Abstract
Soil temperature is a critical parameter influencing ecological and hydrological processes, yet its accurate projection under climate change remains challenging due to coarse-resolution climate models and complex soil-atmosphere interactions. This study develops a deep learning framework to downscale soil temperature (5 cm depth) in western Iran, under climate change scenarios. Using an ensemble of three complementary techniques—Random Forest (Gini) importance, Permutation Importance, and SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis—we identified optimal predictors from the 26 available CanESM5 (CMIP6) variables. Four deep learning models—CNN, LSTM, GRU, and a hybrid CNN-LSTM—were evaluated for downscaling performance using historical data (1980–2014). The hybrid CNN-LSTM model outperformed others, achieving the highest accuracy (NSE > 86%, RMSE < 4.3°C) by capturing spatial and temporal dependencies in soil thermal dynamics. Assessing the plausibility of each scenario’s trend (2015–2020) revealed regional climate patterns: western stations, more arid and warming-sensitive, aligned with SSP245/SSP370, while eastern stations, influenced by the Zagros Mountains, showed cooling and precipitation feedbacks favoring SSP119/SSP126. Future projections under SSP126, SSP245, and SSP585 scenarios indicated nonlinear soil temperature responses, with high-emission pathways (SSP585) causing initial cooling (-4.11°C by 2040) followed by accelerated warming (+ 2.09°C by 2100). In stark contrast, low- and mid-emission pathways (SSP126, SSP245) lead to stable, moderate warming. This creates a dramatic reversal in decadal trends for SSP585, shifting from strong cooling to rapid heating, and alters the climate’s statistical profile. The findings emphasize that high emissions defer but ultimately cause the most intense warming, highlighting the critical influence of emission pathways on the future pace and pattern of soil temperature change.
Data availability
The Raw data will be made available on https://github.com/mnazeri/Soil-Thermal-Regimes-.git. Also, the data from the CanESM5 climate model was taken from the website https://climate-scenarios.canada.ca.
References
Bradford, J. B. et al. Climate-driven shifts in soil temperature and moisture regimes suggest opportunities to enhance assessments of dryland resilience and resistance. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7, 358 (2019).
Fischer, G., Cleves-Leguizamo, J. A. & Balaguera-López, H. E. Impact of soil temperature on fruit species within climate change scenarios. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hortíc. 16(1), e12769 (2022).
Suseela, V., Conant, R. T., Wallenstein, M. D. & Dukes, J. S. Effects of soil moisture on the temperature sensitivity of heterotrophic respiration vary seasonally in an old-field climate change experiment. Glob. Change Biol. 18(1), 336–348 (2012).
Davidson, E. A., Samanta, S., Caramori, S. S. & Savage, K. The D ual A rrhenius and M ichaelis–M enten kinetics model for decomposition of soil organic matter at hourly to seasonal time scales. Glob. Change Biol. 18(1), 371–384 (2012).
Ameloot, N., Graber, E. R., Verheijen, F. G. & De Neve, S. Interactions between biochar stability and soil organisms: Review and research needs. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 64(4), 379–390 (2013).
Luo, Y. et al. Toward more realistic projections of soil carbon dynamics by Earth system models. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 30(1), 40–56 (2016).
Pugnaire, F. I. et al. Climate change effects on plant-soil feedbacks and consequences for biodiversity and functioning of terrestrial ecosystems. Sci. Adv. 5(11), eaaz1834 (2019).
Malhi, G. S., Kaur, M. & Kaushik, P. Impact of climate change on agriculture and its mitigation strategies: A review. Sustainability 13(3), 1318 (2021).
Elmi, A., Anwar, S. A. & Al-Dashti, H. Measurements and regional climate modeling of soil temperature with and without bias correction method under arid environment: Can soil temperature outperform air temperature as a climate change indicator?. Environ. Model. Assess. 29(2), 279–289 (2024).
Hu, G. et al. New Fourier-series-based analytical solution to the conduction–convection equation to calculate soil temperature, determine soil thermal properties, or estimate water flux. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer. 95, 815–823 (2016).
Wang, C., Fu, B., Zhang, L. & Xu, Z. Soil moisture–plant interactions: An ecohydrological review. J. Soils Sediments 19, 1–9 (2019).
Alizamir, M. et al. Advanced machine learning model for better prediction accuracy of soil temperature at different depths. PLoS One 15(4), e0231055 (2020).
Elsayed, S. et al. Interpretation the influence of hydrometeorological variables on soil temperature prediction using the potential of deep learning model. Knowledge-Based Eng. Sci. 4(1), 55–77 (2023).
Imanian, H. et al. A comparative analysis of deep learning models for soil temperature prediction in cold climates. Theoret. Appl. Climatol. 155(4), 2571–2587 (2024).
Jin, Y., Zhang, H., Yan, Y. & Cong, P. A semi-parametric geographically weighted regression approach to exploring driving factors of fractional vegetation cover: A case study of Guangdong. Sustainability 12(18), 7512 (2020).
Balmaceda-Huarte, R., Olmo, M. E. & Bettolli, M. L. Regional climate projections of daily extreme temperatures in Argentina applying statistical downscaling to CMIP5 and CMIP6 models. Clim. Dyn. 62(6), 4997–5018 (2024).
Sun, Y. et al. Deep learning in statistical downscaling for deriving high spatial resolution gridded meteorological data: A systematic review. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2023.12.011 (2024).
Ranjbar, A., Heydarnejad, S., Mousavi, S. H. & Mirzaei, R. Mapping desertification potential using life cycle assessment method: A case study in Lorestan Province, Iran. J. Arid Land 11, 652–663 (2019).
Swart, N. C. et al. The Canadian earth system model version 5 (CanESM5. 0.3). Geosci. Model Dev. 12(11), 4823–4873 (2019).
Tahroudi, M., Mirabbasi, R. & Nasrolahi, A. Investigating the possibilities of temperature concentration distribution in Zayanderood based on climate change. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2024.101454 (2024).
Amirabadizadeh, M., Ramezani, Y., Nazeri Tahroudi, M. & Zeynali, M. J. Assessment of data-driven models in downscaling of the daily temperature in Birjand synoptic station. AUT J. Civ. Eng. 3(2), 193–200 (2019).
Pizzigalli, C. et al. Dynamical and statistical downscaling of precipitation and temperature in a Mediterranean area. Ital. J. Agron. 7(1), e2 (2012).
Gers, F. A., Schmidhuber, J. & Cummins, F. Learning to forget: Continual prediction with LSTM. Neural Comput. 12(10), 2451–2471 (2000).
Saeidinia, M., Haghiabi, A. H., Nazeri Tahroudi, M., Nasrolahi, A. & De Michele, C. Deep learning and vine copula-based sequencing: Approaches under investigation for forecasting soil temperature dynamics. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 39, 1–35 (2025).
Cho, K., Van Merriënboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., Bengio, Y. Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.1078 (2014).
Xie, H., Zhang, L. & Lim, C. P. Evolving CNN-LSTM models for time series prediction using enhanced grey wolf optimizer. IEEE Access 8, 161519–161541 (2020).
Cao, L. et al. A novel transformer-CNN approach for predicting soil properties from LUCAS Vis-NIR spectral data. Agronomy 14(9), 1998 (2024).
Dong, Z. et al. Prediction of soil organic carbon content in complex vegetation areas based on CNN-LSTM model. Land 13(7), 915 (2024).
Kirkland, E. J. Bilinear interpolation. In Advanced computing in electron microscopy 261–263 (Springer, US, 2010).
Byun, K. & Hamlet, A. F. An improved empirical quantile mapping approach for bias correction of extreme values in climate model simulations. Environ. Res. Lett. 20(1), 014041 (2024).
Farhangmehr, V. et al. A spatiotemporal CNN-LSTM deep learning model for predicting soil temperature in diverse large-scale regional climates. Sci. Total Environ. 968, 178901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178901 (2025).
Imanian, H. et al. A comparative analysis of deep learning models for soil temperature prediction in cold climates. Theoret. Appl. Climatol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-023-04781-x (2023).
Malik, A. et al. Predicting daily soil temperature at multiple depths using hybrid machine learning models for a semi-arid region in Punjab, India. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 29, 71270–71289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20837-3 (2022).
Kheir, A., Elnashar, A., Mosad, A. & Govind, A. An improved deep learning procedure for statistical downscaling of climate data. Heliyon https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18200 (2023).
Wetterhall, F., Bárdossy, A., Chen, D., Halldin, S. & Xu, C. Y. Daily precipitation-downscaling techniques in three Chinese regions. Water Resour. Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004573 (2006).
Turco, M., Llasat, M. C., Herrera, S. & Gutiérrez, J. M. Bias correction and downscaling of future RCM precipitation projections using a MOS-Analog technique. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 122(5), 2631–2648 (2017).
Schepen, A., Everingham, Y. & Wang, Q. J. Coupling forecast calibration and data-driven downscaling for generating reliable, high-resolution, multivariate seasonal climate forecast ensembles at multiple sites. Int. J. Climatol. 40, 2479–2496 (2020).
Wang, F., Tian, D., Lowe, L., Kalin, L. & Lehrter, J. Deep learning for daily precipitation and temperature downscaling. Water Resour. Res. 57(4), e2020WR029308 (2021).
Nazeri Tahroudi, M., Ramezani, Y., De Michele, C. & Mirabbasi, R. Application of copula-based approach as a new data-driven model for downscaling the mean daily temperature. Int. J. Climatol. 43(1), 240–254 (2023).
Huang, R. et al. Soil temperature estimation at different depths, using remotely-sensed data. J. Integr. Agric. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2095-3119(19)62657-2 (2020).
García-García, A. et al. Soil heat extremes can outpace air temperature extremes. Nat. Clim. Chang. 13, 1237–1241. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01812-3 (2023).
Yang, H. et al. Stronger impact of extreme heat event on vegetation temperature sensitivity under future scenarios with high-emission intensity. Remote Sens. 16, 3708. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16193708 (2024).
Jia, M. et al. Characteristics of Soil temperature change in lhasa in the face of climate change. Atmosphere https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15040450 (2024).
Zhong, H. & Guo, Y. Long-term persistence in observed temperature and precipitation series. Fractal Fract. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract9060385 (2025).
Chiang, F. et al. Responses of compound daytime and nighttime warm-dry and warm-humid events to individual anthropogenic forcings. Environ. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac80ce (2022).
Jiang, K. et al. Combined influence of soil moisture and atmospheric humidity on land surface temperature under different climatic background. iScience https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.106837 (2023).
Mohammadi, M., Shafaie, V., Samani, A., Garizi, A. & Rad, M. Assessing future hydrological variability in a semi-arid mediterranean basin: Soil and water assessment tool model projections under shared socioeconomic pathways climate scenarios. Water https://doi.org/10.3390/w16060805 (2024).
You, Q. et al. Temperature dataset of CMIP6 models over China: Evaluation, trend and uncertainty. Clim. Dyn. 57, 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05691-2 (2021).
Alaminie, A. et al. Evaluation of past and future climate trends under CMIP6 scenarios for the UBNB (Abay), Ethiopia. Water https://doi.org/10.3390/w13152110 (2021).
Seneviratne, S. I. et al. Investigating soil moisture–climate interactions in a changing climate: A review. Earth-Sci. Rev. 99(3–4), 125–161 (2010).
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MS and MNT: Methodology, data curation, methodology, software, formal analysis, writing—original draft, preparing the revised version. AHH, AHN, and CDM: conceptualization, validation, writing—review & editing. All authors reviewed the revised manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saeidinia, M., Haghiabi, A.H., Nazeri Tahroudi, M. et al. High-resolution forecasting of soil thermal regimes using different deep learning frameworks under climate change.
Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38496-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38496-6
Keywords
- Climate change scenarios
- CMIP6
- CNN-LSTM
- Deep learning
- Soil temperature downscaling
- SSPs
Source: Ecology - nature.com
