in

Calibrating antimicrobial resistance influent and effluent signals in wastewater systems


Abstract

Here, in this Perspective, we discuss how the detailed measurements of microbial hazards generated by wastewater surveillance remain fundamentally underdetermined: they quantify variation without resolving the biological states they represent. This limitation is particularly evident for antimicrobial resistance, where large-scale monitoring is advancing in the absence of parameters that link wastewater concentrations to population-level burden and environmental risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Conceptual overview of the wastewater surveillance calibration gap (AMR focused) in wastewater systems.
Fig. 2: Suggested wastewater surveillance (AMR-focused) calibration solution for interpretation of epidemiological data and risk of environmental introduction.

References

  1. Nourbakhsh, S. et al. A wastewater-based epidemic model for SARS-CoV-2 with application to three Canadian cities. Epidemics 39, 100560 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  2. Directive (EU) 2024/3019 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2024 Concerning Urban Wastewater Treatment (Recast), Official Journal of the European Union, L 2024/3019. European Union https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/3019/oj/eng? (2024).

  3. ECDC framework to guide the integration of wastewater-based surveillance into infectious disease surveillance at the EU/EEA level. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control https://doi.org/10.2900/6843735 (2025)

  4. Davis, B. C., Vikesland, P. J. & Pruden, A. Evaluating quantitative metagenomics for environmental monitoring of antibiotic resistance and establishing detection limits. Environ. Sci. Technol. 59, 6192–6202 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  5. Langenfeld, K. et al. Development of a quantitative metagenomic approach to establish quantitative limits and its application to viruses. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, gkaf118 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  6. Karaolia, P. et al. Leveraging wastewater: validating the national-scale SARS-CoV-2 surveillance system in Cyprus for elevated public health surveillance and enhanced epidemiological insight. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 12, 112953 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  7. Prasek, S. M. et al. Population level SARS-CoV-2 fecal shedding rates determined via wastewater-based epidemiology. Sci. Total Environ. 838, 156535 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brouwer, A. F. et al. The role of time-varying viral shedding in modelling environmental surveillance for public health: revisiting the 2013 poliovirus outbreak in Israel. J. R. Soc. Interface 19, 20220006 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  9. Arts, P. J. et al. Longitudinal and quantitative fecal shedding dynamics of SARS-CoV-2, pepper mild mottle virus, and crAssphage. mSphere 8, e0013223 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guzman, H. P., Zhao, L. & Xagoraraki, I. Wastewater surveillance of Salmonella enterica, Campylobacter jejuni, and norovirus reveals potential underreporting of disease cases in the tri-county Detroit Area, Michigan. ACS ES&T Water 5, 5426–5437 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chavez, J. et al. Early introductions of Candida auris detected by wastewater surveillance, Utah, USA, 2022–2023. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 30, 2107–2117 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nakayama, T., Kumeda, Y., Kawahara, R. & Yamamoto, Y. Quantification and long-term carriage study of human extended-spectrum/AmpC β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli after international travel to Vietnam. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 21, 229–234 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  13. Willmann, M. et al. Distinct impact of antibiotics on the gut microbiome and resistome: a longitudinal multicenter cohort study. BMC Biol. 17, 1–18 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  14. Van Den Bunt, G. et al. Dynamics of intestinal carriage of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the Dutch general population, 2014–2016. Clin. Infect. Dis. 71, 1847–1855 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  15. ÖstholmBalkhed, Å et al. Duration of travel-associated faecal colonisation with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae – a one year follow-up study. PLoS ONE 13, 1–12 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  16. Heston, S. M. et al. The effects of antibiotic exposures on the gut resistome during hematopoietic cell transplantation in children. Gut Microbes 16, 1–15 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  17. Li, X. et al. Differential responses of the gut microbiome and resistome to antibiotic exposures in infants and adults. Nat. Commun. 14, 8526 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rodriguez-Ruiz, J. P. et al. Long-term effects of ciprofloxacin treatment on the gastrointestinal and oropharyngeal microbiome are more pronounced after longer antibiotic courses. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 64, 107259 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ludden, C. et al. Colonisation with ESBL-producing and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, and meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a long-term care facility over one year. BMC Infect. Dis. 15, 1–12 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ohashi, Y. & Fujisawa, T. Detection of antibiotic resistance genes in the feces of young adult Japanese. Biosci. Microbiota Food Heal. 36, 151–154 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  21. Douterelo, I., Sharpe, R. L. & Boxall, J. B. Influence of hydraulic regimes on bacterial community structure and composition in an experimental drinking water distribution system. Water Res. 47, 503–516 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pallares-Vega, R. et al. Annual dynamics of antimicrobials and resistance determinants in flocculent and aerobic granular sludge treatment systems. Water Res. 190, 116752 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  23. Blaustein, R. A. et al. Irrigation waters and pipe-based biofilms as sources for antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Environ. Monit. Assess. 188, 1–12 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  24. Li, L. et al. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase and carbapenemase genes are substantially and sequentially reduced during conveyance and treatment of urban sewage. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 5939–5949 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gupta, S., Wu, X., Pruden, A., Zhang, L. & Vikesland, P. Global scale exploration of human faecal and sewage resistomes as a function of socio-economic status. Nat. Water 2, 975–987 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  26. Li, J. et al. Metagenomics-based source attribution of antimicrobial resistance in wastewater for improved epidemiological risk assessment. Water Res. 298, 125810 (2026).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang, S. et al. In-sewer decay and partitioning of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli and implications for their wastewater surveillance. Water Res. 233, 119737 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bosch, A., Pintó, R. M. & Abad, F. X. Survival and transport of enteric viruses in the environment. In Viruses in Foods. Food Microbiology and Food Safety (ed. Goyal, S. M.) 151–187 https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29251-9_6 (Springer, 2006).

  29. PIRTLE, E. C. & BERAN, G. W. Virus survival in the environment. Rev. Sci. Tech. l’OIE 10, 733–748 (1991).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  30. Opulente, D. A. et al. Pathogenic budding yeasts isolated outside of clinical settings. FEMS Yeast Res. 19, foz032 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ghosh, S. & LaPara, T. M. The effects of subtherapeutic antibiotic use in farm animals on the proliferation and persistence of antibiotic resistance among soil bacteria. ISME J 1, 191–203 (2007).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  32. Liu, J., Zhao, Z., Orfe, L., Subbiah, M. & Call, D. R. Soil-borne reservoirs of antibiotic-resistant bacteria are established following therapeutic treatment of dairy calves. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 557–564 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  33. Negreanu, Y., Pasternak, Z., Jurkevitch, E. & Cytryn, E. Impact of treated wastewater irrigation on antibiotic resistance in agricultural soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 4800–4808 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mahaney, A. P. & Franklin, R. B. Persistence of wastewater-associated antibiotic resistant bacteria in river microcosms. Sci. Total Environ. 819, 153099 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nasser, A. M., Fawaqa, H. & Nitzan, Y. The role of wastewater treatment plants in the environmental dissemination of antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) and resistance genes (ARG). J. Water Resour. Prot. 11, 981–994 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kummerer, K. Resistance in the environment. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 54, 311–320 (2004).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang, S. et al. Chlorine disinfection facilitates natural transformation through ROS-mediated oxidative stress. ISME J 15, 2969–2985 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  38. Li, X., Zhang, Z., Liu, H., Wen, H. & Wang, Q. The fate of intracellular and extracellular antibiotic resistance genes during ultrafiltration-ultraviolet-chlorination in a full-scale wastewater treatment plant. J. Hazard. Mater. 486, 137088 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  39. Read, D. S. et al. Dissemination and persistence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) along the wastewater-river continuum. Water Res. 264, 122204 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  40. Pang, Y. C., Xi, J. Y., Li, G. Q., Shi, X. J. & Hu, H. Y. Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in a lake for the storage of reclaimed water before and after usage as cooling water. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 17, 1182–1189 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kvesić, M. et al. Microbiome and antibiotic resistance profiling in submarine effluent-receiving coastal waters in Croatia. Environ. Pollut. 292, 118282 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  42. Szekeres, E. et al. Investigating antibiotics, antibiotic resistance genes, and microbial contaminants in groundwater in relation to the proximity of urban areas. Environ. Pollut. 236, 734–744 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  43. Gatica, J. & Cytryn, E. Impact of treated wastewater irrigation on antibiotic resistance in the soil microbiome. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 20, 3529–3538 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  44. Liu, Y., Shan, X., Liu, C. & Chen, H. Microcosm experiments deciphered resistome coalescence, risks and source-sink relationship of antibiotic resistance in the soil irrigated with reclaimed water. J. Hazard. Mater. 488, 137398 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  45. Li, Y. et al. Rhizosphere suppression hinders antibiotic resistance gene (ARG) spread under bacterial invasion. One Heal 16, 100481 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  46. Yang, W. & Wang, X. Transmission mechanisms and risk tracing of antibiotic resistance genes in rivers driven by wastewater inputs. J. Hazard. Mater. 500, 140523 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang, G. et al. Metagenomic and network analyses decipher profiles and co-occurrence patterns of antibiotic resistome and bacterial taxa in the reclaimed wastewater distribution system. J. Hazard. Mater. 400, 123170 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  48. Chu, B. T. T. et al. Metagenomics reveals the impact of wastewater treatment plants on the dispersal of microorganisms and genes in aquatic sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 84, e02168–17 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  49. Abe, K., Nomura, N. & Suzuki, S. Biofilms: Hot spots of horizontal gene transfer (HGT) in aquatic environments, with a focus on a new HGT mechanism. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 96, 1–12 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Liu, Z. et al. Deterministic effect of pH on shaping soil resistome revealed by metagenomic analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 985–996 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  51. Huang, H. et al. Distribution of tetracycline resistance genes in anaerobic treatment of waste sludge: the role of pH in regulating tetracycline resistant bacteria and horizontal gene transfer. Bioresour. Technol. 218, 1284–1289 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kittredge, H. A., Dougherty, K. M. & Evans, S. E. Dead but not forgotten: how extracellular DNA, moisture, and space modulate the horizontal transfer of extracellular antibiotic resistance genes in soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 88, e0228021 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  53. Haack, B. J., Andrews, R. E. & Loynachan, T. E. Tn916-mediated genetic exchange in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 28, 765–771 (1996).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  54. Song, Y.-Q. et al. Impacts of soil type on the temporal dynamics of antibiotic resistance gene profiles following application of composted manure. J. Hazard. Mater. 480, 136372 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  55. Zhang, J. et al. Soil types influence the fate of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes following the land application of sludge composts. Environ. Int. 118, 34–43 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  56. Chen, Q. et al. Long-term field application of sewage sludge increases the abundance of antibiotic resistance genes in soil. Environ. Int. 92–93, 1–10 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  57. Chen, Q. L. et al. Application of struvite alters the antibiotic resistome in soil, rhizosphere, and phyllosphere. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 8149–8157 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  58. Zhu, L. et al. Environmentally persistent microbial contamination in agricultural soils: high risk of pathogenicity and antibiotic resistance. Environ. Int. 190, 108902 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  59. Liao, H. et al. Herbicide selection promotes antibiotic resistance in soil microbiomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 2337–2350 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  60. Anedda, E., Farrell, M. L., Morris, D. & Burgess, C. M. Evaluating the impact of heavy metals on antimicrobial resistance in the primary food production environment: a scoping review. Environ. Pollut. 320, 121035 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wang, Q. et al. Heavy metal copper accelerates the conjugative transfer of antibiotic resistance genes in freshwater microcosms. Sci. Total Environ. 717, 137055 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  62. Liu, W. et al. Organic fertiliser additions promote transformation of extracellular antibiotic resistance genes to soil bacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 28, e70273 (2026).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  63. Calero-Cáceres, W. & Muniesa, M. Persistence of naturally occurring antibiotic resistance genes in the bacteria and bacteriophage fractions of wastewater. Water Res. 95, 11–18 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  64. Rebelo, A., Quadrado, M., Franco, A., Lacasta, N. & Machado, P. Water reuse in Portugal: new legislation trends to support the definition of water quality standards based on risk characterization. Water Cycle 1, 41–53 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  65. Rebelo, A., Bento Amaro, A. & Quadrado, F. Water reuse: a risk assessment model for water resources. KnE Mater. Sci. https://doi.org/10.18502/kms.v7i1.11623 (2022).

  66. Official Journal of the European Union REGULATION (EU) 2020/741 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 25 May 2020 on minimum requirements for water reuse. L177 2019, 32–55 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Union, T., Journal, O. & Union, E. Sludge directive. Focus Surfactants 2002, 2 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Bondarczuk, K., Markowicz, A. & Piotrowska-Seget, Z. The urgent need for risk assessment on the antibiotic resistance spread via sewage sludge land application. Environ. Int. 87, 49–55 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  69. Kampouris, I. D. et al. Treated wastewater irrigation promotes the spread of antibiotic resistance into subsoil pore-water. Environ. Int. 146, 106190 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  70. Solaiman, S. et al. Effects of season and water type on the distribution and antimicrobial resistance of Enterococcus faecalis and Ent. faecium from surface and reclaimed water. J. Appl. Microbiol. 133, 477–487 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  71. Leonard, A. F. C., Zhang, L., Balfour, A. J., Garside, R. & Gaze, W. H. Human recreational exposure to antibiotic resistant bacteria in coastal bathing waters. Environ. Int. 82, 92–100 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  72. Leonard, A. F., Morris, D., Schmitt, H. & Gaze, W. H. Natural recreational waters and the risk that exposure to antibiotic resistant bacteria poses to human health. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 65, 40–46 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  73. Knight, M. E., Farkas, K., Kiss, A. & Jones, D. L. National-scale insights into AMR transmission along the wastewater-environment continuum. Water Res. 282, 123603 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  74. Christou, A. et al. Sustainable wastewater reuse for agriculture. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 5, 504–521 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  75. Fierer, N. et al. A metagenomic investigation of spatial and temporal changes in sewage microbiomes across a university campus. mSystems 7, e0065122 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  76. Schmiege, D. et al. Small-scale wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) for infectious diseases and antibiotic resistance: a scoping review. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 259, 114379 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  77. Eramo, A., Morales Medina, W. R. & Fahrenfeld, N. L. Factors associated with elevated levels of antibiotic resistance genes in sewer sediments and wastewater. Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 6, 1697–1710 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  78. Brienza, M. et al. Reclaimed wastewater reuse in irrigation: role of biofilms in the fate of antibiotics and spread of antimicrobial resistance. Water Res. 221, 118830 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  79. Shi, X. et al. Microbial risk assessment across multiple environments based on metagenomic absolute quantification with cellular internal standards. Nat. Water 3, 473–485 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  80. Bickhart, D. M. et al. Generating lineage-resolved, complete metagenome-assembled genomes from complex microbial communities. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 711–719 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  81. Van de Wiele, T., Van den Abbeele, P., Ossieur, W., Possemiers, S. & Marzorati, M. The Simulator of the Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem (SHIME®). In The Impact of Food Bioactives on Health (eds Verhoeckx, K., et al.) 305–317 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16104-4_27 (Springer, 2015).

  82. Bauer, E., Zimmermann, J., Baldini, F., Thiele, I. & Kaleta, C. BacArena: individual-based metabolic modeling of heterogeneous microbes in complex communities. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005544 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  83. Oh, M. et al. Meta Compare: a computational pipeline for prioritizing environmental resistome risk. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 94, 1–9 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  84. Wang, H., Hu, X. & Hu, C. Effects of chlorine and pipe material on biofilm development and structure in a reclaimed water distribution system. Water Supply 12, 362–371 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  85. Mohammed, H., Tornyeviadzi, H. M. & Seidu, R. Modelling the impact of water temperature, pipe, and hydraulic conditions on water quality in water distribution networks. Water Pract. Technol. 16, 387–403 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  86. Mantilla-Calderon, D. et al. Water disinfection byproducts increase natural transformation rates of environmental DNA in Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 6520–6528 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  87. Li, L. et al. Estimating the transfer range of plasmids encoding antimicrobial resistance in a wastewater treatment plant microbial community. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 5, 260–265 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  88. Luo, C., Zhang, T., Mustafa, M. F., Li, M. & Xu, S. Removal efficiency of ARGs in different wastewater treatment plants and their potential risks in effluent. npj Clean Water 8, 45 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  89. Sonkar, V. et al. Removal of antimicrobial resistance determinants from wastewater: role of capacity overloading and treatment technology in wastewater treatment plants. J. Environ. Manage. 395, 127897 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  90. Cadena-Aponte, F. X. et al. From the reclaimed water treatment plant to irrigation in intensive agriculture farms: assessment of the fate of antibiotics, antibiotic resistance bacteria and genes, and microbial pathogens at real scale. Environ. Sci. Technol. 59, 19953–19965 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  91. Fahrenfeld, N., Ma, Y., O’Brien, M. & Pruden, A. Reclaimed water as a reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes: distribution system and irrigation implications. Front. Microbiol. 4, 130 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the scientific discussions and interdisciplinary exchanges developed through the SPORE-MED project (PRIMA Programme, grant agreement no. 2322) and Joint Action EU-WISH (European Union Wastewater Integrated Surveillance for Public Health), which contributed to the development of the perspectives presented in this work.

Funding

S.C. was funded from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 101034403.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

This Perspective was jointly conceptualized through collaborative development of the proposed framework and iterative discussion of the supporting evidence. The manuscript was refined through repeated critical review by all authors. All authors approved the final version and accept responsibility for its content.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Despo Fatta-Kassinos.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Water thanks Benjamin C. Davis and Sen Pei for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Naziri, Α., Chatzimichail, S., Karaolia, P. et al. Calibrating antimicrobial resistance influent and effluent signals in wastewater systems.
Nat Water (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-026-00701-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-026-00701-1


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Ontogenetic shifts, trophic differentiation, and predator–prey size relationships in Oxyrhopus false coral snakes from Bahia, Brazil

Avian migration timing advances linked to season-dependent population benefits