in

A probabilistic approach to predicting alfalfa’s winter survival using local conditions, weather and management factors


Abstract

Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) produce relatively high yields of high-quality forage and contributes to carbon sequestration. Still, its winter survival is often lower than that of grasses, reducing plant density and field productivity. Winterkill is influenced by environmental factors (e.g., snow cover, temperature fluctuations, hardening period) and management practices (e.g., cutting time, fertilization, drainage). To assess these factors and improve persistence, this study developed a quantitative assessment tool for Canadian forage producers. A numerical simulation framework integrated soil, weather, and field management variables to evaluate yield variability and winterkill risk. Data were collected from 225 farms across Nova Scotia, Quebec, Ontario, and Manitoba using a randomized hierarchical sampling design. Soil samples were analyzed in commercial laboratories, and stem density was measured each spring and fall over three years. Descriptive statistics linking stem characteristics with soil and topographic features, weather conditions, and management practices, including soil nutrient levels, revealed a decline in mean stem counts from 49 in spring 2021 to 37 in spring 2023. To illustrate performance, weighted scores and persistence analyses were used to define model parameters across three distinct scenarios: optimal, average, and worst-case. The risk-assessment tool offers decision support to Canadian forage growers, enhancing productivity through informed management, species selection, and soil recommendations.

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from Mon Système Fourrager; however, restrictions apply to their availability, as they were used under license for the current research and are not publicly accessible. Data are, however, available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of Mon Système Fourrager.

Abbreviations

Al:

Aluminum

BS:

Base saturation

B:

Bore

BD:

Bulk density

Ca:

Calcium

CEC:

Cation exchange capacity

CRAAQ:

Centre de référence en agriculture et agroalimentaire du Québec

Cu:

Copper

DSS:

Decision support system

GDD:

Growing degree days

HRDEM:

High-resolution digital elevation model

ISP:

Integral suspension pressure

Fe:

Iron

LiDAR:

Light detection and ranging

Mg:

Magnesium

Mn:

Manganese

Max:

Maximum value

Min:

Minimum value

NDVI:

Normalized difference vegetation index

OMAFRA:

Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs

P:

Phosphorous

K:

Potassium

IRDA:

Research and Development Institute for the Agri-environment

K + Mg+Ca:

Saturation of Ca, K, Mg

Na:

Sodium

SOM:

Soil organic matter

Std.:

Standard deviation

TWI:

Topographic wetness index

Zn:

Zinc

References

  1. Undersander, D., Grau, C., Cosgrove, D. & Neal Martin, J. D. Alfalfa stand assessment: is this stand good enough to keep? (2011). http://forage.msu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/WI-A3620-IsThisAlfalfaStandGoodEnoughToKeep-Undersander-etal_2011.pdf.

  2. Bélanger, G. et al. Winter damage to perennial forage crops in Eastern canada: causes, mitigation, and prediction. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 86, 33–47 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sheaffer, C. C. et al. Leaf and stem properties of alfalfa entries. Agron. J. 92, 733–739 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Castonguay, Y., Laberge, S., Brummer, E. C. & Volenec, J. J. Alfalfa winter hardiness: a research retrospective and integrated perspective. Adv. Agron. 90, 203–265 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wells, M. S., Martinson, K. L., Undersander, D. J. & Sheaffer, C. C. A survey investigating alfalfa winter injury in Minnesota and Wisconsin from the winter of 2012–2013. Forage Grazinglands 12, 963 (2014).

  6. Poudel, K. et al. Quantifying winter survival of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L). Agron. J. 116, 170–179 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brock Porth, C. et al. Remote sensing applications for insurance: a predictive model for pasture yield in the presence of systemic weather. North. Am. Actuar. J. 24, 333–354 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kinoshita, R., Rossiter, D. & van Es, H. Spatio-temporal analysis of yield and weather data for defining site-specific crop management zones. Precis Agric. 22, 1952–1971 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ma, H. & Jiang, P. Effects of nitrogen fertilization combined with subsurface irrigation on alfalfa yield, water and nitrogen use efficiency, quality, and economic benefits. Front Plant. Sci 15, 748 (2024).

  10. Brummer, E. C., Shah, M. M. & Luth, D. Reexamining the relationship between fall dormancy and winter hardiness in alfalfa. Crop Sci. 40, 971–977 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cunningham, S. M., Volenec, J. J. & Teuber, L. R. Plant survival and root and bud composition of alfalfa populations selected for contrasting fall dormancy. Crop Sci. 38, 962–969 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  12. de Nijs, P. J., Berry, N. J., Wells, G. J. & Reay, D. S. Quantification of biophysical adaptation benefits from climate-smart agriculture using a bayesian belief network. Sci. Rep. 4, 6682 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eltarabily, M. G. et al. Simulated soil water distribution patterns and water use of alfalfa under different subsurface drip irrigation depths. Agric Water Manag. 293, 4152 (2024).

  14. Kim, J. Y. Software design for image mapping and analytics for high throughput phenotyping. Comput. Electron. Agric. 191, 106550 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cleland, E. E., Chuine, I., Menzel, A., Mooney, H. A. & Schwartz, M. D. Shifting plant phenology in response to global change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 357–365 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chen, Y. et al. Application of image-based phenotyping tools to identify QTL for in-field winter survival of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Theor. Appl. Genet. 132, 2591–2604 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Strullu, L. et al. Simulation using the STICS model of C&N dynamics in alfalfa from sowing to crop destruction. Eur. J. Agron. 112, 125948 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wood, S. et al. Validation of predictive equations of pre-harvest forage nutritive value for alfalfa–grass mixtures. Agron. J. 110, 950–960 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Volenec, J. J. & Nelson, C. J. Environmental aspects of forage management. In Forages: An Introduction to Grassland Agriculture (2017).

  20. Cortés, U., Sànchez-Marrè, M., Ceccaroni, L., R-Roda, I. & Poch, M. Artificial intelligence and environmental decision support systems. Appl. Intell. 13, 77–91 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shinde, S. Development of a numeric on-line decision support system for crop fertilizer optimization. Dissertations & Theses @ McGill University (Canada) (2017).

  22. Tantalaki, N., Souravlas, S. & Roumeliotis, M. Data-driven decision making in precision agriculture: the rise of big data in agricultural systems. J. Agric. Food Inf. 20, 344–380 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  23. McCauley, D. M., Nackley, L. L. & Kelley, J. Demonstration of a low-cost and open-source platform for on-farm monitoring and decision support. Comput. Electron. Agric. 187, 106284 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Buxton, D. R. & Fales, S. L. ASA, CSSA, SSSA,. Plant environment and quality. In Forage Quality, Evaluation, and Utilization (ed. Fahey, G. C.) (1994).

  25. Hall, M. H., Nelson, C. J., Coutts, J. H. & Stout, R. C. Effect of seeding rate on alfalfa stand longevity. Agron. J. 96, 717–722 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Undersander, D. et al. Alfalfa Management Guide (Wiley, 2021).

  27. Thompson, N. M., DeLay, N. D. & Mintert, J. R. Understanding the farm data lifecycle: collection, use, and impact of farm data on U.S. Commercial corn and soybean farms. Precis Agric. 22, 1685–1710 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Thorsen, S. M. & Höglind, M. Modelling cold hardening and dehardening in timothy: sensitivity analysis and bayesian model comparison. Agric. Meteorol. 150, 1529–1542 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Saifuzzaman, M. et al. Clustering tools for integration of satellite remote sensing imagery and proximal soil sensing data. Remote Sens. 11, 1036 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA). Soil Fertility Handbook. Queen’s Printer for Ontario, Ch. 5 (2022).

  31. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA). Risk of alfalfa winterkill (1991). https://www.ontario.ca/page/risk-alfalfa-winterkill.

  32. Saifuzzaman, M., Adamchuk, V., Biswas, A. & Rabe, N. High-density proximal soil sensing data and topographic derivatives to characterise field variability. Biosyst Eng. 211, 19–34 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang, Y., Qian, B. & Hong, G. A long-term, 1-km resolution daily meteorological dataset for modeling and mapping permafrost in Canada. Atmosphere 11, 526 (2020).

  34. Bélanger, G. et al. Climate change and winter survival of perennial forage crops in Eastern Canada. Agron. J. 94, 1120–1130 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Python Software Foundation. Python (Version 3.x) [Computer software] (2024). https://www.python.org.

  36. Page, L. & Brin, S. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Comput. Netw. ISDN Syst. 30, 107–117 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Evans, M., Hastings, N. & Peacock, B. Probability density function and probability function. Stat. Distrib. 2000, 9–11 (2000).

  38. Darapuneni, M. K. et al. Potassium and sulfur fertilizer sources influence alfalfa yield and nutritive value and residual soil characteristics in an arid, moderately low-potassium soil. Agronomy 14, 526 (2024).

  39. Dhakal, C. & Lange, K. Crop yield response functions in nutrient application: a review. Agron. J. 113, 5222–5234 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hakl, J., Pisarčik, M., Fuksa, P. & Šantrůček, J. Potential of Lucerne sowing rate to influence root development and its implications for field stand productivity. Grass Forage Sci. 76, 378–389 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Orloff, S. Choosing appropriate sites for alfalfa production. In Alfalfa Management Guide, Ch. 2 (Univ. of California, 2007).

  42. Elsamet, R. M., Serag, A. & Abdel-Razek, M. The influence of tile drainage spacing on water-table fluctuation and alfalfa crop production in the Northeast nile Delta, Egypt. Menoufia J. Soil. Sci. 8, 185–197 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Fick, G. W. & Mueller, S. C. Alfalfa: quality, maturity, and mean stage of development. Cornell Univ. Info Bull. 217, 1–16 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Gao, L., Su, J., Chen, C., Tian, Q. & Shen, Y. Increases in forage legume biomass as a response to nitrogen input depend on temperature, soil characters and planting system: a meta-analysis. Grass Forage Sci. 76, 309–319 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lauzon, J. et al. Alfalfa and timothy nutritive value in contrasting agroclimatic regions. Agron. J. 111, 1371–1380 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors give special thanks to the Canadian Forage and Grassland Association (CFGA) and Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada and Institut de recherche et de développement en agroenvironnement (IRDA) Quebec for data support and cooperation. We are grateful to Dr. Gilles Bélanger and Dr. Dan Undersander for their valuable suggestions and contributions to the project. Additionally, we would like to express our appreciation to Felipe Hoffmann Silva Karp and other graduate students for their assistance with data processing at various stages.

Funding

This research was supported in part through the Mitacs Accelerate program with support from the Canadian Forage Grassland Association (Fredericton, NB, Canada), Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), and Ministère de l’Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l’Alimentation (MAPAQ).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MS and VIA conceived and designed the study. MS, VIA, and ML developed an analytical framework and methodology. MS, VIA, ML, and HE performed data analysis and investigations. MS, VIA, ML, and KC created visualizations and contributed to the interpretation of the results. MS drafted the initial manuscript. MS, VIA, PS, ML, and KC reviewed, revised, and approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Md Saifuzzaman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saifuzzaman, M., Adamchuk, V.I., Leduc, M. et al. A probabilistic approach to predicting alfalfa’s winter survival using local conditions, weather and management factors.
Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37585-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37585-w

Keywords

  • Alfalfa
  • Environmental factors
  • Field management
  • Persistency
  • Probability model
  • Risk assessment


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Tropical cyclones impact the dispersal of a globally invasive moth pest

Unsupervised mapping of urban tree diversity using spatially-aware visual clustering

Back to Top