Honey environmental DNA reveals entomological fingerprints through dual mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) and cytochrome b (CYTB) metabarcoding

1. Codex Alimentarius – International Food Standards. Standard for honey. Adopted in 1981. Revised in 1987, 2001. Amended in 2019, 2022. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations-World Health Organization. CXS 12–1981, 1-8 (2022).

2. Pita-Calvo, C. & Vázquez, M. Differences between honeydew and blossom honeys: a review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 57, 79–87 (2017).

   Google Scholar 

3. da Silva, P. M., Gauche, C., Gonzaga, L. V., Costa, A. C. O. & Fett, R. Honey: Chemical composition, stability and authenticity. Food Chem. 196, 309–323 (2016).

   Google Scholar 

4. De-Melo, M., Almeida-Muradian, A. A., Sancho, L. B. D., Pascual-Maté, A. & M. T., & Composition and properties of Apis mellifera honey: A review. J. Apic. Res. 57, 5–37 (2018).

   Google Scholar 

5. Laube, I. et al. Development of primer and probe sets for the detection of plant species in honey. Food Chem. 118, 979–986 (2010).

   Google Scholar 

6. Bruni, I. et al. A DNA barcoding approach to identify plant species in multiflower honey. Food Chem. 170, 308–315 (2015).

   Google Scholar 

7. Hawkins, J. et al. Using DNA metabarcoding to identify the floral composition of honey: a new tool for investigating honey bee foraging preferences. PLoS One 10, e0134735 (2015).

   Google Scholar 

8. Torricelli, M., Pierboni, E., Tovo, G. R., Curcio, L. & Rondini, C. In-house validation of a DNA extraction protocol from honey and bee pollen and analysis in fast Real-Time PCR of commercial honey samples using a knowledge-based approach. Food Anal. Methods. 9, 3439–3450 (2016).

   Google Scholar 

9. Kast, C. & Roetschi, A. Evaluation of baker’s yeast in honey using a real-time PCR assay. Food Microbiol. 62, 282–288 (2017).

   Google Scholar 

10. Bovo, S. et al. Shotgun metagenomics of honey DNA: Evaluation of a methodological approach to describe a multi-kingdom honey bee derived environmental DNA signature. PLoS One 13, e0205575 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

11. Utzeri, V. J. et al. Application of next generation semiconductor based sequencing to detect the botanical composition of monofloral, polyfloral and honeydew honey. Food Control 86, 342–349 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

12. Utzeri, V. J., Ribani, A. & Fontanesi, L. Authentication of honey based on a DNA method to differentiate Apis mellifera subspecies: Application to Sicilian honey bee (A. m. siciliana) and Iberian honey bee (A. m. iberiensis) honeys. Food Control 91, 294–301 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

13. Ribani, A., Utzeri, V. J., Taurisano, V. & Fontanesi, L. Honey as a source of environmental DNA for the detection and monitoring of honey bee pathogens and parasites. Vet. Sci. 7, 113 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

14. Utzeri, V. J. et al. A next generation sequencing approach for targeted Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae) mitochondrial DNA analysis based on honey derived environmental DNA. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 161, 47–53 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

15. Bovo, S., Utzeri, V. J., Ribani, A., Cabbri, R. & Fontanesi, L. Shotgun sequencing of honey DNA can describe honey bee derived environmental signatures and the honey bee hologenome complexity. Sci. Rep. 10, 9279 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

16. Ribani, A., Utzeri, V. J., Taurisano, V., Galuppi, R. & Fontanesi, L. Analysis of honey environmental DNA indicates that the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) trypanosome parasite Lotmaria passim is widespread in the apiaries of the North of Italy. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 184, 107628 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

17. Ribani, A., Taurisano, V., Utzeri, V. J. & Fontanesi, L. Honey environmental DNA can be used to detect and monitor honey bee pests: Development of methods useful to identify Aethina tumida and Galleria mellonella infestations. Vet. Sci. 9, 213 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

18. Utzeri, V. J. et al. Entomological signatures in honey: An environmental DNA metabarcoding approach can disclose information on plant-sucking insects in agricultural and forest landscapes. Sci. Rep. 8, 9996 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

19. Utzeri, V. J., Ribani, A., Taurisano, V., Banqué, C. H. I. & Fontanesi, L. Distribution of the main Apis mellifera mitochondrial DNA lineages in Italy assessed using an environmental DNA approach. Insects 12, 620 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

20. Bovo, S. et al. A genotyping by sequencing approach can disclose Apis mellifera population genomic information contained in honey environmental DNA. Sci. Rep. 12, 19541 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

21. Utzeri, V. J., Ribani, A., Taurisano, V. & Fontanesi, L. Entomological authentication of honey based on a DNA method that distinguishes Apis mellifera mitochondrial C mitotypes: Application to honey produced by A. m. ligustica and A. m. carnica. Food Control 134, 108713 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

22. Kek, S. P., Chin, N. L., Tan, S. W., Yusof, Y. A. & Chua, L. S. Molecular identification of honey entomological origin based on bee mitochondrial 16S rRNA and COI gene sequences. Food Control 78, 150–159 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

23. Prosser, S. W. & Hebert, P. D. Rapid identification of the botanical and entomological sources of honey using DNA metabarcoding. Food Chem. 214, 183–191 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

24. Khansaritoreh, E. et al. Employing DNA metabarcoding to determine the geographical origin of honey. Heliyon 6, e05596 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

25. Milla, L. et al. Pollen DNA metabarcoding identifies regional provenance and high plant diversity in Australian honey. Ecol. Evol. 11, 8683–8698 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

26. Wirta, H., Abrego, N., Miller, K., Roslin, T. & Vesterinen, E. DNA traces the origin of honey by identifying plants, bacteria and fungi. Sci. Rep. 11, 4798 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

27. Laha, R. C. et al. Meta-barcoding in combination with palynological inference is a potent diagnostic marker for honey floral composition. AMB Express 7, 132 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

28. Espinosa Prieto, A., Hardion, L., Debortoli, N. & Beisel, J. N. Finding the perfect pairs: A matchmaking of plant markers and primers for multi-marker eDNA metabarcoding. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 24, e13937 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

29. Keck, F., Couton, M. & Altermatt, F. Navigating the seven challenges of taxonomic reference databases in metabarcoding analyses. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 23, 742–755 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

30. Fontanesi, L., Taurisano, V., Ribani, A. & Utzeri, V. J. A reply to the Letter to the Editor of Moškrič et al. entitled A comment on the paper from Utzeri et al. (2022) Entomological authentication of honey based on a DNA method that distinguishes Apis mellifera mitochondrial C mitotypes: Application to honey produced by A. m. ligustica and A. m. carnica, Food Control 121, 2021, 107626. Food Control 147, 109570 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

31. Taurisano, V. et al. Distribution of honey bee mitochondrial DNA haplotypes in an Italian region where a legislative act is protecting the Apis mellifera ligustica subspecies. Sci. Rep. 14, 20583 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

32. Taurisano, V. et al. Comparing morphometric and mitochondrial DNA data from honeybees and honey samples for identifying Apis mellifera ligustica subspecies at the colony level. Animals 15, 1743 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

33. NCBI Resource Coordinators Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, D8–D13 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

34. Camacho, C. et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform. 10, 421 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

35. Fu, L., Niu, B., Zhu, Z., Wu, S. & Li, W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28, 3150–3152 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

36. Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 17, 10–12 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

37. Schmieder, R. & Edwards, R. Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 27, 863–864 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

38. Tamura, K., Stecher, G. & Kumar, S. MEGA 11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 3022–3027 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

39. Tamura, K., Nei, M. & Kumar, S. Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 11030–11035 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

40. Park, C. G. et al. Genetic variability of the invasive species Metcalfa pruinosa (Hemiptera: Flatidae) in the Republic of Korea. J. Econ. Entomol. 109, 1897–1906 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

41. Lee, K. H. et al. Tracing the invasion and expansion characteristics of the flatid planthopper, Metcalfa pruinosa (Hemiptera: Flatidae), in Korea using mitochondrial DNA sequences. Insects 12, 4 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

42. Coeur d’acier, A. et al. DNA barcoding and the associated PhylAphidB@ se website for the identification of European aphids (Insecta: Hemiptera: Aphididae). PLoS One 9, e97620 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

43. Liu, M., Clarke, L. J., Baker, S. C., Jordan, G. J. & Burridge, C. P. A practical guide to DNA metabarcoding for entomological ecologists. Ecol. Entomol. 45, 373–385 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

44. Yang, J. et al. Zooplankton community profiling in a eutrophic freshwater ecosystem-lake tai basin by DNA metabarcoding. Sci. Rep. 7, 1773 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

45. Keller, A. et al. Evaluating multiplexed next-generation sequencing as a method in palynology for mixed pollen samples. Plant. Biol. 17, 558–566 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

46. Zangheri, S. & Donadini, P. Comparsa nel Veneto di un Omottero neartico: Metcalfa pruinosa Say (Homoptera, Flatidae). Redia 63, 301–304 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

47. Lucchi, A. Metcalfa pruinosa and honey production in Italy. Am. Bee J. 137, 532–535 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

48. Bagnoli, B. & Lucchi, A. Dannosità e Misure di Controllo Integrato. In: A Lucchi (ed.) La Metcalfa Negli Ecosistemi Italiani, 65–88. ARSIA, Firenze (2000).

    Google Scholar 

49. Della Giustina, W. & Navarro, E. Metcalfa pruinosa, un nouvel envahisseur ? Phytoma 451, 30–32 (1993).

50. Dean, H. A. & Bailey, J. C. A flatid planthopper, Metcalfa pruinosa. J. Econ. Entomol. 54, 1104–1106 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

51. Li, R., Li, M., Yan, J., Bai, M. & Zhang, H. Five mitochondrial genomes of the genus Eysarcoris Hahn, 1834 with phylogenetic implications for the Pentatominae (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Insects 12, 597 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

52. Bai, H., Zhang, J., Dietrich, C. H., Li, Y. & Yuan, X. Structural characteristics of mitochondrial genomes of eight treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae: Centrotinae) and their phylogenetic implications. Genes 14, 1510 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

53. Zhou, X., Lei, Y., Dietrich, C. H. & Huang, M. Investigating monophyly of Typhlocybini based on complete mitochondrial genomes with characterization and comparative analysis of 19 species (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Typhlocybinae). Insects 14, 842 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

54. Lin, S., Zhang, H., Hou, Y., Zhuang, Y. & Miranda, L. High-level diversity of dinoflagellates in the natural environment, revealed by assessment of mitochondrial cox1 and cob genes for dinoflagellate DNA barcoding. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 1279–1290 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

55. Matsumoto, Y., Yanase, T., Tsuda, T. & Noda, H. Species-specific mitochondrial gene rearrangements in biting midges and vector species identification. Med. Vet. Entomol. 23, 47–55 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

56. Stuart, O. P. et al. Morphological and molecular analysis of Australian earwigs (Dermaptera) points to unique species and regional endemism in the Anisolabididae family. Insects 10, 72 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

57. Görür, G. & Demirtaş, E. Phenotypic plasticity in morphological features of Thelaxes suberi (Del Guercio, 1911) (Hemiptera: Aphidoidea) feed on Quercus (L.) species. J. Insect Biodivers. 5, 1–9 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

58. Lieutier, F. & Ghaioule, D. Entomological research in Mediterranean forest ecosystems (Editions Quae., 2005).

59. Akyıldırım Beğen, H., Görür, G. & Şenol, Ö. Cinara (Hemiptera: Aphidoidea) species distributed in Turkey and their host plants. Turk. J. Biod. 2, 24–33 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

60. Oğuzoğlu, Ş., Avcı, M. & Şenol, Ö. New contributions to the Turkish aphid fauna and species composition (Hemiptera: Aphididomorpha) in Isparta forests. Turk. J. Entomol. 46, 453–467 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

61. Obrycki, J. J. & Kring, T. J. Predaceous Coccinellidae in biological control. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 43, 295–321 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

62. Wang, X. Y., Yang, X. M., Lu, B., Zhou, L. H. & Wu, K. M. Genetic variation and phylogeographic structure of the cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii, based on mitochondrial DNA and microsatellite markers. Sci. Rep. 7, 1920 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

63. Komazaki, S., Shigehara, T. & Toda, S. Diversity of Japanese Aphis gossypii and comparison with other Aphis species based on the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I sequence. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 103, 916–924 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

64. Rebijith, K. B., Asokan, R., Krishna, V., Kumar, N. K. & Ramamurthy, V. V. Development of species-specific markers and molecular differences in mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences of Aphis gossypii and Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Fla. Entomol. 95, 674–682 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

65. Lagos-Kutz, D., Favret, C., Giordano, R. & Voegtlin, D. J Molecular and morphological differentiation between Aphis gossypii Glover (Hemiptera, Aphididae) and related species, with particular reference to the North American Midwest. ZooKeys 459, 49 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

66. Dong, Z., Li, Y., Liu, S. & Zhang, Z. Genetic diversity of the melon aphid Aphis gossypii (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in a diversified vegetable growing area. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 53, 259–266 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

Download references