in

Agricultural water use efficiency and land-use intensity dominate the water-food-ecology nexus coupling coordination in the Lake Victoria Basin


Abstract

Water, food, and ecology are closely interconnected and are essential for regional development and human well-being, forming the water-food-ecology (WFE) nexus. However, knowledge about progress towards sustainable development of the WFE nexus at the basin scale remains largely unavailable. This study constructed an evaluation system to assess the WFE nexus in the Lake Victoria Basin (LVB) aligning with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The spatio-temporal dynamics of WFE nexus coupling coordination were revealed using coupling coordination degree (CCD) model and spatial autocorrelation analysis. Then, the random forest algorithm was employed to identify key factors dominating the evolutionary patterns of CCD. The results showed that the water subsystem index decreased 4.55%, accompanied by growing spatial imbalance. In contrast, the food and ecology subsystem indices increased 45.45% and 33.33%, respectively, with reduced spatial imbalance. Besides, the mean coupling coordination level of WFE nexus improved from intermediate discoordination (CCD = 0.36) to basic coordination (CCD = 0.405), while the proportion of area reaching coordination increased from 36.34% to 51.66%. A cluster of high coupling coordination was maintained in the relatively more developed northeastern sub-basins of the LVB. In addition, social influencing factors dominated CCD across the basin, with agricultural water use efficiency and land-use intensity consistently ranking higher in importance than climate and vegetation variables, highlighting the closer association between human activities and WFE nexus coupling coordination. This study provided a feasible evaluation framework and improved understanding of the WFE nexus in great lake basins.

Similar content being viewed by others

Spatio-temporal characteristics and influencing factors of the coupling coordination of the water-energy-food nexus in Northeast China

Spatial adaptation patterns and coordinated development of water-energy-food complex system in the yellow river basin

Integrating trade-offs and supply-demand into ecosystem service zoning management to provide more targeted management strategies from the water-food-ecosystem nexus perspective

Data availability

The datasets generated or analyzed during the current study are derived from publicly available sources, which are fully described in the “Methods” section. Processed data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

The R code will be available on reasonable request.

References

  1. Liu, Y. et al. Review and prospect of the water-food-ecosystem nexus in dryland’s Coupled Human-Earth System (IN CHINESE). Geogr. Res. 40, 541–555 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rosa, L. & Sangiorgio, M. Global water gaps under future warming levels. Nat. Commun. 16, 11245 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ge, Y. et al. What dominates sustainability in endorheic regions? Sci. Bull. 67, 1636–1640 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  4. United Nations. Sustainable Development Goals: 17 goals to transform our world http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/ (UN, 2015).

  5. Liu, J. et al. Nexus approaches to global sustainable development. Nat. Sustain. 1, 466–476 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stewart-Koster, B. et al. Living within the safe and just Earth system boundaries for blue water. Nat. Sustain. 7, 53–63 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Delabre, I. et al. Actions on sustainable food production and consumption for the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. Sci. Adv. 7, eabc8259 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Xue, F. et al. Floodplain lakes: linking hydrology to ecology and conservation. Earth Sci. Rev. 258, 104967 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lester, R. E. et al. Synergies in environmental and agricultural water availability under climate change. Nat. Sustain. 9, 234–246 (2026).

  10. Xu, Z. et al. Assessing global sustainability performance, imbalance, and coordination over space and time. Nat. Commun. 16, 9186 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lake Victoria Basin Commission & GRID-Arendal. Lake Victoria Basin: atlas of our changing environment https://www.grida.no/publications/328 (LVBC & GRID-Arendal, 2017).

  12. Morgan, B., Awange, J. L., Saleem, A. & Kexiang, H. Understanding vegetation variability and their “hotspots” within Lake Victoria Basin (LVB: 2003-2018). Appl. Geogr. 122, 102238 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Katusiime, J., Schütt, B. & Mutai, N. The relationship of land tenure, land use and land cover changes in Lake Victoria basin. Land Use Policy 126, 106542 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Paulos, A. H. et al. Temperature and precipitation affect the water fetching time burden in Sub-Saharan Africa. Nat. Commun. 16, 3486 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vörösmarty, C. J. et al. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467, 555–561 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dahal, B. et al. Harnessing hydrochemical characterisation and ANN-driven water quality modelling for wetland sustainability in Sudurpaschim province, central Himalaya, Nepal. Lakes Reserv. Res. Manag. 30, e70012 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kaphle, C. et al. Hydrochemical assessment and water quality evaluation of Syarpu Lake, Nepal: implications for sustainable management. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev. 16, 214–224 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Khanal, B. et al. Evaluation of water quality in lowland Ramsar Wetlands: insights on hydrochemistry analysis-sustainable development goals nexus. Phys. Chem. Earth 141, 104097 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reshmi, N. et al. Hydrochemical dynamics and pollution regimes in Satyawati Lake, Nepal: implications for water quality and sustainable management. Int. J. Energ. Water Res. 10, 10 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, Y. et al. Hydrological impacts of land use/cover changes in the Lake Victoria basin. Ecol. Indic. 145, 109580 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Humphrey, O. S. et al. Sediment and soil source apportionment using geochemical fingerprinting techniques in the Winam Gulf, Lake Victoria. Catena 255, 109053 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hoff, H. Understanding the Nexus. In Proc. Background paper for the Bonn2011 Nexus Conference. 1–52 (Stockholm Environment Institute, 2011).

  23. Maziotis, A., Sala-Garrido, R., Mocholi-Arce, M. & Molinos-Senante, M. Understanding water-energy-carbon nexus in English and Welsh water industry by assessing eco-productivity of water companies. npj Clean Water 7, 121 (2024).

  24. Huntington, H. P. et al. Applying the food-energy-water nexus concept at the local scale. Nat. Sustain. 4, 672–679 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Naderi, M. M., Mirchi, A., Massah Bavani, A. R., Goharian, E. & Madani, K. System dynamics simulation of regional water supply and demand using a food-energy-water nexus approach: application to Qazvin Plain, Iran. J. Environ. Manag. 280, 111843 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gu, D., Guo, J., Fan, Y., Zuo, Q. & Yu, L. Evaluating water-energy-food system of the Yellow River Basin based on type-2 fuzzy sets and Pressure-State-Response model. Agric. Water Manag. 267, 107607 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schlemm, A. et al. Integrating ecosystem services into the water-energy-food-environment (WEFE) nexus for informed conservation strategies and planning in the Upper White Nile basin. Environ. Dev. 56, 101272 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Saladini, F. et al. Linking the water-energy-food nexus and sustainable development indicators for the Mediterranean region. Ecol. Indic. 91, 689–697 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cheng, Y., Wang, J. & Shu, K. The coupling and coordination assessment of food-water-energy systems in China based on sustainable development goals. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 35, 338–348 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yu, Y. et al. Transboundary cooperation in infrastructure operation generates economic and environmental co-benefits in the Lancang-Mekong River Basin. Nat. Water 2, 589–601 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zhao, D. et al. Quantifying economic-social-environmental trade-offs and synergies of water-supply constraints: an application to the capital region of China. Water Res. 195, 116986 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ciacci, A., Ivaldi, E. & Pavanini, T. Uneven paths toward sustainability in Africa: a multidimensional and spatio-Temporal assessment of SDG progress (2000-2022). Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 103, 102355 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Irrigation in Africa in figures: Water Reports 19. https://www.fao.org/4/W3094E/w3094e02.htm (FAO, 1997).

  34. Han, D., Yu, D. & Qiu, J. Assessing coupling interactions in a safe and just operating space for regional sustainability. Nat. Commun. 14, 1369 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Banerjee, A. et al. Long-term climate change and anthropogenic activities together with regional water resources and agricultural productivity in Uganda using Google Earth Engine. Phys. Chem. Earth 134, 103545 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  36. National Irrigation Authority. National Expanded Irrigation Programme https://www.irrigationauthority.go.ke/projects/national-expanded-irrigation-programme/ (NIA-Kenya, 2011).

  37. Aramburu-Merlos, F. et al. Adopting yield-improving practices to meet maize demand in Sub-Saharan Africa without cropland expansion. Nat. Commun. 15, 4492 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Liu, Y. et al. Overlooked uneven progress across sustainable development goals at the global scale: challenges and opportunities. Innovation 5, 100573 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Huan, Y. et al. Capturing spatio-temporal variations in SDG interactions and prioritizations. Appl. Geogr. 186, 103830 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Transboundary Agro-ecosystem Management Project for the Kagera river basin https://www.fao.org/in-action/incentives-for-ecosystem-services/policy/policy-recommendations/kagera-tamp/en/ (FAO, 2009).

  41. Green Climate Fund, KfW Development Bank & Ministry of Water, Tanzania. Simiyu Climate Resilience Project. https://simiyu-cr-project.org/index.php/en/ (GCF, KfW & MoW, 2021).

  42. Kihwele, E. S. et al. Upstream land use negatively affects river flow dynamics in the Serengeti National Park. Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol. 21, 1–12 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Nile Basin Initiative. Karazi Hydropower Project Feasibility Report. https://nilebasin.org/news/karazi-hydropower-project-feasibility-report (NBI, 2023).

  44. Lake Victoria Basin Commission. Adapting to Climate Change in Lake Victoria Basin Project https://www.lvbcom.org/project/adapting-to-climate-change-in-lake-victoria-basin-project-acc-lvb/ (LVBC, 2018).

  45. May, R., Jackson, C., Bevanger, K., & Røskaft, E. Servicescape of the Greater Serengeti-Mara Ecosystem: visualizing the linkages between land use, biodiversity and the delivery of wildlife-related ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 40, 101025 (2019).

  46. Bai, T., Liu, X., Liu, D. & Zhou, Y. Water allocation and irrigation scheme considering runoff forecasting of Ulungur River. Ecol. Indic. 173, 113381 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Yuan, S. et al. Intensifying rice production to reduce imports and land conversion in Africa. Nat. Commun. 15, 835 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  48. World Agroforestry. Improved land management in the Lake Victoria Basin: Final report on the TransVic project https://www.worldagroforestry.org/publication/improved-land-management-lake-victoria-basin-final-report-transvic-project-0 (ICRAF, 2006).

  49. Zhang, Z. et al. Water-saving strategies across prefectures should target the manufacturing and agriculture sectors in China. Commun. Earth Environ. 6, 349 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Amanya, P. M., Ji, Y., Fu, Y., Yang, Z. & Kipkogei, S. Weather index insurance, agricultural productivity, and multiscale resilience. A comparative analysis of farmers with varying exposure to weather shocks in Kenya. J. Environ. Manag. 396, 128105 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Mensah, T. N. O., Oyewo, A. S., Bogdanov, D., Aghahosseini, A. & Breyer, C. Pathway for a fully renewable power sector of Africa by 2050: Emphasising on flexible generation from biomass. Renew. Energy 234, 121198 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Clements, H. S. et al. A place-based assessment of biodiversity intactness in sub-Saharan Africa. Nature 649, 113–121 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  53. African Great Lakes Inform. Empowering Local Champions for Africa’s Great Lakes https://www.africangreatlakesinform.org/project/empowering-local-champions-africas-great-lakes (AGLI, 2022).

  54. Asiama, K. O., Voss, W., Bennett, R. & Rubanje, I. Land consolidation activities in Sub-Saharan Africa towards the agenda 2030: a tale of three countries. Land Use Policy 101, 105140 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  55. World Bank. Lake Victoria Environmental Management Project Phase III (LVEMP-III) Concept Information Document https://projects.worldbank.org/en/projects-operations/project-detail/P165352 (WB, 2018).

  56. Keva, O. et al. The role of land use in terrestrial support of boreal lake food webs. Nat. Commun. 16, 3572 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Shi, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, S. & Shi, H. Decoding resources strategies: Food-energy-water nexus across varied development stages. Innov. Geosci. 3, 100172 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Chagas, V. B., Chaffe, P. L. & Blöschl, G. Climate and land management accelerate the Brazilian water cycle. Nat. Commun. 13, 5136 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Bai, Y. et al. Developing China’s Ecological Redline Policy using ecosystem services assessments for land use planning. Nat. Commun. 9, 3034 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Leh, M. D., Matlock, M. D., Cummings, E. C. & Nalley, L. L. Quantifying and mapping multiple ecosystem services change in West Africa. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 165, 6–18 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Pang, W., Ji, P., Pang, L. & Gao, R. Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of land-use patterns and ecosystem service functions in the Greater Khingan Mountains of Inner Mongolia (IN CHINESE). Bull. Soil Water Conserv. 44, 340–351+361 (2024).

  62. Mulligan, M. et al. Mapping nature’s contribution to SDG 6 and implications for other SDGs at policy relevant scales. Remote Sens. Environ. 239, 111671 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wang, Y., Song, J. & Sun, H. Coupling interactions and spatial equilibrium analysis of water-energy-food in the Yellow River Basin, China. Sustain. Cities Soc. 88, 104293 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Zhao, H. et al. Inequality of household consumption and air pollution-related deaths in China. Nat. Commun. 10, 4337 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Bell, W., Lividini, K. & Masters, W. A. Global dietary convergence from 1970 to 2010 altered inequality in agriculture, nutrition and health. Nat. Food 2, 156–165 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Qin, Q., He, W., Yuan, L., Degefu, D. M. & Ramsey, T. S. Coupled and coordinated development of water-energy-food-ecology-land system in the Yangtze River Delta, China. npj Clean Water 8, 38 (2025).

  67. Wang, S., Kong, W., Ren, L., Zhi, D. & Dai, B. Research on misuses and modification of coupling coordination degree model in China (IN CHINESE). J. Nat. Resour. 36, 793–810 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Xiong, M. et al. Climate resilience assessment of sustainability at national level: a case study of sub-Saharan Africa. J. Clean. Prod. 430, 139717 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Hu, L. et al. Flood disaster risk and socioeconomy in the Yellow River Basin, China. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 44, 101272 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Martinez-Morata, I. et al. Nationwide geospatial analysis of county racial and ethnic composition and public drinking water arsenic and uranium. Nat. Commun. 13, 7461 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Liu, M., Trugman, A. T., Peñuelas, J. & Anderegg, W. R. Climate-driven disturbances amplify forest drought sensitivity. Nat. Clim. Change 14, 746–752 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Li, Z., Wang, C., Liu, Y. & Wang, J. Enhancing the explanation of household water consumption through the water-energy nexus concept. npj Clean Water 7, 8 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Zhang, W. et al. Stabilization of acidification in China’s cropland soils. Nat. Geosci. 18, 1125–1132 (2025).

  74. Zhou, Q. et al. Groundwater quality evolution across China. Nat. Commun. 16, 2522 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Morris, J. et al. Quantifying both socioeconomic and climate uncertainty in coupled human-Earth systems analysis. Nat. Commun. 16, 2703 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Tabash, M. I., Mesagan, E. P. & Farooq, U. Dynamic linkage between natural resources, economic complexity, and economic growth: empirical evidence from Africa. Resour. Policy 78, 102865 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Hope, R. & Ballon, P. Global water policy and local payment choices in rural Africa. npj Clean Water 2, 21 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  78. United Nations Environment Programme. Lake Victoria Basin environment outlook: Environment and development https://bit.ly/3kXwiKV (UNEP, 2006).

  79. Wollburg, P., Markhof, Y., Bentze, T. & Ponzini, G. Substantial impacts of climate shocks in African smallholder agriculture. Nat. Sustain. 7, 1525–1534 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  80. De Vos, K. et al. African food system and biodiversity mainly affected by urbanization via dietary shifts. Nat. Sustain. 7, 869–878 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Mafaranga, H. Heavy Rains, Human Activity, and Rising Waters at Lake Victoria. Eos https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EO146582 (2020).

  82. Xu, X., Li, B., Liu, X., Li, X. & Shi, Q. Mapping annual global land cover changes at a 30 m resolution from 2000 to 2015. Nat. Remote Sens. Bull. 25, 1896–1916 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Yan, D. et al. A data set of distributed global population and water withdrawal from 1960 to 2020. Sci. Data 9, 640 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Jiang, M., Zheng, C., Jia, L. & Chen, J. A 20-year dataset (2001-2020) of global cropland water-use efficiency at 1-km grid resolution. Sci. Data 12, 574 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Long, D. et al. Unprecedented large-scale aquifer recovery through human intervention. Nat. Commun. 16, 7296 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42361144888).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology: T.W. and J.P.; analysis and investigation: T.W., J.S., M.M., and Y.L.; writing-original draft preparation: T.W., J.S., M.M., Y.L., D.Z., and J.P.; writing-reviewing and editing: M.M., J.W., G.R., and J.P.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Jian Peng.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, T., Shu, J., Mugabowindekwe, M. et al. Agricultural water use efficiency and land-use intensity dominate the water-food-ecology nexus coupling coordination in the Lake Victoria Basin.
npj Clean Water (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-026-00563-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-026-00563-w


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Fast response of satellite fluorescence-derived plant physiology to drought stress

Predicting the global distribution of Coffee Bee Hawk Moth (Cephanodes hylas L.) under climate change using MaxEnt

Back to Top