Abstract
Time-series gridded population datasets are foundational resources for diverse fields, from public health to sustainable development. Current datasets’ evaluations primarily focus on their cross-sectional accuracy, and their applications often carry an implicit assumption that datasets with higher cross-sectional accuracy are more effective in representing population dynamics. This study evaluated six time-series gridded population datasets (CnPop, GHS-POP, GlobPop, GPWv4, LandScan, and WorldPop) using high-resolution Chinese township-level census data (2010 and 2020). The findings challenge this assumption. Although most time-series datasets exhibited high cross-sectional accuracy (Pearson’s r with census data exceeding 0.8), their ability to accurately represent decadal population change was severely limited. Specifically, these datasets showed substantial inaccuracies in identifying the population decline trends and weak performance in capturing the magnitude of change (Pearson’s r ≤ 0.27). Notably, despite excelling in cross-sectional accuracy, both GlobPop and WorldPop performed below the average rate (53.25%) in capturing the direction of decadal population change. Conversely, CnPop, which exhibited the lowest cross-sectional accuracy, achieved the highest directional accuracy rate (60.42%). These results underscore the significant limitations of existing gridded datasets in capturing population changes during China’s rapid urbanization and highlight the need for careful evaluation before application. Improvements in future gridded population data production can be achieved by enhancing input data quality and advancing spatiotemporal modeling techniques, enabling better representation of population dynamics, rather than focusing solely on cross-sectional precision.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 42101099, 42161021) and the Guangdong Office of Philosophy and Social Science (Grant Nos. GD23XYJ87).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
Ethical approval was not required as the study did not involve human participants.
Informed consent
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information (download DOCX )
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, L., Fu, S., Zhou, X. et al. Cross-sectional accuracy does not imply the reliability of population change in gridded population datasets of China.
Humanit Soc Sci Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-07688-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-07688-w
Source: Ecology - nature.com
