in

Governments must reconcile dissonant climate assessment approaches


Security analysts and government economists increasingly present policymakers with different pictures of the same climate and nature risk. We argue that governments need a shared way to weigh these assessments, particularly given that under-preparing for a severe, irreversible outcome costs far more than over-preparing.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Successive assessments have revised climate risk upward, internationally and nationally.

Subjects

  • Biodiversity
  • Climate change
  • Climate-change impacts
  • Policy
  • Transnational Climate Change Adaptation Governance

References

  1. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs Global Biodiversity Loss, Ecosystem Collapse and National Security https://go.nature.com/4gbRRGe (HM Government, 2026).

  2. Rising, J., Tedesco, M., Piontek, F. & Stainforth, D. A. Nature 610, 643–651 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  3. Weitzman, M. L. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 5, 275–292 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  4. Neal, T., Newell, B. R. & Pitman, A. Environ. Res. Lett. 20, 044029 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bevacqua, E., Fischer, E., Sillmann, J. & Zscheischler, J. Nature 651, 946–953 (2026).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  6. Armstrong McKay, D. I. et al. Science 377, eabn7950 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brysse, K., Oreskes, N., O’Reilly, J. & Oppenheimer, M. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 327–337 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zommers, Z. et al. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 516–529 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  9. Workman, M. et al. Environ. Sci. Policy 120, 127–137 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  10. Birch, J. Eur. J. Phil. Sci. 11, 90 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  11. The Seventh Carbon Budget https://go.nature.com/4gcWRKA (Climate Change Committee, 2025).

  12. Fiscal Risks and Sustainability – September 2024 https://go.nature.com/4wBl81P (Office for Budget Responsibility, 2024).

  13. NGFS Climate Scenarios for Central Banks and Supervisors https://go.nature.com/4xhq7VM (Network for Greening the Financial System, 2024).

  14. Planetary solvency: finding our balance with nature. Institute and Faculty of Actuaries https://go.nature.com/4gqBioT (16 January 2025).

  15. Smith, J. B. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 4133–4137 (2009).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Paul Behrens.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

H.M. is founder and CEO of charity-funded non-profit Real Zero Ltd, which seeks to leverage the healthcare economy to drive decarbonization, and is unpaid chair of the UK Health Alliance on Climate Change. R.N. is a member of the UK Government’s Climate Security Taskforce. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Behrens, P., Abrams, J.F., Montgomery, H. et al. Governments must reconcile dissonant climate assessment approaches.
Nat. Clim. Chang. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-026-02736-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-026-02736-4


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Raman spectroscopic insights into rare blue and green shell colouration in bivalve molluscs

Viral diversity and ecological functions in the world’s largest deep-sea mineral exploration region