in

Basin-based science and management of freshwater invasive species


Defining non-native populations is essential yet challenging in freshwater systems, where policy relies on administrative borders and science on ecological units. This mismatch complicates regulation, risk assessment and biosecurity. We propose a basin-first, population-level classification that distinguishes intrabasin from interbasin nativity to better support coherent, ecologically grounded policy and management.

Access through your institution

Buy or subscribe

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Blackburn, T. M. et al. A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 333–339 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buckley, Y. M. & Catford, J. Does the biogeographic origin of species matter? Ecological effects of native and non‐native species and the use of origin to guide management. J. Ecol. 104, 4–17 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hoff, M. H., Irons, K. S. & Forester, J. E. Policy challenges relating to integrated pest management of freshwater aquatic invasive animals. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 41, 276–288 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  4. Xu, M. et al. Ecological similarity governs non-native fish establishment while human pressure and native diversity shape invasion richness. Sci. Adv. 11, eadw4347 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  5. Holmes, G. Who let the frogs out? Illicit and unregulated species translocations. Conserv. Lett. 18, e13155 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tarkan, A. S., Kurtul, I., Błońska, D., Britton, J. R. & Haubrock, P. J. Resolving the issues of translocated species in freshwater invasions. NeoBiota 93, 177–186 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blanchet, S. et al. Broad-scale determinants of non-native fish species richness are context-dependent. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 276, 2385–2394 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  8. Matsuzaki, S. S., Sasaki, T. & Akasaka, M. Consequences of the introduction of exotic and translocated species and future extirpations on the functional diversity of freshwater fish assemblages. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 22, 1071–1082 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dawson, W. et al. Global hotspots and correlates of alien species richness across taxonomic groups. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0186 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, J. et al. Translocated species exceed alien species in homogenizing freshwater fish assemblages. Glob. Change Biol. 31, e70506 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carvajal-Quintero, J. et al. Drainage network position and historical connectivity explain global patterns in freshwater fishes’ range size. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 13434–13439 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  12. Haubrock, P. J. et al. Biological invasions are a population‐level rather than a species‐level phenomenon. Glob. Change Biol. 30, e17312 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  13. Soto, I. et al. Taming the terminological tempest in invasion science. Biol. Rev. 99, 1357–1390 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dodd, J. A., Vilizzi, L., Bean, C. W., Davison, P. I. & Copp, G. H. At what spatial scale should risk screenings of translocated freshwater fishes be undertaken – river basin district or climo-geographic designation? Biol. Conserv. 230, 122–130 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  15. Robertson, P. A. et al. A proposed unified framework to describe the management of biological invasions. Biol. Invasions 22, 2633–2645 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

J.S. was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 42301064). J.D.O. was supported by the Richard C. and Lois M. Worthington Endowed Professor in Fisheries Management from the School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the conceptualization of the paper and discussions of the content. J.S. led the writing and all authors (P.J.H., A.S.T., J.D.O., E.J., S.M.G., H.Y., Y.X., M.C.L. and H.M.) contributed substantially to the drafts of the manuscript. J.S., H.Y., and Y.X. contributed to the preparation of the figure in Supplementary Note 1. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript before submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Jingrui Sun 
(孙璟睿).

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Related links

HydroBASINS: https://www.hydrosheds.org/products/hydrobasins

Supplementary information

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sun, J., Haubrock, P.J., Tarkan, A.S. et al. Basin-based science and management of freshwater invasive species.
Nat. Rev. Biodivers. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44358-026-00136-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44358-026-00136-2


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Spatiotemporal assessment of maize evapotranspiration and surface energy fluxes under varying irrigation regimes using UAV based METRIC

Publisher Correction: Nanotyrannus and Tyrannosaurus coexisted at the close of the Cretaceous