addressing chemical pollution in biodiversity research. Global Change Biol. 29, 3240–3255 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sylvester, F. et al. Better integration of chemical pollution research will further our understanding of biodiversity loss. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1552–1555 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brodin, T. et al. The urgent need for designing greener drugs. Nat. Sustain. 7, 949–951 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kidd, K. A. et al. Collapse of a fish population after exposure to a synthetic estrogen. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 8897–8901 (2007).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  9. Duarte, C. M. et al. Rebuilding marine life. Nature 580, 39–51 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barbarossa, V. et al. Threats of global warming to the world’s freshwater fishes. Nat. Commun. 12, 1701 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zoroufchi, B. K. et al. Environmental occurrence and toxicity of 6PPD quinone, an emerging tire rubber-derived chemical: a review. Environ. Sci. Tech. Lett. 10, 815–823 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  12. Butchart, S. H. M. et al. Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328, 1164–1168 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  13. Khuong, V. D. Vietnam’s fish kill remains unexamined. Science 365, 333 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tanneberger, K. et al. Predicting fish acute toxicity using a fish gill cell line-based toxicity assay. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 1110–1119 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sixth Report on the Statistics on the Number of Animals Used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes in the Member States of the European Union https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/1107/COM_SEC(2010)1107_EN.pdf (Commission of the European Communities, accessed 8 October 2024).

  16. Coors, A. et al. Minimizing experimental testing on fish for legacy pharmaceuticals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 1721–1730 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tian, Z. et al. A ubiquitous tire rubber–derived chemical induces acute mortality in Coho salmon. Science 371, 185–189 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mangold-Döring, A. et al. A novel multispecies toxicokinetic modeling approach in support of chemical risk assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 9109–9118 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fisher, J. W. et al. Fundamentals of physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling. In Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling: Methods and Applications in Toxicology and Risk Assessment (eds Fisher, J. W. et al.) 57–80 (Academic, 2020).

  20. Zhang, S. et al. Tissue-specific accumulation, biotransformation, and physiologically based toxicokinetic modeling of benzotriazole ultraviolet stabilizers in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 11874–11884 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  21. Breen, M. et al. High-throughput PBTK models for in vitro to in vivo extrapolation. Expert Opin.Drug Met. 17, 903–921 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  22. Brinkmann, M. et al. Understanding receptor-mediated effects in rainbow trout: in vitro–in vivo extrapolation using physiologically based toxicokinetic models. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 3303–3309 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  23. Krabbenhoft, T. J. et al. Ficli, the fish and climate change database, informs climate adaptation and management for freshwater fishes. Sci. Data 7, 124 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  24. Manel, S. et al. Global determinants of freshwater and marine fish genetic diversity. Nat. Commun. 11, 692 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  25. Roberson, L. A. et al. Over 90 endangered fish and invertebrates are caught in industrial fisheries. Nat. Commun. 11, 4764 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  26. Grech, A. et al. Generic physiologically-based toxicokinetic modelling for fish: integration of environmental factors and species variability. Sci. Total Environ. 651, 516–531 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  27. Brinkmann, M. et al. Cross-species extrapolation of uptake and disposition of neutral organic chemicals in fish using a multispecies physiologically-based toxicokinetic model framework. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 1914–1923 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wang, J. et al. A generalized physiologically based kinetic model for fish for environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 6500–6510 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  29. Golmohammadi, H. et al. Quantitative structure–activity relationship prediction of blood-to-brain partitioning behavior using support vector machine. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 47, 421–429 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sarigiannis, D. Α et al. Development of QSARs for parameterizing physiology based toxicokinetic models. Food Chem. Toxicol. 106, 114–124 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  31. Iwata, H. et al. Prediction of total drug clearance in humans using animal data: proposal of a multimodal learning method based on deep learning. J. Pharm. Sci. 110, 1834–1841 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chou, W.-C. & Lin, Z. Machine learning and artificial intelligence in physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling. Toxicol. Sci. 191, 1–14 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kosugi, Y. & Hosea, N. Direct comparison of total clearance prediction: computational machine learning model versus bottom-up approach using in vitro assay. Mol. Pharm. 17, 2299–2309 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang, S. et al. Multimodal model to predict tissue-to-blood partition coefficients of chemicals in mammals and fish. Environ. Sci. Technol. 58, 1944–1953 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  35. Black, S. R. et al. Evaluation and comparison of in vitro intrinsic clearance rates measured using cryopreserved hepatocytes from humans, rats, and rainbow trout. Toxicology 457, 152819 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  36. MacRae, C. A. & Peterson, R. T. Zebrafish as tools for drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 14, 721–731 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  37. Matthee, C. et al. Factors determining the susceptibility of fish to effects of human pharmaceuticals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 8845–8862 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  38. Louisse, J. et al. Use of physiologically based kinetic modeling-based reverse dosimetry to predict in vivo toxicity from in vitro data. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 30, 114–125 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  39. Post-2020 global biodiversity framework. IUCN https://www.iucn.org/sites/default/files/2022-07/post-2020-strategic-initiative_policy-brief_march2022.pdf (accessed 25 September 2024).

  40. Silvestro, D. et al. Improving biodiversity protection through artificial intelligence. Nat. Sustain. 5, 415–424 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  41. Arnot, J. A. et al. A quantitative structure–activity relationship for predicting metabolic biotransformation rates for organic chemicals in fish. Environ. Toxicol. 28, 1168–1177 (2009).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  42. Li, J. et al. High-resolution mass spectrometry screening of emerging organophosphate esters (OPEs) in wild fish: occurrence, species-specific difference, and tissue-specific distribution. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 302–312 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  43. Harrison, C. 3R centers tap into the human mindset to bolster replacement, reduction and refinement uptake. Lab Anim. 53, 166–169 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hack, C. E. et al. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling software. In Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling: Methods and Applications in Toxicology and Risk Assessment (eds Fisher, J. W. et al.) 81–126 (Academic, 2020).

  45. Bell, S. et al. An integrated chemical environment with tools for chemical safety testing. Toxicol. In Vitro 67, 104916 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). United Nations https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/ (accessed 2 October 2024).

  47. Erickson, R. J. & McKim, J. M. A model for exchange of organic chemicals at fish gills: flow and diffusion limitations. Aquat. Toxicol. 18, 175–197 (1990).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hendriks, A. J. et al. The power of size. 1. Rate constants and equilibrium ratios for accumulation of organic substances related to octanol–water partition ratio and species weight. Environ. Toxicol. 20, 1399–1420 (2001).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  49. Fitzsimmons, P. N. et al. Branchial elimination of superhydrophobic organic compounds by rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquat. Toxicol. 55, 23–34 (2001).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  50. Bertelsen, S. L. et al. Evaluation of log kow and tissue lipid content as predictors of chemical partitioning to fish tissues. Environ. Toxicol. 17, 1447–1455 (1998).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  51. Mansouri, K. et al. OPERA models for ADME-related properties. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/sites/default/files/iccvam/meetings/sot22/poster/mansouri-sot2022.pdf (accessed 10 February 2026).

  52. Briggs, G. G. Theoretical and experimental relationships between soil adsorption, octanol–water partition coefficients, water solubilities, bioconcentration factors, and the parachor. J. Agric. Food Chem. 29, 1050–1059 (1981).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  53. Hendriks, A. J. et al. Critical body residues linked to octanol−water partitioning, organism composition, and LC50 QSARS: meta-analysis and model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 3226–3236 (2005).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  54. Huang, Y. et al. Quantitative structure–activity relationship models for predicting inflammatory potential of metal oxide nanoparticles. Environ. Health Perspect. 128, 067010 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  55. Liu, W. et al. Machine learning model for screening thyroid stimulating hormone receptor agonists based on updated datasets and improved applicability domain metrics. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 36, 947–958 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  56. Jaworska, J. et al. QSAR applicability domain estimation by projection of the training set in descriptor space: a review. Altern. Lab. Anim. 33, 445–459 (2005).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  57. Guo, J. et al. Deep mining of reported emerging contaminants in China’s surface water in the past decade: exposure, ecological effects and risk assessment. Water Res. 243, 120318 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  58. Scholz, S. et al. Alternatives to in vivo tests to detect endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in fish and amphibians – screening for estrogen, androgen and thyroid hormone disruption. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 43, 45–72 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  59. Han, P. et al. Supplementary data sets for “Advancing aquatic ecological risk assessment through AI-driven prediction of chemical exposure and toxicity in freshwater and marine fish”. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28521698 (2026).

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant nos. 2022YFC3902104 and 2024YFC3712004), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. U25A20580) and the Programme of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (B25041).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

X.L. designed the research and provided guidance and supervision. P.H. conducted the research and wrote the paper. P.H., Y.Z. and J.Y. designed the platform’s interface and collected the data necessary to support the platform’s operation. J.C. and W.J.G.M.P. participated in the discussions of the study and revised the paper. All authors provided comments on the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Xuehua Li.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Water thanks Emilio Benfenati, Yongdong Liu and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Supplementary Methods 1–6, Results 1–4, Tables 1–23 and Figs. 1–34.

Peer Review File (download PDF )

Supplementary Data 1 (download XLSX )

The Excel file lists species information from the multimodal dataset, as well as the mean values of blood flow, tissue volume and tissue content calculated for the species when grouped by species family and environmental medium.

Supplementary Data 2 (download XLSX )

The Excel file contains datasets used in this study to construct the prediction models for multi-species Fcard and VO2, as well as the classification and quantification models for human and multi-species CLin vitro,int.

Supplementary Data 3 (download XLSX )

The Excel file contains 703 internal exposure concentration data collected from extensive literature for validation of the HM-PBTK model.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 3 (download XLSX )

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 4 (download XLSX )

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 5 (download XLSX )

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 6 (download XLSX )

Statistical source data.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Han, P., Chen, J., Zhu, Y. et al. Advancing aquatic ecological risk assessment through AI-driven prediction of chemical exposure and toxicity in freshwater and marine fish.
Nat Water (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-026-00709-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-026-00709-7


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Using a trait-based framework to characterize farmed seaweeds and guide selection of new candidates

Robert Ricklefs (1943–2026)