in

Flyway population increase and emergence of new wintering grounds with climate change in an Arctic-breeding goose


Abstract

Changes in climate, land cover, hunting disturbance, and food availability are often cited as drivers of bird migratory patterns. We examined long-term changes in the Pannonic flyway population of the Arctic-breeding Greater White-fronted Goose (GWfG, Anser albifrons) in regular counts conducted in Hortobágy National Park, eastern Hungary, between 1989 and 2019. During 31 years, GWfG counts increased from fewer than 2,000 to more than 30,000 individuals, with a stronger increase in spring than in autumn. The rate of increase exceeded that of the entire Pannonic flyway population. Spring counts rose more rapidly in the early years (1989–1997), whereas autumn counts increased faster more recently (2007–2019). Overwintering began in the mid-2000s, and winter counts have increased sharply since 2007. Mean temperature influenced GWfG counts positively in winter and negatively in spring, while the number of frost days in winter and snowy days in spring had negative effects. GWfG counts decreased less from December to January when temperatures did not drop or increased. These results indicate that milder winters have played a major role in the long-term increase and appearance of overwintering. In addition, small changes in land cover and slight increases in hunting disturbance may have also contributed to the increase of the GWfG counts at the study site, whereas food availability on nearby croplands declined and may have had an opposite effect. Our study shows that the disproportionate increase in staging and overwintering GWfG is primarily driven by climate change, especially by the rising frequency of unusually mild winters.

Data availability

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). in Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem services. Brondízio. 1082 (eds Settele, E. S., Díaz, J. & Ngo, H. T.) (IPBES Secretariat, 2019). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831673.

  2. Gordo, O. Why are bird migration dates shifting? A review of weather and climate effects on avian migratory phenology. Climate Res. 35, 37–58 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bauer, S., Lisovski, S., Eikelenboom-Kil, R. J. F. M., Shariati, M. & Nolet, B. A. Shooting May aggravate rather than alleviate conflicts between migratory geese and agriculture. J. Appl. Ecol. 55, 2653–2662 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jenni, L. & Kéry, M. Timing of autumn bird migration under climate change: advances in long-distance migrants, delays in short-distance migrants. Proc. Royal Soc. B. 270, 1467–1471 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kölzsch, A. et al. Forecasting spring from afar? Timing of migration and predictability of phenology along different migration routes of an avian herbivore. J. Anim. Ecol. 84, 272–283 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clausen, K. K. & Clausen, P. Earlier Arctic springs cause phenological mismatch in long-distance migrants. Oecologia 173, 1101–1112 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lehikoinen, A. & Jaatinen, K. Delayed autumn migration in Northern European waterfowl. J. Ornithol. 153, 563–570 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grishchenko, M. et al. Land use change and the migration geography of greater White-fronted geese in European Russia. Ecosphere 10, e02754 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guillemain, M. et al. Disentangling the drivers of change in common teal migration phenology over 50 years: land use vs. climate change effects. J. Ornithol. 156, 647–655 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nuijten, R. J. M., Wood, K. A., Haitjema, T., Rees, E. C. & Nolet, B. A. Concurrent shifts in wintering distribution and phenology in migratory swans: individual and generational effects. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 4263–4275 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fox, A. D. & Abraham, K. F. Why geese benefit from the transition from natural vegetation to agriculture. Ambio 46, S188–S197 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fox, A. D. et al. Current estimates of Goose population sizes in Western Europe, a gap analysis and assessment of trends. Ornis Svecica. 20, 115–127 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stroud, D. A., Madsen, J. & Fox, A. D. Key actions towards the sustainable management of European geese. Ambio 46, S328–S338 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fox, A. D. & Leafloor, J. O. (eds) A global audit of the status and trends of Arctic and Northern Hemisphere goose populations. Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna International Secretariat: Akureyri, Iceland. ISBN 978-9935-431-66-0. (2018).

  15. Wetlands International. Waterbird Populations Portal. Retrieved from wpp.wetlands.org (last accessed 30 June 2025). (2021).

  16. Madsen, J., Cracknell, G. & Fox, A. D. (eds) Goose Populations of the Western Palearctic. A Review of Status and Distribution (Wetlands International and National Environmental Research Institute, 1999).

  17. Kölzsch, A. et al. Flyway connectivity and exchange primarily driven by moult migration in geese. Mov. Ecol. 7, 3 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cuthbert, R. J. et al. Estimating the autumn staging abundance of migratory Goose species in Northern Kazakhstan. Wildfowl 68, 44–69 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wuczyński, A. et al. Long-term changes in numbers of geese stopping over and wintering in south-western Poland. Cent. Eur. J. Biology. 7, 495–506 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nagy, J. A Hortobágy madárvilága. A Hortobágy jelentősége a madárvonulásban. Az Itt átvonuló Vadludak. Aquila 30–31, 272–279 (1924). (In Hungarian).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Faragó, S. & Gosztonyi, L. Population trend, phenology and dispersion of common waterfowl species in Hungary based on a ten year long time series of the Hungarian waterfowl monitoring. Acta Silvatica Et Lignaria Hungarica. 5, 83–107 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mooij, J., Faragó, S. & Kirby, J. S. White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons albifrons. In Goose Populations of the Western Palearctic. A Review of Status and Distribution: 94–128. (eds Madsen, J., Cracknell, G. & Fox, A. D.) Wageningen: Wetlands International & Rønde: National Environmental Research Institute. (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ecsedi, Z. & Kovács, G. Vörösnyakú lúd. In A Hortobágy madárvilága: 159–161. Ecsedi, Z. (Ed.). Hortobágy Természetvédelmi Egyesület, Winter Fair, Balmazújváros-Szeged. (In Hungarian) (2004).

  24. Faragó, S. Numbers and distributions of geese in Hungary 1984–2009. Ornis Svecica. 20, 144–154 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Barczi, A., Tóth, T. M., Csanádi, A., Sümegi, P. & Czinkota, I. Reconstruction of the paleo-environment and soil evolution of the Csípő-halom kurgan, Hungary. Quatern. Int. 156–157, 49–59 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Szilágyi, G., Gulyás, S., Vári, T. Z. & Sümegi, P. Late quaternary paleoecology and the environmental history of the Hortobágy, an alkaline steppe in central Europe. Diversity 16, 67 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  27. QGIS Development Team. QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. (2025). http://qgis.osgeo.org.

  28. Gilbert, G., Gibbons, D. W. & Evans, J. Bird Monitoring Methods: a Manual of Techniques for Key UK Species (Published by the RSPB in association with British Trust for Ornithology, 1998).

  29. Muggeo, V. M. R. Segmented: an R package to fit regression models with broken-line relationships. R News. 8, 20–25 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hurvich, C. M., Simonoff, J. S. & Tsai, C. L. Smoothing parameter selection in nonparametric regression using an improved Akaike information criterion. J. Royal Stat. Soc. B. 60, 271–293 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wood, S. N. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R. Second edition, Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, ISBN 9781498728331. (2017).

  32. European Environment Agency. CORINE Land Cover dataset (Version 20b2). (2020). https://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/corine-land-cover.

  33. Valkó, O., Borza, S., Godó, L., Végvári, Z. & Deák, B. The Eurasian crane (Grus grus) as an ecosystem engineer in grasslands: conservation values, ecosystem services, and disservices related to a large iconic bird species. Land Degrad. Dev. 33, 2155–2165 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lengyel, S., Tar, J. & Ecsedi, Z. Space use and exposure of Lesser White-fronted Geese to hunting in the Hortobágy region, Hungary. Pp. 53–60. In: Tolvanen P, Øien IJ, Ruokolainen K (eds.): WWF Finland Report No. 27 & Norwegian Ornithological Society Report No. 1-2009. (2009).

  35. Biró, M., Bölöni, J. & Molnár, Z. Use of long-term data to evaluate loss and endangerment status of natura 2000 habitats and effects of protected areas. Conserv. Biol. 32, 660–671 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lengyel, S. et al. Grassland restoration to conserve landscape-level biodiversity: a synthesis of early results from a large-scale project. Appl. Veg. Sci. 15, 264–276 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Hortobágy National Park Directorate for permitting and supporting this study. This study was financially supported by a grant from the National Research, Development and Innovation Office of Hungary (OTKA K 134391).

Funding

Open access funding provided by University of Debrecen. This study was supported by a grant from the National Research, Development and Innovation Office of Hungary (OTKA K 134391) to SL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PG conceived the study idea, designed the methodology and collected the data, SL analysed the data and led the writing of the manuscript. Both authors contributed critically to the draft and have approved the final version for submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Péter Gyüre.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gyüre, P., Lengyel, S. Flyway population increase and emergence of new wintering grounds with climate change in an Arctic-breeding goose.
Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40447-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40447-0

Keywords

  • Climate change
  • Migration
  • Overwintering
  • Phenology
  • Game or quarry species
  • Staging
  • Stopover
  • Waterfowl
  • Wildlife management


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Conservation tillage and sprinkler irrigation for sustainable water management and enhanced crop yields in maize and field pea cropping system

Targeted supplementation with bioactive plants sustainably improves goat health and decreases antiparasitic drug use on smallholder farms

Back to Top