Abstract
Mepiquat (MPQ) is a quaternary ammonium salt widely used as a growth regulator in agriculture. A recent report from the European Union Reference Laboratory for Single Residue Methods (EURL SRM) reported MPQ residues in Egyptian sweet potatoes at levels that raised some concern. Hence, this study aimed to develop and validate a fast, effective extraction method coupled with LC-MS/MS for MPQ analysis in Egypt. Initially, the QuEChERS citrate buffered method was tested, but it showed significant fluctuation in spike recovery (30%-72%). A systematic investigation revealed that recovery differed depending on the amount of residual soil in the sweet potato samples. Two key observations were made: (1) Clay loam negatively affected recovery more than sandy loam, and (2) the “dilute and shoot” Quick Polar Pesticides (QuPPe) method was less impacted by residual soil. By applying exponential decay equation modelling, it was proved that residual soil can remain on the sweet potato even after 10 min washing. A study on the effect of washing for 10 min was done using real contaminated samples and it showed that about 30% of the incurred pesticide was lost. Hence, dry scrubbing was used for the removal of the soil on the sweet potato, in addition to the QuPPe method for sample extraction. This provides a predictive framework for understanding how residual soil influences recovery, which could be extended to other polar pesticides and root crops. The QuPPe method was validated for specificity, selectivity, accuracy, and precision, ensuring its suitability for quantitative MPQ analysis in sweet potatoes. A survey of 30 samples showed that only four tested positives for MPQ, with one exceeding the maximum residue limits.
Data availability
The datasets generated and analysed during this study, including raw LC–MS/MS files, and recovery validation results, are available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
Riediker, S., Obrist, H., Varga, N. & Stadler, R. H. Determination of Chlormequat and mepiquat in pear, tomato, and wheat flour using on-line solid-phase extraction (Prospekt) coupled with liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A. 966, 15–23 (2002).
Alder, L. et al. Determination of Chlormequat and mepiquat in foods by liquid Chromatography/Mass spectrometry or liquid Chromatography/Tandem mass spectrometry: interlaboratory study. J. AOAC Int. 88, 1762–1776 (2005).
Álvarez, F. et al. Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance mepiquat (evaluated variant mepiquat chloride). EFSA J. 22, e8923 (2024).
Esparza, X., Moyano, E. & Galceran, M. T. Analysis of Chlormequat and mepiquat by hydrophilic interaction chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry in food samples. J. Chromatogr. A. 1216, 4402–4406 (2009).
Andersen, J., Bille, R. & Granby, K. An intercomparison study of the determination of glyphosate, Chlormequat and mepiquat residues in wheat. Food Addit. Contam. 24, 140–148 (2007).
Gao, J. et al. A highly sensitive method for simultaneous determination of the quaternary ammonium pesticides Chlormequat and mepiquat in Pears and potatoes by modified QuEChERS-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. RSC Adv. 5, 5895–5903 (2014).
Anagnostopoulos, C. J. et al. Imultaneous determination of different classes of plant growth regulator in high water content agricultural products by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry and time of flight mass spectrometryJ. Liq Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 36, 315–335 (2013).
Urban, M., Hann, S. & Rost, H. Simultaneous determination of pesticides, mycotoxins, tropane alkaloids, growth regulators, and pyrrolizidine alkaloids in Oats and whole wheat grains after online clean-up via two-dimensional liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. J. Environ. Sci. Health B. 54, 98–111 (2019).
Hamda, Ahmad, M. Q., Saleem, A., Yan, H. & Li, Q. Biofortified sweet potato—an ideal source of mitigating hidden hunger. Biofortification Grain Veg. Crop Mol. Breed. Approaches. 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91735-3.00013-3 (2024).
Qin, Y., Naumovski, N., Ranadheera, C. S. & D’Cunha, N. M. Nutrition-related health outcomes of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) consumption: A systematic review. Food Biosci. 50, 102208 (2022).
F EL-Sayed, S. S., Wadod, E. A. E., Influence of planting and harvest dates on the productivity and storage ability of two sweet potato cultivars to face the climate changes. 2- storability and storage root quality. Minia J. Agric. Res. Dev. 43, 269–290 (2023).
Tang, C. et al. Recent advances on the biological activities of purple sweet potato anthocyanins. Food Biosci. 53, 102670 (2023).
Garg, N. Technology for the production of agricultural wines. Sci. Technol. Fruit Wine Prod. 463–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800850-8.00008-9 (2017).
CAPMAS. The movement of production and foreign trade of agricultural commodities 2021. (2021).
Attallah, E. R., Amer, M. E. & Gomaa, A. M. El Gohary, A. A. QuEChERS analytical method for determination of 93 pesticide residues in apples and potatoes using LC-MS/MS. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 8, 5690–5697 (2012).
FAO-WHO. Maximum Residue Limits | CODEXALIMENTARIUS FAO-WHO. (2025).
EU. EU legislation on MRLs – European Commission. (2025).
European Commission. EU Pesticides Database – MRLs – Pesticide residue(s) and maximum residue levels (mg_kg). (2024).
EURL-SRM. Residue Findings of QuPPe-Compounds in Samples of Plant Origin from the German Market in 2023. (2023).
Anastassiades, M., Lehotay, S. J., Štajnbaher, D. & Schenck, F. J. Fast and easy multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction/Partitioning and dispersive Solid-Phase extraction for the determination of pesticide residues in produce. J. AOAC Int. 86, 412–431 (2003).
EURL-SRM. QuPPe: About the method. (2024).
Mamdouh, M., Amer, M. E. & Omran, A. Analysing multi-class pesticide residues in tilapia fish: development and validation of LC-MS/MS and GC-MS/MS methods. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2024.2349798 (2024).
He, Z. et al. Multiresidue analysis of over 200 pesticides in cereals using a quechers and gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry-based method. Food Chem. 169, 372–380 (2015).
Lesueur, C., Knittl, P., Gartner, M., Mentler, A. & Fuerhacker, M. Analysis of 140 pesticides from conventional farming foodstuff samples after extraction with the modified quechers method. Food Control. 19, 906–914 (2008).
Union, E. Analytical quality control and method validation procedures for pesticide residues analysis in food and feed SANTE 11312/2021. Doc. N° SANTE. 11945/2015, 1–57 (2021).
Diallo, T. et al. Wide-scope screening of multi-class contaminants in seafood using a novel sample Preparation (QuEChUP) procedure coupled with UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS: application for semi-quantitation of real seafood samples. Food Chem. 426, 136572 (2023).
Zoghi, P. & Mafigholami, R. Optimisation of soil washing method for removal of petroleum hydrocarbons from contaminated soil around oil storage tanks using response surface methodology. Sci. Rep. 2023 131 (13), 15457 (2023).
Anastassiades, M. et al. EURLs for residues of pesticides single residue methods EUPT-SRM19 (Grape-Matrix) and News from SRM. (2024).
Juhler, R. K., Henriksen, T., Rosenbom, A. E. & Kjaer, J. Fate and transport of Chlormequat in subsurface environments. Environ. Sci. Pollut Res. 17, 1245–1256 (2010).
Flamminii, F., Minetti, S., Mollica, A., Cichelli, A. & Cerretani, L. The effect of washing, blanching and frozen storage on pesticide residue in spinach. Foods 12, (2023).
Jalhoum, E. M. & S. Sil characteristics and landforms relationship in the northwestern coast, Egypt.,J. Soil. Sci. Agric. Eng. Mansoura Univ. 5, 739–753 (2014).
Attallah, E. R., Soliman, M. & Abo-Aly, M. M. Determination of Diquat residues in potato using reversed-phase liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. J. AOAC Int. 100, 789–795 (2017).
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the use of the facilities, equipment, and resources of the Central Laboratory of Residue Analysis of Pesticides and Heavy Metals in Foods (QCAP) during the period of the development of this paper. The authors also thank all staff members at QCAP laboratory. FundingOpen access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Mohamed Wageed: Investigation, methodology, validation, and Writing – original draft, Hend A. Mahmoud: Supervision, M.I. Abdel-Megeed: Resources, Ramadan Sayed: Investigation, methodology, validation, and Writing – original draft, Hassan A. El-Gammal: Formal analysis and methodolgy, Mostafa Soliman: Investigation, Conceptualization, Methodology, Visualization, Validation, and Writing – review & editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wageed, M., Mahmoud, H.A., Abdel-Megeed, M.I. et al. Comparative evaluation of QuEChERS and the ‘dilute and shoot’ QuPPe extraction methods coupled with LC-MS/MS for the analysis of mepiquat residue in sweet potatoes: addressing residual soil impact on recovery efficiency.
Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37007-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37007-x
Keywords
- Mepiquat
- QuPPe
- QuEChERS
- Sweet potatoes
- LC-MS/MS
- Soil
Source: Ecology - nature.com
