in

Assessment of the spatiotemporal coupling relationship between ecological environment quality and tourist spatial activities in Qianjiangyuan National Park


Abstract

Balancing recreational services of national parks with the protection of ecological environment quality is essential for the sustainable use of natural resources. Taking Qianjiangyuan National Park as a case study, this study integrated remote sensing data, trajectories, and geotagged photos, and applied the remote sensing ecological index, a clustering algorithm, and the coupling coordination model to investigate the spatiotemporal coupling relationship between ecological environment quality and tourist spatial activities from 2017 to 2024. The results showed that: (1) The ecological environment quality of the study area remained generally high, with over 79.20% of the area classified as good and above. High-value areas were primarily located in the northwest and southern regions. In contrast, low-value areas were primarily located along the periphery, in residential zones, and adjacent to roads. (2) Tourist activities were primarily concentrated in forest ecosystem regions with high ecological and recreational value. The distribution of trajectories exhibited distinct seasonal patterns and a fluctuating trend from 2017 to 2024, characterized by an initial increase, a subsequent decline, and eventual recovery. The 18 areas of interest demonstrated a spatial distribution characterized by linear continuity and localized aggregation; (3) The ecological environment quality and tourist spatial activities generally exhibited strong coupling and basic coordination. High values were primarily observed in the northwest and southwest of the study area, while low values were concentrated in the northeast, central, and southern regions. These spatial patterns provide actionable insights for targeted management strategies to balance tourism utilization and ecological conservation in national parks.

Similar content being viewed by others

Assessment of ecotourism suitability in Qilian mountain National park

Study on the ecological restoration zoning and strategy of the West Qinling Mountains

Co-management for sustainable development and conservation in Sanjiangyuan National Park and the surrounding Tibetan nomadic pastoralist areas

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code availability

The code is available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Adach, S., Wojtkowska, M. & Religa, P. Consequences of the accessibility of the mountain national parks in Poland. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30, 27483–27500 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Esfandiar, K., Dowling, R., Pearce, J. & Goh, E. What a load of rubbish! The efficacy of theory of planned behaviour and norm activation model in predicting visitors’ binning behaviour in national parks. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 46, 304–315 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pulido-Fernández, J. I., Carrillo-Hidalgo, I., López-Sánchez, Y. & Casado-Montilla, J. Assessing social carrying capacity of tourists in protected natural areas. Curr. Issues Tour. 28, 1062–1078 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang, H., Chen, W., Zhang, Y., Buhalis, D. & Lu, L. National park visitors’ car-use intention: A norm-neutralization model. Tourism Manage. 69, 97–108 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rogowski, M., Zawilińska, B. & Hibner, J. Managing tourism pressure: Exploring tourist traffic patterns and seasonality in mountain national parks to alleviate overtourism effects. J. Environ. Manage. 373, 123430 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lutz, H. J. Soil conditions of picnic grounds in public forest parks. J. For. 43, 121–127 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hammitt, W. E., Cole, D. N. & Monz, C. A. Wildland Recreation: Ecology and Management (Wiley, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Salesa, D. & Cerdà, A. Soil erosion on mountain trails as a consequence of recreational activities. A comprehensive review of the scientific literature. J. Environ. Manage. 271, 110990 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ouattara, B., Pérez-Barahona, A. & Strobl, E. Dynamic implications of tourism and environmental quality. J. Public. Econ. Theory. 21, 241–264 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, Y. & Suk, S. Coupling and coordinating relationship between tourism economy and ecological environment—A case study of Nagasaki Prefecture, Japan. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 18, 12818 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pan, Z., Luo, Y., Wang, Y., Ji, J. & Lai, B. Coupling coordination and driving mechanism between tourism development, ecological conservation and digital economy: Insights from Chinese 278 cities. Sci Rep. 15, 37445 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhong, C., Wu, X., Jia, P. & Zhang, K. Study on the coupling coordination effect and dynamic relationship between tourism development and the ecological environment: A case study of Hainan Island. Front. Ecol. Evol. 12, 1284278 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sowińska-Świerkosz, B. Application of surrogate measures of ecological quality assessment: The introduction of the Indicator of Ecological Landscape Quality (IELQ). Ecol. Indic. 73, 224–234 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fancy, S. G., Gross, J. E. & Carter, S. L. Monitoring the condition of natural resources in US national parks. Environ. Monit. Assess. 151, 161–174 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hosseini, S., Oladi, J. & Amirnejad, H. The evaluation of environmental, economic and social services of national parks. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 23, 9052–9075 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kitole, F. A. & Sesabo, J. K. Tourism-driven livelihood dynamics: A comprehensive empirical study of Mount Kilimanjaro National Park communities in Tanzania. Int. J. Geoherit. Parks. 12, 416–433 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Firozjaei, M. K. et al. Surface anthropogenic heat islands in six megacities: An assessment based on a triple-source surface energy balance model. Remote Sens. Environ. 242, 111751 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kennedy, R. E. et al. Bringing an ecological view of change to Landsat-based remote sensing. Front. Ecol. Environ. 12, 339–346 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Singh, H. & Srivastava, S. K. Identification of forest fire-prone region in Lamington National Park using GIS-based multicriteria technique: Validation using field and Sentinel-2-based observations. Geocarto Int. 40, 2462484 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rai, P. K. Forest and land use mapping using Remote Sensing and Geographical Information System: A case study on model system. Environ. Skept. Crit. 2, 97 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Coutts, A. M. et al. Thermal infrared remote sensing of urban heat: Hotspots, vegetation, and an assessment of techniques for use in urban planning. Remote Sens. Environ. 186, 637–651 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mishra, N. B., Crews, K. A., Neeti, N., Meyer, T. & Young, K. R. MODIS derived vegetation greenness trends in African Savanna: Deconstructing and localizing the role of changing moisture availability, fire regime and anthropogenic impact. Remote Sens. Environ. 169, 192–204 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  23. White, D. C., Lewis, M. M., Green, G. & Gotch, T. B. A generalizable NDVI-based wetland delineation indicator for remote monitoring of groundwater flows in the Australian Great Artesian Basin. Ecol. Indic. 60, 1309–1320 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Xu, H. et al. Prediction of ecological effects of potential population and impervious surface increases using a remote sensing based ecological index (RSEI). Ecol. Indic. 93, 730–740 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, J., Zhu, Y. & Fan, F. Mapping and evaluation of landscape ecological status using geographic indices extracted from remote sensing imagery of the Pearl River Delta, China, between 1998 and 2008. Environ. Earth Sci. 75, 327 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Xu, H. Remote sensing urban ecological index and its application. Acta Ecol. Sin. 33, 7853–7862 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhu, D., Chen, T., Wang, Z. & Niu, R. Detecting ecological spatial-temporal changes by Remote Sensing Ecological Index with local adaptability. J. Environ. Manage. 299, 113655 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Qureshi, S. et al. A remotely sensed assessment of surface ecological change over the Gomishan Wetland, Iran. Remote Sens. 12, 2989 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yang, X., Meng, F., Fu, P., Zhang, J. & Liu, Y. Instability of remote sensing ecological index and its optimisation for time frequency and scale. Ecol. Inform. 72, 101870 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Xu, H., Wang, Y., Guan, H., Shi, T. & Hu, X. Detecting ecological changes with a remote sensing based ecological index (RSEI) produced time series and change vector analysis. Remote Sens. 11, 2345 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  31. He, Z., Guo, Q., Yin, Z., Luo, X. & Sun, M. Evolution and driving mechanisms of eco-environmental quality across different urbanization stages. Sci Rep. 15, 22101 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gu, Q., Zhang, H., Huang, S., Zheng, F. & Chen, C. Tourists’ spatiotemporal behaviors in an emerging wine region: A time-geography perspective. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 19, 100513 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  33. East, D., Osborne, P., Kemp, S. & Woodfine, T. Combining GPS & survey data improves understanding of visitor behaviour. Tour. Manage. 61, 307–320 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Li, Y., Yang, L., Shen, H. & Wu, Z. Modeling intra-destination travel behavior of tourists through spatio-temporal analysis. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 11, 260–269 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yun, H. J., Kang, D. J. & Lee, M. J. Spatiotemporal distribution of urban walking tourists by season using GPS-based smartphone application. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 23, 1047–1061 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Vu, H. Q., Li, G. & Law, R. Discovering highly profitable travel patterns by high-utility pattern mining. Tour. Manage. 77, 104008 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Xu, D., Cong, L. & Wall, G. Tourists’ spatio-temporal behaviour and concerns in park tourism: Giant Panda National Park, Sichuan. China. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 24, 924–943 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Liu, J., Chen, J., Law, R., Wang, S. & Yang, L. Travel patterns and spatial structure: Understanding winter tourism by trajectory data mining. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 29, 1351–1368 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Huang, S. et al. Unveiling the potential supply of cultural ecosystem services on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: Insights from tourist hiking trajectories. Ecosyst. Serv. 73, 101711 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bishop, M. V., Ólafsdóttir, R., Michaud, T. & Metcalf, C. Crowdsourced mapping of tourism distribution and dynamics in Iceland using Flickr. Scand. J. Hosp. Tour. 25, 330–346 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Paulino, I., Domènech, A. & Bassols, N. Do visitors visit what the tours industry supplies? Sightseeing tours versus first-timers’ photos. Tour. Plan. Dev. 21, 416–437 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Liu, W. et al. Cluster analysis of microscopic spatio-temporal patterns of tourists’ movement behaviors in mountainous scenic areas using open GPS-trajectory data. Tour. Manage. 93, 104614 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zhuang, Q., Wang, L. & Zheng, G. An evaluation of national park system pilot area using the AHP-delphi approach: A case study of the Qianjiangyuan National Park system pilot area. China. Forests. 13, 1162 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  44. National Forestry and Grassland Administration. National park monitoring specification (GB/T 39738-2020, 2020).

  45. Yu, H., Chen, T., Zhong, L. & Zhou, R. Functional zoning of the Qianjiangyuan National Park System Pilot Area. Resour. Sci. 39, 20–29 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ning, L., Jiayao, W. & Fen, Q. The improvement of ecological environment index model RSEI. Arab. J. Geosci. 13, 403 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Luo, H. et al. NDVI, temperature and precipitation variables and their relationships in Hainan Island from 2001 to 2014 based on MODIS NDVI. In Geo-Informatics in Resource Management and Sustainable Ecosystem. 45–56 (Springer, 2016).

  48. Chen, C. et al. Evaluation and driving mechanism of eco-environmental quality based on improved RSEI model—A case study of Taojiang County, Hunan Province. Bull. Soil Water Conserv. 44, 159–170 (2024) (Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Huang, C., Wylie, B., Yang, L., Homer, C. & Zylstra, G. Derivation of a tasselled cap transformation based on Landsat 7 at-satellite reflectance. Int. J. Remote Sens. 23, 1741–1748 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Zawadzki, J., Przeździecki, K. & Miatkowski, Z. Determining the area of influence of depression cone in the vicinity of lignite mine by means of triangle method and LANDSAT TM/ETM+ satellite images. J. Environ. Manage. 166, 605–614 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Xu, H. A new index for delineating built-up land features in satellite imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens. 29, 4269–4276 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Small, C. Comparative analysis of urban reflectance and surface temperature. Remote Sens. Environ. 104, 168–189 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wentz, E. A. et al. Supporting global environmental change research: A review of trends and knowledge gaps in urban remote sensing. Remote Sens. 6, 3879–3905 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Campello, R. J., Moulavi, D. & Sander, J. Density-based clustering based on hierarchical density estimates. In Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 160–172 (Springer, 2013).

  55. Mou, N. et al. Cycling in Tibet: An analysis of tourists’ spatiotemporal behavior and infrastructure. Tour. Manage. 88, 104418 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Mou, N. et al. Exploring spatio-temporal changes of city inbound tourism flow: The case of Shanghai, China. Tour. Manage. 76, 103955 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Li, Q., Dang, G., Yu, T., Zhang, L. & Chen, W. Spatial-temporal variation and driving forces analysis of ecological environment quality in arid counties based on GEE: Acase study of Alxa Left Banner. Arid Zone Res. 42, 360–371 (2025) (Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Li, J. et al. Exploring collective activity space and its spatial heterogeneity using mobile phone signaling Data: A case of Shenzhen, China. Trav. Behav. Soc. 38, 100920 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Schägner, J. P. et al. Monitoring recreation across European nature areas: A geo-database of visitor counts, a review of literature and a call for a visitor counting reporting standard. J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour. 18, 44–55 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kuang, Q. et al. Study on the spatiotemporal response of landscape quality and tourist trajectories in alpine grassland of Zoige County. J. Chin. Ecotourism. 13, 907–922 (2023) (Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China for providing funding for this research.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant Number No. 32071835.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: X.C.; Methodology: X.C.; Formal analysis and Investigation: X.C.; Writing—original draft preparation: X.C.; Writing—review and editing: C.W.; Funding acquisition: C.W.; Resources: C.W.; Supervision: C.W.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Chengzhao Wu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, X., Wu, C. Assessment of the spatiotemporal coupling relationship between ecological environment quality and tourist spatial activities in Qianjiangyuan National Park.
Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38914-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38914-9

Keywords

  • Ecological environment quality
  • Coupling coordination
  • Remote sensing ecological index
  • Geotagged photos
  • National parks


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Recurrent introgression and geographical stratification shape Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the Neotropics

Responses of tree defoliators to traffic-derived particulate matter and trace elements along a roadside pollution gradient

Back to Top