Abstract
Below every step we take there is groundwater. Out-competing rivers, lakes and wetlands in terms of water quantity and quality, shallow aquifers are an essential reservoir of freshwater for the human population. At the same time, they represent the largest freshwater biome on earth, forming a responsive but vulnerable interface between the highly dynamic surface aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems and the environmentally static deeper zones of the subsurface. Shallow aquifers are home to a vast phylogenetic and functional microbial diversity, regularly surpassing those of surface environments. Predominantly colonized by microorganisms, key drivers of community composition and biogeochemical cycles are the hydrogeological settings, availability of energy and prevailing redox conditions, as well as climate and local to regional anthropogenic activities. Although there is steadily growing knowledge on microbial biodiversity and their potential functions, quantitative data on active key processes, such as carbon cycling, are scarce. We do have a very incomplete idea of the abundances and distribution of viruses, protists and fungi and their ecological role in groundwater. In this Review, we discuss current and future pressures to shallow groundwater ecosystems in terms of microbial community dynamics particularly in light of global and climate change, that is, groundwater pollution and warming.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Aquilina, L., Stumpp, C., Tonina, D. & Buffington, J. M. Hydrodynamics and geomorphology of groundwater environments. In Groundwater Ecology and Evolution 2nd edn (eds Malard, F. et al.) 3–37 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819119-4.00014-7 (Academic Press, 2023).
Gleeson, T., Befus, K. M., Jasechko, S., Luijendijk, E. & Cardenas, M. B. The global volume and distribution of modern groundwater. Nat. Geosci. 9, 161–167 (2016).
Google Scholar
Scanlon, B. R. et al. Global water resources and the role of groundwater in a resilient water future. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 4, 87–101 (2023).
Google Scholar
Gleeson, T., Wada, Y., Bierkens, M. F. & van Beek, L. P. Water balance of global aquifers revealed by groundwater footprint. Nature 488, 197 (2012).
Google Scholar
Lall, U., Josset, L. & Russo, T. A snapshot of the world’s groundwater challenges. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 45, 171–194 (2020).
Google Scholar
Saccò, M. et al. Groundwater is a hidden global keystone ecosystem. Glob. Change Biol. 30, e17066 (2024).
Google Scholar
Marmonier, P., Galassi, D. M. P., Korbel, K., Datry, T. & Karwautz, C. Groundwater biodiversity and constraints to biological distribution. In Groundwater Ecology and Evolution 2nd edn (eds Malard, F. et al.) 113–140 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819119-4.00003-2 (Academic Press, 2023).
Fan, Y., Li, H. & Miguez-Macho, G. Global patterns of groundwater table depth. Science 339, 940–943 (2013).
Google Scholar
Cuthbert, M. O. et al. Global patterns and dynamics of climate–groundwater interactions. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 137–141 (2019).
Google Scholar
Rohde, M. M. et al. Groundwater-dependent ecosystem map exposes global dryland protection needs. Nature 632, 101–107 (2024). The authors report that over one-third of the global dryland GDEs support critical biodiversity, yet 53% face severe depletion risks while only 21% are formally protected.
Google Scholar
Robertson, A. L., Smith, J. W. N., Johns, T. & Proudlove, G. S. The distribution and diversity of stygobites in Great Britain: an analysis to inform groundwater management. Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol. 42, 359–368 (2009).
Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B. C. et al. Hydrologic refugia, plants, and climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 2941–2961 (2017).
Google Scholar
Amy, P. S. Microbial dormancy and survival in the subsurface. In Microbiology of the Terrestrial Deep Subsurface (eds. Amy, P. & Haldeman, D.) 185–204 (CRC Press, 1997).
Newman, D. K. & Banfield, J. F. Geomicrobiology: how molecular-scale interactions underpin biogeochemical systems. Science 296, 1071–1077 (2002).
Google Scholar
Bradley, J. A. Microbial dormancy as an ecological and biogeochemical regulator on Earth. Nat. Commun. 16, 3909 (2025).
Google Scholar
Griebler, C. & Lueders, T. Microbial biodiversity in groundwater ecosystems. Freshw. Biol. 54, 649–677 (2009).
Google Scholar
Akob, D. M. & Küsel, K. Where microorganisms meet rocks in the Earth’s critical zone. Biogeosciences 8, 3531–3543 (2011).
Google Scholar
Griebler, C. & Avramov, M. Groundwater ecosystem services: a review. Freshw. Sci. 34, 355–367 (2014).
Google Scholar
He, Z. et al. Microbial functional gene diversity predicts groundwater contamination and ecosystem functioning. mBio 9, e02435-17 (2018).
Google Scholar
Filippini, M., Stumpp, C., Nijenhuis, I., Richnow, H. H. & Gargini, A. Evaluation of aquifer recharge and vulnerability in an alluvial lowland using environmental tracers. J. Hydrol. 529, 1657–1668 (2015).
Google Scholar
Chik, A. H. S. et al. Evaluation of groundwater bacterial community composition to inform waterborne pathogen vulnerability assessments. Sci. Total Environ. 743, 140472 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wang, H. et al. Groundwater microbiomes balance resilience and vulnerability to hydroclimatic extremes. Commun. Earth Environ. 6, 683 (2025).
Google Scholar
Fan, Y. Groundwater in the Earth’s critical zone: relevance to large-scale patterns and processes. Water Resour. Res. 51, 3052–3069 (2015).
Google Scholar
Wu, X. et al. Distinct depth-discrete profiles of microbial communities and geochemical insights in the subsurface critical zone. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 89, e00500–e00523 (2023). This study reveals distinct communities and metabolic potentials forming over short vertical distances owing to sediment geochemistry and hydrogeological factors.
Google Scholar
Smith, H. J. et al. Impact of hydrologic boundaries on microbial planktonic and biofilm communities in shallow terrestrial subsurface environments. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 94, fiy191 (2018).
Google Scholar
van Driezum, I. H. et al. Spatiotemporal analysis of bacterial biomass and activity to understand surface and groundwater interactions in a highly dynamic riverbank filtration system. Sci. Total Environ. 627, 450–461 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hofmann, R., Uhl, J., Hertkorn, N. & Griebler, C. Linkage between dissolved organic matter transformation, bacterial carbon production, and diversity in a shallow oligotrophic aquifer: results from flow-through sediment microcosm experiments. Front. Microbiol. 11, 543567 (2020). The study reveals that groundwater microbial communities react slowly to sudden, labile dissolved organic matter input, requiring days to weeks for substantial degradation and biomass production to occur.
Google Scholar
Lehmann, R. & Totsche, K. U. Multi-directional flow dynamics shape groundwater quality in sloping bedrock strata. J. Hydrol. 580, 124291 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wang, H. et al. Dynamics of pathogens and fecal indicators during riverbank filtration in times of high and low river levels. Water Res. 209, 117961 (2022).
Google Scholar
Benz, S. A. et al. Global groundwater warming due to climate change. Nat. Geosci. 17, 545–551 (2024). A global-scale assessment that projects that shallow groundwater will warm by about 2.1 °C on average by 2100 under a moderate emissions pathway.
Google Scholar
Kaminsky, E. et al. Increasing trends of shallow groundwater warming in vienna’s urban aquifers. Hydrol. Process. 39, e70076 (2025).
Google Scholar
Harvey, R. W., Kinner, N. E., MacDonald, D., Metge, D. W. & Bunn, A. Role of physical heterogeneity in the interpretation of small-scale laboratory and field observations of bacteria, microbial-sized microsphere, and bromide transport through aquifer sediments. Water Resour. Res. 29, 2713–2721 (1993).
Google Scholar
Mailloux, B. J. et al. The role of physical, chemical, and microbial heterogeneity on the field-scale transport and attachment of bacteria. Water Resour. Res. 39, 1142 (2003).
Google Scholar
Lacroix, E. M. et al. Consider the anoxic microsite: acknowledging and appreciating spatiotemporal redox heterogeneity in soils and sediments. ACS Earth Space Chem. 7, 1592–1609 (2023). This study emphasizes that transient anoxic niches within otherwise oxic soils and sediments create pore-scale hot spots and moments that enable overlapping aerobic–anaerobic processes and strongly regulate element cycling.
Google Scholar
Stockdale, A., Davison, W. & Zhang, H. Micro-scale biogeochemical heterogeneity in sediments: a review of available technology and observed evidence. Earth Sci. Rev. 92, 81–97 (2009).
Google Scholar
Meckenstock, R. U. et al. Biodegradation: updating the concepts of control for microbial cleanup in contaminated aquifers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 7073–7081 (2015).
Google Scholar
Jones, A. A. & Bennett, P. C. Mineral microniches control the diversity of subsurface microbial populations. Geomicrobiol. J. 31, 246–261 (2014).
Google Scholar
Ren, Y. et al. Emergent heterogeneous microenvironments in biofilms: substratum surface heterogeneity and bacterial adhesion force-sensing. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 42, 259–272 (2018).
Google Scholar
Stewart, P. S. & Franklin, M. J. Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 199–210 (2008).
Google Scholar
Heinze, B. M. et al. Microbial oxidation significantly reduces methane export from global groundwaters. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2508773122 (2025).
Google Scholar
Freeze, R. A. & Cherry, J. A. Groundwater (Prentice-Hall, 1979).
Fillinger, L., Hug, K. & Griebler, C. Aquifer recharge viewed through the lens of microbial community ecology: Initial disturbance response, and impacts of species sorting versus mass effects on microbial community assembly in groundwater during riverbank filtration. Water Res. 189, 116631 (2021). The authors explain that riverbank filtration-driven recharge initially imposes mass effects via dispersal and carbon inputs, but subsequently steers groundwater community assembly and function by local conditions.
Google Scholar
Datry, T. et al. Non-perennial segments in river networks. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 4, 815–830 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J. et al. Water availability creates global thresholds in multidimensional soil biodiversity and functions. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1002–1011 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kindler, R. et al. Dissolved carbon leaching from soil is a crucial component of the net ecosystem carbon balance. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 1167–1185 (2011).
Google Scholar
Lehmann, K., Lehmann, R. & Totsche, K. U. Event-driven dynamics of the total mobile inventory in undisturbed soil account for significant fluxes of particulate organic carbon. Sci. Total Environ. 756, 143774 (2021). Short hydrological events can mobilize large pulses of particulate organic carbon from undisturbed soils, altering dissolved organic carbon/total organic carbon ratios and carbon availability along recharge pathways into aquifers. This demonstrates the preferential mobilization of organic matter during storms, which impacts groundwater biogeochemistry.
Google Scholar
Qureshi, M. E., Reeson, A., Reinelt, P., Brozović, N. & Whitten, S. Factors determining the economic value of groundwater. Hydrogeol. J. 20, 821–829 (2012).
Google Scholar
Castilla-Rho, J. C., Rojas, R., Andersen, M. S., Holley, C. & Mariethoz, G. Social tipping points in global groundwater management. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 640–649 (2017).
Google Scholar
Mammola, S. et al. Subterranean environments contribute to three-quarters of classified ecosystem services. Biol. Rev. 101, 1582–1605 (2026).
Google Scholar
Mammola, S. et al. Scientists’ warning on the conservation of subterranean ecosystems. Bioscience 69, 641–650 (2019).
Google Scholar
Geesink, P., ter Horst, J. & Ettema, T. J. G. More than the sum of its parts: uncovering emerging effects of microbial interactions in complex communities. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 100, fiae029 (2024).
Google Scholar
Deng, C., Hu, J., Chen, Q., Zhou, S. & Ni, J. Expanded global groundwater microbial diversity reveals bioprospecting potential. Cell Rep. 45, 116760 (2026).
Google Scholar
Magnabosco, C. et al. The biomass and biodiversity of the continental subsurface. Nat. Geosci. 11, 707 (2018). The authors estimate that the continental subsurface hosts 2–6 × 1029 cells, a major portion of Earth’s prokaryotic biomass, and highlights diverse microbial communities shaped by depth, temperature and lithology.
Google Scholar
Prosser, J. I. & Martiny, J. B. H. Conceptual challenges in microbial community ecology. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 375, 20190241 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gralka, M. Searching for principles of microbial ecology across levels of biological organization. Integr. Comp. Biol. 63, 1520–1531 (2023).
Google Scholar
Krause, S. et al. Trait-based approaches for understanding microbial biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Front. Microbiol. 5, 251 (2014).
Google Scholar
Larkin, A. A. & Martiny, A. C. Microdiversity shapes the traits, niche space, and biogeography of microbial taxa: the ecological function of microdiversity. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 9, 55–70 (2017).
Google Scholar
Philippot, L. et al. The ecological coherence of high bacterial taxonomic ranks. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8, 523–529 (2010).
Google Scholar
Lennon, J. T., Aanderud, Z. T., Lehmkuhl, B. K. & Schoolmaster, D. R. Mapping the niche space of soil microorganisms using taxonomy and traits. Ecology 93, 1867–1879 (2012).
Google Scholar
Hall, E. K. et al. Understanding how microbiomes influence the systems they inhabit. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 977–982 (2018).
Google Scholar
Malki, K. et al. Prokaryotic and viral community composition of freshwater springs in Florida, USA. mBio 11, e00436-20 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gios, E. et al. Ultra-small bacteria and archaea exhibit genetic flexibility towards groundwater oxygen content, and adaptations for attached or planktonic lifestyles. ISME Commun. 3, 13 (2023).
Google Scholar
Retter, A. et al. From the mountain to the valley: drivers of groundwater prokaryotic communities along an alpine river corridor. Microorganisms 11, 779 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhong, S. et al. May microbial ecological baseline exist in continental groundwater? Microbiome 11, 152 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ruff, S. E. et al. A global comparison of surface and subsurface microbiomes reveals large-scale biodiversity gradients, and a marine-terrestrial divide. Sci. Adv. 10, eadq0645 (2024). This meta-analysis highlights strong biodiversity gradients and a pronounced marine–terrestrial divide in microbial community composition, alongside overlapping diversity between surface and subsurface environments.
Google Scholar
Madsen, E. L. Identifying microorganisms responsible for ecologically significant biogeochemical processes. Nat. Rev. Micro 3, 439–446 (2005).
Google Scholar
Balart-García, P. et al. Advances, challenges and frontiers for omics in subterranean ecosystems. Nat. Rev. Biodivers. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44358-026-00151-3 (2026).
Google Scholar
Prasoodanan, V. P. K. et al. Unbinned contigs expand known diversity in the global microbiome. Nat. Microbiol. 11, 1463 (2026). This study reports the use of a marker-gene clustering method on 92,000 metagenomes to uncover thousands of new, rare microorganisms, expanding the known diversity in undersampled environments, such as the subsurface.
Google Scholar
Hug, L. A. et al. A new view of the tree of life. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16048 (2016).
Google Scholar
Herrmann, M. & Taubert, M. Biogeochemical cycling of carbon and nitrogen in groundwater — key processes and microbial drivers. In Encyclopedia of Inland Waters 2nd edn (eds Mehner, T. & Tockner, K.) 412–427 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819166-8.00087-6 (Elsevier, 2022).
Reisser, W. The hidden life of algae underground. In Algae and Cyanobacteria in Extreme Environments Vol. 11 (ed. Seckbach, J.) 47–58 (Springer, 2007).
Di Rienzi, S. C. et al. The human gut and groundwater harbor non-photosynthetic bacteria belonging to a new candidate phylum sibling to Cyanobacteria. eLife 2, e01102 (2013).
Google Scholar
Langille, M. G. I. et al. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 814–821 (2013).
Google Scholar
Mongad, D. S. et al. MicFunPred: a conserved approach to predict functional profiles from 16S rRNA gene sequence data. Genomics 113, 3635–3643 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bell, T. H. & Bell, T. Many roads to bacterial generalism. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 97, fiaa240 (2021).
Google Scholar
Guo, L., Wang, G., Sheng, Y., Shi, Z. & Sun, X. Groundwater microbial communities and their connection to hydrochemical environment in Golmud, Northwest China. Sci. Total Environ. 695, 133848 (2019).
Google Scholar
Walters, K. E. & Martiny, J. B. H. Alpha-, beta-, and gamma-diversity of bacteria varies across habitats. PLoS ONE 15, e0233872 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lazar, C. S. et al. Archaeal diversity and CO2 fixers in carbonate-/siliciclastic-rock groundwater ecosystems. Archaea 2017, 2136287 (2017).
Google Scholar
He, C. et al. Genome-resolved metagenomics reveals site-specific diversity of episymbiotic CPR bacteria and DPANN archaea in groundwater ecosystems. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 354–365 (2021). Genome-resolved metagenomics and cryo-transmission electron microscopy reveal abundant yet site-specific ultrasmall CPR–DPANN episymbionts in eight Northern California aquifers, which have host-attached replication and influence nitrogen and sulfur cycling.
Google Scholar
Allenby, A. et al. Occurrence of methane-oxidizing bacteria and methanogenic archaea in earth’s cave systems — a metagenomic analysis. Front. Ecol. Evol. 10, 909865 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ham, B., Choi, B.-Y., Chae, G.-T., Kirk, M. F. & Kwon, M. J. Geochemical influence on microbial communities at CO2-leakage analog sites. Front. Microbiol. 8, 2203 (2017).
Google Scholar
Brown, C. T. et al. Unusual biology across a group comprising more than 15% of domain Bacteria. Nature 523, 208–211 (2015). A study using metagenomics to reconstruct hundreds of genomes from over 35 candidate radiation phyla, revealing shared features such as small cell size, limited biosynthetic pathways and unusual rRNA genes.
Google Scholar
Luef, B. et al. Diverse uncultivated ultra-small bacterial cells in groundwater. Nat. Commun. 6, 6372 (2015).
Google Scholar
Anantharaman, K. et al. Thousands of microbial genomes shed light on interconnected biogeochemical processes in an aquifer system. Nat. Commun. 7, 13219 (2016). This study reports the reconstruction of over 2,500 microbial genomes from a subsurface aquifer, revealing that few organisms in the complex community can perform multiple sequential redox transformations.
Google Scholar
Castelle, C. J. et al. Extraordinary phylogenetic diversity and metabolic versatility in aquifer sediment. Nat. Commun. 4, 2120 (2013).
Google Scholar
Chaudhari, N. M. et al. The economical lifestyle of CPR bacteria in groundwater allows little preference for environmental drivers. Environ. Microbiome 16, 24 (2021).
Google Scholar
Chaudhari, N. M., Pérez-Carrascal, O. M., Overholt, W. A., Totsche, K. U. & Küsel, K. Genome streamlining in Parcubacteria transitioning from soil to groundwater. Environ. Microbiome 19, 41 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wang, J., Zhong, H., Chen, Q. & Ni, J. Adaption mechanism and ecological role of CPR bacteria in brackish-saline groundwater. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 10, 141 (2024).
Google Scholar
Li, P. et al. The defensome of prokaryotes in aquifers. Nat. Commun. 16, 6482 (2025).
Google Scholar
Novarino, G. et al. Protistan communities in aquifers: a review. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 20, 261–275 (1997).
Google Scholar
Retter, A. & Nawaz, A. The groundwater mycobiome: fungal diversity in terrestrial aquifers. In Encyclopedia of Inland Waters Vol. 3 (eds Mehner, T. & Trockner, K.) 385–396 (Elsevier, 2022).
Zarda, B. et al. Analysis of bacterial and protozoan communities in an aquifer contaminated with monoaromatic hydrocarbons. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 27, 141–152 (1998).
Google Scholar
Karwautz, C., Zhou, Y., Kerros, M.-E., Weinbauer, M. G. & Griebler, C. Bottom-up control of the groundwater microbial food-web in an alpine aquifer. Front. Ecol. Evol. 10, 854228 (2022).
Google Scholar
Loquay, N., Wylezich, C. & Arndt, H. Composition of groundwater nanoprotist communities in different aquifers based on aliquot cultivation and genotype assessment of cercomonads. Fundam. Appl. Limnol. 174, 261–269 (2009).
Google Scholar
Risse-Buhl, U. et al. Phagotrophic protist diversity in the groundwater of a karstified aquifer – morphological and molecular analysis. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 60, 467–479 (2013).
Google Scholar
Cukusic, A. et al. Dynamic changes in protist community composition along a surface water-groundwater transect in the Danube wetland Lobau, Vienna, Austria. Front. Microbiol. 17, 1749803 (2026).
Google Scholar
Nawaz, A. et al. First insights into the living groundwater mycobiome of the terrestrial biogeosphere. Water Res. 145, 50–61 (2018).
Google Scholar
Grossart, H.-P., Wurzbacher, C., James, T. Y. & Kagami, M. Discovery of dark matter fungi in aquatic ecosystems demands a reappraisal of the phylogeny and ecology of zoosporic fungi. Fungal Ecol. 19, 28–38 (2016).
Google Scholar
Peay, K. G., Kennedy, P. G. & Talbot, J. M. Dimensions of biodiversity in the Earth mycobiome. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 434–447 (2016).
Google Scholar
Grabner, D., Weber, D. & Weigand, A. M. Updates to the sporadic knowledge on microsporidian infections in groundwater amphipods (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Niphargidae). Subterr. Biol. 33, 71–85 (2020).
Google Scholar
Perkins, A. K. et al. Highly diverse fungal communities in carbon-rich aquifers of two contrasting lakes in Northeast Germany. Fungal Ecol. 41, 116–125 (2019).
Google Scholar
Retter, A. et al. Metabarcoding reveals ecologically distinct fungal assemblages in river and groundwater along an Austrian alpine to lowland gradient. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 100, fiae139 (2024). Metabarcoding along an alpine-to-lowland transect shows that rivers and adjacent groundwater host ecologically distinct fungal assemblages shaped by hydrological exchange and surface inputs.
Google Scholar
Pan, D. et al. Correlation between viral production and carbon mineralization under nitrate-reducing conditions in aquifer sediment. ISME J. 8, 1691–1703 (2014).
Google Scholar
Schweichhart, J., Pleyer, D., Winter, C., Retter, A. & Griebler, C. Presence and role of prokaryotic viruses in groundwater environments. In Encyclopedia of Inland Waters (eds Mehner, T. & Tockner, K.) 373–384 (Elsevier, 2022).
Wu, Z. et al. Unveiling the unknown viral world in groundwater. Nat. Commun. 15, 6788 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kothari, A. et al. Ecogenomics of groundwater phages suggests niche differentiation linked to specific environmental tolerance. mSystems https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.00537-21 (2021).
Koonin, E. V. & Dolja, V. V. A virocentric perspective on the evolution of life. Curr. Opin. Virol. 3, 546–557 (2013).
Google Scholar
Beavogui, A. et al. The defensome of complex bacterial communities. Nat. Commun. 15, 2146 (2024).
Google Scholar
Sime-Ngando, T. Environmental bacteriophages: viruses of microbes in aquatic ecosystems. Front. Microbiol. 5, 355 (2014).
Google Scholar
Hay, I. D. & Lithgow, T. Filamentous phages: masters of a microbial sharing economy. EMBO Rep. 20, e47427 (2019).
Google Scholar
Pratama, A. A., Pérez-Carrascal, O., Sullivan, M. B. & Küsel, K. Diversity and ecological roles of hidden viral players in groundwater microbiomes. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-68914-2 (2026). This study emphasizes that diverse groundwater viruses actively regulate host populations and biogeochemical fluxes via kill-the-winner dynamics, gene transfer and auxiliary metabolic genes, linking aquifer chemistry to microbial–viral community structure and ecosystem function.
Google Scholar
Wilhartitz, I. C. et al. Heterotrophic prokaryotic production in ultraoligotrophic alpine karst aquifers and ecological implications. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 68, 287–299 (2009).
Google Scholar
Griebler, C., Fillinger, L., Karwautz, C. & Hose, G. C. Knowledge gaps, obstacles, and research frontiers in groundwater microbial ecology. In Encyclopedia of Inland Waters Vol. 3 (eds Junk, W., Wittmann, F. & Griebler, C.) 611–624 (Elsevier, 2022).
Fillinger, L., Zhou, Y., Kellermann, C. & Griebler, C. Non-random processes determine the colonization of groundwater sediments by microbial communities in a pristine porous aquifer. Environ. Microbiol. 21, 327–342 (2019).
Google Scholar
Flynn, T. M., Sanford, R. A. & Bethke, C. M. Attached and suspended microbial communities in a pristine confined aquifer. Water Resour. Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006633 (2008).
Google Scholar
Herrmann, M., Opitz, S., Harzer, R., Totsche, K. & Küsel, K. Attached and suspended denitrifier communities in pristine limestone aquifers harbor high fractions of potential autotrophs oxidizing reduced iron and sulfur compounds. Microb. Ecol. 74, 264–277 (2017).
Google Scholar
Flynn, T. M. et al. Functional microbial diversity explains groundwater chemistry in a pristine aquifer. BMC Microbiol. 13, 146 (2013).
Google Scholar
Anneser, B. et al. High resolution analysis of contaminated aquifer sediments and groundwater—what can be learned in terms of natural attenuation? Geomicrobiol. J. 27, 130–142 (2010).
Google Scholar
Stegen, J. C., Lin, X., Konopka, A. E. & Fredrickson, J. K. Stochastic and deterministic assembly processes in subsurface microbial communities. ISME J. 6, 1653–1664 (2012).
Google Scholar
Ning, D. et al. Environmental stress mediates groundwater microbial community assembly. Nat. Microbiol. 9, 490–501 (2024).
Google Scholar
Beaton, E. D. et al. Local and regional diversity reveals dispersal limitation and drift as drivers for groundwater bacterial communities from a fractured granite formation. Front. Microbiol. 7, 1933 (2016).
Google Scholar
Merino, N. et al. Subsurface microbial communities as a tool for characterizing regional-scale groundwater flow. Sci. Total Environ. 842, 156768 (2022).
Google Scholar
Taylor, R., Cronin, A., Pedley, S., Barker, J. & Atkinson, T. The implications of groundwater velocity variations on microbial transport and wellhead protection — review of field evidence. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 49, 17–26 (2004).
Google Scholar
Gerba, C. P., Pepper, I. L. & Newby, D. T. Microbial transport in the subsurface. In Environmental Microbiology 3rd edn (eds Pepper, I. L. et al.) 319–337 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394626-3.00015-6 (Academic Press, 2015).
Dwivedi, D. et al. From legacy contamination to watershed systems science: a review of scientific insights and technologies developed through DOE-supported research in water and energy security. Environ. Res. Lett. 17, 043004 (2022). A review examining the Department of Energy research on subsurface contamination from nuclear production, to understand the complex interactions within entire watersheds, including carbon and nitrogen cycling.
Google Scholar
Taubert, M., Stähly, J., Kolb, S. & Küsel, K. Divergent microbial communities in groundwater and overlying soils exhibit functional redundancy for plant-polysaccharide degradation. PLoS ONE 14, e0212937 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wei, Y. et al. A critical review of groundwater table fluctuation: formation, effects on multifields, and contaminant behaviors in a soil and aquifer system. Environ. Sci. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c08543 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lennon, J. T. & Jones, S. E. Microbial seed banks: the ecological and evolutionary implications of dormancy. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 119–130 (2011).
Google Scholar
Mestre, M. & Höfer, J. The microbial conveyor belt: connecting the globe through dispersion and dormancy. Trends Microbiol. 29, 482–492 (2021).
Google Scholar
Fukami, T. Historical contingency in community assembly: integrating niches, species pools, and priority effects. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 46, 1–23 (2015).
Google Scholar
Peiffer, S. et al. A biogeochemical–hydrological framework for the role of redox-active compounds in aquatic systems. Nat. Geosci. 14, 264–272 (2021). This study introduces the RAMP framework, which links hydrological disturbances to microscale redox cycling. This regulates hot spots and moments of element turnover at aquatic interfaces.
Google Scholar
Danczak, R. E., Johnston, M. D., Kenah, C., Slattery, M. & Wilkins, M. J. Microbial community cohesion mediates community turnover in unperturbed aquifers. mSystems 3, e00066-18 (2018).
Google Scholar
Fillinger, L., Hug, K. & Griebler, C. Selection imposed by local environmental conditions drives differences in microbial community composition across geographically distinct groundwater aquifers. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 95, fiz160 (2019).
Google Scholar
Shabarova, T. et al. Bacterial community structure and dissolved organic matter in repeatedly flooded subsurface karst water pools. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 89, 111–126 (2014).
Google Scholar
Pilloni, G. et al. Dynamics of hydrology and anaerobic hydrocarbon degrader communities in A Tar-Oil contaminated aquifer. Microorganisms 7, 46 (2019). The authors demonstrate that groundwater table fluctuations strongly impact biogeochemistry and microbial communities in a contaminated aquifer, with functional redundancy among degraders helping to maintain hydrocarbon biodegradation.
Google Scholar
Hug, L. A. et al. Aquifer environment selects for microbial species cohorts in sediment and groundwater. ISME J. 9, 1846–1856 (2015).
Google Scholar
Zelaya, A. J. et al. High spatiotemporal variability of bacterial diversity over short time scales with unique hydrochemical associations within a shallow aquifer. Water Res. 164, 114917 (2019).
Google Scholar
Beauregard-Tousignant, S. & Lazar, C. S. Primary succession of microbial communities in an aquifer from the covey hill formation in Quebec, Canada. Front. Microbiol. 16, 1568469 (2025).
Google Scholar
Zhou, Y., Kellermann, C. & Griebler, C. Spatio-temporal patterns of microbial communities in a hydrologically dynamic pristine aquifer. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 81, 230–242 (2012).
Google Scholar
Herzyk, A. et al. Response and recovery of a pristine groundwater ecosystem impacted by toluene contamination — a meso-scale indoor aquifer experiment. J. Contam. Hydrol. 207, 17–30 (2017).
Google Scholar
Cram, J. A., Parada, A. E. & Fuhrman, J. A. Dilution reveals how viral lysis and grazing shape microbial communities. Limnol. Oceanogr. 61, 889–905 (2016).
Google Scholar
Våge, S. et al. Simple models combining competition, defence and resource availability have broad implications in pelagic microbial food webs. Ecol. Lett. 21, 1440–1452 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zimmerman, A. E. et al. Metabolic and biogeochemical consequences of viral infection in aquatic ecosystems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 21–34 (2020).
Google Scholar
Bouvier, T. & Del Giorgio, P. A. Key role of selective viral-induced mortality in determining marine bacterial community composition. Environ. Microbiol. 9, 287–297 (2007).
Google Scholar
Birtel, J. & Matthews, B. Grazers structure the bacterial and algal diversity of aquatic metacommunities. Ecology 97, 3472–3484 (2016).
Google Scholar
Liang, X. et al. Incorporating viruses into soil ecology: a new dimension to understand biogeochemical cycling. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 117–137 (2024).
Google Scholar
Malard, F., Griebler, C. & Rétaux, S. Groundwater Ecology and Evolution https://doi.org/10.1016/C2018-0-04328-5 (Elsevier, 2023).
Schulz, F. et al. Single-cell genomics reveals complex microbial and viral associations in ciliates and testate amoebae. Nat. Commun. 16, 10336 (2025).
Google Scholar
Deng, L. et al. Grazing of heterotrophic flagellates on viruses is driven by feeding behaviour. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 6, 325–330 (2014).
Google Scholar
Bouvy, M. et al. Trophic interactions between viruses, bacteria and nanoflagellates under various nutrient conditions and simulated climate change. Environ. Microbiol. 13, 1842–1857 (2011).
Google Scholar
Kieft, T. L. & Phelps, T. J. Life in the slow lane: activities of microorganisms in the subsurface. In Microbiology of the Terrestrial Deep Subsurface (eds. Amy, P. & Haldeman, D.) 137–163 (CRC Press, 1997).
Hoehler, T. M. Biological energy requirements as quantitative boundary conditions for life in the subsurface. Geobiology 2, 205–215 (2004).
Google Scholar
Borrel, G. et al. Unexpected and novel putative viruses in the sediments of a deep-dark permanently anoxic freshwater habitat. ISME J. 6, 2119–2127 (2012).
Google Scholar
Schenone, L., Aarons, Z. S., García-Martínez, M., Happe, A. & Redoglio, A. Mixotrophic protists and ecological stoichiometry: connecting homeostasis and nutrient limitation from organisms to communities. Front. Ecol. Evol. 12, 1505037 (2024). This publication explains how protists maintain homeostasis and sustain energy and nutrient flow in oligotrophic systems.
Google Scholar
Longnecker, K., Da Costa, A., Bhatia, M. & Kujawinski, E. B. Effect of carbon addition and predation on acetate-assimilating bacterial cells in groundwater. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 70, 456–470 (2009).
Google Scholar
Kinner, N. E., Harvey, R. W., Shay, D. M., Metge, D. W. & Warren, A. Field evidence for a protistan role in an organically-contaminated aquifer. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36, 4312–4318 (2002).
Google Scholar
Kota, S., Borden, R. C. & Barlaz, M. A. Influence of protozoan grazing on contaminant biodegradation. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 29, 179–189 (1999).
Google Scholar
Paul, J. H. Prophages in marine bacteria: dangerous molecular time bombs or the key to survival in the seas? ISME J. 2, 579–589 (2008).
Google Scholar
Székely, A. J. & Breitbart, M. Single-stranded DNA phages: from early molecular biology tools to recent revolutions in environmental microbiology. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 363, fnw027 (2016).
Google Scholar
Pleyer, D., Griebler, C. & Winter, C. Virus production in shallow groundwater at the bank of the Danube River. PLoS ONE 19, e0306346 (2024).
Google Scholar
Mermillod-Blondin, F. et al. Role of invertebrates in groundwater ecosystem processes and services. In Groundwater Ecology and Evolution 2nd edn (eds Malard, F. et al.) 263–281 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819119-4.00008-1 (Academic Press, 2023).
Hose, G. C. & Stumpp, C. Architects of the underworld: bioturbation by groundwater invertebrates influences aquifer hydraulic properties. Aquat. Sci. 81, 20 (2019).
Google Scholar
Guðmundsdóttir, R., Kreiling, A. K., Kristjánsson, B. K., Marteinsson, V. Þ & Pálsson, S. Bacterial diversity in Icelandic cold spring sources and in relation to the groundwater amphipod crangonyx islandicus. PLoS ONE 14, e0222527 (2019).
Google Scholar
Freilich, S. et al. Competitive and cooperative metabolic interactions in bacterial communities. Nat. Commun. 2, 589 (2011).
Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Valera, F. & Molina-Pardines, C. On the biological meaning of the population pangenome. Trends Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2025.07.004 (2025).
Google Scholar
Egli, T. How to live at very low substrate concentration. Water Res. 44, 4826–4837 (2010).
Google Scholar
Shen, Y., Chapelle, F. H., Strom, E. W. & Benner, R. Origins and bioavailability of dissolved organic matter in groundwater. Biogeochemistry 122, 61–78 (2015). This paper shows that groundwater dissolver organic matter is a complex mixture heavily influenced by processes in the unsaturated zone and microbial activity.
Google Scholar
McDonough, L. K. et al. Changes in global groundwater organic carbon driven by climate change and urbanization. Nat. Commun. 11, 1279 (2020).
Google Scholar
Harjung, A., Schweichhart, J., Rasch, G. & Griebler, C. Large-scale study on groundwater dissolved organic matter reveals a strong heterogeneity and a complex microbial footprint. Sci. Total Environ. 854, 158542 (2023).
Google Scholar
Finley, B. K. et al. Unraveling the influence of microbial necromass on subsurface microbiomes: metabolite utilization and community dynamics. ISME Commun. 5, ycaf006 (2025).
Google Scholar
Berg, I. A. Ecological aspects of the distribution of different autotrophic CO2 fixation pathways. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 1925–1936 (2011).
Google Scholar
Alfreider, A., Vogt, C., Geiger-Kaiser, M. & Psenner, R. Distribution and diversity of autotrophic bacteria in groundwater systems based on the analysis of RubisCO genotypes. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 32, 140–150 (2009).
Google Scholar
Herrmann, M. et al. Large fractions of CO2-fixing microorganisms in pristine limestone aquifers appear to be involved in the oxidation of reduced sulfur and nitrogen compounds. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 2384–2394 (2015).
Google Scholar
Wegner, C.-E. et al. Biogeochemical regimes in shallow aquifers reflect the metabolic coupling of the elements nitrogen, sulfur, and carbon. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 85, e02346-18 (2019). A multiomic profiling study that highlights how nitrogen and sulfur cycling is interconnected with carbon metabolism, influencing the formation of different biogeochemical zones.
Google Scholar
Probst, A. J. et al. Biology of a widespread uncultivated archaeon that contributes to carbon fixation in the subsurface. Nat. Commun. 5, 5497 (2014).
Google Scholar
Overholt, W. A. et al. Carbon fixation rates in groundwater similar to those in oligotrophic marine systems. Nat. Geosci. 15, 561–567 (2022). Chemolithoautotrophic microorganisms drive high rates of dark carbon fixation in carbonate aquifers, with productivity levels comparable to those of oligotrophic marine surface waters. This finding highlights a substantial, overlooked carbon source for subterranean ecosystems.
Google Scholar
Taubert, M. et al. Bolstering fitness via CO2 fixation and organic carbon uptake: mixotrophs in modern groundwater. ISME J. 16, 1153–1162 (2022).
Google Scholar
Burgin, A. J., Yang, W. H., Hamilton, S. K. & Silver, W. L. Beyond carbon and nitrogen: how the microbial energy economy couples elemental cycles in diverse ecosystems. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 44–52 (2011).
Google Scholar
Balderacchi, M. et al. Groundwater pollution and quality monitoring approaches at the European level. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 323–408 (2013).
Google Scholar
Gu, B., Ge, Y., Chang, S. X., Luo, W. & Chang, J. Nitrate in groundwater of China: sources and driving forces. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 1112–1121 (2013).
Google Scholar
Burow, K. R., Nolan, B. T., Rupert, M. G. & Dubrovsky, N. M. Nitrate in groundwater of the United States, 1991−2003. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 4988–4997 (2010).
Google Scholar
Groffman, P. M. et al. Challenges to incorporating spatially and temporally explicit phenomena (hotspots and hot moments) in denitrification models. Biogeochemistry 93, 49–77 (2009).
Google Scholar
Westrop, J. P. et al. Nitrate-stimulated release of naturally occurring sedimentary uranium. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 4354–4366 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ruff, S. E. et al. Hydrogen and dark oxygen drive microbial productivity in diverse groundwater ecosystems. Nat. Commun. 14, 3194 (2023). This study finds oxygen produced in situ by subsurface microorganisms supporting aerobic metabolism in these otherwise oxygen-poor environments.
Google Scholar
Chen, S.-C. et al. Microbial iron oxide respiration coupled to sulfide oxidation. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09467-0 (2025).
Google Scholar
Wang, D. et al. Metaproteomics-informed stoichiometric modeling reveals the responses of wetland microbial communities to oxygen and sulfate exposure. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 10, 55 (2024).
Google Scholar
Bonneville, S., Van Cappellen, P. & Behrends, T. Microbial reduction of iron(III) oxyhydroxides: effects of mineral solubility and availability. Chem. Geol. 212, 255–268 (2004).
Google Scholar
Kappler, A. et al. An evolving view on biogeochemical cycling of iron. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 19, 360–374 (2021).
Google Scholar
Weber, K. A., Achenbach, L. A. & Coates, J. D. Microorganisms pumping iron: anaerobic microbial iron oxidation and reduction. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4, 752–764 (2006).
Google Scholar
Fierer, N., Barberán, A. & Laughlin, D. C. Seeing the forest for the genes: using metagenomics to infer the aggregated traits of microbial communities. Front. Microbiol. 5, 614 (2014).
Google Scholar
Malard, L. A. & Guisan, A. Into the microbial niche. Trends Ecol. Evol. 38, 936–945 (2023).
Google Scholar
Schreiber, F. et al. Phenotypic heterogeneity driven by nutrient limitation promotes growth in fluctuating environments. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16055 (2016).
Google Scholar
Kundu, K., Weber, N., Griebler, C. & Elsner, M. Phenotypic heterogeneity as key factor for growth and survival under oligotrophic conditions. Environ. Microbiol. 22, 3339–3356 (2020). This study shows how microorganisms can grow and persist when energy and nutrients are limited, and why only a small, active fraction responds rapidly while the major part of the groundwater community remains dormant under oligotrophic conditions.
Google Scholar
Buessecker, S. et al. An essential role for tungsten in the ecology and evolution of a previously uncultivated lineage of anaerobic, thermophilic Archaea. Nat. Commun. 13, 3773 (2022).
Google Scholar
Giovannelli, D. Trace metal availability and the evolution of biogeochemistry. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 4, 597–598 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wilkins, M. J. et al. Single-cell genomics reveals metabolic strategies for microbial growth and survival in an oligotrophic aquifer. Microbiology 160, 362–372 (2014).
Google Scholar
Yin, Q., He, K., Collins, G., De Vrieze, J. & Wu, G. Microbial strategies driving low concentration substrate degradation for sustainable remediation solutions. npj Clean Water 7, 52 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wang, J., Yao, X., Xu, H., Lou, H. & Hu, B. Methane cycle in subsurface environment: a review of microbial processes. Environ. Res. 265, 120404 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lohmann, P. et al. Seasonal patterns of dominant microbes involved in central nutrient cycles in the subsurface. Microorganisms 8, 1694 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kappler, A. & Bryce, C. Cryptic biogeochemical cycles: unravelling hidden redox reactions. Environ. Microbiol. 19, 842–846 (2017).
Google Scholar
Thullner, M. & Regnier, P. Microbial controls on the biogeochemical dynamics in the subsurface. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 85, 265–302 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hansel, C. M. et al. Dominance of sulfur-fueled iron oxide reduction in low-sulfate freshwater sediments. ISME J. 9, 2400–2412 (2015).
Google Scholar
Wang, K., Pan, R., Fei, H., Tong, Q. & Han, F. Changes in soil prokaryotic communities and nitrogen cycling functions along a groundwater table drawdown gradient in desert wetlands. Sci. Total Environ. 842, 156868 (2022).
Google Scholar
Li, D. et al. Dissolved organic carbon influences microbial community composition and diversity in managed aquifer recharge systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 6819–6828 (2012).
Google Scholar
Griebler, C. et al. Potential impacts of geothermal energy use and storage of heat on groundwater quality, biodiversity, and ecosystem processes. Environ. Earth Sci. 75, 1391 (2016).
Google Scholar
Song, Y., Mao, G., Gao, G., Bartlam, M. & Wang, Y. Structural and functional changes of groundwater bacterial community during temperature and pH disturbances. Microb. Ecol. 78, 428–445 (2019).
Google Scholar
O’Gorman, P. A. & Schneider, T. The physical basis for increases in precipitation extremes in simulations of 21st-century climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 14773–14777 (2009).
Google Scholar
Retter, A., Karwautz, C. & Griebler, C. Groundwater microbial communities in times of climate change. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 41, 509–538 (2020).
Google Scholar
Richardson, S. D. & Postigo, C. Drinking water disinfection by-products. In Emerging Organic Contaminants and Human Health (ed. Barceló, D.) 93–137 (Springer, 2011).
Fenner, K., Canonica, S., Wackett, L. P. & Elsner, M. Evaluating pesticide degradation in the environment: blind spots and emerging opportunities. Science 341, 752–758 (2013).
Google Scholar
Lin, X. et al. Spatial and temporal dynamics of the microbial community in the hanford unconfined aquifer. ISME J. 6, 1665–1676 (2012).
Google Scholar
Röling, W. F. M., van Breukelen, B. M., Braster, M., Lin, B. & van Verseveld, H. W. Relationships between microbial community structure and hydrochemistry in a landfill leachate-polluted aquifer. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67, 4619–4629 (2001).
Google Scholar
Abiriga, D., Jenkins, A., Alfsnes, K., Vestgarden, L. S. & Klempe, H. Spatiotemporal and seasonal dynamics in the microbial communities of a landfill-leachate contaminated aquifer. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 97, fiab086 (2021). This study demonstrates that the aquifer’s solid sediment matrix and the flowing groundwater host entirely distinct microbial communities.
Google Scholar
Kwon, M. J. et al. Impacts of leachates from livestock carcass burial and manure heap sites on groundwater geochemistry and microbial community structure. PLoS ONE 12, e0182579 (2017).
Google Scholar
Mauffret, A., Baran, N. & Joulian, C. Effect of pesticides and metabolites on groundwater bacterial community. Sci. Total Environ. 576, 879–887 (2017).
Google Scholar
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Wetlands and Water Synthesis: A Report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (World Resources Institute, 2005).
Griebler, C., Avramov, M. & Hose, G. Groundwater ecosystems and their services: current status and potential risks. In Atlas of Ecosystem Services: Drivers, Risks, and Societal Responses (eds Schröter, M. et al.) 197–203 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96229-0_31 (Springer, 2019).
Amundson, K. K., Borton, M. A. & Wilkins, M. J. Anthropogenic impacts on the terrestrial subsurface biosphere. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 23, 147–161 (2024).
Google Scholar
Gadd, G. M. Metals, minerals and microbes: geomicrobiology and bioremediation. Microbiology 156, 609–643 (2010).
Google Scholar
Oremland, R. S. & Stolz, J. F. The ecology of arsenic. Science 300, 939–944 (2003).
Google Scholar
Scow, K. M. & Hicks, K. A. Natural attenuation and enhanced bioremediation of organic contaminants in groundwater. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 16, 246–253 (2005).
Google Scholar
Evich, M. G. et al. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the environment. Science 375, eabg9065 (2022).
Google Scholar
Rios-Miguel, A. B. et al. Predicting and improving the microbial removal of organic micropollutants during wastewater treatment: a review. Chemosphere 333, 138908 (2023).
Google Scholar
Eren, A. M. & Banfield, J. F. Modern microbiology: embracing complexity through integration across scales. Cell 187, 5151–5170 (2024).
Google Scholar
Nayfach, S. & Pollard, K. S. Toward accurate and quantitative comparative metagenomics. Cell 166, 1103–1116 (2016).
Google Scholar
Farley, S. S., Dawson, A., Goring, S. J. & Williams, J. W. Situating ecology as a big-data science: current advances, challenges, and solutions. BioScience 68, 563–576 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hose, G. C. et al. Assessing groundwater ecosystem health, status, and services. In Groundwater Ecology and Evolution 2nd edn (eds Malard, F. et al.) Ch. 22, 501–524 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819119-4.00022-6 (Academic Press, 2023).
Salazar-Hamm, S. et al. Subterranean marvels: microbial communities in caves and underground mines and their promise for natural product discovery. Nat. Prod. Rep. 42, 592–622 (2025).
Google Scholar
Atanasov, A. G., Zotchev, S. B., Dirsch, V. M. & Supuran, C. T. Natural products in drug discovery: advances and opportunities. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 20, 200–216 (2021).
Google Scholar
White, C., Sayer, J. A. & Gadd, G. M. Microbial solubilization and immobilization of toxic metals: key biogeochemical processes for treatment of contamination. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 20, 503–516 (1997).
Google Scholar
Zhang, L.-Z. et al. Metabolic coupling of arsenic, carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur in high arsenic geothermal groundwater: evidence from molecular mechanisms to community ecology. Water Res. 249, 120953 (2024). Zhang et al. demonstrate that geothermal groundwater flow drives arsenic mobility by regulating coupled carbon, nitrogen and sulfur metabolic networks through distinct microbial community shifts in recharge and discharge areas.
Google Scholar
Löffler, F. E. & Edwards, E. A. Harnessing microbial activities for environmental cleanup. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 17, 274–284 (2006).
Google Scholar
Davis, G. B. Reviewing the bioremediation of contaminants in groundwater: investigations over 40 years provide insights into what’s achievable. Front. Biosci. 15, 16 (2023).
Google Scholar
Sati, S. et al. Bioremediation of heavy metals in contaminated water: conventional vs. advanced methods. Front. Water https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2026.1749800 (2026).
Google Scholar
Rawlings, D. E. Heavy metal mining using microbes. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 56, 65–91 (2002).
Google Scholar
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors contributed equally to all aspects of the article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Microbiology thanks Karthik Anantharaman, Mike Wilkins and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karwautz, C., Griebler, C. Microbial ecology of shallow groundwater ecosystems.
Nat Rev Microbiol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-026-01362-3
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-026-01362-3
Source: Ecology - nature.com
