in

Effects of a bloodless diet on fitness and malaria susceptibility in Anopheles mosquitoes from Burkina Faso


Abstract

Emerging resistance in malaria vectors and parasites has accelerated the development of novel control strategies such as the Sterile Insect Technique and Wolbachia-based approaches, which require large-scale mosquito rearing. These methods traditionally rely on vertebrate Blood, raising ethical and logistical concerns. This study evaluated the effects of a BLOODless™ on wing size, longevity, and Plasmodium falciparum susceptibility in Anopheles coluzzii and An. gambiae from Burkina Faso, and the Kisumu An. gambiae strain. Blood and Bloodless-reared mosquitoes were compared across seven generations. Wing size was unaffected by diet in the 3rd and 7th generations, though sex impacted size in the 3rd generation only. A diet-species interaction was detected in the 7th generation. Plasmodium falciparum infection rates were similar in the 3rd generation, but by the 6th, Blood-fed mosquitoes showed higher oocyst prevalence, though intensity remained unchanged. Infection outcomes were species-dependent only at this later stage. Longevity, initially comparable across groups, increased significantly in Bloodless-fed mosquitoes by the 7th generation. Species had no effect on survival. A Blood-free diet enables sustained mosquito rearing while preserving traits essential for malaria research, providing an ethical, effective alternative to vertebrate Blood in vector control and experimental programs.

Data availability

The data generated in this study are available as Additional file 1.

References

  1. WHO. World malaria report. (2024).

  2. Hemingway, J. et al. Tools and strategies for malaria control and elimination: what do we need to achieve a grand convergence in malaria? PLoS Biol. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002380 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ranson, H. & Lissenden, N. Insecticide resistance in African Anopheles mosquitoes: A worsening situation that needs urgent action to maintain malaria control. Trends Parasitol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2015.11.010 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ranson, H. Current and future prospects for preventing malaria transmission via the use of insecticides. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Med. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a026823 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bhatt, S. et al. The effect of malaria control on Plasmodium falciparum in Africa between 2000 and 2015. Nature (2015) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15535

  6. Huijben, S. & Paaijmans, K. P. Putting evolution in elimination: winning our ongoing battle with evolving malaria mosquitoes and parasites. Evol. Appl. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12530 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sternberg, E. D. & Thomas, M. B. Insights from agriculture for the management of insecticide resistance in disease vectors. Evol. Appl. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12501 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  8. WHO. World Malaria Report. (2022).

  9. WHO. World malaria report. (2023).

  10. Datoo, M. S. et al. Safety and efficacy of malaria vaccine candidate R21/Matrix-M in African children: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02511-4 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bouyer, J. Current status of the sterile insect technique for the suppression of mosquito populations on a global scale. Infect. Dis. Poverty. 13, 68 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hammond, A. et al. A CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive system targeting female reproduction in the malaria mosquito vector Anopheles Gambiae. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3439 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Moreira, L. A. et al. A wolbachia symbiont in Aedes aegypti limits infection with Dengue, Chikungunya, and plasmodium. Cell 139, 1268–1278 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yen, P. S. & Failloux, A. B. A review: Wolbachia-based population replacement for mosquito control shares common points with genetically modified control approaches. Pathogens https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9050404 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sinden, R. E. Developing transmission-blocking strategies for malaria control. PLoS Pathog. 13, 1–12 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Geoffrey, M., Attardo, I. A. & Hansen, A. S. R. Nutritional regulation of vitellogenesis in mosquitoes: implications for anautogeny. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol 35, (2005).

  17. Marques, J. et al. Long-term blood-free rearing of Anopheles mosquitoes with no effect on fitness, Plasmodium infectivity nor microbiota composition. Sci. Rep. 14, 1–12 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gonzales, K. K. & Hansen, I. A. Artificial diets for mosquitoes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13121267 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Phasomkusolsil, S. et al. Maintenance of mosquito vectors: effects of blood source on feeding, survival, fecundity, and egg hatching rates. J. Vector Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7134.2013.12006.x (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Marques, J. et al. Fresh-blood-free diet for rearing malaria mosquito vectors. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35886-3 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Marques, J., Cardoso, J. C. R., Félix, R. C., Power, D. M. & Silveira, H. A Blood-Free diet to Rear Anopheline mosquitoes. J. Vis. Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/60144-v (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mosi, F. A. et al. Effects of a blood-free mosquito diet on fitness and gonotrophic cycle parameters of laboratory reared Anopheles Gambiae sensu stricto. Parasites Vectors. 17, 1–8 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ilboudo, H. et al. Insecticide resistance in Anopheles Gambiae in villages around the soum agropolis in the Center – West region of Burkina Faso. (2025).

  24. Amara, M. F., Namountougou, M. & Konaté, H. Insecticide resistance and malaria transmission indicators in Anopheles gambiae s. l. in Bobo – Dioulasso, Burkina Faso : implications for vector control strategies. (2025).

  25. Santolamazza, F. et al. Insertion polymorphisms of SINE200 retrotransposons within speciation Islands of Anopheles Gambiae molecular forms. Malar. J. 7, 163 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hien, D. F. D. S. et al. Contrasting effects of the alkaloid ricinine on the capacity of Anopheles Gambiae and Anopheles coluzzii to transmit Plasmodium falciparum. Parasites Vectors. 14, 1–11 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Crawley, M. J. The R Book (John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2007).

  28. Gnémé, A. et al. Equivalent susceptibility of Anopheles Gambiae M and S molecular forms and Anopheles arabiensis to Plasmodium falciparum infection in Burkina Faso. Malar. J. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-12-204 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ndiath, M. O. et al. Methods to collect Anopheles mosquitoes and evaluate malaria transmission: A comparative study in two villages in Senegal. Malar. J. 10, 270 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ayo, D. et al. Susceptibility of Anopheles Gambiae to natural Plasmodium falciparum infection: A comparison between the Well-Established Anopheles Gambiae s.s line and a newly established Ugandan Anopheles Gambiae s.s. line. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.23-0203 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Angleró-Rodríguez, Y. I. et al. A natural Anopheles -associated Penicillium chrysogenum enhances mosquito susceptibility to Plasmodium infection. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34084 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wang, M. et al. Glucose-mediated proliferation of a gut commensal bacterium promotes Plasmodium infection by increasing mosquito midgut pH. Cell. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108992 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Huang, W., Wang, S. & Jacobs-Lorena, M. Use of microbiota to fight Mosquito-Borne disease. Front. Genet. 11, 1–6 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dong, Y., Manfredini, F. & Dimopoulos, G. Implication of the mosquito midgut microbiota in the defense against malaria parasites. PLoS Pathog. 5, 10 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Meister, S. et al. Anopheles Gambiae PGRPLC-mediated defense against bacteria modulates infections with malaria parasites. PLoS Pathog. 5, e1000542 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Cirimotich, C. M. et al. Natural microbe-mediated refractoriness to Plasmodium infection in Anopheles Gambiae. Science 332, 855–858 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tchioffo, M. T. et al. Modulation of malaria infection in Anopheles Gambiae mosquitoes exposed to natural midgut bacteria. PLoS One. 8, 4–12 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wang, S. & Jacobs-Lorena, M. Genetic approaches to interfere with malaria transmission by vector mosquitoes. Trends Biotechnol. 31, 185–193 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Blanford, S. et al. Fungal pathogen reduces potential for malaria transmission. Sci. (80-). 308, 1638–1641 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bargielowski, I. & Koella, J. C. A possible mechanism for the suppression of Plasmodium Berghei development in the mosquito Anopheles Gambiae by the microsporidian Vavraia culicis. PLoS One 4, (2009).

  41. Aliota, M. T., Chen, C. C., Dagoro, H., Fuchs, J. F. & Christensen, B. M. Filarial worms reduce plasmodium infectivity in mosquitoes. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 5, e963 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Maïga, H., Dabiré, R. K., Lehmann, T., Tripet, F. & Diabaté, A. Variation in energy reserves and role of body size in the mating system of Anopheles Gambiae. J. Vector Ecol. 37, 289–297 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sawadogo, S. P. et al. Effects of age and size on Anopheles Gambiae s.s. Male mosquito mating success. J. Med. Entomol. https://doi.org/10.1603/ME12041 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zhou, G. et al. Metabolic fate of [ 14 C ] -labeled meal protein amino acids in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. 50, 337–349 (2004).

  45. Hansen, I. A., Attardo, G. M., Park, J., Peng, Q. & Raikhel, A. S. Target of rapamycin-mediated amino acid signaling in mosquito anautogeny. (2004).

  46. Stone, C. M., Jackson, B. T. & Foster, W. A. Effects of plant-community composition on the vectorial capacity and fitness of the malaria mosquito Anopheles Gambiae. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 87, 727–736 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The research received financial support from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia and Aga-Khan Development Network (MosqDiet_FCT AGAKHAN/541725581/2019), and IHI (Training and Capacity Building Unit). J.M. and H.S. are supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT Portugal) by funds to GHTM/IHMT-NOVA (GHTM-UID GHTM UID/04413/2020). J.M. is recipient of a contract by FCT (https://doi.org/10.54499/CEECIND/00450/2017/CP1415/CT0001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

H.S., J.M., R.V., I.S., E.B and D.F.S.H conceived and designed the present study; J.M. and R.V. produced the diet. D.F.S.H, A.M.A.P.S, and I.S. conducted the experiments, with E.B. providing supervision and overseeing the study; B.S.P. and D.F.S.H carried out the data analysis; D.F.S.H drafted the manuscript; E.B., I.S., H.S., J.M., A.D and R.V. provided critical revisions to the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to
Domonbabele François de Sales Hien or Etienne M. Bilgo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The protocol of the study was approved by the Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, ethics committee: A 009-2023/CEIRES/IRSS. Prior to inclusion, informed consent was obtained from the parents or legal guardian of the volunteers.

Consent for publication

All authors concur with the submission presented by the corresponding authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Sales Hien, D.F., Sare, I., Sib, A.M.A.P. et al. Effects of a bloodless diet on fitness and malaria susceptibility in Anopheles mosquitoes from Burkina Faso.
Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40458-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40458-x

Keywords

  • Bloodless diet
  • Wing length
  • Susceptibility to Plasmodium falciparum
  • Longevity, Anopheles mosquitoes


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Optimizing the trench area proportion in rice crayfish co-culture systems balances greenhouse gas mitigation and productivity

China’s mega-city clusters grab water resources and carbon credit from vulnerable hinterlands

Back to Top