Abstract
This study assessed the fuel requirement and annual fuel-based heating cost of conventional diesel (F0), raw biomass (F1), low-severity torrefied biomass (F2), and high-severity torrefied biomass (F3) for greenhouse heating across different climatic regions of Korea. Heating demand was estimated for seven major horticultural regions using climate-based data and crop-specific day/night setpoint temperatures and cultivation periods for strawberry, tomato, and paprika, which represent greenhouse crops with contrasting thermal requirements and production schedules. Fuel consumption and annual fuel-based heating cost were then compared across fuel options. Additional analyses included price sensitivity testing, an equal-efficiency scenario, transport-distance scenarios, break-even analysis, and decision-boundary mapping. Annual heating demand was lowest in Jeju and highest in Chuncheon for all crops, and increased in the order of strawberry, tomato, and paprika. Under the baseline assumptions, high-severity torrefied biomass (F3) showed the lowest estimated fuel requirement and annual fuel-based heating cost across all crops and regions. This ranking was maintained under the equal-efficiency scenario and under transport-distance scenarios from 0 to 200 km, in which both the fixed biomass logistics cost and the distance-dependent transport cost were included. In the decision-space analysis, F3 occupied the largest share (53.49%), followed by F1 (39.34%) and F2 (7.17%), indicating that F3 was not universally dominant across all price conditions. The break-even prices relative to raw biomass were 0.294 USD/kg for F2 and 0.442 USD/kg for F3 under the baseline transport condition. Overall, under the assumed fuel properties, delivered-price structure, transport-cost assumptions, and standardised greenhouse conditions, high-severity torrefied biomass showed favourable fuel-cost performance among the evaluated scenarios. However, its competitiveness was conditional on the interaction between raw biomass price, torrefaction premium, transport distance, and greenhouse heat-demand conditions. Therefore, the results should be interpreted as a screening-level fuel-cost comparison rather than as a direct prediction of farm-level heating bills.
Similar content being viewed by others
Assessing thermal hazards and toxicity of raw biomass particles from prevalent agricultural crops in China
Artificial intelligence models development for profitability factor prediction in concentrated solar power with dual backup systems
Bioenergy potential of agricultural straw residues from Southern Spain
Funding
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea [grant number NR060130 and 2022R1C1C2009821].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary Material 1 (download DOCX )
Supplementary Material 2 (download XLSX )
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Park, S., Oh, K.C. & Kim, D. Climate-driven fuel-cost-based assessment of raw and torrefied biomass for greenhouse heating across different climatic regions of Korea.
Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-59325-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-59325-w
Source: Ecology - nature.com
