Abstract
Although environmental regulations are intended to improve ecological conditions, their implementation may also be accompanied by a relative concentration of polluting activities in boundary areas, thereby increasing pollution pressure in these locations. Hog production has long been a major contributor to water pollution in China. In response, the Chinese government has implemented the most stringent livestock and poultry environmental regulations (LERs) in its history. Using a staggered DDD model and a manually collected panel dataset covering 1028 counties across ten provinces, this study examines the effects of LERs on hog production and water pollution pressure in boundary counties. The findings show that LER implementation increased slaughter volume and slaughter density in boundary counties by 8.68% and 11.42%, respectively, with stronger effects in economically less-developed regions, consistent with the “pollution haven” hypothesis. The effects of LERs exhibit significant heterogeneity across different hog-farming functional areas, with notable increases in hog production in boundary counties located in potential growth and constrained development areas. The increase in hog-farming intensity in boundary areas is associated with modest increases in selected water-pollution indicators. Specifically, LERs weaken the positive relationship between hog production and water pollution to some extent, but the relative expansion of hog production in boundary areas following LER implementation remains associated with additional pollution pressure. After accounting for the mitigating effect of LERs, the marginal effects of slaughter volume on CODMn are 0.0672, and the marginal effects of slaughter density on CODMn and NH₃-N are 0.0916 and 0.0755, respectively. The findings offer policy-relevant insights for improving the effectiveness of environmental regulation and addressing boundary-pollution issues.
Similar content being viewed by others
Measurement and spatiotemporal evolution of spatial agglomeration in China’s hog industry an EG-index analysis based on prefecture-level data
Rainfall’s impact on agricultural production and government poverty reduction efficiency in China
Contract farming and hog farmers’ income: evidence from a microsurvey in rural China
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China (Grant No.17BTQ054), the Guangdong Intellectual Property Protection Center of China (Grant No.GZGK20P021C0076C), and the Doctoral Research Start-up Funding Project of Jiangsu Ocean University (Grant No.KQ24032; Grant No.KQ25025).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
The study does not involve human participants or their data.
Informed consent
The study does not involve human participants or their data.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary (download PDF )
data (download XLSX )
Do Environmental Regulation Policies Induce Boundary Effects
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, Q., Wu, X. & Xu, L. Do environmental regulation policies induce boundary effects: evidence from hog production in the Yangtze River Basin, China.
Humanit Soc Sci Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-09164-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-09164-x
Source: Ecology - nature.com
