in

Intelligent irrigation management system for arid and semi-arid regions under climate change


Abstract

In arid and semi-arid regions, optimal irrigation management requires a detailed and integrated understanding of the interactions among climate, soil, and crop physiology on a daily time scale. In this study, an intelligent system for determining irrigation timing and depth was developed by integrating actual and predicted climate data with a physical water–soil–plant model, and its efficiency was evaluated for three crops, wheat, tomato, and apple, under water-limited conditions in the Miandoab Plain (Lake Urmia Basin). The system accurately estimated the water requirements of crops by simulating soil moisture at different layers, calculating crop evapotranspiration (ETc), and dynamically updating soil evaporation coefficient (Ke) and crop transpiration coefficient (Kcb) based on leaf area index (LAI) and phenological stages. The results showed that the temporal patterns of temperature and ETc changes were fully consistent with the semi-arid climate, and an increase in temperature during the middle of the growing season led to a significant rise in ETc. The highest ETc values were observed in the apple orchard (up to approximately 29 mm/day), while tomato and wheat exhibited peak-decline and flowering-to-grain-filling patterns, respectively. The results showed that the intelligent system provided estimates comparable to those of the Penman–Monteith method, with no significant difference (p > 0.05). Analysis of Kcb and Ke coefficients indicated that, as leaf area expanded, the contribution of soil surface evaporation decreased, and crop transpiration became the dominant component of water consumption. Field validation demonstrated that the intelligent system predicted water needs more accurately than conventional methods, resulting in up to 41% reduction in water use, up to 12.6% increase in yield, and up to 87% improvement in water productivity, depending on the crop and irrigation system. Correlation analysis confirmed the strong relationship between temperature, LAI, and ETc, demonstrating the system’s capability to represent climatic and physiological factors simultaneously. Overall, the study shows that intelligent systems based on physical–physiological models can significantly enhance the accuracy of water demand forecasting, improve productivity, and promote sustainable irrigation management at both farm and basin scales, serving as a generalizable tool for climate-change-adapted agriculture in arid and semi-arid regions.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Pereira, L. S., Cordery, I. & Iacovides, I. Coping with water scarcity: Addressing the challenges (Springer, 2007).

  2. Zhang, X., Liu, Y. & Li, H. Climate change impacts on water resources and irrigation. Agric. Water Manage. 245, 106585 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  3. FAO. Water and agriculture in arid regions (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2021).

  4. Madani, K., Motlagh, B. & Karami, E. Water scarcity and agricultural sustainability in Lake Urmia Basin. J. Environ. Manage. 182, 312–324 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dolatshahi, A., Shafiei, M. & Rahimi, M. Limitations of conventional irrigation scheduling methods in arid regions. Irrig. Drain. 71 (2), 265–279 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Abuhashim, A. & Negm, A. Water productivity and economic profitability of deficit irrigation. Agric. Water Manage. 208, 97–107 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Li, F., Zhang, J. & Chen, L. Economic analysis of deficit irrigation strategies. Irrig. Sci. 37, 123–136 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Šimunek, J., van Genuchten, M. T. & Sejna, M. The HYDRUS-1D software package for simulating water flow and solute transport in variably saturated media. Version 3, 0 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Selim, H. M., Wang, X. & Zhu, Q. Soil salinity modeling under field conditions. Agric. Water Manage. 118, 1–9 (2013).

  10. Noshadi, E., Karimi, P. & Khalili, M. Field-scale irrigation optimization with HYDRUS. Irrig. Sci. 38 (4), 307–320 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Er-Raki, S., Abib, A. & Bouksila, F. Optimizing irrigation with HYDRUS simulations in semi-arid conditions. Agric. Water Manage. 248, 106734 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Khalili, M. & Ghaffari, M. Simulation of crop water requirement using SWAP model. Agric. Water Manage. 277, 108204 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fujimaki, H., Nakagawa, K. & Sato, T. Forecast-based irrigation management systems. Irrig. Sci. 33, 423–436 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Abd, E., Baki, S. F., El-Sebaii, A. A. & Sharaf, A. M. Integrated modeling of crop water requirement using weather forecast data. Agric. Water Manage. 190, 45–56 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Abd, E., Baki, S. F., El-Sebaii, A. A. & Sharaf, A. M. Optimization of irrigation scheduling under limited water supply. Irrig. Sci. 36 (5), 321–337 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Abd, E., Baki, S. F., El-Sebaii, A. A. & Sharaf, A. M. Simulation-based decision support for irrigation management. Agric. Syst. 180, 102770 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, L. & Cai, X. Limitations of irrigation scheduling models in arid climates. Irrig. Sci. 27, 31–42 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Linker, R. & Sylaios, G. Crop modeling in semi-arid Mediterranean regions. Agric. Syst. 145, 50–63 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jamal, A., Ali, S. & Khan, M. Validation of irrigation models in arid climates. J. Arid Environ. 164, 1–13 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Emami, S., Rezaverdinejad, V., Dehghanisanij, H., Emami, H. & Elbeltagi, A. Data mining predictive algorithms for estimating soil water content. Soft Comput. 28 (6), 4915–4931 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dehghanisanij, H., Emami, S., Nourjou, A. & Rezaverdinejad, V. Investigating the compatibility of an irrigation decision support system with water rights and allocation in a selected irrigation network. Irrig. Drain. 73 (3), 1119–1137 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jones, H., Smith, R. & Wang, Y. Web-based irrigation management for smallholder farmers. Comput. Electron. Agric. 188, 106311 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ritzema, H., Simmers, I. & van Loon, E. Web-based irrigation management tools for arid regions. Irrig. Drain. 68 (2), 243–258 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Emami, S., Dehghanisanij, H. & Hajimirzajan, A. Agent-based simulation model to evaluate government policies for farmers’ adoption and synergy in improving irrigation systems: A case study of Lake Urmia basin. Agric. Water Manage. 294, 108730 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Feizizadeh, B., Abdollahi, Z. & Shokati, B. A GIS-based spatiotemporal impact assessment of droughts in the hyper-saline Urmia Lake Basin on the hydro-geochemical quality of nearby aquifers. Remote Sens. 14 (11), 2516 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gassman, P. W., Reyes, M. R., Green, C. H. & Arnold, J. G. The soil and water assessment tool: historical development, applications, and future research directions. Trans. ASABE. 50 (4), 1211–1250 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D. & Smith, M. Crop evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrig. Drain. Pap. 56, 300(9), D05109 (1998).

  28. Steppuhn, H., Van Genuchten, M. T. & Grieve, C. M. Root-zone salinity: II. Indices for tolerance in agricultural crops. Crop Sci. 45 (1), 221–232 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Raes, D., Steduto, P., Hsiao, T. C., Fereres, E. & AquaCrop FAO’s crop model to simulate yield response to water: II. Main algorithms and software description. Agron. J. 101, 438–447 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Doorenbos, J. & Kassam, A. H. Yield Response to Water; FAO Irrig. Drain. Pap. 33 7–13 (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 1986).

  31. Nations, D. E. S., Pour, U. & La Alimentacion, Y. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2002).

  32. Pessarakli, M. Handbook of plant and crop physiology (CRC, 2014).

  33. Rycroft, D. W. & Smedema, L. K. Land drainage: planning and design of agricultural drainage systems (Batsford Academic & Educational, 1983).

  34. Savva, A. P. & Frenken, K. Irrigation manual. Planning, development monitoring and evaluation of irrigated agriculture with farmer participation. FAO (2002).

  35. Lehmann, N. & Finger, R. Economic and environmental assessment of irrigation water policies: A bioeconomic simulation study. Environ. Model. Softw. 51, 112–122 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ge, Y., Li, X., Huang, C. & Nan, Z. A. Decision Support System for irrigation water allocation along the middle reaches of the Heihe River Basin, Northwest China. Environ. Model. Softw. 47, 182–192 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Howell, T. A., Evett, S. R., Tolk, J. A., Copeland, K. S. & Marek, T. H. Evapotranspiration and crop coefficients for irrigated sunflower in the Southern High Plains. In 2012 Dallas, Texas, July 29–August 1 p.1. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. (2012).

  38. Berry, J. & Bjorkman, O. Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. 31 (1), 491–543 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Xue, R. et al. Physiological response of tomato and cucumber plants to micro-spray in high-temperature environment: a scientific and effective means of alleviating crop heat stress. Agronomy 13 (11), 2798 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hatfield, J. L. & Dold, C. Water-use efficiency: advances and challenges in a changing climate. Front. Plant. Sci. 10, 103 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Dragoni, D., Lakso, A. N. & Piccioni, R. M. Transpiration of an apple orchard in a cool humid climate: measurement and modeling. In IV International Symposium on Irrigation of Horticultural Crops 664, 175–180 (2003).

  42. Steduto, P., Raes, D., Hsiao, T.C., Fereres, F., Heng, L.K., Howell, T.A., Evett, S.R., Rojas-Lara, B.A., Farahani, H.J., Izzi, G., Oweis, T.Y., Wani, S.P., Hoogeveen, J. & Geerts, S. Concepts and Applications of AquaCrop: The FAO Crop Water Productivity Model. In: Cao, W., White, J.W., Wang, E. (eds) Crop Modeling and Decision Support. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 175–191 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kroes, J. G., Wesseling, J. G. & Van Dam, J. C. Integrated modelling of the soil–water–atmosphere–plant system using the model SWAP 2·0: an overview of theory and an application. Hydrol. Process. 14 (11–12), 1993–2002 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kodešová, R., Kočárek, M., Kodeš, V., Šimůnek, J. & Kozák, J. Impact of soil micromorphological features on water flow and herbicide transport in soils. Vadose Zone J. 7 (2), 798–809 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Monteith, J. L. Vegetation and the Atmosphere. 1, 273 (Academic, 1975).

Download references

Funding

The present study was carried out with the financial support of the Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) (project No. 4040570).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.E. and H.D. designed the study, analyzed and discussed the data and results. S.E., H.D. and H.E. performed the experiments and simulations. S.E., H.D. and H.E. prepared the hybrid proposed model/ materials/equipment’s/irrigation system. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Somayeh Emami.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Emami, S., Dehghanisanij, H. & Emami, H. Intelligent irrigation management system for arid and semi-arid regions under climate change.
Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46523-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46523-9

Keywords

  • Evapotranspiration
  • Irrigation management
  • Water scarcity
  • Intelligent system
  • Lake Urmia


Source: Ecology - nature.com

A Middle Stone Age occupation identified at Baden-Baden in the grasslands of the Free State, South Africa

Comparative environmental and economic assessment of greenhouse cucumber and opuntia ficus-indica cultivation in arid regions

Back to Top