in

Digitally native species are a necessary shift in taxonomic practice


Biodiversity science laments how little is known about the planet’s biodiversity, yet routinely discards much of the taxonomic evidence generated during species description. Digitally native species conceived and maintained in machine-actionable environments can both address shortcomings and broaden participation in taxonomy.

Access through your institution

Buy or subscribe

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Taxonomic workflows.

References

  1. Bánki, O. et al. Catalogue of Life (2025-11-16 XR) (Catalogue of Life Foundation, 2025); https://doi.org/10.48580/dgvbl.

  2. Miralles, A. et al. Repositories for taxonomic data: where we are and what is missing. Syst. Biol. 69, 1231–1253 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  3. Godfray, H. C. J. Jr. Linnaeus in the information age. Nature 446, 259–260 (2007).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  4. Renner, S. S. Linking to images and AI-based identification tools—the only way for flora projects to survive. Plants People Planet 8, 452–460 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  5. Agosti, D., Catapano, T., Sautter, G. & Egloff, W. The Plazi workflow: the PDF prison break for biodiversity data. Biodivers. Inf. Sci. Stand. 3, e37046 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  6. La Salle, J. et al. Accelerating taxonomic discovery through automated character extraction. Zootaxa 2217, 43–55 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wührl, L. et al. DiversityScanner: robotic handling of small invertebrates with machine learning methods. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 22, 1626–1638 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  8. Van Dam, A. R. & Štarhová Serbina, L. Descriptron: artificial intelligence for automating taxonomic species descriptions with a user-friendly software package. Syst. Entomol. 51, e70005 (2026).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  9. La Salle, J., Williams, K. J. & Moritz, C. Biodiversity analysis in the digital era. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 371, 20150337 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  10. Srivathsan, A. et al. ONTbarcoder and MinION barcodes aid biodiversity discovery and identification by everyone, for everyone. BMC Biol. 19, 217 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hartop, E., Srivathsan, A., Ronquist, F. & Meier, R. Towards large-scale integrative taxonomy (LIT): resolving the data conundrum for dark taxa. Syst. Biol. 71, 1404–1422 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  12. Torres, A., Lee, L., Srivathsan, A. & Meier, R. UITOTO: a software for generating molecular diagnoses for species descriptions. Cladistics 42, 193–205 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Rudolf Meier.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meier, R., Agosti, D. & Srivathsan, A. Digitally native species are a necessary shift in taxonomic practice.
Nat. Rev. Biodivers. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44358-026-00156-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44358-026-00156-y


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Spatiotemporal evolution and driving mechanisms of multiple scales ecological security in Shanxi Province from the perspective of service, risk and health

An explainable GeoAI framework for spatial assessment of wildfire susceptibility in the Upper Ravi sub-basin, Indian Himalaya