Integrating theory and machine learning to reveal determinants of plasmid copy number

1. Rodríguez-Beltrán, J., DelaFuente, J., León-Sampedro, R., MacLean, R. C. & San Millán, Á Beyond horizontal gene transfer: the role of plasmids in bacterial evolution. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 19, 347–359 (2021).

   Google Scholar 

2. Ramiro-Martínez, P., de Quinto, I., Lanza, V. F., Gama, J. A. & Rodríguez-Beltrán, J. Universal rules govern plasmid copy number. Nat. Commun. 16, 6022 (2025).

   Google Scholar 

3. Maddamsetti, R. et al. Scaling laws of bacterial and archaeal plasmids. Nat. Commun. 16, 6023 (2025).

   Google Scholar 

4. San Millan, A., Escudero, J. A., Gifford, D. R., Mazel, D. & MacLean, R. C. Multicopy plasmids potentiate the evolution of antibiotic resistance in bacteria. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0010 (2016).

   Google Scholar 

5. Yao, Y. et al. Intra-and interpopulation transposition of mobile genetic elements driven by antibiotic selection. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 555–564 (2022).

   Google Scholar 

6. Hernandez-Beltran, J. C. R. et al. Plasmid-mediated phenotypic noise leads to transient antibiotic resistance in bacteria. Nat. Commun. 15, 2610 (2024).

   Google Scholar 

7. Wang, H. et al. Increased plasmid copy number is essential for Yersinia T3SS function and virulence. Science 353, 492–495 (2016).

   Google Scholar 

8. Sidhu, R. K. et al. Attenuation of virulence in Yersinia pestis across three plague pandemics. Science 388, eadt3880 (2025).

   Google Scholar 

9. Wang, H. & Joffré, E. Plasmid copy number as a modulator in bacterial pathogenesis and antibiotic resistance. npj Antimicrob. Resist. 3, 72 (2025).

   Google Scholar 

10. Joshi, S. H.-N., Yong, C. & Gyorgy, A. Inducible plasmid copy number control for synthetic biology in commonly used E. coli strains. Nat. Commun. 13, 6691 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

11. Kumar, S., Lezia, A. & Hasty, J. Engineering plasmid copy number heterogeneity for dynamic microbial adaptation. Nat. Microbiol. 9, 2173–2184 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

12. Rouches, M. V., Xu, Y., Cortes, L. B. G. & Lambert, G. A plasmid system with tunable copy number. Nat. Commun. 13, 3908 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

13. Son, H. -I. et al. Population-level amplification of gene regulation by programmable gene transfer. Nat. Chem. Biol. 21, 939–948 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

14. Camargo, A. P. et al. IMG/PR: a database of plasmids from genomes and metagenomes with rich annotations and metadata. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, D164–D173 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

15. Lee, C., Kim, J., Shin, S. G. & Hwang, S. Absolute and relative QPCR quantification of plasmid copy number in Escherichia coli. J. Biotechnol. 123, 273–280 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

16. Browne, H. P. et al. Culturing of ‘unculturable’ human microbiota reveals novel taxa and extensive sporulation. Nature 533, 543–546 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

17. Zhang, Z. et al. Assessment of global health risk of antibiotic resistance genes. Nat. Commun. 13, 1553 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

18. Lucks, J. B., Qi, L., Whitaker, W. R. & Arkin, A. P. Toward scalable parts families for predictable design of biological circuits. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 11, 567–573 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

19. Leinonen, R., Sugawara, H., Shumway, M. & Collaboration, I. N. S. D. The sequence read archive. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D19–D21 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

20. Soppa, J. Polyploidy and community structure. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 1–2 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

21. Mendell, J. E., Clements, K. D., Choat, J. H. & Angert, E. R. Extreme polyploidy in a large bacterium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 6730–6734 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

22. Takacs, C. N. et al. Polyploidy, regular patterning of genome copies, and unusual control of DNA partitioning in the Lyme disease spirochete. Nat. Commun. 13, 7173 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

23. Hamrick, G. S. et al. Programming dynamic division of labor using horizontal gene transfer. ACS Synth. Biol. 13, 1142–1151 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

24. Xue, W., Hong, J. & Wang, T. The evolutionary landscape of prokaryotic chromosome/plasmid balance. Commun. Biol. 7, 1434 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

25. Doolittle, W. F. & Sapienza, C. Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution. Nature 284, 601–603 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

26. Lopatkin, A. J. et al. Persistence and reversal of plasmid-mediated antibiotic resistance. Nat. Commun. 8, 1689 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

27. Wang, T. & You, L. The persistence potential of transferable plasmids. Nat. Commun. 11, 5589 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

28. Hall, J. P. et al. Plasmid fitness costs are caused by specific genetic conflicts enabling resolution by compensatory mutation. PLos Biol. 19, e3001225 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

29. Thomas, C. M. et al. Annotation of plasmid genes. Plasmid 91, 61–67 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

30. Yu, M. K., Fogarty, E. C. & Eren, A. M. Diverse plasmid systems and their ecology across human gut metagenomes revealed by PlasX and MobMess. Nat. Microbiol. 9, 830–847 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

31. Paysan-Lafosse, T. et al. The Pfam protein families database: embracing AI/ML. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D523–D534 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

32. Hyatt, D. et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinforma. 11, 119 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

33. Finn, R. D. et al. Pfam: clans, web tools and services. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, D247–D251 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

34. Motallebi-Veshareh, M., Rouch, D. & Thomas, C. A family of ATPases involved in active partitioning of diverse bacterial plasmids. Mol. Microbiol. 4, 1455–1463 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

35. Mitchell, A. et al. The InterPro protein families database: the classification resource after 15 years. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D213–D221 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

36. Campbell, E. A. et al. Structure of the bacterial RNA polymerase promoter specificity σ subunit. Mol. Cell 9, 527–539 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

37. Seabold, R. R. & Schleif, R. F. Apo-AraC actively seeks to loop. J. Mol. Biol. 278, 529–538 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

38. Kleiger, G. & Eisenberg, D. GXXXG and GXXXA motifs stabilize FAD and NAD (P)-binding Rossmann folds through Cα–H⋯ O hydrogen bonds and van der Waals interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 323, 69–76 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

39. De Meo, P., Ferrara, E., Fiumara, G. & Provetti, A. Generalized louvain method for community detection in large networks. 11th international conference on intelligent systems design and applications, 88-93 (2011).

40. Bethke, J. H. et al. Environmental and genetic determinants of plasmid mobility in pathogenic Escherichia coli. Sci. Adv. 6, eaax3173 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

41. Cooper, A. L., Wong, A., Tamber, S., Blais, B. W. & Carrillo, C. D. Analysis of antimicrobial resistance in bacterial pathogens recovered from food and human sources: insights from 639,087 bacterial whole-genome sequences in the NCBI Pathogen Detection database. Microorganisms 12, 709 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

42. Alcock, B. P. et al. CARD 2023: expanded curation, support for machine learning, and resistome prediction at the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database. Nucleic Aacids Res. 51, D690–D699 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

43. Avire, N. J., Whiley, H. & Ross, K. A review of Streptococcus pyogenes: public health risk factors, prevention and control. Pathogens 10, 248 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

44. Higgins, D. A. et al. The major Vibrio cholerae autoinducer and its role in virulence factor production. Nature 450, 883–886 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

45. Hazen, T. C., Fliermans, C. B., Hirsch, R. P. & Esch, G. W. Prevalence and distribution of Aeromonas hydrophila in the United States. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 36, 731–738 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

46. Salyers, A. A., Gupta, A. & Wang, Y. Human intestinal bacteria as reservoirs for antibiotic resistance genes. Trends Microbiol. 12, 412–416 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

47. Jurėnas, D., Fraikin, N., Goormaghtigh, F. & Van Melderen, L. Biology and evolution of bacterial toxin–antitoxin systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 20, 335–350 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

48. Luo, X. et al. Characterization of DinJ-YafQ toxin–antitoxin module in Tetragenococcus halophilus: activity, interplay, and evolution. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 105, 3659–3672 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

49. San Millan, A. et al. Small-plasmid-mediated antibiotic resistance is enhanced by increases in plasmid copy number and bacterial fitness. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 59, 3335–3341 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

50. van Mastrigt, O., Lommers, M. M., de Vries, Y. C., Abee, T. & Smid, E. J. Dynamics in copy numbers of five plasmids of a dairy Lactococcus lactis strain under dairy-related conditions, including near-zero growth rates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 84, e00314–00318 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

51. Uhlin, B. E., Molin, S., Gustafsson, P. & Nordström, K. Plasmids with temperature-dependent copy number for amplification of cloned genes and their products. Gene 6, 91–106 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

52. Akasaka, N. et al. Change in the plasmid copy number in acetic acid bacteria in response to growth phase and acetic acid concentration. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 119, 661–668 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

53. Saad, A. et al. Plasmid copy number variation impacts pathogenicity and quantification of Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens infecting the mung bean. Plant Pathol. 74, 2670–2681 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

54. Wedel, E. et al. Insertion sequences determine plasmid adaptation to new bacterial hosts. MBio 14, e03158–03122 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

55. Peng, K. et al. Long-read metagenomic sequencing reveals that high-copy small plasmids shape the highly prevalent antibiotic resistance genes in the animal fecal microbiome. Sci. Total Environ. 893, 164585 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

56. Potter, S. C. et al. HMMER web server: 2018 update. Nucleic acids Res. 46, W200–W204 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

57. Ahlmann-Eltze, C. & Huber, W. Comparison of transformations for single-cell RNA-seq data. Nat. Methods 20, 665–672 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

58. Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. (2012).

59. Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 785–794 (2016).

60. Rajewska, M., Wegrzyn, K. & Konieczny, I. AT-rich region and repeated sequences – the essential elements of replication origins of bacterial replicons. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 36, 408–434 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

61. Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498–2504 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

62. Traag, V. A., Waltman, L. & van Eck, N. J. From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities. Sci. Rep. 9, 5233 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

63. Robertson, J. ames & Nash John H, E. MOB-suite: software tools for clustering, reconstruction and typing of plasmids from draft assemblies. Microb. Genom. 4, e000206 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

64. Seemann, T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30, 2068–2069 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

65. Shahzadi, I. et al. Integrating theory and machine learning to reveal determinants of plasmid copy number. Github https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19343249 (2026).

Download references