in

Full-elevational gradient dataset on moth diversity and abundance in a temperate mountain range


Abstract

Climate change is reshaping ecosystems worldwide, yet our ability to quantify its long-term impact across taxa is limited by a lack of reliable and comparable data. Here, we present a systematically collected long-term dataset spanning nearly a decade (2012–2021), documenting the diversity, abundance, and distribution of 439 moth species (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) from the Czech part of the Giant Mountains, a region entirely protected as Krkonoše National Park. Using standardised light traps, we sampled 982 localities across an area of 550 km², yielding a total of 64,776 specimens. Localities are accompanied by in-situ assessments of vegetation characteristics and management regimes, complemented by topographical derivatives and ecosystem information retrieved post-hoc from open spatial data. The dataset provides a valuable resource for investigating spatial and temporal patterns in moth diversity and abundance, as well as for evaluating the effects of different management practices, supporting both basic and applied research.

Data availability

The dataset is publicly available on Figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30290536).

Code availability

An R script containing the full spatial data processing workflow is available on GitHub repository (https://github.com/antoninhlavacek/Moth_Krkonose), with routines for data download, using httr49 and xml250 packages, processing, and site-specific extraction.

References

  1. Hallmann, C. A. et al. More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas. PLOS ONE 12, e0185809, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185809 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hallmann, C. A., Ssymank, A., Sorg, M., de Kroon, H. & Jongejans, E. Insect biomass decline scaled to species diversity: General patterns derived from a hoverfly community. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 118, e2002554117, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2002554117 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Müller, J. et al. Weather explains the decline and rise of insect biomass over 34 years. Nature 628, 349–354, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06402-z (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Müller, J. et al. Reply to: Weather anomalies cannot explain insect decline. Nature 639, E12–E13, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08529-z (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hallmann, C. A. et al. Weather anomalies cannot explain insect decline. Nature 639, E7–E11, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08528-0 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wagner, D. L., Grames, E. M., Forister, M. L., Berenbaum, M. R. & Stopak, D. Insect decline in the Anthropocene: Death by a thousand cuts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 118, e2023989118, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023989118 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Payne, D., Spehn, E. M., Snethlage, M. & Fischer, M. Opportunities for research on mountain biodiversity under global change. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 29, 40–47, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.11.001 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Watson, J. E. M. et al. Persistent Disparities between Recent Rates of Habitat Conversion and Protection and Implications for Future Global Conservation Targets. Conserv. Lett. 9, 413–421, https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12295 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Selwood, K. E. & Zimmer, H. C. Refuges for biodiversity conservation: A review of the evidence. Biol. Conserv. 245, 108502, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108502 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Suggitt, A. J. et al. Extinction risk from climate change is reduced by microclimatic buffering. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 713–717, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0231-9 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gentili, R., Badola, H. K. & Birks, H. J. B. Alpine biodiversity and refugia in a changing climate. Biodiversity 16, 193–195, https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2015.1117023 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hampe, A. & Petit, R. J. Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters. Ecol. Lett. 8, 461–467, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00739.x (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Scalercio, S., Bonacci, T., Mazzei, A., Pizzolotto, R. & Brandmayr, P. Better up, worse down: bidirectional consequences of three decades of climate change on a relict population of Erebia cassioides. J. Insect Conserv. 18, 643–650, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-014-9669-x (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kawahara, A. Y. et al. Diel behavior in moths and butterflies: a synthesis of data illuminates the evolution of temporal activity. Org. Divers. Evol. 18, 13–27, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-017-0350-6 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kawahara, A. Y. et al. Phylogenomics reveals the evolutionary timing and pattern of butterflies and moths. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116, 22657–22663, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1907847116 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Altermatt, F. & Pearse, I. S. Similarity and Specialization of the Larval versus Adult Diet of European Butterflies and Moths. Am. Nat. 178, 372–382, https://doi.org/10.1086/661248 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Potocký, P., Bartoňová, A., Beneš, J., Zapletal, M. & Konvička, M. Life-history traits of Central European moths: gradients of variation and their association with rarity and threats. Insect Conserv. Divers. 11, 493–505, https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12291 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gaston, K. J. Patterns in the Local and Regional Dynamics of Moth Populations. Oikos 53, 49–57, https://doi.org/10.2307/3565662 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Beck, J. et al. Elevational species richness gradients in a hyperdiverse insect taxon: a global meta-study on geometrid moths. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 26, 412–424, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12548 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mertens, J. E. J. et al. Elevational and seasonal patterns of butterflies and hawkmoths in plant-pollinator networks in tropical rainforests of Mount Cameroon. Sci. Rep. 11, 9710, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89012-x (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kadlec, T., Kotela, M., Novák, I., Konvička, M. & Jarošík, V. Effect of land use and climate on the diversity of moth guilds with different habitat specialization. https://doi.org/10.1556/comec.10.2009.2.3 (2009).

  22. Kadlec, T., Štrobl, M., Hanzelka, J., Hejda, M. & Reif, J. Differences in the community composition of nocturnal Lepidoptera between native and invaded forests are linked to the habitat structure. Biodivers. Conserv. 27, 2661–2680, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1560-8 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Froidevaux, J. S. P., Broyles, M. & Jones, G. Moth responses to sympathetic hedgerow management in temperate farmland. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 270–271, 55–64, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.10.008 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Piccini, I. et al. Short-term effects of clearing restoration on the relationship of plant and moth communities. Biodivers. Conserv. 33, 3683–3701, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-024-02917-7 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hill, G. M., Kawahara, A. Y., Daniels, J. C., Bateman, C. C. & Scheffers, B. R. Climate change effects on animal ecology: butterflies and moths as a case study. Biol. Rev. 96, 2113–2126, https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12746 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jeník, J. Alpinská Vegetace Krkonoš, Králického Sněžníku a Hrubého Jeseníku: Teorie Anemo-Orografických Systémů/. (Nakladatelství Československé akademie věd, 1961).

  27. Treml, V. & Banaš, M. Alpine timberline in the High Sudetes. Acta Univ. Carol. Geogr. 15, 83–99 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Brehm, G. et al. Moths are strongly attracted to ultraviolet and blue radiation. Insect Conserv. Divers. 14, 188–198, https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12476 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Heath, J. A Genuinely Portable M.V. Light Trap. Entomol. Rec. J. Var. 76–77, 246–248 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Laštůvka, Z. & Liška, J. Komentovaný Seznam Motýlů České Republiky. Annotated Checklist of Moths and Butterflies of the Czech Republic (Insecta: Lepidoptera). (Biocont Laboratory, 2011).

  31. Hejda, R., Farkač, J. & Chobot, K. Červený seznam ohrožených druhů České republiky: BEZOBRATLÍ: Red List of Threatened Species of Czech Republic: INVERTEBRATES. Příroda 1–611 (2017).

  32. Truxa, C. & Fiedler, K. Attraction to light – from how far do moths (Lepidoptera) return to weak artificial sources of light? EJE 109, 77–84, https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2012.010 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  33. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (2024).

  34. Roussel, J.-R. et al. lidR: An R package for analysis of Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) data. Remote Sens. Environ. 251, 112061, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112061 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Roussel, J.-R. & Auty, D. Airborne LiDAR Data Manipulation and Visualization for Forestry Applications (2025).

  36. Pebesma, E. Simple Features for R: Standardized Support for Spatial Vector Data. R J. 10, 439–446 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pebesma, E. & Bivand, R. Spatial Data Science: With Applications in R. (Chapman and Hall/CRC., 2023).

  38. Hijimas, R. J. terra: Spatial Data Analysis (2025).

  39. ČÚZK. ZABAGED®—Altimetry—DMR 5G. Digital Terrain Model of the Czech Republic of the 5th generation (DMR 5G) in S-JTSK, Bpv. (2025).

  40. Horn, B. K. P. Hill shading and the reflectance map. Proc. IEEE 69, 14–47, https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1981.11918 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Evans, J. S. & Murphy, A. Evans, J. S., & Murphy, M. A. spatialEco (R package version 2.0-2) (2023).

  42. Dilts, T. E., Blum, M. E., Shoemaker, K. T., Weisberg, P. J. & Stewart, K. M. Improved topographic ruggedness indices more accurately model fine-scale ecological patterns. Landsc. Ecol. 38, 1395–1410, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-023-01646-6 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  43. McCune, B. & Keon, D. Equations for potential annual direct incident radiation and heat load. J. Veg. Sci. 13, 603–606, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2002.tb02087.x (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  44. NCA CR. Consolidated Layer of Ecosystems (2021).

  45. NCA CR. Update of the mapping of natural habitats (2025).

  46. Čížek, O. et al. Full-elevational gradient dataset on moth diversity and abundance in a temperate mountain range. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30290536 (2026).

  47. Čížek, O., Marhoul, P., Kadlec, T., Jor, T. & Hlaváček, A. Noční Motýli Jako Klíčová Bioindikační Skupina pro Zlepšení Péče o Krkonošské Louky z Pohledu Bezobratlých a pro Sledování Dopadů Klimatických Změn. 1261 (2022).

  48. Pebesma, E. J. Multivariable geostatistics in S: the gstat package. Comput. Geosci. 30, 683–691, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2004.03.012 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wickham, H. httr: Tools for working with urls and HTTP. (2023).

  50. Wickham, H., Hester, J. & Ooms, J. xml2: Parse XML. (2023).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our special gratitude to Jan Materna from Krkonoše National Park for his dedicated and exceptionally persistent support and interest. We also thank Barbora Dubská, Lenka Hamšíková, Petr Havránek, Jan Hrnčíř, Zuzana Hýrková, Otto Krotvar, Vojtěch Pařízek, Jiří Skala, Markéta Staňková, Martin Štrobl, Michal Zapletal, Jaroslav Zámečník, and Barbora Zsáková for their help with fieldwork. We appreciate Michal FoFo Zapletal’s help with identifying the specimens. Data collection and investigation was funded by several projects, including: 1) Operational Programme Environment (OPE) no EIS:CZ.05.4.27/0.0/0.0/17_078/0006395, co-funded by the EU European Regional Development Fund and Cohesion Fund (2019–2021); 2) LIFE CORCONTICA project (LIFE11 NAT/CZ/490) financially supported by the European Commission from the LIFE + program (2007–2013); 3) Additional funding provided by the Krkonoše National Park. The work of AH was supported by the Grant Agency of Charles University, project no. 168024/2024.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

O.C.: conceptualization, data curation, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, validation, writing – review & editing; P.M.: conceptualization, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, writing – review & editing; T.K.: conceptualization, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, writing – review & editing; O.K.: data curation, formal analysis, validation, visualization, writing – review & editing; T.J.: investigation; writing – review & editing; A.H.: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, validation, visualization, writing – original draft.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to
Oldřich Čížek or Antonín Hlaváček.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Čížek, O., Marhoul, P., Kadlec, T. et al. Full-elevational gradient dataset on moth diversity and abundance in a temperate mountain range.
Sci Data (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-026-06837-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-026-06837-9


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Wildfires on a changing planet

Population genomics identifies Italian and North American origins of Popillia japonica in Switzerland

Back to Top