Search

Menu
Search
in Ecology

Life history optimization and the macroevolution of mammal body size

139 Views


Abstract

Although body size is linked to nearly every aspect of an organism’s biology, its evolution remains poorly understood. Here, an analytical life history model of optimal size is tested for the first time using unprecedented data on mammal life history and phylogeny and shown to explain several well-defined macroevolutionary patterns. The evolution of body size is explained in large part by life history optimization with respect to adult mortality under metabolic constraints on productivity. The model also explains plausible effects of climate change, diet, feeding mode, cursoriality, aquatic living, powered flight, and island endemicity on the evolution of body size. This study furthers our understanding of the relationship between micro- and macro-evolution.

Data availability

Datasets and custom code are available in the Dryad data repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.j3tx95xt0.

Code availability

Custom code are available in the Dryad data repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.j3tx95xt0.

References

  1. Coulson, T. et al. Density dependent environments can select for extremes of body size. Peer Commun. J. https://doi.org/10.24072/pcjournal.162 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bonner, J. T. The Evolution of Complexity by Means of Natural Selection (Princeton University Press, 1988).

  3. Smith, F. A. & Lyons, S. K. Animal Body Size : Linking Pattern and Process Across Space, Time, and Taxonomic Group (The University of Chicago Press, 2013).

  4. Calder, W. A. Size, Function, and Life History (Harvard University Press, 1984).

  5. Peters, R. H. The Ecological Implications of Body Size (Cambridge University Press, 1983).

  6. White, C. R., Alton, L. A., Bywater, C. L., Lombardi, E. J. & Marshall, D. J. Metabolic scaling is the product of life-history optimization. Science 377, 834–839. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abm7649 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Weil, S.-S. et al. Body size and life history shape the historical biogeography of tetrapods. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1467–1479. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02150-5 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schmidt-Nielsen, K. Scaling: Why is Animal Size so Important? (Cambridge University Press, 1984).

  9. Stearns, S. C. The Evolution of Life Histories (Oxford University Press, 1992).

  10. Roff, D. A. Life History Evolution (Sinauer Associates, 2002).

  11. Kozłowski, J. & Wiegert, R. G. Optimal age and size at maturity in annuals and perennials with determinate growth. Evol. Ecol. 1, 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/Bf02067553 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Charnov, E. L. Evolution of life-history variation among female mammals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 1134–1137. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.88.4.1134 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Charnov, E. L. Life History Invariants: Some Explorations of Symmetry in Evolutionary Ecology (Oxford University Press, 1993).

  14. Kozłowski, J. & Wiegert, R. G. Optimal allocation of energy to growth and reproduction. Theor. Popul. Biol. 29, 16–37 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Diniz-Filho, J. A. F. The Macroecological Perspective: Theories, Models and Methods 1 edn. (Springer International Publishing AG, 2023).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mattila, T. M. & Bokma, F. Extant mammal body masses suggest punctuated equilibrium. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 275, 2195–2199. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0354 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Huang, S. et al. Mammal body size evolution in North America and Europe over 20 Myr: similar trends generated by different processes. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci 284, 20162361 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Raia, P., Carotenuto, F., Passaro, F., Fulgione, D. & Fortelius, M. Ecological specialization in fossil mammals explains Cope’s Rule. Am. Nat. 179, 328–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/664081 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Venditti, C., Meade, A. & Pagel, M. Multiple routes to mammalian diversity. Nature 479, 393–396. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10516 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pagel, M., O’Donovan, C. & Meade, A. General statistical model shows that macroevolutionary patterns and processes are consistent with Darwinian gradualism. Nat. Commun. 13, 1113 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Baker, J., Meade, A., Pagel, M. & Venditti, C. Adaptive evolution toward larger size in mammals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 5093–5098. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419823112 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Clauset, A. & Erwin, D. H. The evolution and distribution of species body size. Science 321, 399–401. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1157534 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Finarelli, J. A. Mechanisms behind active trends in body size evolution of the Canidae (Carnivora: Mammalia). Am. Nat. 170, 876–885. https://doi.org/10.1086/522846 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sanisidro, O., Mihlbachler, M. C. & Cantalapiedra, J. L. A macroevolutionary pathway to megaherbivory. Science 380, 616–618 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rolland, J. et al. Conceptual and empirical bridges between micro- and macroevolution. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1181–1193. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02116-7 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kemp, T. S. The Origin and Evolution of Mammals (Oxford University Press, 2005).

  27. Alroy, J. Cope’s rule and the dynamics of body mass evolution in North American fossil mammals. Science 280, 731–734 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Smith, F. A. et al. The evolution of maximum body size of terrestrial mammals. science 330, 1216–1219 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mammal Diversity Database. (Zenodo, 2025).

  30. Soria, C. D., Pacifici, M., Di Marco, M., Stephen, S. M. & Rondinini, C. COMBINE: A coalesced mammal database of intrinsic and extrinsic traits. Ecology 102, e03344. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3344 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Álvarez-Carretero, S. et al. A species-level timeline of mammal evolution integrating phylogenomic data. Nature 602, 263–267. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04341-1 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Faurby, S. et al. PHYLACINE 1.2: The phylogenetic atlas of mammal macroecology. Ecology 99, 2626–2626. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2443 (2018). https://doi.org/https://

    Google Scholar 

  33. Casanovas-Vilar, I., van den Hoek Ostende, L. W., Janis, C. M. & Saarinen, J. Evolution of Cenozoic Land Mammal Faunas and Ecosystems (Springer, 2023).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jones, K. E. et al. PanTHERIA: a species-level database of life history, ecology, and geography of extant and recently extinct mammals. Ecology 90, 2648–2648. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1494.1 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cooper, N. & Purvis, A. Body size evolution in mammals: Complexity in tempo and mode. Am. Nat. 175, 727–738. https://doi.org/10.1086/652466 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Evans, A. R. et al. The maximum rate of mammal evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 4187–4190 (2012).

  37. Lovegrove, B. & Mowoe, M. The evolution of mammal body sizes: responses to Cenozoic climate change in North American mammals. J. Evol. Biol. 26, 1317–1329 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Huang, S., Eyres, A., Fritz, S. A., Eronen, J. T. & Saarinen, J. In Evolution of Cenozoic Land Mammal Faunas and Ecosystems: 25 Years of the NOW Database of Fossil Mammals (eds. Casanovas-Vilar, I., van den Hoek Ostende, L. W., Janis, C. M., & Saarinen, M.) 79–93 (2023).

  39. Clavel, J. & Morlon, H. Accelerated body size evolution during cold climatic periods in the Cenozoic. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 4183–4188 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Smith, F. A., Smith, E., Lyons, R. E., Payne, J. L. & S. K. & Body size downgrading of mammals over the late Quaternary. Science 360, 310–313. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao5987 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zhu, D. et al. The large mean body size of mammalian herbivores explains the productivity paradox during the Last Glacial Maximum. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 640–649 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Farina, B., Faurby, S. & Silvestro, D. Dollo meets Bergmann: morphological evolution in secondary aquatic mammals. Proc. Royal Soc. B. 290, 20231099 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Moyers Arévalo, R. L., Amador, L. I., Almeida, F. C. & Giannini, N. P. Evolution of body mass in bats: Insights from a large supermatrix phylogeny. J. Mamm. Evol. 27, 123–138 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Price, S. A. & Hopkins, S. S. The macroevolutionary relationship between diet and body mass across mammals. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 115, 173–184 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Pineda-Munoz, S., Evans, A. R. & Alroy, J. The relationship between diet and body mass in terrestrial mammals. Paleobiology 42, 659–669 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Gearty, W., McClain, C. R. & Payne, J. L. Energetic tradeoffs control the size distribution of aquatic mammals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 115, 4194–4199. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1712629115 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Benítez-López, A. et al. The island rule explains consistent patterns of body size evolution in terrestrial vertebrates. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 768–786 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lomolino, M. V. Body size of mammals on islands – The island rule reexamined. Am. Nat. 125, 310–316. https://doi.org/10.1086/284343 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Lomolino, M. V., Sax, D. F., Palombo, M. R. & van der Geer, A. A. Of mice and mammoths: Evaluations of causal explanations for body size evolution in insular mammals. J. Biogeogr. 39, 842–854 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  50. McClain, C. R., Durst, P. A. P., Boyer, A. G. & Francis, C. D. Unravelling the determinants of insular body size shifts. Biology Letters https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2012.0989 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lovegrove, B. G. & Haines, L. The evolution of placental mammal body sizes: Evolutionary history, form, and function. Oecologia 138, 13–27 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Stanley, S. M. An explanation for Cope’s rule. Evolution https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1973.tb05912.x (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Sibly, R. M. & Brown, J. H. Effects of body size and lifestyle on evolution of mammal life histories. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104, 17707–17712 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sibly, R. M. & Brown, J. H. Mammal reproductive strategies driven by offspring mortality-size relationships. Am. Nat. 173, E185–E199 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Charnov, E. L., Warne, R. & Moses, M. Lifetime reproductive effort. Am. Nat. 170, E129–E142. https://doi.org/10.1086/522840 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Kozłowski, J., Konarzewski, M. & Czarnoleski, M. Coevolution of body size and metabolic rate in vertebrates: A life-history perspective. Biol. Rev. 95, 1393–1417 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ginther, S. C., Cameron, H., White, C. R. & Marshall, D. J. Metabolic loads and the costs of metazoan reproduction. Science 384, 763–767. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adk6772 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Janis, C. in The Ecology of Browsing and Grazing Ecological Studies (eds Gordon, I. J., & Prins, H. H. T.) Ch. 2, 21–45 (Springer, 2008).

  59. Janis, C. M. Tertiary mammal evolution in the context of changing climates, vegetation, and tectonic events. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24, 467–500. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.24.110193.002343 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Shupinski, A. B., Wagner, P. J., Smith, F. A. & Lyons, S. K. Unique functional diversity during early Cenozoic mammal radiation of North America. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 291, 20240778. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2024.0778 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Juhn, M. S. et al. Cenozoic climate change and the evolution of North American mammalian predator ecomorphology. Paleobiology 50, 452–461. https://doi.org/10.1017/pab.2024.27 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Sander, P. M. et al. Early giant reveals faster evolution of large body size in ichthyosaurs than in cetaceans. Science 3741578. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abf5787 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Slater, G. J., Goldbogen, J. A. & Pyenson, N. D. Independent evolution of baleen whale gigantism linked to Plio-Pleistocene ocean dynamics. Proc. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0546 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Jones, K. E. & MacLarnon, A. Bat life histories: Testing models of mammalian life-history evolution. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3, 487–505 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Lázaro, J. et al. Geographic patterns in seasonal changes of body mass, skull, and brain size of common shrews. Ecol. Evol. 11, 2431–2448 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Hamilton, M. J., Davidson, A. D., Sibly, R. M. & Brown, J. H. Universal scaling of production rates across mammalian lineages. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278, 560–566. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1056 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Stearns, S. C., Ackermann, M., Doebeli, M. & Kaiser, M. Experimental evolution of aging, growth, and reproduction in fruitflies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 3309–3313. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.7.3309 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Kirkwood, T. B. L. & Rose, M. R. Evolution of senescence: Late survival sacrificed for reproduction. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 332, 15–24 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Ronget, V. et al. Causes and consequences of variation in offspring body mass: Meta-analyses in birds and mammals. Biol. Rev. 93, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12329 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Charnov, E. L. Evolution of mammal life histories. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3, 521–535 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Charnov, E. L. Mammal life-history evolution with size-dependent mortality. Evol. Ecol. Res. 7, 795–799 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Lande, R., Engen, S. & Sæther, B. E. Evolution of stochastic demography with life history tradeoffs in density-dependent age-structured populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 114, 11582–11590. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1710679114 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Travis, J., Bassar, R. D., Coulson, T., Reznick, D. & Walsh, M. Density-dependent selection. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110321-055345 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Jaggi, H. et al. Density dependence shapes life-history trade-offs in a food-limited population. Ecol. Lett. 27, e14551. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.14551 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Kentie, R., Clegg, S. M., Tuljapurkar, S., Gaillard, J. M. & Coulson, T. Life-history strategy varies with the strength of competition in a food-limited ungulate population. Ecol. Lett. 23, 811–820. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13470 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Bonenfant, C. et al. Empirical evidence of density-dependence in populations of large herbivores. Adv. Ecol. Res. 41, 313–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2504(09)00405-x (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Mylius, S. D. & Diekmann, O. On evolutionarily stable life histories, optimization and the need to be specific about density dependence. Oikos 74, 218–224. https://doi.org/10.2307/3545651 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Gould, S. J. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory (Belknap Press of Harvard University, 2002).

  79. Grenié, M. et al. Harmonizing taxon names in biodiversity data: A review of tools, databases and best practices. Methods Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13802 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  80. GBIF.org. (2023).

  81. rgbif: Interface to the Global Biodiversity Information Facility API v. R package version 3.7.8. (2023).

  82. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2025).

  83. Burgin, C. J., Colella, J. P., Kahn, P. L. & Upham, N. S. How many species of mammals are there?. J. Mammal. 99, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyx147 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Mammal Diversity Database (Zenodo, 2022).

  85. Purvis, A. & Harvey, P. H. Mammal life-history evolution: A comparative test of Charnov’s model. J. Zool. 237, 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1995.tb02762.x (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Salguero-Gómez, R. et al. COMADRE: A global data base of animal demography. J. Anim. Ecol. 85, 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12482 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Jones, O. R. et al. Rcompadre and Rage—two R packages to facilitate the use of the COMPADRE and COMADRE databases and calculation of life-history traits from matrix population models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 13, 770–781. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13792 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Pagel, M. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401, 877–884 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Package. ‘caper’: Comparative Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R v. 1.0.3 (2023).

  90. Upham, N. S., Esselstyn, J. A. & Jetz, W. Inferring the mammal tree: Species-level sets of phylogenies for questions in ecology, evolution, and conservation. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000494 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Genoud, M., Isler, K. & Martin, R. D. Comparative analyses of basal rate of metabolism in mammals: Data selection does matter. Biol. Rev. 93, 404–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12350 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Charnov, E. L. & Berrigan, D. Dimensionless numbers and life history evolution: Age of maturity versus the adult lifespan. Evol. Ecol. 4, 273–275 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Penone, C. et al. Imputation of missing data in life-history trait datasets: Which approach performs the best?. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5, 961–970. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12232 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Tjorve, K. M. C. & Tjorve, E. A proposed family of unified models for sigmoidal growth. Ecol. Model. 359, 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.05.008 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Zullinger, E. M., Ricklefs, R. E., Redford, K. H. & Mace, G. M. Fitting sigmoidal equations to mammalian growth-curves. J. Mammal. 65, 607–636. https://doi.org/10.2307/1380844 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Skinner, J. D. & Chimimba, C. T. The Mammals of the Southern African Subregion 3rd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2005).

  97. Kingdon, J. et al. 6 Volumes: Illustrations (Some Color), Color Maps (Bloomsbury, 2013).

Download references

Acknowledgements

E. Charnov, J. Kozłowski, and D. Roff provided helpful comments. This work was supported by the School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide.

Funding

No funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Biological Science, Adelaide University, Adelaide, Australia

    Jack da Silva

Authors

  1. Jack da Silva
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.d.S. conceived the project and carried out all analyses and writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Jack da Silva.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1. (download DOCX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

da Silva, J. Life history optimization and the macroevolution of mammal body size.
Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46697-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46697-2

Source: Ecology - nature.com

Investigating the association between marital status and survival outcomes in patients with follicular thyroid carcinoma: a population-based analysis

Extent of sediment concentration trends associated with climate and human factors across global rivers

This portal is not a newspaper as it is updated without periodicity. It cannot be considered an editorial product pursuant to law n. 62 of 7.03.2001. The author of the portal is not responsible for the content of comments to posts, the content of the linked sites. Some texts or images included in this portal are taken from the internet and, therefore, considered to be in the public domain; if their publication is violated, the copyright will be promptly communicated via e-mail. They will be immediately removed.

Back to Top
Close