Abstract
Symbiotic interactions frequently shift along a mutualism-parasitism continuum, altering host fitness, population dynamics, and microbial community structure with ecological context. Here, we integrate field surveys, reciprocal breeding experiments, feeding assays, and microbiome profiling to dissect interactions between phoretic mite (Poecilochirus carabi), nematode (Rhomborhabditis regina), and their burying beetle host (Nicrophorus nepalensis) during reproduction. We show that high nematode densities reduce beetle offspring survival during metamorphosis, but co-occurring mites mitigate these costs by preying on nematodes and suppressing vertical transmission, thereby enhancing beetle fitness. Both mites and nematodes are equally effective at suppressing bacterial loads on carrion, but mites drive greater shifts in carcass microbiome composition. Carcasses exposed to both symbionts display the most pronounced shifts in bacterial communities, suggesting that inter-symbiont interactions have cascading effects on host-associated microbiota. Intriguingly, in the absence of nematodes, mites impose fitness costs on their beetle hosts. These results demonstrate that the net effects of mites on beetle fitness emerge largely through indirect, density-dependent interactions with nematodes and microbial competitors. By integrating macro-symbiont and microbiome perspectives, our study highlights how phoresy extends beyond passive dispersal to actively restructure host–symbiont networks, highlighting the overlooked potential of indirect effects in driving context-dependent mutualism within multisymbiotic systems.
Data availability
The source data behind the figures in the paper are available in Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17397723)54. Nucleotide sequence data have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers PZ145830–PZ145848. Raw 16S rRNA gene sequencing reads have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject accession PRJNA1435584. Any remaining information can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Code availability
The R script for our analyses was deposited in Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17397723)54.
References
Pawlowska, T. E. Symbioses between fungi and bacteria: from mechanisms to impacts on biodiversity. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 80, 102496 (2024).
Mutualism. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2015).
Chomicki, G., Beinart, R., Prada, C., Ritchie, K. B. & Weber, M. G. Editorial: symbiotic relationships as shapers of biodiversity. Front. Ecol. Evol. 10, (2022).
Sun, S.-J., Horrocks, N. P. C. & Kilner, R. M. Conflict within species determines the value of a mutualism between species. Evol. Lett. 3, 185–197 (2019).
Drew, G. C., Stevens, E. J. & King, K. C. Microbial evolution and transitions along the parasite–mutualist continuum. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 19, 623–638 (2021).
Rogalski, M. A., Stewart Merrill, T., Gowler, C. D., Cáceres, C. E. & Duffy, M. A. Context-dependent host-symbiont interactions: shifts along the Parasitism-Mutualism Continuum. Am. Nat. 198, 563–575 (2021).
Chamberlain, S. A., Bronstein, J. L. & Rudgers, J. A. How context dependent are species interactions? Ecol. Lett. 17, 881–890 (2014).
Becks, L., Gaedke, U. & Klauschies, T. Emergent feedback between symbiosis form and population dynamics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 0, (2025).
Sun, S.-J., Chen, S., Federle, W. & Kilner, R. M. Biomechanical adaptations enable phoretic mite species to occupy distinct spatial niches on host burying beetles. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 291, 20240230 (2024).
Cibils-Stewart, X. et al. Mycorrhizal fungi compromise production of endophytic alkaloids, increasing plant susceptibility to an aphid herbivore. J. Ecol. 1–14 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14410.
Susi, H., Barrès, B., Vale, P. F. & Laine, A.-L. Co-infection alters population dynamics of infectious disease. Nat. Commun. 6, 5975 (2015).
Dziuba, M. K. et al. Microsporidian coinfection reduces fitness of a fungal pathogen due to rapid host mortality. mBio 15, e00583-24 (2024).
Wilson, D. S. & Knollenberg, W. G. Adaptive indirect effects: the fitness of burying beetles with and without their phoretic mites. Evol. Ecol. 1, 139–159 (1987).
Granroth-Wilding, H. M. V. et al. Indirect effects of parasitism: costs of infection to other individuals can be greater than direct costs borne by the host. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 282, 20150602 (2015).
Six, D. L. & Wingfield, M. J. The role of phytopathogenicity in bark beetle–fungus symbioses: a challenge to the classic paradigm. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 56, 255–272 (2011).
Klepzig, K. D. & Wilkens, R. T. Competitive interactions among symbiotic fungi of the southern pine beetle. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63, 621–627 (1997).
Lee, J. H., Kim, T. W. & Choe, J. C. Commensalism or mutualism: conditional outcomes in a branchiobdellid-crayfish symbiosis. Oecologia 159, 217–224 (2009).
Sun, S.-J. & Kilner, R. M. Temperature stress induces mites to help their carrion beetle hosts by eliminating rival blowflies. eLife 9, e55649 (2020).
Ben-Ami, F., Mouton, L. & Ebert, D. T. H. E. Effects of multiple infections on the expression and evolution of virulence in a Daphnia-endoparasite system. Evolution 62, 1700–1711 (2008).
Mideo, N. Parasite adaptations to within-host competition. Trends Parasitol. 25, 261–268 (2009).
Rio, R. V. M., Wu, Y., Filardo, G. & Aksoy, S. Dynamics of multiple symbiont density regulation during host development: tsetse fly and its microbial flora. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 273, 805–814 (2006).
Ramsay, C. & Rohr, J. R. Identity and density of parasite exposures alter the outcome of coinfections: Implications for management. J. Appl. Ecol. 60, 205–214 (2023).
Sun, S.-J. A framework for using phoresy to assess ecological transition into parasitism and mutualism. Symbiosis 86, 133–138 (2022).
White, P. S., Morran, L. & Roode, J. de. Phoresy. Curr. Biol. 27, R578–R580 (2017).
De Gasperin, O. & Kilner, R. M. Friend or foe: inter-specific interactions and conflicts of interest within the family. Ecol. Entomol. 40, 787–795 (2015).
Wang, Y. & Rozen, D. E. Fitness costs of phoretic nematodes in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides. Ecol. Evol. 9, 26–35 (2019).
Grisez, C., Perrin, W., Begou, M., Jay-Robert, P. & Jacquiet, P. An initial investigation of the predatory activity of the phoretic mites of dung beetles, Macrocheles sp. (Mesostigmata: Macrochelidae), on the gastrointestinal nematode of sheep Haemonchus contortus (Strongylida: Trichostrongylidae). Biol. Control 185, 105301 (2023).
Gasperin, O. D. & Kilner, R. M. Interspecific interactions and the scope for parent-offspring conflict: high mite density temporarily changes the trade-off between offspring size and number in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides. PLoS ONE 11, e0150969 (2016).
Scott, M. P. The ecology and behavior of burying beetles. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 43, 595–618 (1998).
Richter, S. Phoretic Association Between the Dauerjuveniles of Rhabditis Stammeri (Rhabditidae) and Life History Stages of the Burying Beetle Nicrophorus Vespilloides (Coleoptera: Silphidae). (1993) https://doi.org/10.1163/187529293X00295.
Rozen, D. E., Engelmoer, D. J. P. & Smiseth, P. T. Antimicrobial strategies in burying beetles breeding on carrion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 17890–17895 (2008).
Manegold, A. & Kiontke, K. The association of two Diplogasteroides species (Secernentea: Diplogastrina) and cockchafers (Melolontha spp., Scarabaeidae). (2001) https://doi.org/10.1163/156854101753389211.
Duarte, A. et al. No evidence of a cleaning mutualism between burying beetles and their phoretic mites. Sci. Rep. 7, 13838 (2017).
Dunkley, K., Ward, A. J. W., Perkins, S. E. & Cable, J. To clean or not to clean: Cleaning mutualism breakdown in a tidal environment. Ecol. Evol. 10, 3043–3054 (2020).
Sun, S.-J. & Kilner, R. M. Competition among host-specific lineages of Poecilochirus carabi mites influences the extent of co-adaptation with their Nicrophorus vespilloides burying beetle hosts. Ecol. Evol. 14, e10837 (2024).
Toft, S. & Wise, D. H. Growth, development, and survival of a generalist predator fed single- and mixed-species diets of different quality. Oecologia 119, 191–197 (1999).
Carter, D. O., Yellowlees, D. & Tibbett, M. Cadaver decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Naturwissenschaften 94, 12–24 (2007).
Solter, L. F., Lustigman, B. & Shubeck, P. Survey of medically important true bacteria found associated with carrion beetles (Coleoptera: Silphidae). J. Med. Entomol. 26, 354–359 (1989).
Galac, M. R. & Lazzaro, B. P. Comparative pathology of bacteria in the genus Providencia to a natural host, Drosophila melanogaster. Microbes Infect. 13, 673–683 (2011).
Kopf, A. et al. Identification and antibiotic profiling of Wohlfahrtiimonas chitiniclastica, an underestimated human pathogen. Front. Microbiol. 12, 712775 (2021).
Hall, C. L. et al. Inhibition of microorganisms on a carrion breeding resource: the antimicrobial peptide activity of burying beetle (Coleoptera: Silphidae) oral and anal secretions. Environ. Entomol. 40, 669–678 (2011).
Lee, J. K. et al. Wohlfahrtiimonas larvae sp. nov., isolated from the larval gut of Hermetia illucens (Diptera: Stratiomyidae). Antonie Van. Leeuwenhoek 105, 15–21 (2014).
Schulte, F. & Poinar, G. Description of Rhabditis (Rhabditoides) regina n. sp. (Nematoda: Rhabditidae) from the body cavity of beetle larvae in Guatemala. Rev. Nématol 14, 165–180 (1991).
Nunn, G. B. Nematode Molecular Evolution: An Investigation of Evolutionary Patterns Among Nematodes Based Upon DNA Sequences. (University of Nottingham, 1992).
Jarrett, B. J. M. et al. A sustained change in the supply of parental care causes adaptive evolution of offspring morphology. Nat. Commun. 9, 3987 (2018).
Malik, T. G., Jarrett, B. J. M. & Sun, S.-J. The effect of experimental warming on reproductive performance and parental care in the burying beetle Nicrophorus nepalensis. R. Soc. Open Sci. 11, 240653 (2024).
Atlas, R. M. Handbook of Microbiological Media. (CRC Press, 2010). https://doi.org/10.1201/EBK1439804063.
Toju, H., Tanabe, A. S., Yamamoto, S. & Sato, H. High-coverage ITS primers for the DNA-based identification of Ascomycetes and Basidiomycetes in environmental samples. PLoS ONE 7, e40863 (2012).
Core, R. Team. lme4. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (2024).
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).
Lenth, R. V. et al. emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. (2025).
Hartig, F., Lohse, L. & Leite, M. de S. DHARMa: Residual Diagnostics for Hierarchical (Multi-Level / Mixed) Regression Models. (2024).
Steiger, S. Bigger mothers are better mothers: disentangling size-related prenatal and postnatal maternal effects. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 280, 20131225 (2013).
Lee, Y.-H. et al. Context-dependent indirect effects mediate ecological transitions between parasitism and mutualism [Date set]. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17397723 (2025).
Acknowledgements
We thank the four anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments on this manuscript. We thank Megan M.Y. Chang for helping with illustrations. We thank Shao-Chi Huang, Yi-Fei Fang, Yi-Zhen Wu and Yi-Ta Wu for logistic support in the lab. We are very grateful to Chia-Lin Chung for comments on this manuscript, as well as support for bacterial culturing assay. Y.-H.L. was supported by a College Student Research Scholarship, National Science and Technology Council (113CFA0100068); S.-J.S. was supported by the NTU New Faculty Founding Research Grant, National Science and Technology Council 2030 Cross-Generation Young Scholars Program (112-2628-B-002-013-; 113-2628-B-002-028-; 114-2628-B-002-027-), Academic Research-Career Development Project (Sprout Research Projects; 114L7869) provided by National Taiwan University, and the Yushan Fellow Program (MOE-111-YSFAG-0003-002-P1) provided by the Ministry of Education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.-H.L. and S.-J.S. conceived the study. Y.-H.L., W.-J.L., M.-T.T., B.L., Y.-L. C. and S.-J.S. collected the data. Y.-H.L. and J.-I.Y. conducted the nematode identification. Y.-H.L. and S.-J.S. analysed the data. All authors wrote the paper and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Biology thanks Enric Frago and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Rupali Sathe. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )
Supplementary Information (download PDF )
Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download PDF )
Video S1 (download MP4 )
Video S2 (download MP4 )
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, YH., Lin, WJ., Tsai, MT. et al. Context-dependent indirect effects mediate ecological transitions between parasitism and mutualism.
Commun Biol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09945-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09945-9
Source: Ecology - nature.com
