in

Anthropogenic Factors Dominate Taxonomic Diversity of Urban Street Trees While Climate Drives Phylogenetic Diversity


Abstract

Urbanization profoundly alters ecosystems, yet urban areas, home to more than half the world’s population, also support a wide range of biodiversity. Urban street trees, a crucial component of urban green space, are among the most frequently encountered green infrastructure in city environments for urban residents. Despite their vast range of benefits to urban quality of life, the taxonomic diversity and phylogenetic diversity patterns at the regional scale, and the underlying drivers, remain insufficiently understood. To address this, we explore and map geographic patterns of taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity of street trees across 116 county-level cities of Yunnan province and further analyze the factors influencing these patterns. Urban street trees comprise 180 species (119 genera, 47 families), with distribution highly uneven (81 species occurring only once and 30 species in over 10 cities). We found that climatic and anthropogenic (i.e., socio-economic and urbanization metrics) factors jointly influenced taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity, with anthropogenic factors primarily driving taxonomic diversity and climatic factors dominating phylogenetic diversity. Although urban expansion can introduce more species, the phylogenetic structure of street trees is still shaped by climate. Enhancing diversity requires introducing climate-resilient species that can adapt to current and future environmental stresses.

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are publicly available on figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30277585). Additionally, data are also contained in the supplementary materials.

Code availability

The code for the analysis will be publicly available on figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30277585). We ran all analyses using the software R 4.3.254.

References

  1. Elmqvist, T. et al. Urbanization, Biodiversity And Ecosystem Services: Challenges And Opportunities: A Global Assessment. (Springer Nature, 2013).

  2. Hou, Y., Li, J., Li, G. & Qi, W. Negative effects of urbanization on plants: a global meta-analysis. Ecol. Evol. 13, 1–9 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li, G. et al. Global impacts of future urban expansion on terrestrial vertebrate diversity. Nat. Commun. 13, 1628 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ives, C. D. et al. Cities are hotspots for threatened species. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 25, 117–126 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lepczyk, C. A., Aronson, M. F. & La Sorte, F. A. Cities as sanctuaries. Front. Ecol. Environ. 21, 251–259 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liu, J. & Slik, F. Are street trees friendly to biodiversity? Landsc. Urban Plan 218, 104304 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Willis, K. J. & Petrokofsky, G. The natural capital of city trees. Science 356, 374–376 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gómez-Baggethun, E. et al. Urban ecosystem services. Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities: A Global Assessment, 175–251 (2013).

  9. Mullaney, J., Lucke, T. & Trueman, S. J. A review of benefits and challenges in growing street trees in paved urban environments. Landsc. Urban Plan. 134, 157–166 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Redlich, S. et al. Disentangling effects of climate and land use on biodiversity and ecosystem services—a multi-scale experimental design. Methods Ecol. Evol. 13, 514–527 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Silva, P. A. Bird-flower interactions in an urban area: Ceiba pubiflora provides nectar and promotes biodiversity in the city. Urban Forest. Urban Green. 36, 42–49 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Säumel, I., Weber, F. & Kowarik, I. Toward livable and healthy urban streets: roadside vegetation provides ecosystem services where people live and move. Environ. Sci. Policy. 62, 24–33 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Silva, J. L. S., de Oliveira, M. T. P., Cruz-Neto, O., Tabarelli, M. & Lopes, A. V. Plant–pollinator interactions in urban ecosystems worldwide: a comprehensive review including research funding and policy actions. Ambio. 50, 884–900 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stevenson, P. C. et al. The state of the world’s urban ecosystems: what can we learn from trees, fungi, and bees? Plants People Planet 2, 482–498 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Faith, D. P. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol. Conserv. 61, 1–10 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Le Bagousse-Pinguet, Y. et al. Phylogenetic, functional, and taxonomic richness have both positive and negative effects on ecosystem multifunctionality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 8419–8424 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Srivastava, D. S., Cadotte, M. W., MacDonald, A. A. M., Marushia, R. G. & Mirotchnick, N. Phylogenetic diversity and the functioning of ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 15, 637–648 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kendal, D., Williams, N. S. G. & Williams, K. J. H. A cultivated environment: exploring the global distribution of plants in gardens, parks and streetscapes. Urban Ecosyst. 15, 637–652 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Smart, N., Eisenman, T. S. & Karvonen, A. Street tree density and distribution: an international analysis of five capital cities. Front. Ecol. Evol. 8, 562646 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Li, X. & Walker, D. The plant geography of Yunnan Province, southwest China. J. Biogeogr. 13, 367–397 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Da Fonseca, G. A. & Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 403, 853 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Qian, L., Chen, J., Deng, T. & Sun, H. Plant diversity in Yunnan: current status and future directions. Plant Divers. 42, 281–291 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Xie, C., Chen, S., Liu, D. & Jim, C. Y. Unveiling the complex networks of urban tree diversity research: a global perspective. Ecol. Evol. 14, e11630 (2024).

  24. Ossola, A. et al. The Global Urban Tree Inventory: a database of the diverse tree flora that inhabits the world’s cities. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 1907–1914 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Silva, J. L. D. S. et al. High richness of exotic trees in tropical urban green spaces: reproductive systems, fruiting and associated risks to native species. Urban Forest. Urban Green. 50, 126659 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Palma, E. et al. Functional trait changes in the floras of 11 cities across the globe in response to urbanization. Ecography. 40, 875–886 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Threlfall, C. G. et al. Increasing biodiversity in urban green spaces through simple vegetation interventions. J. Appl. Ecol. 54, 1874–1883 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Aznarez, C. et al. Luxury and legacy effects on urban biodiversity, vegetation cover and ecosystem services. Npj Urban Sustain. 3, 47 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Blanchette, A., Trammell, T. L. E., Pataki, D. E., Endter-Wada, J. & Avolio, M. L. Plant biodiversity in residential yards is influenced by people’s preferences for variety but limited by their income. Landsc. Urban Plan. 214, 104149 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cavender Bares, J. et al. Horticultural availability and homeowner preferences drive plant diversity and composition in urban yards. Ecol. Appl. 30, e02082 (2020).

  31. Aronson, M. F. et al. Biodiversity in the city: key challenges for urban green space management. Front. Ecol. Environ. 15, 189–196 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hope, D. et al. Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8788–8792 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Qian, H. et al. Phylogenetic dispersion and diversity in regional assemblages of seed plants in China. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 23192–23201 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Latham, R. E. & Ricklefs, R. E. Global patterns of tree species richness in moist forests: energy-diversity theory does not account for variation in species richness. Oikos. 67, 325–333 (1993).

  35. Nesbitt, L., Meitner, M. J., Sheppard, S. R. J. & Girling, C. The dimensions of urban green equity: a framework for analysis. Urban Forest. Urban Green. 34, 240–248 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pauchard, A. & Barbosa, O. Regional assessment of Latin America: rapid urban development and social economic inequity threaten biodiversity hotspots. Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities. (Springer, Dordrecht, 2013) pp 589–608.

  37. Fan, C., Johnston, M., Darling, L., Scott, L. & Liao, F. H. Land use and socio-economic determinants of urban forest structure and diversity. Landsc. Urban Plan 181, 10–21 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Yang, Y., Tian, K., Hao, J., Pei, S. & Yang, Y. Biodiversity and biodiversity conservation in Yunnan, China. Biodivers. Conserv. 13, 813–826 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zhu, H. Geographical patterns of Yunnan seed plants may be influenced by the clockwise rotation of the Simao-Indochina geoblock. Front. Earth Sci. 3, 53 (2015).

  40. Yunnan Yearbook Editorial Committee (ed). (Yunnan Yearbook, 2020).

  41. Yang, J. & Huang, X. The 30 m annual land cover dataset and its dynamics in China from 1990 to 2019. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13, 3907–3925 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  42. McGarigal, K. FRAGSTATS Help. (University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA, 2015).

  43. Lin, Q. et al. A dataset on catalogue of alien plants in China. Sheng Wu Duo Yang Xing 30, 22127 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Gao, Z. et al. Drivers of spontaneous plant richness patterns in urban green space within a biodiversity hotspot. Urban Forest. Urban Green. 61, 127098 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Oksanen, J. et al. The vegan package. Commun. Ecol. Package 10, 719 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Pavoine, S. & Bonsall, M. B. Measuring biodiversity to explain community assembly: a unified approach. Biol. Rev. 86, 792–812 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Webb, C. O., Ackerly, D. D. & Kembel, S. W. Phylocom: software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and trait evolution. Bioinformatics. 24, 2098-2100 (2008).

  48. Zanne, A. E. et al. Three keys to the radiation of angiosperms into freezing environments. Nature 506, 89–92 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Jin, Y., Qian, H. & U.PhyloMaker: An R package that can generate large phylogenetic trees for plants and animals. Plant Divers. 45, 347–352 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Gareth, J., Daniela, W., Trevor, H. & Robert, T. An Introduction to Statistical Learning: With Applications in R. (Spinger, 2013).

  51. Menard, S. Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. (Sage, 2002).

  52. Vittinghoff, E., Glidden, D. V., Shiboski, S. C. & McCulloch, C. E. Regression methods in biostatistics: linear, logistic, survival, and repeated measures models. (Springer, 2006).

  53. Lai, J., Zou, Y., Zhang, S., Zhang, X. & Mao, L. glmm. hp: an R package for computing individual effect of predictors in generalized linear mixed models. J. Plant Ecol. 15, 1302–1307 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Core, R. Team. R. Version 3, 1 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions. We would like to extend our gratitude to Tian Wu, Zhenliang Cao, Pengchen Wu, Penghui Teng, and Boxuan Jia from Kunming University for their assistance with the field survey. We also wish to thank Leng Xiushan from Beijing Forestry University for the kind help provided in the preparation of the figures. This research was funded by the Major Program for Basic Research Project of Yunnan Province (202101BC070002), the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2015FY210200), the ECNU Academic Innovation Promotion Program for Excellent Doctoral Students (YBNLTS2019), and Fundamental and Interdisciplinary Disciplines Breakthrough Plan of the Ministry of Education of China (JYB2025XDXM901).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Zhiwen Gao: field survey, data collection, analysis, interpretation and drafting the paper; Yanyi Yang, Mingming Zhuge, Xinyi Luo, Yanhong Wang, Tiyuan Xia, Yuandong Hu: field survey, collecting data and revising the paper; Kun Song and Liangjun Da: funding, conception, revising the manuscript and final approval of the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to
Zhiwen Gao, Yuandong Hu or Kun Song.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

42949_2026_383_MOESM1_ESM (download PDF )

42949_2026_383_MOESM2_ESM (download DOCX )

42949_2026_383_MOESM3_ESM (download CSV )

42949_2026_383_MOESM4_ESM (download CSV )

42949_2026_383_MOESM5_ESM (download CSV )

42949_2026_383_MOESM6_ESM (download CSV )

42949_2026_383_MOESM7_ESM (download CSV )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gao, Z., Yang, Y., Zhuge, M. et al. Anthropogenic Factors Dominate Taxonomic Diversity of Urban Street Trees While Climate Drives Phylogenetic Diversity.
npj Urban Sustain (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-026-00383-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-026-00383-4


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Urban planning students engage with communities through the Freedom Summer Fellowship

Legislation system lacking scientific basis undermines ecological health of Yangtze River

Back to Top