in

Future of high mountain endemic species under climate change: predicting the potential scenarios for Stellaria pulvinata in the Altai Mountains


Abstract

Mountain ecosystems are vulnerable to climate change and unsustainable human activities worldwide, as evidenced by shifts in vegetation and losses of plant species diversity and habitats. These phenomena have a particularly important effect on narrow endemics that are sensitive to environmental and climatic changes. In the Altai Mountain Country (AMC), the endemic plant species Stellaria pulvinata Grubov (Caryophyllaceae) is found in small geographic areas at high elevations between 2,070 and 4,000 m. However, its current geographic range is shrinking owing to global warming, climate change, and habitat loss. Here, we aimed to assess the habitat suitability of S. pulvinata using MaxEnt to identify key environmental factors and predict shifts in its distribution under different climate scenarios (SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5) for the 2050s and 2090s. We tested five algorithms using the “sdm” package in R, and found that the MaxEnt algorithm demonstrated the highest predictive performance (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.96, true skill statistic (TSS) = 0.89, correlation coefficient (COR) = 0.24, deviance = 0.23); therefore, MaxEnt was selected for subsequent analyses. Currently, the total potentially suitable habitat area for S. pulvinata spans approximately 169,659 km2 and covers 25.86% of the AMC. We predicted that the total suitable habitat area for S. pulvinata will decline to 20.59% by the 2050s and 19.19% by the 2090s under the SSP2-4.5 future climate scenario, with the center of suitable habitats shifting southeast. MaxEnt analysis identified elevation, temperature (Bio 4), and precipitation seasonality (Bio 15) as the most significant factors influencing its distribution. This species is expected to shift to higher elevations under future climate conditions (SSP2-4.5) by 2050 and 2090, leading to further range contraction. Notably, only 31.73% of the current range falls within protected areas, thus highlighting a substantial conservation gap. To conserve S. pulvinata, it is important to adopt in-situ and ex-situ conservation measures, conserve germplasm resources through seed banking and tissue culture, and implement strict management policies to minimize human disturbance and promote natural regeneration. These findings highlight the need for targeted conservation measures to address the ongoing threats to this species.

Similar content being viewed by others

Investigating the distributional response of the rare and endangered plant Fritillaria przewalskii to climate change based on optimized MaxEnt model

Population assessment and habitat suitability modelling of endangered medicinal plant, Aconitum heterophyllum Wall. ex Royle in the western Himalaya

Endemic cushions of the Khorassan-Kopet Dagh floristic province show differential responses to future climate change

Data availability

The source codes associated with this study are available on GitHub via https://github.com/Tsegmed1103/Stellaria-pulvinata-in-the-Altai-mountains.

References

  1. Grêt-Regamey, A., Brunner, S. H. & Kienast, F. Mountain ecosystem services: Who cares? Mt. Res. Dev. 32, S23–S34 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kidane, Y. O., Steinbauer, M. J. & Beierkuhnlein, C. Dead end for endemic plant species? A biodiversity hotspot under pressure. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 19, e00670 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Walther, G., Beißner, S. & Burga, C. A. Trends in the upward shift of alpine plants. J. Veg. Sci. 16, 541–548 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Timoshok, E. E. et al. Monitoring of high-altitude terrestrial ecosystems in the Altai Mountains. In IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. Vol. 48, 012008 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Palomo, I. Climate change impacts on ecosystem services in high mountain areas: A literature review. Mt. Res. Dev. 37, 179–187 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Buonincontri, M. P. et al. Shedding light on the effects of climate and anthropogenic pressures on the disappearance of Fagus sylvatica in the Italian lowlands: Evidence from archaeo-anthracology and spatial analyses. Sci. Total Environ. 877, 162893 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Matta, G., Kumar, A., Singh Tomar, D. & Kumar, R. Climate change in the Himalayan region: Susceptible impacts on environment and human settlements. Front. Environ. Sci. 13, 1550843 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pepin, N., Bradley, R. S., Diaz, H. F., Baraer, M. & Caceres, E. B. Elevation-dependent warming in mountain regions of the world. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 424–430 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2015).

  10. Priti, H., Aravind, N. A., Uma Shaanker, R. & Ravikanth, G. Modeling impacts of future climate on the distribution of Myristicaceae species in the Western Ghats, India. Ecol. Eng. 89, 14–23 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Maslin, M. A. Climate change: Essential knowledge for developing holistic solutions to our climate crisis. Emerg. Top. Life Sci. 3, 245–256 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, L., Wang, L., Li, Y. & Wang, J. A century-long analysis of global warming and earth temperature using a random walk with drift approach. Decis. Anal. J. 7, 100237 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Freeman, B. G., Lee-Yaw, J. A., Sunday, J. M. & Hargreaves, A. L. Expanding, shifting and shrinking: The impact of global warming on species’ elevational distributions. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 1268–1276 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Koide, D., Yoshida, K., Daehler, C. C. & Mueller-Dombois, D. An upward elevation shift of native and non-native vascular plants over 40 years on the island of Hawai’i. J. Veg. Sci. 28, 939–950 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Niskanen, A. K. J., Niittynen, P., Aalto, J., Väre, H. & Luoto, M. Lost at high latitudes: Arctic and endemic plants under threat as climate warms. Divers. Distrib. 25, 809–821 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zu, K. et al. Upward shift and elevational range contractions of subtropical mountain plants in response to climate change. Sci. Total Environ. 783, 146896 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. He, X. et al. Upward elevation and northwest range shifts for alpine Meconopsis species in the Himalaya–Hengduan Mountains region. Ecol. Evol. 9, 4055–4064 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liang, Q. et al. Shifts in plant distributions in response to climate warming in a biodiversity hotspot, the Hengduan Mountains. J. Biogeogr. 45, 1–11 (2018).

  19. Mittermeier, R. A., Turner, W. R., Larsen, F. W., Brooks, T. M. & Gascon, C. Global biodiversity conservation: The critical role of hotspots. In Biodiversity Hotspots (eds. Zachos, F. E. & Habel, J. C.) 3–22 (Springer, 2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20992-5_1.

  20. Ajjur, S. B. & Al-Ghamdi, S. G. Global hotspots for future absolute temperature extremes from CMIP6 models. Earth Space Sci. 8, e2021EA001817 (2021).

  21. Ondo, I. et al. Plant diversity darkspots for global collection priorities. New. Phytol. 244, 719–733 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Orme, C. D. L. et al. Global hotspots of species richness are not congruent with endemism or threat. Nature 436, 1016–1019 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cazzolla Gatti, R. et al. Accelerating upward treeline shift in the Altai Mountains under last-century climate change. Sci. Rep. 9, 7678 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, D., Yang, Y. & Lan, B. Climate variability in the northern and southern Altai Mountains during the past 50 years. Sci. Rep. 8, 3238 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Erst, A. S. et al. Distribution analysis, updated checklist, and DNA barcodes of the endemic vascular flora of the Altai mountains, a Siberian biodiversity hotspot. Syst. Biodivers. 20, 1–30 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Erst, A. S. et al. Hotspot and conservation gap analysis of endemic vascular plants in the Altai Mountain Country based on a new global conservation assessment. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 47, e02647 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cranston, B. H., Monks, A., Whigham, P. A. & Dickinson, K. J. M. Variation and response to experimental warming in a New Zealand cushion plant species. Austral Ecol. 40, 642–650 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Körner, C. Alpine Plant Life (Springer, 2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18970-8.

  29. Atashgahi, Z., Erfanian, M. B., Moazzeni, H., Shemirani, G. & Pirani, A. Endemic cushions of the Khorassan-Kopet Dagh floristic province show differential responses to future climate change. Sci. Rep. 15, 16046 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fu, Q. et al. Cushion presence and species pools mitigate the effect of climate on species richness in alpine communities. Research 8, 0975 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Baasanmunkh, S. et al. Distribution of vascular plants in Mongolia—I Part. Mong. J. Biol. Sci. 20, 3–28 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bocharnikov, M. V., Ogureeva, G. N. & Miklyaeva, I. M. Endemic formation of stitchwort polster (Stellaria pulvinata Grub.) in highlands of the Mongolian Altai. Arid Ecosyst. 5, 142–153 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  33. German, D. A. et al. Plant genera and species new to China recently found in northwest Xinjiang. Nord. J. Bot. 30, 61–69 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bocharnikov, M. V. Species Distribution in cenofloras of the cryophytic steppes and cushion plants with the participation of Stellaria pulvinata Grub. in the Mongolian Altai. Arid Ecosyst. 11, 52–61 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bhuyan, A. et al. Predicting habitat suitability of Illicium griffithii under climate change scenarios using an ensemble modeling approach. Sci. Rep. 15, 9691 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yousefi, M. et al. Global scale high-resolution habitat suitability modeling of avifauna providing pollination service (sunbirds, Nectariniidae). Sci. Rep. 15, 9489 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Elith, J. & Leathwick, J. R. Species distribution models: Ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 677–697 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Peterson, A. T. & Soberón, J. Species distribution modeling and ecological niche modeling: Getting the concepts right. Nat. Conserv. 10, 102–107 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lu, W. X., Wang, Z. Z., Hu, X. Y. & Rao, G. Y. Incorporating eco-evolutionary information into species distribution models provides comprehensive predictions of species range shifts under climate change. Sci. Total Environ. 912, 169501 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Qazi, A. W., Saqib, Z. & Zaman-ul-Haq, M. Trends in species distribution modelling in context of rare and endemic plants: A systematic review. Ecol. Process. 11, 40 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tu, W., Xiong, Q., Qiu, X. & Zhang, Y. Dynamics of invasive alien plant species in China under climate change scenarios. Ecol. Indic. 129, 107919 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Di Febbraro, M. et al. Different facets of the same niche: Integrating citizen science and scientific survey data to predict biological invasion risk under multiple global change drivers. Glob Change Biol. 29, 5509–5523 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sarkar, D., Jagannivsan, H., Debnath, A. & Talukdar, G. A systematic review on the potential impact of future climate change on India’s biodiversity using species distribution model (SDM) studies: Trends, and data gaps. Biodivers. Conserv. 33, 3399–3415 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P. & Schapire, R. E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model. 190, 231–259 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Yi, Y., Cheng, X., Yang, Z. F. & Zhang, S. H. Maxent modeling for predicting the potential distribution of endangered medicinal plant (H. riparia Lour) in Yunnan, China. Ecol. Eng. 92, 260–269 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zhang, K., Yao, L., Meng, J. & Tao, J. Maxent modeling for predicting the potential geographical distribution of two peony species under climate change. Sci. Total Environ. 634, 1326–1334 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P., Dudík, M., Schapire, R. E. & Blair, M. E. Opening the black box: An open-source release of Maxent. Ecography 40, 887–893 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Tsegmed, Z. et al. Predicting the current and future suitable habitats, species distribution, and conservation assessment of Fritillaria dagana (Liliaceae). J. Asia Pac. Biodivers. 16, 384–390 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Manish, K., Telwala, Y., Nautiyal, D. C. & Pandit, M. K. Modelling the impacts of future climate change on plant communities in the Himalaya: A case study from Eastern Himalaya, India. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 2, 92 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Yan, Y. & Tang, Z. Protecting endemic seed plants on the Tibetan Plateau under future climate change: Migration matters. J. Plant Ecol. 12, 962–971 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Bezuglova, N. N., Zinchenko, G. S., Malygina, N. S., Papina, T. S. & Barlyaeva, T. V. Response of high-mountain Altai thermal regime to climate global warming of recent decades. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 110, 595–605 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Thiers, B. Index Herbariorum: A Global Directory of Public Herbaria and Associated Staff. N. Y. Bot. Gard. Virtual Herb. http://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih/ (2024).

  53. GBIF. https://www.gbif.org/.

  54. Baasanmunkh, S. et al. iNaturalist projects represent a valuable resource for aggregating plant observations and engaging society: A case study of the Flora of Mongolia project. Plants People Planet. 8, 26–37 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Brown, J. L., Bennett, J. R. & French, C. M. SDMtoolbox 2.0: The next generation Python-based GIS toolkit for landscape genetic, biogeographic and species distribution model analyses. PeerJ 5, e4095 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Pearson, R. G. & Dawson, T. P. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: Are bioclimate envelope models useful? Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 12, 361–371 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Thuiller, W., Lavorel, S., Araújo, M. B., Sykes, M. T. & Prentice, I. C. Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102, 8245–8250 (2005).

  58. Fick, S. E. & Hijmans, R. J. WorldClim 2: New 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 37, 4302–4315 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Bi, D. et al. Configuration and spin-up of ACCESS-CM2, the new generation Australian Community Climate and Earth System Simulator Coupled Model. J. South. Hemisph. Earth Syst. Sci. 70, 225–251 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. (Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, London, 2021).

  61. Guo, H. et al. Assessment of CMIP6 in simulating precipitation over arid Central Asia. Atmos. Res. 252, 105451 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Lei, X. et al. Evaluation of CMIP6 models and multi-model ensemble for extreme precipitation over arid Central Asia. Remote Sens. 15, 2376 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  63. ESRI. ArcGIS desktop: Release 10, 315–325 (Environmental Systems Research Institute, 2011).

  64. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org (2024).

  65. Dormann, C. F. et al. Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36, 27–46 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Naimi, B. & Araújo, M. B. sdm: A reproducible and extensible R platform for species distribution modelling. Ecography 39, 368–375 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Lehmann, A., Overton, J. M. & Leathwick, J. R. GRASP: Generalized regression analysis and spatial prediction. Ecol. Model. 157, 189–207 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Elith, J., Leathwick, J. R. & Hastie, T. A working guide to boosted regression trees. J. Anim. Ecol. 77, 802–813 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Guisan, A., Edwards, T. C. & Hastie, T. Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distributions: Setting the scene. Ecol. Model. 157, 89–100 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Allouche, O., Tsoar, A. & Kadmon, R. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: Prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). J. Appl. Ecol. 43, 1223–1232 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Elith, J. & Graham, C. H. Do they? How do they? WHY do they differ? On finding reasons for differing performances of species distribution models. Ecography 32, 66–77 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Merow, C., Smith, M. J. & Silander, J. A. A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species’ distributions: What it does, and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography 36, 1058–1069 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Warren, D. L. & Seifert, S. N. Ecological niche modeling in Maxent: The importance of model complexity and the performance of model selection criteria. Ecol. Appl. 21, 335–342 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Cobos, M. E., Peterson, A. T., Barve, N. & Osorio-Olvera, L. kuenm: An R package for detailed development of ecological niche models using Maxent. PeerJ 7, e6281 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Wang, Y. et al. Prediction of the potentially suitable areas of Leonurus japonicus in China based on future climate change using the optimized MaxEnt model. Ecol. Evol. 13, e10597 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Rehan, M. et al. Application of species distribution models to estimate and manage the Asiatic black bear (Ursus thibetanus) habitat in the Hindu Kush Mountains, Pakistan. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 70, 62 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Bosso, L. et al. Integrating citizen science and spatial ecology to inform management and conservation of the Italian seahorses. Ecol. Inf. 79, 102402 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Wang, X. et al. Comparative plastome analyses and evolutionary relationships of 25 East Asian species within the medicinal plant genus Scrophularia (Scrophulariaceae). Front. Plant Sci. 15, 1439206 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Chytrý, M. et al. Refugial ecosystems in central Asia as indicators of biodiversity change during the Pleistocene–Holocene transition. Ecol. Indic. 77, 357–367 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Kaky, E., Nolan, V., Alatawi, A. & Gilbert, F. A comparison between ensemble and MaxEnt species distribution modelling approaches for conservation: A case study with Egyptian medicinal plants. Ecol. Inf. 60, 101150 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Valavi, R., Guillera-Arroita, G., Lahoz‐Monfort, J. J. & Elith, J. Predictive performance of presence‐only species distribution models: A benchmark study with reproducible code. Ecol. Monogr. 92, e01486 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Wilson, B. et al. Central Asian wild tulip conservation requires a regional approach, especially in the face of climate change. Biodivers. Conserv. 30, 1705–1730 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Yang, L., Zhu, X., Song, W., Shi, X. & Huang, X. Predicting the potential distribution of 12 threatened medicinal plants on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, with a maximum entropy model. Ecol. Evol. 14, e11042 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Abdelaal, M. et al. Population status, habitat preferences and predictive current and future distributions of three endangered Silene species under changing climate. Front. Plant. Sci. 15, 1336911 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Dainese, M. et al. Global change experiments in mountain ecosystems: A systematic review. Ecol. Monogr. 94, e1632 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Karami, S., Ejtehadi, H., Moazzeni, H., Vaezi, J. & Behroozian, M. Minimal climate change impacts on the geographic distribution of Nepeta glomerulosa, medicinal species endemic to southwestern and central Asia. Sci. Rep. 12, 19893 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Fern, R. R., Morrison, M. L., Wang, H. H., Grant, W. E. & Campbell, T. A. Incorporating biotic relationships improves species distribution models: Modeling the temporal influence of competition in conspecific nesting birds. Ecol. Model. 408, 108743 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Tsiftsis, S. & Djordjević, V. Modelling sexually deceptive orchid species distributions under future climates: The importance of plant–pollinator interactions. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–12 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Qiu, L. et al. Contrasting range changes of Bergenia (Saxifragaceae) species under future climate change in the Himalaya and Hengduan Mountains Region. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 155, 1927–1939 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Tsiftsis, S., Štípková, Z., Rejmánek, M. & Kindlmann, P. Predictions of species distributions based only on models estimating future climate change are not reliable. Sci. Rep. 14, 25778 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Erfanian, M. B., Sagharyan, M., Memariani, F. & Ejtehadi, H. Predicting range shifts of three endangered endemic plants of the Khorassan-Kopet Dagh floristic province under global change. Sci. Rep. 11, 9159 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Chen, J. H. & Yu, R. T. Assessing the distribution pattern of Saussurea medusa under climate change using an optimized MaxEnt model in Qinghai-Xizang Plateau. Environ. Monit. Assess. 197, 165 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Vintsek, L., Klichowska, E., Nowak, A. & Nobis, M. Genetic differentiation, demographic history and distribution models of high alpine endemic vicariants outline the response of species to predicted climate changes in a Central Asian biodiversity hotspot. Ecol. Indic. 144, 109419 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Vintsek, L., Klichowska, E., Nowak, A. & Nobis, M. Insight into the phylogeny and responses of species from the genus Sergia (Campanulaceae) to the climate changes predicted for the Mountains of Central Asia (a world biodiversity hotspot). BMC Plant Biol. 24, 228 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Nobis, M. et al. Evolutionary response of cold-adapted chasmophytic plants to Quaternary climatic oscillations in the Mountains of Central Asia (a world hotspot of biodiversity). Divers. Distrib. 29, 1458–1477 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Boucher, F. C., Lavergne, S., Basile, M., Choler, P. & Aubert, S. Evolution and biogeography of the cushion life form in angiosperms. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 20, 22–31 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  98. Zuo, Z. et al. Importance of soil moisture conservation in mitigating climate change. Sci. Bull. 69, 1332–1341 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (Grant No. RS-2022-NR068406), Korea Basic Science Institute (National Research Facilities and Equipment Center) grant funded by the Ministry of Education (Grant No. 2023R1A6C101B022), Changwon National University ‘Outstanding Research Support Project’ in 2025, the Russian Science Foundation (Grant No. 24-44-00027), and the state assignments for the Central Siberian Botanical Garden, the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Grant No. АААА-А21-121011290024-05).

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Changwon National University, Republic of Korea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SB contributed to the experimental design. ZZ analyzed the data. ZZ and SB drafted the manuscript. ZZ, SB, KO, BO, MN, AE and HJC interpreted the data and revised the manuscript. HJC supervised this study. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Hyeok Jae Choi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsegmed, Z., Baasanmunkh, S., Oyundelger, K. et al. Future of high mountain endemic species under climate change: predicting the potential scenarios for Stellaria pulvinata in the Altai Mountains.
Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45612-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45612-z

Keywords

  • Altai Mountains
  • Climate change
  • Endemic species
  • Maxent

  • Stellaria pulvinata


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Forecasting of global water usage in agriculture and total global consumption by using the Bi-GRU model

Stable isotope analysis suggests nutrient connectivity between salmon and kelp within a commercial scale open coast integrated multi-trophic aquaculture system

Back to Top