Search

Menu
Search
in Ecology

Genomic insights into the admixture and diversity of Kerala crossbred cattle

135 Views


Abstract

The crossbred cattle population of Kerala, primarily consisting of the Sunandini breed, was developed through systematic crossbreeding of indigenous cattle with exotic breeds (Brown Swiss, Jersey, and Holstein Friesian) to enhance milk production. This study aimed to assess the genetic diversity, population structure, and admixture proportions in this population using medium-density SNP genotyping (50 K array) on 2,273 genotyped animals. The study revealed an observed heterozygosity (Ho) of 0.34 ± 0.14 and expected heterozygosity (He) of 0.35 ± 0.14, indicating substantial genetic diversity. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) decayed rapidly with increasing inter-marker distance, averaging r2 = 0.26 at 0–10 kb and dropping to 0.05 at 200–500 kb, suggesting moderate LD levels suitable for genomic selection. The effective population size (Ne) was estimated at 216 one generation ago, indicating a low risk of immediate inbreeding. The genomic inbreeding estimates (FROH) revealed the presence of ancient inbreeding, with the prevalence of short ROH segments (1–8 Mb). Admixture analysis confirmed that the Kerala crossbred population consists of 37% Holstein Friesian, 31% Brown Swiss, 13% Jersey, and 19% indigenous gene pools, aligning with state breeding policies that promote high exotic inheritance in commercial herds. These findings underscore the success of crossbreeding in enhancing productivity while preserving genetic diversity. However, increasing exotic ancestry may affect adaptability to tropical conditions. Future breeding strategies should balance production and adaptation traits while monitoring inbreeding through genomic tools. This study provides crucial insights for optimizing breeding programs and sustaining genetic progress in the tropical crossbred dairy cattle population.

Data availability

The genotypic and pedigree data used and analyzed for the study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Sharma, R. et al. Genetic diversity and relationship of Indian cattle inferred from microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA markers. BMC Genet. 16(1), 73 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chacko, C. T. & Jose, T. K. Crossbreeding for milk production enhancement in Kerala. Indian Dairyman 40, 697–709 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Department of Animal Husbandry, Government of Kerala. State Breeding Policy 2018. (2018).

  4. Khan, K. D. et al. Optimizing the genomic evaluation model in crossbred cattle for smallholder production systems in India. Agriculture 15(9), 945 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Notter, D. R. The importance of genetic diversity in livestock populations of the future. J. Anim. Sci. 77(1), 61–69 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Visser, C., Lashmar, S. F., Van Marle-Köster, E., Poli, M. A. & Allain, D. Genetic diversity and population structure in South African, French and Argentinian Angora goats from genome-wide SNP data. PLoS ONE 11(5), e0154353 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Radhika, G., Aravindakshan, T. V., Jinty, S. & Ramya, K. Evaluation of genetic diversity, population structure, and relationship between legendary Vechur cattle and crossbred cattle of Kerala state, India. Anim. Biotechnol. 29(1), 50–58 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Edea, Z., Dessie, T., Dadi, H., Do, K. T. & Kim, K. S. Genetic diversity and population structure of Ethiopian sheep populations revealed by high-density SNP markers. Front. Genet. 8, 218 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wright, S. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16(2), 97 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Iacolina, L. et al. Novel graphical analyses of runs of homozygosity among species and livestock breeds. Int. J. Genomics 2016(1), 2152847 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Keller, M. C., Visscher, P. M. & Goddard, M. E. Quantification of inbreeding due to distant ancestors and its detection using dense single nucleotide polymorphism data. Genetics 189(1), 237–249 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  12. McQuillan, R. et al. Runs of homozygosity in European populations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 83(3), 359–372 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Slatkin, M. Linkage disequilibrium—understanding the evolutionary past and mapping the medical future. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9(6), 477–485 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Singh, C. V. Cross-breeding in cattle for milk production: Achievements, challenges and opportunities in India-a review. Adv. Dairy Res. 4(3), 1–14 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Barbato, M., Orozco-terWengel, P., Tapio, M. & Bruford, M. W. SNeP: A tool to estimate trends in recent effective population size trajectories using genome-wide SNP data. Front. Genet. 6, 109 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hill, W. G. Estimation of effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium1. Genet. Res. 38(3), 209–216 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Misztal, I. et al. Manual for BLUPF90 family of programs 199 (University of Georgia, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Alexander, D. H., Novembre, J. & Lange, K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res. 19, 1655–1664 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ahmad, S. F. et al. Population structure and admixture analysis in Frieswal crossbred cattle of India–a pilot study. Anim. Biotechnol. 31(1), 86–92 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ahmad, S. F. et al. Revelation of genomic breed composition in crossbred cattle of India with the help of Bovine50K BeadChip. Genomics 112(2), 1531–1535 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Van der Nest, M. A. et al. Breed ancestry, divergence, admixture, and selection patterns of the Simbra crossbreed. Front. Genet. 11, 608650 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bosman, L., Van Marle-Köster, E., Van der Westhuizen, R. R., Visser, C. & Berry, D. P. Short Communication: Population structure of the South African Bonsmara beef breed using high density single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes. Livest. Sci. 197, 102–105 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bhardwaj, S. Elucidating genetic diversity and selection signatures based on high density SNP array in Karan Fries Cattle. PhD Thesis. Submitted at ICAR- National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, India. (2023).

  24. Paul, R., Alex, R., Narayanaswamy, S. V., Yadav, A., Khan, K. D., Chavan, S. P., & Gowane, G. R. Exploring genetic diversity and population structure of field crossbred cattle using genome-wide SNP markers in Indian conditions. The Nucleus, 1–14. (2025).

  25. Boyles, A. L. et al. Linkage disequilibrium inflates type I error rates in multipoint linkage analysis when parental genotypes are missing. Hum. Hered. 59(4), 220–227 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bohmanova, J., Sargolzaei, M. & Schenkel, F. S. Characteristics of linkage disequilibrium in North American Holsteins. BMC Genomics 11(1), 421 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Meuwissen, T. H., Hayes, B. J. & Goddard, M. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157(4), 1819–1829 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Biegelmeyer, P., Gulias-Gomes, C. C., Caetano, A. R., Steibel, J. P. & Cardoso, F. F. Linkage disequilibrium, persistence of phase and effective population size estimates in Hereford and Braford cattle. BMC Genet. 17(1), 32 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Li, Y. & Kim, J. J. Effective population size and signatures of selection using bovine 50K SNP chips in Korean native cattle (Hanwoo). Evol. Bioinforma. 11, EBO-S24359 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Singh, A. et al. Estimation of linkage disequilibrium levels and allele frequency distribution in crossbred Vrindavani cattle using 50K SNP data. PLoS ONE 16(11), e0259572 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nisa, F. U. et al. Genetic insights into crossbred dairy cattle of Pakistan: Exploring allele frequency, linkage disequilibrium, and effective population size at a genome-wide scale. Mamm. Genome 34(4), 602–614 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hayes, B. J. et al. The origin of selection signatures on bovine chromosome 6. Anim. Genet. 39(2), 105–111 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Frankham, R., Bradshaw, C. J. & Brook, B. W. Genetics in conservation management: Revised recommendations for the 50/500 rules, Red List criteria and population viability analyses. Biol. Conserv. 170, 56–63 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bhardwaj, S. et al. Comparative assessment of the effective population size and linkage disequilibrium of Karan Fries cattle revealed viable population dynamics. Anim. Biosci. 37(5), 795 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Chhotaray, S. et al. Genome-wide estimation of inbreeding coefficient, effective population size and haplotype blocks in Vrindavani crossbred cattle strain of India. Biol. Rhythm. Res. 52(5), 666–679 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Vostry, L. et al. Genomic diversity and population structure of the Czech Holstein cattle. Livest. Sci. 273, 105261 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Šaran, M. et al. Genomic characterization of Serbian Holstein-Friesian cattle population. Czeh J. Anim. Sci. https://doi.org/10.17221/89/2023-cjas (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Daetwyler, H. D., Pong-Wong, R., Villanueva, B. & Woolliams, J. A. The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods. Genetics 185(3), 1021–1031 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kristensen, T. N. & Sørensen, A. C. Inbreeding–lessons from animal breeding, evolutionary biology, and conservation genetics. Anim. Sci. 80(2), 121–133 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Suryawanshi, P. V. Effect of ROH-based genomic inbreeding on performance traits in Karan Fries cattle (Doctoral dissertation, ICAR-NDRI, Karnal). (2023).

  41. Mulim, H. A. et al. Characterization of runs of homozygosity, heterozygosity-enriched regions, and population structure in cattle populations selected for different breeding goals. BMC Genom. 23(1), 209 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nisa, F. U. et al. Estimation of genome-wide patterns of homozygosity, heterozygosity and inbreeding in crossbred dairy cattle population in Pakistan. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 57(8), 396 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Xu, J. et al. Identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with heat stress and milk production traits in Chinese Holstein cows. BMC Genomics 26(1), 534 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Xu, L. et al. Genomic signatures reveal new evidences for selection of important traits in domestic cattle. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32(3), 711–725 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bhat, S. A. et al. Comparative milk proteome analysis of Kashmiri and Jersey cattle identifies differential expression of key proteins involved in immune system regulation and milk quality. BMC Genom. 21(1), 161 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Roudbari, Z. et al. Identification of hub genes and target miRNAs crucial for milk production in Holstein Friesian dairy cattle. Genes 14(11), 2105 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hansen, P. J. Physiological and cellular adaptations of zebu cattle to thermal stress. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 82, 349–360 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Behera, R. et al. Genotype x environment interaction on fertility traits of crossbred dairy cows under tropical climatic conditions of India. J. Agrometeorol. 24(2), 146–151 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Naskar, S., Gowane, G. R., Chopra, A., Paswan, C. & Prince, L. L. L. Genetic adaptability of livestock to environmental stresses. In Environmental stress and amelioration in livestock production 317–378 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Strucken, E. M., Swaminathan, M. & Gibson, J. P. Small SNP panels for breed proportion estimation in Indian crossbred dairy cattle. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 138(6), 698–707 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Patel, K. N., Patel, A. C., Shah, H., Nayee, N. G. & Rank, D. N. Determination of genomic breed composition using ADMIXTURE software. Indian J. Vet. Sci. Biotechnol. 18(5), 100–103 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Gebrehiwot, N. Z., Strucken, E. M., Marshall, K., Aliloo, H. & Gibson, J. P. SNP panels for the estimation of dairy breed proportion and parentage assignment in African crossbred dairy cattle. Genet. Sel. Evol. 53(1), 1–18 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Chang, C. C. et al. Second-generation PLINK: Rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience 4(1), s13742-015 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Nei, M. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 70(12), 3321–3323 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Hill, W. G. & Robertson, A. Linkage disequilibrium in finite populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 38(6), 226–231 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Corbin, L. J., Liu, A. Y. H., Bishop, S. C. & Woolliams, J. A. Estimation of historical effective population size using linkage disequilibria with marker data. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 129(4), 257–270 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Sved, J. A., & Feldman, M. W. Correlation and probability methods for one and two loci. (1973).

  58. Blackwell, B. F., Doerr, P. D., Reed, J. M. & Walters, J. R. Inbreeding rate and effective population size: A comparison of estimates from pedigree analysis and a demographic model. Biol. Conserv. 71(3), 299–304 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Wright, S. Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. Am. Nat. 56(645), 330–338 (1922).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Nei, M. F-statistics and analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Ann. Hum. Genet. 41(2), 225–233 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Meyermans, R., Gorssen, W., Buys, N. & Janssens, S. How to study runs of homozygosity using PLINK? A guide for analyzing medium density SNP data in livestock and pet species. BMC Genomics 21, 1–14 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Lencz, T. et al. Runs of homozygosity reveal highly penetrant recessive loci in schizophrenia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104(50), 19942–19947 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Purfield, D. C., Berry, D. P., McParland, S. & Bradley, D. G. Runs of homozygosity and population history in cattle. BMC Genet. 13, 1–11 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Ferenčaković, M. et al. Estimates of autozygosity derived from runs of homozygosity: Empirical evidence from selected cattle populations. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 130(4), 286–293 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Fonseca, P. A., Suárez-Vega, A., Marras, G. & Cánovas, Á. GALLO: An R package for genomic annotation and integration of multiple data sources in livestock for positional candidate loci. Gigascience 9(12), giaa149 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  66. VanRaden, P. M. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J. Dairy Sci. 91, 4414–4423 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  67. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their sincere gratitude to the Director, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, India, and the Kerala Livestock Development Board for providing the necessary facilities and support to carry out this study.

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Animal Genetics and Breeding, ICAR- National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India

    Kashif Dawood Khan, Ashish Yadav, V. N. Sahana, Rani Alex, Pradyut Das, Vikas Vohra & G. R. Gowane

  2. Kerala Livestock Development Board (KLDB), Gokkulam, Kerala, India

    M. V. Rajesh, Sajeev KumarT & R. Rajeev

Authors

  1. Kashif Dawood Khan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ashish Yadav
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V. N. Sahana
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rani Alex
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. V. Rajesh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sajeev KumarT
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. R. Rajeev
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Pradyut Das
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Vikas Vohra
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. G. R. Gowane
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: G.R.G. R. A..; Data generation: R.V.M., S.K.T., and R.R.; Methodology: K.D.K. and R.A.; Formal analysis: K.D.K., V.N.S., and A.Y.; Original draft preparation: K.D.K. and A.Y.; Writing, review, and editing: G.R.G., R.A., and V.V.; Supervision: G.R.G.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
G. R. Gowane.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khan, K.D., Yadav, A., Sahana, V.N. et al. Genomic insights into the admixture and diversity of Kerala crossbred cattle.
Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47282-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47282-3

Keywords

  • Crossbred cattle
  • Genetic diversity
  • Inbreeding
  • Admixture
  • SNP
  • Kerala

Source: Ecology - nature.com

Bedrock-soil geochemistry dominates free-living nitrogen fixation in soils but not in litter via interspecific microbial associations

Soil health improvement and climate change mitigation in soybean agroecosystems

This portal is not a newspaper as it is updated without periodicity. It cannot be considered an editorial product pursuant to law n. 62 of 7.03.2001. The author of the portal is not responsible for the content of comments to posts, the content of the linked sites. Some texts or images included in this portal are taken from the internet and, therefore, considered to be in the public domain; if their publication is violated, the copyright will be promptly communicated via e-mail. They will be immediately removed.

Back to Top
Close