in

Evolution of terrestrial anatomy revealed by a derived stem tetrapod


Abstract

Tetrapods (limbed vertebrates) include lissamphibians and amniotes, and now comprise half of all vertebrate species, with particular importance on land. Limbs first appeared in stem tetrapods by the Late Devonian, 365 million years ago1,2,3,4,5. However, many taxa either have limbs with fin-like functional anatomy or have secondarily lost them, raising questions about the ecological context and early evolution of the tetrapod limb6. Here we provide considerable new data on the enigmatic Early Carboniferous Westlothiana lizziae, widely cited as the earliest terrestrially adapted stem amniote7,8. We find unexpected plesiomorphies of the skull roof, palate, braincase and mandible, alongside aquatic adaptations, including an ossified internal gill skeleton and extensive denticles on the palate and mandible. These traits return Westlothiana as a stem tetrapod in our phylogenetic analyses, demonstrating that terrestrial adaptations such as an amniote-like pedal formula, loss of fin-like forelimb function and superficially claw-like terminal phalanges evolved in a mosaic fashion, and that these traits evolved in a transitional, amphibious context before the origin of the tetrapod crown group. Our findings reinforce recent suggestions of a taxonomically inclusive tetrapod-stem lineage, but also illuminate substantial gaps in anatomical knowledge, especially for small-bodied taxa, that obstruct our understanding of early tetrapod evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: W. lizziae, NMS G.1990.72.1, specimen, renders of skull, foot and vertebrae.
Fig. 2: Skull and mandible of W. lizziae.
Fig. 3: Time-calibrated phylogeny of early tetrapods.

Data availability

Files related to the phylogenetic dataset are available as supplementary files and stored on OSF at https://osf.io.xnm6t. Reconstructions and anatomical information of NMS G.1990.72.1 Computed tomography data and 3D models are available on Morphosource: individual elements, https://www.morphosource.org/concern/media/000672184; skull reconstruction, https://www.morphosource.org/concern/media/000736020.

Code availability

Nexus scripts for Bayesian phylogenetic analyses and R code for conducting ancestral state reconstruction are stored with OSF at https://osf.io/xnm6t.

References

  1. Ahlberg, P. E. Elginerpeton pancheni and the earliest tetrapod clade. Nature 373, 420–425 (1995).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahlberg, P. E. Postcranial stem tetrapod remains from the Devonian of Scat Craig, Morayshire, Scotland. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 122, 99–141 (1998).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  3. Coates, M. I., Ruta, M. & Friedman, M. Ever since Owen: changing perspectives on the early evolution of tetrapods. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39, 571–592 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  4. Niedźwiedzki, G., Szrek, P., Narkiewicz, K., Narkiewicz, M. & Ahlberg, P. E. Tetrapod trackways from the early Middle Devonian period of Poland. Nature 463, 43–48 (2010).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stössel, I. The discovery of a new Devonian tetrapod trackway in SW Ireland. J. Geol. Soc. 152, 407–413 (1995).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pardo, J. D., Szostakiwskyj, M., Ahlberg, P. E. & Anderson, J. S. Hidden morphological diversity among early tetrapods. Nature 546, 642–645 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smithson, T. R. & Rolfe, W. D. I. Westlothiana gen. nov.: naming the earliest known reptile. Scott. J. Geol. 26, 137–138 (1990).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smithson, T. R., Carroll, R. L., Panchen, A. L. & Andrews, S. M. Westlothiana lizziae from the Viséan of East Kirkton, West Lothian, Scotland, and the amniote stem. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. Earth Sci. 84, 383–412 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pardo, J. D., Lennie, K. & Anderson, J. S. Can we reliably calibrate deep nodes in the tetrapod tree? Case studies in deep tetrapod divergences. Front. Genet. 11, 506749 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  10. Garza, H. K., Catlos, E. J., Lapen, T. J., Clarke, J. A. & Brookfield, M. E. New U–Pb constraints and geochemistry of the East Kirkton Quarry, Scotland: implications for early tetrapod evolution in the Carboniferous. PLoS ONE 20, e0321714 (2025).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  11. Long, J. A. et al. Earliest amniote tracks recalibrate the timeline of tetrapod evolution. Nature 641, 1193–1200 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ruta, M., Coates, M. I. & Quicke, D. L. Early tetrapod relationships revisited. Biol. Rev. 78, 251–345 (2003).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  13. Clack, J. A. et al. Phylogenetic and environmental context of a Tournaisian tetrapod fauna. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1–11 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marjanović, D. & Laurin, M. Phylogeny of Paleozoic limbed vertebrates reassessed through revision and expansion of the largest published relevant data matrix. PeerJ 6, e5565 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jenkins, X. A. et al. The recumbirostran Hapsidopareion lepton from the Early Permian (Cisuralian: Artinskian) of Oklahoma reassessed using HRμCT, and the placement of Recumbirostra on the amniote stem. Pap. Palaeontol. 11, e1610 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mann, A., Pardo, J. D. & Maddin, H. C. Infernovenator steenae, a new serpentine recumbirostran from the ‘Mazon Creek’ Lagerstätte further clarifies lysorophian origins. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 187, 506–517 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mann, A. & Maddin, H. C. Diabloroter bolti, a short-bodied recumbirostran ‘microsaur’ from the Francis Creek Shale, Mazon Creek, Illinois. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 187, 494–505 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gee, B. M., Bevitt, J. J. & Reisz, R. R. Computed tomographic analysis of the cranium of the early Permian recumbirostran ‘microsaur’ Euryodus dalyae reveals new details of the braincase and mandible. Pap. Palaeontol. 7, 721–749 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mann, A., Calthorpe, A. S. & Maddin, H. C. Joermungandr bolti, an exceptionally preserved ‘microsaur’ from the Mazon Creek Lagerstätte reveals patterns of integumentary evolution in Recumbirostra. R. Soc. Open Sci. 8, 210319 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mann, A., Pardo, J. D. & Sues, H.-D. Osteology and phylogenetic position of the diminutive ‘microsaur’ Odonterpeton triangulare from the Pennsylvanian of Linton, Ohio, and major features of recumbirostran phylogeny. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 197, 641–655 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pardo, J. D. New information on the neurocranium of Archeria crassidisca and the relationships of the Embolomeri. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 201, zlad156 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jenkins, X. A. et al. Evolutionary assembly of crown reptile anatomy clarified by late Paleozoic relatives of Neodiapsida. Peer Community J. 5, e89 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  23. Coates, M. I. & Clack, J. A. Romer’s gap: tetrapod origins and terrestriality. Bull. Mus. Natl Hist. Nat. 17, 373–388 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pardo, J. D., Holmes, R. & Anderson, J. S. An enigmatic braincase from Five Points, Ohio (Westphalian D) further supports a stem tetrapod position for aïstopods. Earth Environ. Sci. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 109, 255–264 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Witzmann, F. Phylogenetic patterns of character evolution in the hyobranchial apparatus of early tetrapods. Earth Environ. Sci. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 104, 145–167 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ruta, M., Jeffery, J. E. & Coates, M. I. A supertree of early tetrapods. Proc. R. Soc. B 270, 2507–2516 (2003).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ruta, M. & Coates, M. I. Dates, nodes and character conflict: addressing the lissamphibian origin problem. J. Syst. Palaeontol. 5, 69–122 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gauthier, J., Kluge, A. G. & Rowe, T. Amniote phylogeny and the importance of fossils. Cladistics 4, 105–209 (1988).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ruta, M. & Clack, J. A. A review of Silvanerpeton miripedes, a stem amniote from the lower carboniferous of East Kirkton, West Lothian, Scotland. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. Earth Sci. 97, 31–63 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  30. Carroll, R. L. in Amphibian Biology Vol. 4 (ed. Heatwole, H.) 1198–1269 (Surrey Beatty, 2000).

  31. Laurin, M. & Reisz, R. R. A new study of Solenodonsaurus janenschi, and a reconsideration of amniote origins and stegocephalian evolution. Can. J. Earth Sci. 36, 1239–1255 (1999).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  32. Clack, J. A. et al. Acherontiscus caledoniae: the earliest heterodont and durophagous tetrapod. R. Soc. Open Sci. 6, 182087 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  33. Arbez, T., Atkins, J. B. & Maddin, H. C. Cranial anatomy and systematics of Dendrerpeton cf. helogenes (Tetrapoda, Temnospondyli) from the Pennsylvanian of Joggins, revisited through micro-CT scanning. Pap. Palaeontol. 8, e1421 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  34. Klembara, J., Berman, D. S., Henrici, A. C. & Čerňanský, A. New structures and reconstructions of the skull of the seymouriamorph Seymouria sanjuanensis Vaughn. Ann. Carnegie Mus. 74, 217–225 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rawson, J. R. G., Porro, L. B., Martin-Silverstone, E. & Rayfield, E. J. Osteology and digital reconstruction of the skull of the early tetrapod Whatcheeria deltae. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 41, e1927749 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  36. Holmes, R. The skull and axial skeleton of the Lower Permian anthracosauroid amphibian Archeria crassidisca Cope. Palaeontogr. Abt. A 207, 161–206 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Porro, L. B., Rayfield, E. J. & Clack, J. A. Computed tomography and three-dimensional reconstruction of the skull of the stem tetrapod Crassigyrinus scoticus Watson, 1929. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 42, e2183134 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  38. Berman, D. S., Henrici, A. C., Kissel, R. A., Sumida, S. S. & Martens, T. A new diadectid (Diadectomorpha), Orobates pabsti, from the early Permian of central Germany. Bull. Carnegie Mus. Nat. Hist. 35, 1–36 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  39. Downs, J. P., Daeschler, E. B., Long, A. M. & Shubin, N. H. Eusthenopteron jenkinsi sp. nov. (Sarcopterygii, Tristichopteridae) from the Upper Devonian of Nunavut, Canada, and a review of Eusthenopteron taxonomy. Breviora 562, 1–24 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  40. Panchen, A. L. & Smithson, T. R. Character diagnosis, fossils and the origin of tetrapods. Biol. Rev. 62, 341–436 (1987).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ruta, M., Milner, A. R. & Coates, M. I. The tetrapod Caerorhachis bairdi Holmes and Carroll from the Lower Carboniferous of Scotland. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. Earth Sci. 92, 229–261 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  42. Bolt, J. R. & Lombard, R. E. The mandible of the primitive tetrapod Greererpeton, and the early evolution of the tetrapod lower jaw. J. Paleontol. 75, 1016–1042 (2001).

    2.0.CO;2″ data-track-item_id=”10.1666/0022-3360(2001)075<1016:TMOTPT>2.0.CO;2″ data-track-value=”article reference” data-track-action=”article reference” href=”https://doi.org/10.1666%2F0022-3360%282001%29075%3C1016%3ATMOTPT%3E2.0.CO%3B2″ aria-label=”Article reference 42″ data-doi=”10.1666/0022-3360(2001)075<1016:TMOTPT>2.0.CO;2″>Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lebedev, O. A. Morphology of a new osteolepidid fish from Russia. Bull. Mus. Natl Hist. Nat. C 17, 287–341 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Clack, J. A. Pholiderpeton scutigerum Huxley, an amphibian from the Yorkshire coal measures. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 318, 1–107 (1987).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  45. Smithson, T. R. Eldeceeon rolfei, a new reptiliomorph from the Viséan of East Kirkton, West Lothian, Scotland. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. Earth Sci. 84, 377–382 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Carroll, R. L. A new family of Carboniferous amphibians. Palaeontology 12, 537–548 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Mann, A., Xiong, Z., Calthorpe, A. S., Sues, H.-D. & Maddin, H. C. Carboniferous recumbirostran elucidates the origins of terrestrial herbivory. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 10, 193–202 (2026).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  48. Carroll, R. L., Bybee, P. & Tidwell, W. D. The oldest microsaur (Amphibia). J. Paleontol. 65, 314–322 (1991).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  49. Paton, R. L., Smithson, T. R. & Clack, J. A. An amniote-like skeleton from the Early Carboniferous of Scotland. Nature 398, 508–513 (1999).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  50. Smithson, T. R., Ruta, M. & Clack, J. A. On Ossirarus kierani, a stem tetrapod from the Tournaisian of Burnmouth, Berwickshire, Scotland, and the phylogeny of early tetrapods. Foss. Rec. 27, 333–352 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  51. Pierce, S. E. et al. Vertebral architecture in the earliest stem tetrapods. Nature 494, 226–229 (2013).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  52. Danto, M., Witzmann, F. & Fröbisch, N. B. Vertebral development in Paleozoic and Mesozoic tetrapods revealed by paleohistological data. PLoS ONE 11, e0152586 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  53. Otoo, B. K. A., Bolt, J. R., Lombard, R. E., Angielczyk, K. D. & Coates, M. I. The postcranial anatomy of Whatcheeria deltae and its implications for the family Whatcheeriidae. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 193, 700–745 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  54. Clack, J. A. Eucritta melanolimnetes from the Early Carboniferous of Scotland, a stem tetrapod showing a mosaic of characteristics. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. Earth Sci. 92, 75–95 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  55. Clack, J. A., Smithson, T. R. & Ruta, M. A Mississippian (early Carboniferous) tetrapod showing early diversification of the hindlimbs. Commun. Biol. 5, 283 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wood, S. P., Panchen, A. L. & Smithson, T. R. A terrestrial fauna from the Scottish Lower Carboniferous. Nature 314, 355–356 (1985).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  57. Bever, G. S. & Norell, M. A. A new rhynchocephalian (Reptilia: Lepidosauria) from the Late Jurassic of Solnhofen (Germany) and the origin of the marine Pleurosauridae. R. Soc. Open Sci. 4, 170570 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  58. Foffa, D., Johnson, M. M., Young, M. T., Steel, L. & Brusatte, S. L. Revision of the Late Jurassic deep-water teleosauroid crocodylomorph Teleosaurus megarhinus Hulke, 1871 and evidence of pelagic adaptations in Teleosauroidea. PeerJ 7, e6646 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  59. Camaiti, M. et al. A database of the morphology, ecology and literature of the world’s limb-reduced skinks. J. Biogeogr. 49, 1397–1406 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  60. Carter, A. M., Hsieh, S. T., Dodson, P. & Sallan, L. Early amphibians evolved distinct vertebrae for habitat invasions. PLoS ONE 16, e0251983 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  61. Mihalitsis, M. & Bellwood, D. Functional implications of dentition-based morphotypes in piscivorous fishes. R. Soc. Open Sci. 6, 190040 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  62. Porro, L. B., Martin-Silverstone, E. & Rayfield, E. J. Descriptive anatomy and three-dimensional reconstruction of the skull of the tetrapod Eoherpeton watsoni Panchen, 1975 from the Carboniferous of Scotland. Earth Environ. Sci. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 115, 164–184 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Watson, D. M. S. The evolution of the tetrapod shoulder girdle and fore-limb. J. Anat. 52, 1–63 (1917).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  64. Shubin, N. H., Daeschler, E. B. & Coates, M. I. The early evolution of the tetrapod humerus. Science 304, 90–93 (2004).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  65. Milner, A. R. & Sequeira, S. E. K. The temnospondyl amphibians from the Viséan of East Kirkton, West Lothian, Scotland. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. Earth Sci. 84, 331–361 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Maddin, H. C., Eckhart, L., Jaeger, K., Russell, A. P. & Ghannadan, M. The anatomy and development of the claws of Xenopus laevis (Lissamphibia: Anura) reveal alternate pathways of structural evolution in the integument of tetrapods. J. Anat. 214, 607–619 (2009).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  67. Anderson, J. S. A new aïstopod (Tetrapoda: Lepospondyli) from Mazon Creek, Illinois. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 23, 79–88 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  68. Andrews, S. M. & Carroll, R. L. The order Adelospondyli: Carboniferous lepospondyl amphibians. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. Earth Sci. 82, 239–275 (1991).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  69. Mirone, A., Brun, E., Gouillart, E., Tafforeau, P. & Kieffer, J. The PyHST2 hybrid distributed code for high speed tomographic reconstruction with iterative reconstruction and a priori knowledge capabilities. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 324, 41–48 (2014).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  70. Paganin, D., Mayo, S. C., Gureyev, T. E., Miller, P. R. & Wilkins, S. W. Simultaneous phase and amplitude extraction from a single defocused image of a homogeneous object. J. Microsc. 206, 33–40 (2002).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    MathSciNet 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  71. Lyckegaard, A., Johnson, G. & Tafforeau, P. Correction of ring artifacts in X-ray tomographic images. Int. J. Tomogr. Simul. 18, F11 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Benoit, J. et al. The evolution of the maxillary canal in Probainognathia (Cynodontia, Synapsida): reassessment of the homology of the infraorbital foramen in mammalian ancestors. J. Mamm. Evol. 27, 329–348 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  73. Revell, L. J. phytools 2.0: an updated R ecosystem for phylogenetic comparative methods (and other things). PeerJ 12, e16505 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  74. Bell, M. A. & Lloyd, G. T. strap: an R package for plotting phylogenies against stratigraphy and assessing their stratigraphic congruence. Palaeontology 58, 379–389 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility for providing beam time on ID19 for proposal ls2687. We thank S. Walsh and the National Museums of Scotland for promoting the study of Westlothiana, and M. Lowe, U. Göhlich, C. Bird, M. Day and B. Simpson for allowing us to study the specimens under their care. We thank M. Ellison for assistance with the photo-mosaic of the skull (Extended Data Fig. 2). We thank J. Schick for the artistic reconstruction of Westlothiana used in this study.

Funding

B.I. was supported by a Natural Environment Research Council Doctoral Training Partnership award no. NE/S007474/1. This work was supported by ESRF award no. ls2687 to R.B. We also thank the National Science Foundation of the United States (NSF EAR-PF award no. 2518154 to X.J.). Our work was further supported by the Natural Environment Research Council grant nos. NE/S000739/1 and NE/W007576/1 to J.H. and NE/L002507/1 to L.R., as well as the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council under grant no. BB/X014819/1 to L.R.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

B.I., X.J., R.B. and T.S. planned the research. R.B. and V.F. scanned the specimen. B.I. and X.J. segmented the data and wrote the description. B.I., L.R., X.J. and R.B. conducted the phylogenetic analyses. B.I., X.J., R.B., T.S. and J.H. wrote the paper, with comments from all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to
Ben Igielman or Xavier Jenkins.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks Claudia Marsicano and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 The holotype specimen of Westlothiana, NMS G.1990.72.1.

a, counterpart; b, part. Photographs by Roger Benson. Scale bar, 10 mm.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Cranial material of Westlothiana lizziae, based on NMS G.1990.72.1.

a, Part, b, Counterpart, photographed by Roger Benson, with assistance from Mick Ellison. Renderings of the right and left maxillae; c, right maxilla in lateral view, d, right maxilla in medial view, e, left maxilla in lateral view, f, left maxilla in medial view. g, tomographic image generated using synchrotron X-ray computed micro-tomography (see Methods) of the maxillary dentition, showing the infolding at the base of the teeth; Right lacrimal; h, lateral view, i, posteromedial view. Skull in; j, dorsal view. k, ventral view. Labels for panel j are provided in Fig. 1. Right quadrate; l, lateral view; m, medial view. n, Temporal region in postero-dorso-lateral view (i.e. above and behind the back, right corner of the skull), demonstrating the relationship of the different bones of this area, o, reconstructed braincase of NMS G.1990.72.1 in left lateral view; p, exoccipital and basioccipital in posterior view; q, frontals in ventral view. Anterior is oriented towards the right. Scale bars, a,b, j, k, 5 mm, o, 3 mm. Abbreviations: Anterior coronoid (Ac), Angular (Ang), Articular (Art), Cranial Nerves V and II (CnV, CnII), Dentary (De), Ectopterygoid (Ect), Exoccipital (ex), Jugal (Ju), Maxilla (Max), Middle Coronoid (Mc), Orbitosphenoid (Obs), Parietal (P), Prearticular (Pa), Palatine (Pal), Posterior coronoid (Pc), Postorbital (Po), Postfrontal (Pof), Premaxilla (Pmx), Postparietal (Pp), Parasphenoid (Ps), Pterygoid (Pt), Quadrate (Q), Surangular (Sa), Supratemporal (St), Tabular (Tab), Vomer (Vom).

Extended Data Fig. 3 Palatal elements of Westlothiana, based on NMS G.1990.72.1.

Renderings of the premaxilla and vomer, a, premaxilla in anterior view. b, premaxilla in anteroventromedial view. c, premaxilla and vomer in palatal view, illustrating contact between them. Palatine, d, ventral view; e, posterolateral view, demonstrating the position of the canal that carries the maxillary artery and nerve. Renderings of the palatal fangs, f, fangs of the vomer. g, fangs of the palatine. Right pterygoid, h, posterior view i, ventral view, j, medial view in the region of the basal articulation. Parasphenoid, k, ventral view, l, posterior view, m, anterior view, n, dorsal view. Hyobranchial in o, ventral and p, dorsal views. Ceratobranchial in q, ventral and r, dorsal views. Scale bars, 1 mm. Abbreviations: Pmx, premaxilla, Vom, vomer.

Extended Data Fig. 4 The atlas-axis complex (a-j) and dorsal vertebrae (k-n) of Westlothiana, NMS G.1990.72.1, renderings and drawings.

a, b, dorsal view. c, d, right lateral view. e, f, Ventral view. g, h, anterior and posterior views respectively, renderings. i, j, anterior and posterior views, k, left lateral view of 9-11th dorsal vertebrae. l, 11th dorsal vertebrae in anterior and m, posterior views. n, ventral view of 9-11th dorsal vertebra, reconstruction. Scale bar = 1 mm. Abbreviations: Axc, axial centrum; Axn, axial neural arch; At, atlas; Ic, intercentrum; Na, neural arch; Nc, notochordal canal, Pc, pleurocentrum, Prat, Proatlas.

Extended Data Fig. 5 The forelimbs of Westlothiana, NMS G.1990.72.1.

As preserved, both forelimbs have been displaced relative to the trunk and are preserved in opposite orientations. a, left forelimb in dorsal view, right forelimb in ventral view. b, left forelimb in ventral view, right forelimb in dorsal view. Left humerus, renderings and drawn reconstructions: c, d, dorsal view. e, f, ventral view, g, proximal view, h, anterior view, i, posterior view, j, distal view. Right forelimb (right radius and right ulna), renderings and drawn reconstructions, k, l, dorsal view, m, n, ventral view. Right ulna, o, anterior view, p, posterior view. Right radius, q, anterior view; r, posterior view. Scale bars, 1 mm. Abbreviations: Rad, Radius, Ul, Ulna.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Pelvis and hindlimbs of Westlothiana, NMS G.1990.72.1.

Pelvis and hindlimbs as preserved in NMS G.1990.72.1, dorsal view, a, composite rendering of pelvis and hindlimb elements from both the slab and counterslab. b, drawn reconstruction. Dark grey indicates damage and missing bone. Claw-like digit IV terminal phalanx in c, dorsal, d, ventral, and e, lateral view. Renderings and reconstructions of the left femur, f, rendering in dorsal view, g, drawn reconstruction in dorsal view, h, rendering in ventral view, i, drawn reconstruction in ventral view, j, anterior view, k, posterior view, anterior is oriented towards the left, l, proximal view, m, distal view, dorsal is oriented upwards. Scale bars = 1 mm. Abbreviations: Femur (Fe), Fibula (Fi), Puboischiadic plate (Pui), Tibia (Ti).

Extended Data Fig. 7 Bayesian analyses of early tetrapods.

Majority rule consensus tree from Bayesian analyses a, this study, b, Mann et al. (2026), and c, Clack et al. (2019) using the time-calibrated FBD model including nodes with posterior probability < 0.50 labelled beneath the nodes. Placement of Westlothiana indicated by yellow star.

Extended Data Fig. 8 Ancestral character estimation of cranial traits associated with aquatic ecologies.

Reconstruction was performed under the best-supported MkV model (ER, or equal rates model). Probabilities of presence or absence of traits, indicated by numbers next to nodes, mapped onto summarized topology resulting from Bayesian phylogenetic analysis. a, sensory (or lateral line) canals; b, branchial arches with groove for afferent gill artery; c, prearticular shagreen and palatal fangs, and d, gill arch articulation with braincase.

Extended Data Fig. 9 Ancestral character estimation of postcranial traits associated with aquatic or transitional ecologies.

Reconstruction was performed under the best-supported Mk model (ER, or equal rates model). Probabilities of presence or absence of traits indicated by numbers next to nodes, mapped onto summarized topology resulting from our Bayesian analysis. a, L-shaped humeri. b, limb reduction and body elongation.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

This Supplementary Information file contains the following sections: (1) systematic palaeontology; (2) specimens and literature examined; (3) character list; (4) spreadsheet of taxon ages; (5) synapomorphies of selected clades; and (6) supplementary references.

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Peer Review File (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Igielman, B., Jenkins, X., Head, J. et al. Evolution of terrestrial anatomy revealed by a derived stem tetrapod.
Nature (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-11090-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-11090-6


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Restoration-driven positive and negative leakage in sub-Saharan Africa

Uncharted links from mining to fed animal systems: a scoping review