in

Global Urban Tree Species (GUTS): Revealing tree species diversity across the world’s urban areas


Abstract

Diverse tree communities can bolster urban ecosystem resilience and provide vital ecosystem services. However, existing urban tree species datasets have limited geographic coverage and contain inadequate attributes. To address those gaps, we developed the Global Urban Tree Species (GUTS) dataset by integrating data from literature, biodiversity databases, and other open sources. The new dataset encompasses 159,845 occurrence records of 10,094 tree species in 8,349 cities and 139 countries. Among them, 109,879 records were confirmed from urban areas, representing 11.18% of global tree species diversity. The dataset has been validated using multiple methods. GUTS fills critical data gaps and provides a foundation for future research and management of global urban biodiversity.

Similar content being viewed by others

Global inequities in population exposure to urban greenspaces increased amidst tree and nontree vegetation cover expansion

Climate change increases global risk to urban forests

Extensive terrestrial biodiversity threats from global hillside urban expansion

Data availability

The dataset is available at Figshare: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26970220.

Code availability

The code used to curate the data in this data descriptor is available on Mendeley Data Repository (https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/pghkfm5sm9/1)20.

References

  1. Stevenson, P. C. et al. The state of the world’s urban ecosystems: What can we learn from trees, fungi, and bees? Plants, People. Planet 2, 482–498 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Morgenroth, J. et al. Urban tree diversity—Taking stock and looking ahead. Urban For. Urban Greening 15, 1–5 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vanden Broeck, A., Cox, K., Melosik, I., Maes, B. & Smets, K. Genetic diversity loss and homogenization in urban trees: the case of Tilia × europaea in Belgium and the Netherlands. Biodivers. Conserv. 27, 3777–3792 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lüttge, U. & Buckeridge, M. Trees: structure and function and the challenges of urbanization. Trees 37, 9–16 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Li, Y. et al. Multitrophic arthropod diversity mediates tree diversity effects on primary productivity. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 832–840 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ma, B. et al. A global basis of urban tree inventories: What comes first the inventory or the program. Urban For. Urban Greening 60, 127087 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yang, J., Yan, P., He, R. & Song, X. Exploring land-use legacy effects on taxonomic and functional diversity of woody plants in a rapidly urbanizing landscape. Landscape Urban Plann. 162, 92–103 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jin, J. & Yang, J. Effects of sampling approaches on quantifying urban forest structure. Landscape Urban Plann. 195, 103722 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Salmond, J. A. et al. Health and climate related ecosystem services provided by street trees in the urban environment. Environ. Health 15, 36 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  10. FAO. FAO Green Cities Initiative – Green cities Action Programme: building back better, https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/cb0848en (2020).

  11. Gronkiewicz-Waltz, H. et al. European Commission: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Gronkiewicz-Waltz, H., Larsson, A., Boni, A., Krogh Andersen, K. et al., 100 climate-neutral cities by 2030 – by and for the citizens – Report of the mission board for climate-neutral and smart cities, Publications Office, 2020, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/46063. (European Commission: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Report of the mission board for climate-neutral and smart cities, Publications Office, 2020).

  12. Roloff, A., Korn, S. & Gillner, S. The Climate-Species-Matrix to select tree species for urban habitats considering climate change. Urban For. Urban Greening 8, 295–308 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Burley, H. et al. Substantial declines in urban tree habitat predicted under climate change. Sci. Total Environ. 685, 451–462 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mantova, M. et al. Monitoring urban trees across the world. Report from the Urban Trees Ecophysiology Network (UTEN) inaugural workshop: The Urban Trees Ecophysiology Network inaugural workshop, Georgia Center at the University of Georgia, Athens, United States, March 2023. New Phytol. 242, 1881–1885 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ossola, A. et al. The Global Urban Tree Inventory: A database of the diverse tree flora that inhabits the world’s cities. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 1907–1914 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Page, M. J. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372, n71 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. BGCI. GlobalTreeSearch online database (version 1.8). Botanic Gardens Conservation International. Richmond, UK, https://tools.bgci.org/global_tree_search.php (2024).

  18. Beech, E., Rivers, M., Oldfield, S. & Smith, P. P. GlobalTreeSearch: The first complete global database of tree species and country distributions. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 36, 454–489 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  19. WFO. World Flora Online, http://www.worldfloraonline.org (2024).

  20. Jin, J. & Yang, J. BDcleaner: A workflow for cleaning taxonomic and geographic errors in occurrence data archived in biodiversity databases. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 21, e00852 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chamberlain, S. A. & Szöcs, E. taxize: taxonomic search and retrieval in R [v2; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/24v]. F1000Research 2, 191 (2013).

  22. Chamberlain, S. taxizedb: Tools for working with ‘Taxonomic’ databases, version 0.1.4. https://github.com/ropensci/taxizedb (2017).

  23. GBIF.org. GBIF Occurrence Download, https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.ruxuit (2018).

  24. BIEN. Botanical Information and Ecology Network (BIEN)[DB/OL], http://bien.nceas.ucsb.edu/bien (2019).

  25. ALA. Atlas of Living Australia e open access to Australia’s biodiversity data, https://www.ala.org.au/ (2019).

  26. Dornelas, M. et al. BioTIME: A database of biodiversity time series for the Anthropocene. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 760–786 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dauby, G. et al. RAINBIO: a mega-database of tropical African vascular plants distributions. PhytoKeys, 1–18 (2016).

  28. iDigBio. Integrated Digitized Biocollections (iDigBio)[DB/OL]. https://www.idigbio.org (2019).

  29. SpeciesLink. SpeciesLink[DB/OL], http://www.splink.org.br (2019).

  30. BISON. Biodiversity information serving our nation, https://bison.usgs.gov/ (2019).

  31. Defourny, P. et al. Observed annual global land-use change from 1992 to 2020 three times more dynamic than reported by inventory-based statistics, in preparation, http://maps.elie.ucl.ac.be/CCI/viewer/download.php (2023).

  32. Schiavina, M., Melchiorri, M. & Pesaresi, M. GHS-SMOD R2023A – GHS settlement layers, application of the Degree of Urbanisation methodology (stage I) to GHS-POP R2023A and GHS-BUILT-S R2023A, multitemporal (1975-2030)European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), https://doi.org/10.2905/A0DF7A6F-49DE-46EA-9BDE-563437A6E2BA (2023).

  33. Li, X. et al. Mapping global urban boundaries from the global artificial impervious area (GAIA) data. Environ. Res. Lett. 15 (2020).

  34. GeoNames. GeoNames geographical database, https://www.geonames.org (2019).

  35. GADM database. GADM Data Version 4.1[DB/OL].[2022-07-16], https://gadm.org/data.html (2022).

  36. Yang, X., Yan, P., Jin, J., Liu, X. & Yang, J. Global Urban Tree Species (GUTS): Revealing tree species diversity across the world’s urban areas. Figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26970220.v2 (2026).

  37. Olson, D. M. et al. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: A new map of life on earth. BioScience 51, 933–938 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Keppel, G. et al. Synthesizing tree biodiversity data to understand global patterns and processes of vegetation. J. Veg. Sci. 32 (2021).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all authors whose work was included in our systematic review for sharing their valuable data. We also extend our gratitude to the institutions that curate the biodiversity databases used in this study. Their generous data sharing made this research possible. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 32171542).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.Y. conceived the dataset plan and supervised the work. X.Y., P.Y., J.J. and J.Y. collected and compiled data. X.Y. conducted data validation. X.Y. and J.Y. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Jun Yang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, X., Yan, P., Jin, J. et al. Global Urban Tree Species (GUTS): Revealing tree species diversity across the world’s urban areas.
Sci Data (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-026-06868-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-026-06868-2


Source: Ecology - nature.com

An interdisciplinary machine learning-based approach for predicting corn grain yield under biofertilizer applications

Determinants of adoption of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) practices in mushroom farming in Bangladesh

Back to Top