Abstract
Despite its industrial potential, productivity in castor remains constrained by genotype × environment interactions (GEI) which obscure the true genetic potential of hybrids across variable production ecologies. The present investigation sought to elucidate the magnitude and pattern of GEI and to identify stable, high-performing hybrids for yield and yield-contributing traits across diverse agro-climatic conditions of Telangana, India. Eight elite castor hybrids were evaluated across multi-environment trials using AMMI (Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction) and GGE (Genotype and Genotype × Environment) biplot models to dissect stability, adaptability and environmental representativeness. Highly significant GEI effects were detected for seed yield, days to 50% flowering, number of nodes and hundred-seed weight underscoring the differential response of genotypes across environments. The AMMI biplot effectively captured interaction patterns, identifying Palem (E1) location as the most representative and least interactive environment for yield performance. “Which-won-where” analysis of the GGE biplot delineated mega-environment groupings, with PCH-596 excelling under Tandur (E2) and Tornala (E3) locations while ICH-5 demonstrated superior adaptability to E1. Yield Stability Index (YSI) and GGE ranking analyses consistently recognized PCH-596 (G2) and ICH-5 (G6) as the most stable and high-yielding hybrids across the environments. The integration of AMMI and GGE biplot methodologies proved highly effective in unravelling complex GEI patterns, facilitating the identification of genotypes with broad and specific adaptability. Further, Multi-Trait Stability Index (MTSI) has proven ICH-1160 (G3) as the most stable genotype across the environments. These findings provide a quantitative basis for environment-specific hybrid recommendations and contribute to accelerating genetic gains in castor breeding programs targeting enhanced productivity and resilience.
Similar content being viewed by others
AMMI and GGE biplot analysis for seed yield and stability performance of selected buckwheat genotypes under multi-environmental trials
AMMI and GGE biplot analysis for yield performance and stability assessment of selected Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc.) genotypes under the multi-environmental trials (METs)
Multivariate stability analysis to select elite rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes for grain yield, zinc and Iron
Data availability
Data will be made available on request.
References
Rukhsar Patel, M. P., Parmar, D. J., Kalola, A. D. & Kumar, S. Morphological and molecular diversity patterns in castor germplasm accessions. Ind. Crops Prod. 97, 316–323 (2017).
Xu, W. et al. Genomic insights into the origin, domestication and genetic basis of agronomic traits of castor bean. Genome Biol. 22(1), 1–27 (2021).
Indiastat. https://www.indiastat.com (2025).
Elhadi, M. Y. Fruits and vegetable Phyto Chemicals: Chemistry and Human Health 2nd edn, 1 (Wiley, 2018).
Vieira, C. et al. Effect of ricinoleic acid in acute and subchronic experimental models of inflammation. Mediat. Inflamm. 9(5), 223–228 (2000).
Maiti, S., Hegde, M. R. & Chattopadhyay, S. B. Handbook of Oil Seed Crops 317 (Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. (PVt). Ltd., 1988).
Memon, J. et al. Deployment of AMMI, GGE-biplot and MTSI to select elite genotypes of castor (Ricinus communis L.). Heliyon 9, e13515 (2023).
Sujatha, M., Reddy, T. P. & Mahasi, M. J. Role of biotechnological interventions in the improvement of castor (Ricinus communis L.) and Jatropha curcas L.. Biotechnol. Adv. 26(5), 424–435 (2008).
Baker, R. J. Differential response to environmental stress. https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US8863668 (1988).
Joshi, H. J., Maheta, D. R. & Jadon, B. S. Phenotypic stability and adaptability of castor hybrids. Indian J. Agric. Res. 36(4), 269–273 (2002).
Asungre, P. A., Akromah, R., Kena, A. W. & Gangashetty, P. Genotype by environment interaction on grain yield stability and iron and zinc content in OPV of pearl millet in Ghana using the AMMI method. Int. J. Agron. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9656653 (2021).
Ajay, B. C. et al. Modified AMMI stability index (MASI) for stability analysis. Groundnut Newsl. 18, 4–5 (2018).
Yan, W., Hunt, L. A., Sheng, Q. & Szlavnics, Z. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Sci. 40(3), 597–605. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.403597x (2000).
Ding, M., Tier, B. & Yan, W. K. Application of GGE biplot analysis to evaluate genotype (G), environment (E) and G×E interaction on P. radiata: case study. In Australasian Forest Genetics Conference 11–14 (2007).
Miranda, G. V. et al. Multivariate analyses of genotype x environment interaction of popcorn. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 44, 45–50 (2009).
Olivoto, T., Lúcio, A. D., da Silva, J. A., Sari, B. G. & Diel, M. I. Mean performance and stability in multi-environment trials II: Selection based on multiple traits. J. Agron. 111(6), 2961–2969. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2019.03.0221 (2019).
De Mendiburu, F. Agricolae. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. Available from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/agricolae/index.html (2017).
Bernal, E. F. & Villardon, P. G. GGE Biplot GUI: Interactive GGE Biplots in R. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/GGEBiplotGUI/index.html (2016).
Olivoto, T. & Lúcio, A. D. C. Metan: An R package for multi-environment trial analysis. Methods Ecol. Evol. 11, 783–789 (2020).
Peterson, D. D. Statistical Techniques in Agricultural Research: A Simple Exposition of Practice and Procedure in Biometry (McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc, 1939).
Akhila, S. R., Kumar, S., Sakure, A. A., Patel, D. A. & Patel, M. P. Integration of morpho-physico-biochemical traits with SSR and SRAP markers for characterization of castor genotypes of Indian origin. Oil Crop Sci. 7(1), 22–30 (2022).
Baye, T. M., Abebe, T. & Wilke, R. A. Genotype–environment interactions and their translational implications. Pers. Med. 8(1), 59–70 (2011).
Haldane, J. B. S. The interaction of nature and nature. Ann. Eugen. 13, 197–205 (1946).
Ebdon, J. S. & Gauch, H. G. Jr. Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction analysis of national turfgrass performance trials: Interpretation of genotype × environment interaction. Crop Sci. 42(2), 489–496 (2002).
Vargas, M. & Crossa, J. The AMMI analysis and graphing the biplot. Biometrics and statistics unit, CIMMYT combining features of AMMI and BLUP techniques. Agron. J. 111(6), 2949–2960 (2000).
Yan, W. & Hunt, L. A. Interpretation of genotype environment interaction for winter wheat yield in Ontario. Crop Sci. 41, 19–25 (2001).
Gauch, H. G. Jr. & Zobel, R. W. Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes. Crop Sci. 37(2), 311–326 (1997).
Narasimhulu, R., Veeraraghavaiah, R., Sahadeva Reddy, B., Tara Satyavathi, C. & Ajay BC Sanjana Reddy, P. Yield stability analysis of pearl millet genotypes in arid region of India using AMMI and GGE biplot. J. Environ. Biol. 44, 185–192 (2023).
Kilic, H. Additive main effects and multiplicative interactions (AMMI) analysis of grain yield in barley genotypes across environments. J. Agric. Sci. 20(4), 337–344 (2014).
Purchase, J. L. Parametric Stability to Describe G x E Interactions and Yield Stability in Winter Wheat. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agricultural University of Orange Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa (1997).
Akter, A. et al. AMMI biplot analysis for stability of grain yield in hybrid rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Rice Res. 2, 1–4 (2014).
Singamsetti, A. et al. Genotype × environment interaction and selection of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids across moisture regimes. Field Crops Res. 270, 108224 (2021).
Yan, W. GGE biplot: A window application for graphical analysis of multi-environmental data and other types of two-way data. Agron. J. 93, 1111–1118 (2001).
Ajay, B. C. et al. Identification of stable sources for low phosphorus conditions from groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) germplasm accessions using GGE biplot analysis. Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed. 81, 300–306 (2021).
Yan, W., Kang, M. S., Ma, B., Woods, S. & Cornelius, P. L. GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Sci. 47(2), 643–653 (2007).
Samyuktha, S. M. et al. Delineation of genotype × environment interaction for identification of stable genotypes to grain yield in mungbean. Front. Agron. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2020.577911 (2020).
Yan, W. Singular-value partitioning in biplot analysis of multi environment trial data. Agron. J. 94, 990–996 (2002).
Olanrewaju, O. S., Oyatom, O., Babalola, O. O. & Abberton, M. GGE biplot analysis of genotype × environment interaction and yield stability in bambara groundnut. Agronomy 11, 1839 (2021).
Ajay, B. C. et al. Improving genetic attributes of confectionary traits in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) using multivariate analytical tools. J. Agric. Sci. 4(3), 247–258 (2012).
Hashim, N. et al. Integrating multivariate and univariate statistical models to investigate genotype environment interaction of advanced fragrant rice genotypes under rainfed condition. Sustainability 13(8), 4555 (2021).
Hussain, T., Akram, Z., Shabbir, G., Manaf, A. & Ahmed, M. Identification of drought tolerant chickpea genotypes through multi trait stability index. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 28, 6818–6828 (2021).
Funding
Authors would like thank Professor Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana, India – 500 030 for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Planning and conducting the experiment and contributed significantly to writing the manuscripts [K. Sadaiah and G. Eswara Reddy], Conducted the experiment & data collection [K. Parimala, A. Saritha and T. Rajeshwar Reddy], Crop management and preparation of manuscript [G. Madhuri, V. Divya Rani and N. Nalini], Interpretation of data, review & editing of manuscript [S. Vanisri and M. Sreedhar], Supervision and administrative support [L. Krishna].
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sadaiah, K., Reddy, G.E., Parimala, K. et al. Genotype × environment interaction insights for yield and yield components in castor via AMMI and GGE biplot models.
Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44030-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44030-5
Keywords
- Castor
- Genotype × environment interaction
- AMMI
- GGE biplot
- MTSI
- Yield
Source: Ecology - nature.com
