in

Biodiminution of lithium in forest floor food webs


Abstract

Lithium (Li) is an emerging contaminant of global concern due to its rapidly increasing demand for rechargeable batteries. However, concerns exist regarding its bioaccumulation and trophic transfer in natural food webs, with extremely scarce data particularly in terrestrial ecosystems. Here, we examined Li levels in soil, leaf litter and ground-dwelling invertebrates from 4 temperate forest sites across the United States (US) and 2 subtropical forest sites in Hong Kong (HK), China. Overall, we found statistical differences in Li levels between US and HK sites (p < 0.05) but not within regions (p > 0.05) while Li concentrations among invertebrates ranged from < 400 ng/g dry wt. (moths and butterflies) to ~ 9,000 ng/g dry wt. (earthworms). Indeed, biodimunition patterns (i.e., negative trophic magnification slope) were consistent among sites. Further, invertebrate classification by feeding habits revealed that the detritivorous invertebrates had the highest median Li (earthworms at 5,013 ng/g). Also, partially decomposed leaf litter retained ~ 5- to 10-fold higher Li compared to fresh litter (p < 0.05), implying that soil is the predominant source of Li to the food web components. Our study identifies that forest floor is a source of Li and suggests that the soils and decomposing litter can be an important source of Li to the lower forest floor food webs through differential feeding habits while Li does not exhibit any enrichment along the trophic transfer. We posit that detritivorous invertebrates are prone to chronic Li exposure, prompting them a priority for future Li ecological risk assessments in terrestrial ecosystems.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information (SI) file.

References

  1. Bolan, N. et al. From mine to mind and mobiles – Lithium contamination and its risk management. Environ. Pollut. 290, 118067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118067 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chow, A. T. Proactive approach to minimize lithium pollution. J. Environ. Qual. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20405 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yang, X. et al. Emerging Research Needs for Characterizing the risks of global lithium pollution under carbon neutrality strategies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57 (13), 5103–5106. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c01431 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. IEA. The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions, IEA, Paris. License: CC BY 4.0. https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-critical-minerals-in-clean-energy-transitions (2021). Accessed: 18 Dec 2025.

  5. Schlesinger, W. H., Klein, E. M., Wang, Z. & Vengosh, A. Global biogeochemical cycle of lithium. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles. 35 (8). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021gb006999 (2021).

  6. Li, W. & Achal, V. Environmental and health impacts due to e-waste disposal in China – A review. Sci. Total Environ. 737, 139745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139745 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Choi, H. B., Ryu, J. S., Shin, W. J. & Vigier, N. The impact of anthropogenic inputs on lithium content in river and tap water. Nat. Commun. 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13376-y (2019).

  8. Gao, S. et al. Urban geochemistry and human-impacted imprint of dissolved trace and rare earth elements in a high-tech industrial city, Suzhou. Elementa: Sci. Anthropocene. 9 (1), 00151. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.00151 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Franzaring, J., Schlosser, S., Damsohn, W. & Fangmeier, A. Regional differences in plant levels and investigations on the phytotoxicity of lithium. Environ. Pollut. 216, 858–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.06.059 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Đorđević, D. et al. The influence of exploration activities of a potential lithium mine to the environment in Western Serbia. Sci. Rep. 14 (1), 17090. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-68072-9 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yang, X. et al. Lithium pollution and its associated health risks in the largest lithium extraction industrial area in China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 58 (26), 11637–11648. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c00225 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Guo, M. et al. Trends in metal(loid) biulation in aquatic organisms: A bibliometric analysisoaccum from 1963 to 2024. Ecol. Ind. 176, 113707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113707 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Joubert, T., Greyvenstein, B., Marcelo-Silva, J. & Siebert, S. J. Transfer of potentially toxic metals and metalloids from terrestrial plants to arthropods—A mini review. Ecol. Res. 39 (6), 809–821. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1703.12532 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Xu, Z., Zhang, Z. & Wang, X. Ecotoxicological effects of soil lithium on earthworm Eisenia fetida: Lethality, bioaccumulation, biomarker responses, and histopathological changes. Environ. Pollut. 330, 121748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121748 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thibon, F. et al. Large-scale survey of lithium concentrations in marine organisms. Sci. Total Environ. 751, 141453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141453 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zou, C., Wang, R., Yang, S. & Yin, D. Importance of salinity on regulating the environmental fate and bioaccumulation of lithium in the Yangtze River Estuary. Sci. Total Environ. 954, 176648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176648 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Li, X., Gao, P., Gjetvaj, B., Westcott, N. & Gruber, M. Y. Analysis of the metabolome and transcriptome of Brassica carinata seedlings after lithium chloride exposure. Plant Sci. 177 (1), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.03.013 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lemarchand, E., Chabaux, F., Vigier, N., Millot, R. & Pierret, M. C. Lithium isotope systematics in a forested granitic catchment (Strengbach, Vosges Mountains, France). Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 74 (16), 4612–4628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2010.04.057 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Figueroa, L. T. et al. Environmental lithium exposure in the north of Chile—II. Natural food sources. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 151 (1), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-012-9543-1 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Robinson, B. H., Yalamanchali, R., Reiser, R. & Dickinson, N. M. Lithium as an emerging environmental contaminant: Mobility in the soil-plant system. Chemosphere 197, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.01.012 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kashin, V. K. Lithium in soils and plants of western Transbaikalia. Eurasian Soil. Sci. 52 (4), 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229319040094 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Iordache, A. M., Voica, C., Roba, C. & Nechita, C. Lithium content and its nutritional beneficence, dietary intake, and impact on human health in edibles from the Romanian market. Foods (Basel Switzerland). 13 (4), 592. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13040592 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liu, X. et al. Rapid and significant lithium isotope response to afforestation in Icelandic topsoils. CATENA 254, 108967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2025.108967 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kabata-Pendias, A. & Mukherjee, A. B. Trace Elements from Soil to Human (Springer, 2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32714-1

  25. Strohfeldt, K. A. Essentials of Inorganic Chemistry: For students of pharmacy, pharmaceutical science and medicinal chemistry (Wiley, 2015).

  26. Poet, M. et al. Biological fractionation of lithium isotopes by cellular Na+/H+ exchangers unravels fundamental transport mechanisms. iScience 26 (6), 106887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.106887 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Portillo-Estrada, M. et al. Climatic controls on leaf litter decomposition across European forests and grasslands revealed by reciprocal litter transplantation experiments. Biogeosciences 13 (5), 1621–1633. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-1621-2016 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Seibold, S., Rammer, W., Hothorn, T., Seidl, R., Ulyshen, M. D., Lorz, J., Cadotte,M. W., Lindenmayer, D. B., Adhikari, Y. P., Aragón, R., Bae, S., Baldrian, P., Barimani Varandi, H., Barlow, J., Bässler, C., Beauchêne, J., Berenguer, E., Bergamin, R. S.,Birkemoe, T., Müller, J. The contribution of insects to global forest deadwood decomposition. Nature, 597 (7874), 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03740-8 (2021).

  29. Rosenberg, Y. et al. The global biomass and number of terrestrial arthropods. Sci. Adv. 9 (5). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abq4049 (2023).

  30. Peterson, B. J. & Fry, B. Stable isotopes in ecosystem studies. Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18, 293–320 (1987). https://www.jstor.org/stable/2097134

    Google Scholar 

  31. Badeck, F. W., Tcherkez, G., Nogués, S., Piel, C. & Ghashghaie, J. Post-photosynthetic fractionation of stable carbon isotopes between plant organs—a widespread phenomenon. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 19 (11), 1381–1391. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.1912 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cornwell, W. K., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Amatangelo, K., Dorrepaal, E., Eviner, V.T., Godoy, O., Hobbie, S. E., Hoorens, B., Kurokawa, H., Pérez-Harguindeguy, N., Quested,H. M., Santiago, L. S., Wardle, D. A., Wright, I. J., Aerts, R., Allison, S. D., Van Bodegom, P., Brovkin, V., Chatain, A., Westoby, M. Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide.Ecology Letters, 11 (10), 1065–1071. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01219.x (2008).

  33. McCutchan, J. H., Lewis, W. M., Kendall, C. & McGrath, C. C. Variation in trophic shift for stable isotope ratios of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur. Oikos (Copenhagen Denmark). 102 (2), 378–390. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12098.x (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hyodo, F. et al. The structure of a food web in a tropical rain forest in Malaysia based on carbon and nitrogen stable isotope ratios. J. Trop. Ecol. 26 (2), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467409990502 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pollierer, M. M., Langel, R., Körner, C., Maraun, M. & Scheu, S. The underestimated importance of belowground carbon input for forest soil animal food webs. Ecol. Lett. 10 (8), 729–736. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01064.x (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Birkhofer, K., Wise, D. H. & Scheu, S. Subsidy from the detrital food web, but not microhabitat complexity, affects the role of generalist predators in an aboveground herbivore food web. Oikos (Copenhagen Denmark). 117 (4), 494–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16361.x (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Jardine, T. D., Kidd, K. A. & Fisk, A. T. Applications, considerations, and sources of uncertainty when using stable isotope analysis in ecotoxicology. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40 (24), 7501–7511. https://doi.org/10.1021/es061263h (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Buchmann, N., Kao, W. & Ehleringer, J. Influence of stand structure on carbon-13 of vegetation, soils, and canopy air within deciduous and evergreen forests in Utah, United States. Oecologia 110 (1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050139 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gangwere, S. K. Food Habits of Insects. In Encyclopedia of Entomology (pp. 896–903). Kluwer Academic Publishers. (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48380-7_1667

  40. Shahzad, B. et al. Lithium toxicity in plants: Reasons, mechanisms and remediation possibilities – A review. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 107, 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.05.034 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Borovik-Romanova, T. F. The Content of Lithium in Plants. In: The Content of Lithium in Plants (Khitarov N.I. (ed.)). Trans. USSR: Inst. Geokem. Akad. Nauk. In: (1965).

  42. Soliman, M. et al. Trophic transfer of heavy metals across a food chain in a wastewater-irrigated agroecosystem. Environ. Monit. Assess. 196 (11), 1082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-024-13179-9 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mao, B., Yu, Z. Y. & Zeng, D. H. Non-additive effects of species mixing on litter mass loss and chemical properties in a Mongolian pine plantation of Northeast China. Plant. Soil. 396 (1–2), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2593-3 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  44. De Santo, A. V., Fierro, A., Berg, B., Rutigliano, F. A. & De Marco, A. Heavy metals and litter decomposition in coniferous forests. In Developments in Soil Science (Vol. 28, pp. 63–78). Elsevier. (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2481(02)80044-7

  45. Scheid, S., Günthardt-Goerg, M. S., Schulin, R. & Nowack, B. Accumulation and solubility of metals during leaf litter decomposition in non-polluted and polluted soil. Eur. J. Soil. Sci. 60 (4), 613–621. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01153.x (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hopkin, S. P. & Martin, M. H. Assimilation of zinc, cadmium, lead, copper, and iron by the spider Dysdera crocata, a predator of woodlice. Bull. Environ Contam. Toxicol. 34 (1), 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01609722 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hendrickx, F., Maelfait, J. & Langenbick, F. Absence of cadmium excretion and high assimilation result in cadmium biomagnification in a wolf spider. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 55 (3), 287–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-6513(02)00129-X (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Knutti, R. et al. Cadmium in the Invertebrate Fauna of an Unpolluted Forest in Switzerland pp. 171–191 (Springer, 1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70553-3_14

  49. Roodbergen, M., Klok, C. & Van Der Hout, A. Transfer of heavy metals in the food chain earthworm Black-tailed godwit (Limosa limosa): Comparison of a polluted and a reference site in The Netherlands. Sci. Total Environ. 406 (3), 407–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.051 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Dallinger, R. Strategies of Metal Detoxification in Terrestrial. In Ecotoxicology of metals in invertebrates (pp. 245–289). (1993).

  51. Vijver, M., Wolterbeek, H., Vink, J. & Vangestel, C. Surface adsorption of metals onto the earthworm Lumbricus rubellus and the isopod Porcellio scaber is negligible compared to absorption in the body. Sci. Total Environ. 340 (1–3), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.12.018 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kraus, J. M. et al. Metamorphosis alters contaminants and chemical tracers in insects: Implications for food webs. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48 (18), 10957–10965. https://doi.org/10.1021/es502970b (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Snodgrass, R. E. The Caterpillar and the Butterfly. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections Volume 143, Number 6. Smithsonian Institution. (1961).

  54. Bauerfeind, S. S. & Fischer, K. Effects of adult-derived carbohydrates, amino acids and micronutrients on female reproduction in a fruit-feeding butterfly. J. Insect. Physiol. 51 (5), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2005.02.002 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Schrauzer, G. N. Lithium: Occurrence, dietary intakes, nutritional essentiality. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 21 (1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2002.10719188 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Van Huis, A. Potential of insects as food and feed in assuring food security. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 58 (1), 563–583. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153704 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Van Kolck, M., Huijbregts, M. A. J., Veltman, K. & Hendriks, A. J. Estimating bioconcentration factors, lethal concentrations and critical body residues of metals in the mollusks Perna Viridis and Mytilus Edulis using ion characteristics. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 27 (2), 272–276. https://doi.org/10.1897/07-224R.1 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Tsui, M. T. K. et al. Controls of methylmercury bioaccumulation in forest floor food webs. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53 (5), 2434–2440. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b06053 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Holter, P. & Scholtz, C. H. What do dung beetles eat? Ecol. Entomol. 32 (6), 690–697. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2007.00915.x (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Sanzone, D. M. et al. Carbon and nitrogen transfer from a desert stream to riparian predators. Oecologia 134 (2), 238–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-1113-3 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Baxter, C. V., Fausch, K. D., Saunders, C. & W Tangled webs: Reciprocal flows of invertebrate prey link streams and riparian zones. Freshw. Biol. 50 (2), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01328.x (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Borgå, K. et al. Trophic magnification factors: Considerations of ecology, ecosystems, and study design. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 8 (1), 64–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.244 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Ogle, D. H., Doll, J. C., Wheeler, A. P. & Dinno, A. FSA: Simple Fisheries Stock Assessment Methods. Compr. R Archive Netw. 0101. https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.FSA (2025).

Download references

Funding

This study was financially supported by a National Science Foundation (USA) award (DEB-1354811) and a General Research Fund award from the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (14300724).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

N.M. and M.C. performed the work. N.M. conducted the data analysis and wrote the manuscript draft. M.T. provided resources, supervised, and reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Martin Tsz-Ki Tsui.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Material 1. (download DOCX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muisa, N., Cheng, M.LH. & Tsui, M.TK. Biodiminution of lithium in forest floor food webs.
Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46717-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46717-1

Keywords

  • Forest floor food chain
  • Earthworms
  • Feeding habit
  • Biodiminution
  • Non-essential elements


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Soil health improvement and climate change mitigation in soybean agroecosystems

Improving rare-class detection in deep-sea imagery via generative augmentation with stable diffusion

Back to Top