in

Discovery of Goethe’s amber ant: its phylogenetic and evolutionary implications


Abstract

Museum collections remain essential scientific resources, especially when revisited using modern analytical techniques. In an interdisciplinary study, we examined the overlooked amber collection of Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749–1832), polymath and pioneer of art and natural science. Using synchrotron-based micro-computed tomography (SR-µ-CT), we identified a fossil ant from Baltic amber (Eocene ~ 47–34 Ma) in Goethe’s collections. The specimen is assigned to †Ctenobethylus goepperti (Mayr in Die Ameisen des Baltischen Bernsteins. Beiträge zur Naturkunde Preussens, 1868), which we redescribe and re-diagnose, proposing †Eldermyrmex exsectus Dubovikoff et Dlussky, 2019 as its junior synonym (syn. nov., comb. nov.). We further infer a potential sister-group relationship with the extant genus Liometopum Mayr, 1861, suggesting that †C. goepperti may have been a dominant arboreal species in warm-temperate coniferous forests, a scenario which is supported by its abundance in Baltic amber. Critically, our results document endoskeletal structures in a Cenozoic fossil ant, underscoring both the morphological value of historical collections and the lasting scientific legacy of Goethe’s naturalist vision.

Data availability

All four scans are available at: http://www.morphosource.org/projects/000760923?locale=en

References

  1. Haas, O. Goethe and evolution. Osiris 10, 35–42 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barteczko, K. & Jacob, M. A re-evaluation of the premaxillary bone in humans. Anat. Embryol. 207, 417–437 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Steiner, R. The Science of Knowing (Mercury, 1988).

  4. Mierbach, J. Reihe (Series). Goethe-Lexicon of Philosophical Concepts 3 (2022).

  5. Prescher, H. (ed.) Goethes Sammlungen zur Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie: Katalog (Akademie-Verlag, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mayr, G. Die Ameisen des Baltischen Bernsteins. Beiträge zur Naturkunde Preussens, 1–102, Vol. 1 (1868).

  7. Brown, W. L. Jr. Ctenobethylus (Bethylidae) a new synonym of Iridomyrmex (Formicidae, Hymenoptera). Psyche 83, 213–215 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dlussky, G. M. & Rasnitsyn, A. P. Ants (Insecta: Vespida: Formicidae) in the Upper Eocene Amber of central and eastern Europe. Paleontol. J. 43, 1024–1042 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dlussky, G. M. & Perkovsky, E. E. Ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) from the Rovno Amber. [In Russian.]. Vestnik Zoologii 36, 3–20 (2002).

  10. Ward, P. S., Brady, S. G., Fisher, B. L. & Schultz, T. R. Phylogeny and biogeography of dolichoderine ants: Effects of data partitioning and relict taxa on historical inference. Syst. Biol. 59, 342–362 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shattuck, S. O. Review of the dolichoderine ant genus Iridomyrmex Mayr with descriptions of three new genera (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Aust. Entomol. Soc. 31, 13–18 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shattuck, S. O. Taxonomic Catalog of the Ant Subfamilies Aneuretinae and Dolichoderinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) (University of California Publications in Entomology, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bolton, B. Identification Guide to the Ant Genera of the World (Harvard University Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bolton, B. A New General Catalogue of the Ants of the World (Harvard University Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shattuck, S. O. Generic revision of the ant subfamily Dolichoderinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 21, 1–181 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Boudinot, B. E., Probst, R. S., Brandão, C. R. F., Feitosa, R. M. & Ward, P. S. Out of the Neotropics: newly discovered relictual species sheds light on the biogeographical history of spider ants (Leptomyrmex, Dolichoderinae, Formicidae). Syst. Entomol. 41, 658–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12181 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sadowski, E.-M., Schmidt, A.R. & Kunzmann, L. The hyperdiverse conifer flora of the Baltic amber forest. Palaeontographica, Abteilung B: Palaeobotany – Palaeophytology 304, 1–48 (2022).

  18. Boudinot, B. E., Borowiec, M. L. & Prebus, M. M. Phylogeny, evolution, and classification of the ant genus Lasius, the tribe Lasiini and the subfamily Formicinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Syst. Entomol. 47, 113–151 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Goethe, J. W. v. Zur Farbenlehre (Cotta, Tübingen, 1810).

  20. Huxley, T. H. Nature: aphorisms by Goethe. Nature 1, 9–11 (1869).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hall, B. K. Tribute: In Goethe’s Wake: Marvalee Wake’s conceptual contributions to the development and evolution of a science of morphology. Zoology, 108, 269–275 (2005).

  22. Levit, G. S., Reinhold, P. & Hoßfeld, U. Goethe’s “Comparirte Anatomy” as a foundation for the growth of theoretical and applied biomedical sciences in Jena. Theory Biosci. 134, 9–15 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Steiner, R. Einleitungen zu Goethes naturwissenschaftlichen Schriften: Zugleich eine Grundlegung der Geisteswissenschaft (Anthroposophie) 4. GA 001 (Rudolf Steiner Verlag, Dornach 1987).

  24. Toni, J. F. G. On the origins and renaissance of Goethe’s morphology. Elemente der Naturwissenschaft 108, 5–21 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sullivan, H. I. Collecting the rocks of time: Goethe, the romantics and early geology. Eur. Romant. Rev. 10, 341–370 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Goethe, J. W. v. Die Metamorphose der Pflanzen. In Friedrich Schiller (Hrsg.). Musen-Almanach für das Jahr 1799 (J. G. Cotta, Tübingen 1798).

  27. Schellenberg, R. The self and other things: Goethe the collector. Publ. the English Goethe Soc. 81, 166–177 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Trebra, F. W. H. v. Mineraliencabinett gesammlet und beschrieben von dem Verfasser der Erfahrungen vom Innern der Gebirge. Clausthal (1795).

  29. Sendel, N. Historia succinorum corpora aliena involventium et naturae opere pictorum et caelatorum ex regiis Augustorum cimeliis Dresdae conditis aeri insculptorum. apud Io. Fridericum Gleditschium (1742).

  30. Jacobi, C. J., Varga, P. J. & Vaidyanathan, B. Aesthetic experiences and flourishing in science: A four-country study. Front. Psychol. 13, (2022).

  31. Deans, A. R. et al. Finding our way through phenotypes. PLoS Biol. 13(1), e1002033 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sigwart, J. D. et al. Collectomics–towards a new framework to integrate museum collections to address global challenges. Nat. History Collect. Mus. 2, 1–20 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Schmuck, T. Anschauung der Erde. Goethes geowissenschaftliches Sammeln und Arbeiten. 352 (Sandstein-Verlag Dresden, 2026).

  34. Safranski, R. Goethe Life as a Work of Art. (Liveright Publishing Cooperation, 2017).

  35. Freies Deutsches Hochstift/Frankfurter Goethe-Museum. III-14047: Farbenkreis zur Symbolisierung des “menschlichen Geistes- und Seelenlebens” (1809), accessed 04 Feb 2025; https://goethehaus.museum-digital.de/object/39390.

  36. Kosmowska-Ceranowicz, B., Kohlman-Adamska, A. & Grabowska, I. Erste Ergebnisse zur Lithologie und Palynologie der bernsteinführenden Sedimente im Tagebau Primorskoje. Metalla 66, 5–17 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kasiński, J. R., Kramarska, R., Słodkowska, B., Sivkov, V. & Piwocki, M. Paleocene and Eocene deposits on the eastern margin of the Gulf of Gdańsk (Yantarny P-1 borehole, Kaliningrad region, Russia). Geol. Q. 64, 29–53 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sadowski, E. et al. Conservation, preparation and imaging of diverse ambers and their inclusions. Earth Sci. Rev. 220, 103653 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Moosmann, J. et al. Time-lapse X-ray phase-contrast microtomography for in vivo imaging and analysis of morphogenesis. Nat. Protoc. 9, 294–304 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Palenstijn, W. J., Batenburg, K. J. & Sijbers, J. Performance improvements for iterative electron tomography reconstruction using graphics processing units (GPUs). J. Struct. Biol. 176, 250–253 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  41. van Aarle, W. V. et al. The ASTRA Toolbox: A platform for advanced algorithm development in electron tomography. Ultramicroscopy 157, 35–47 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  42. van Aarle, W. V. et al. Fast and flexible X-ray tomography using the ASTRA toolbox. Opt. Express 24, 25129–25147 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Engelkes, K., Friedrich, F., Hammel, J. U. & Haas, A. A simple setup for episcopic microtomy and a digital image processing workflow to acquire high-quality volume data and 3D surface models of small vertebrates. Zoomorphology 137, 213–228 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  45. AntWeb, Version 8.114., accessed 17 November 2025; https://www.antweb.org.

  46. Richter, A. et al. The cephalic anatomy of workers of the ant species Wasmannia affinis (Formicidae, Hymenoptera, Insecta) and its evolutionary implications. Arthropod. Struct. Dev. 49, 26–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2019-02-002 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Richter, A. et al. Comparative analysis of worker head anatomy of Formica and Brachyponera (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Arthropod. Syst. Phylogeny 78, 133–170 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Richter, A. et al. The head anatomy of Protanilla lini (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Leptanillinae), with a hypothesis of their mandibular movement. Myrmecol. News 31, 85–114 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Richter, A., Boudinot, B. E., Yamamoto, S., Katzke, J. & Beutel, R. G. The first reconstruction of the head anatomy of a Cretaceous insect, †Gerontoformica gracilis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), and the early evolution of ants. Insect Syst. Divers. 6, 1–80 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Richter, A. et al. Wonderfully weird: The head anatomy of the armadillo ant, Tatuidris tatusia (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Agroecomyrmecinae), with evolutionary implications. Myrmecol. News 33, 35–75 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Boudinot, B. E., Moosdorf, O. T. D., Beutel, R. G. & Richter, A. Anatomy and evolution of the head of Dorylus helvolus (Formicidae: Dorylinae): Patterns of sex- and caste-limited traits in the sausagefly and the driver ant. J. Morphol. 282, 1616–1658 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Aibekova, L. et al. The skeletomuscular system of the mesosoma of Formica rufa workers (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insect Syst. Divers. 6, 1–26 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Aibekova, L. et al. The mesosoma of Protanilla (Leptanillinae) and the groundplan of the Formicidae (Hymenoptera). J. Morphol. (2025).

  54. Lieberman, Z. E., Billen, J. P. J., van de Kamp, T. & Boudinot, B. E. The ant abdomen: The skeletomuscular and soft tissue anatomy of Amblyopone australis workers (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Morphol. 283, 693–770 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Björn Rulik (Leibniz-Institut zur Analys des Biodiversitätswandels, Bonn) for the helpful comments on the determination of the two nematoceran flies. We would like to thank the Klassik Stiftung Weimar for permission to examine these valuable cultural assets, as well as the Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology Jena for the scan time at short notice. We also acknowledge provision of beamtime related to the proposal BAG- 20230681 ‘AmberSOIL – Characterization of soil organisms and their biota across time using Cenozoic and Mesozoic ambers’ at beamline P05, PETRA III at Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY), Hamburg, a member of the Helmholtz Association (HGF). This research was supported in part through the Maxwell computational resources operated at Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Hamburg. We also express our gratitude to the International Amber Association (IAA) Gdańsk, Poland for spectroscopic analysis of the amber pieces. We also like to thank Sandra Rüdiger, (Institute of Zoology and Evolutionary Research) Matthias Krüger (Phyletisches Museum) and the administrative staff of the Friedrich Schiller University for their quick support in processing of our requests.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. BEB acknowledges financial support from an Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung research fellowship (2020–2022) and from the Smithsonian Institute via a Peter S. Buck research fellowship (2023–). MW was supported by the Honours Programme University of Jena (2021–2022) and Landesgraduiertenstipendium University of Jena (2023–2025). DT was supported by a scholarship of Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt (DBU). Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: B.E.B., B.L.B., T.S.; Methodology: B.E.B., B.L.B., D.T., J.U.H., M.W., V.G.; Software: J.U.H., V.G.; D.T. M.W.; Validation: B.E.B., J.T.O., M.M.S.-K., T.S., B.L.B.; Investigation: B.E.B., B.L.B., T.S., J.T.O.; Data curation: J.U.H., D.T., V.G., K.J.; Resources: J.U.H., V.G.; Writing—original draft: B.E.B., B.L.B., T.S; Writing—review & editing: B.E.B., B.L.B., J.T.O, M.W., D.T., T.S.; M.M.S.-K., V.G., J.U.H., K.J.; Visualization: D.T., B.L.B., M.W., B.E.B., K.J.; Supervision: B.E.B., B.L.B., T.S.; Project administration: B.E.B., B.L.B.; Funding acquisition: B.E.B., D.T., M.W., K.J., J.T.O.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to
Brendon E. Boudinot, Bernhard L. Bock or Thomas Schmuck.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boudinot, B.E., Bock, B.L., Tröger, D. et al. Discovery of Goethe’s amber ant: its phylogenetic and evolutionary implications.
Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36004-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36004-4


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Molecular characterisation of the invasive terrestrial nemertean Geonemertes pelaensis: long and complex mitogenome and presence of NUMTs

Glacial lakes and GLOFs in a warming Himalaya-Karakoram region: current understanding, challenges, and the way forward

Back to Top