Abstract
The strength and stability of the terrestrial carbon (C) sink depend critically on total belowground C allocation (TBCA), yet its long-term response to several co-occurring global change drivers remains largely unknown. Here, using an 11-year multifactor grassland experiment, we examined the individual and interactive effects of +2.5 °C warming, summer rainfall reduction, CO2 enrichment and nitrogen addition on the TBCA. Warming and CO2 enrichment increased TBCA by 17% and 16%, respectively, and these gains interacted with other drivers. The effects of CO2 enrichment were amplified under drought, the effects of warming strengthened with nitrogen addition, and the interaction between CO2 enrichment and nitrogen addition on TBCA strengthened over time from additive to synergistic. Moreover, TBCA was positively linked to soil respiration, C stock and plant nitrogen uptake. Together, TBCA responses to global change drivers are non-additive and shift over time, and elevated CO2 and warming promote soil C gains synergistically when nitrogen availability is high.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access through your institution
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Unexpected sustained soil carbon flux in response to simultaneous warming and nitrogen enrichment compared with single factors alone
High CO2 dampens then amplifies N-induced diversity loss over 24 years
Plant community, ecosystem, and abiotic data from a global change experiment in mountain grasslands in Norway
Data availability
All data supporting the findings of this study are available via figshare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.31321399 (ref. 48).
Code availability
All code used to generate the results and figures in this study are available via figshare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.31321399 (ref. 48).
References
Giardina, C. P., Litton, C. M., Crow, S. E. & Asner, G. P. Warming-related increases in soil CO2 efflux are explained by increased below-ground carbon flux. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 822–827 (2014).
Google Scholar
Morra, B. M., Richardson, W. C., Stringham, T. K. & Sullivan, B. W. Carbon stocks and total belowground carbon flux respond to weather and grazing in semiarid montane meadows. Ecosystems 26, 1428–1440 (2023).
Google Scholar
Giardina, C. P., Binkley, D., Ryan, M. G., Fownes, J. H. & Senock, R. S. Belowground carbon cycling in a humid tropical forest decreases with fertilization. Oecologia 139, 545–550 (2004).
Google Scholar
Giardina, C. P. et al. in Trees Species Effects on Soils: Implications for Global Change (eds Binkley, D. & Menyailo, O.) 119–154 (Springer, 2005).
Drake, J. E. et al. Increases in the flux of carbon belowground stimulate nitrogen uptake and sustain the long-term enhancement of forest productivity under elevated CO2. Ecol. Lett. 14, 349–357 (2011).
Google Scholar
Gill, A. L. & Finzi, A. C. Belowground carbon flux links biogeochemical cycles and resource-use efficiency at the global scale. Ecol. Lett. 19, 1419–1428 (2016).
Google Scholar
Keller, A. & Phillips, R. P. Relationship between belowground carbon allocation and nitrogen uptake in saplings varies by plant mycorrhizal type. Front. For. Glob. Change 2, 81 (2019).
Google Scholar
IPCC Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report (eds Lee, H. & Romero, J.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2023).
Reich, P. B. et al. Synergistic effects of four climate change drivers on terrestrial carbon cycling. Nat. Geosci. 13, 787–793 (2020).
Google Scholar
Song, J. et al. A meta-analysis of 1,119 manipulative experiments on terrestrial carbon-cycling responses to global change. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1309–1320 (2019).
Google Scholar
Reich, P. B. et al. Nitrogen limitation constrains sustainability of ecosystem response to CO2. Nature 440, 922–925 (2006).
Google Scholar
Pastore, M. A., Lee, T. D., Hobbie, S. E. & Reich, P. B. Interactive effects of elevated CO, warming, reduced rainfall, and nitrogen on leaf gas exchange in five perennial grassland species. Plant Cell Environ. 43, 1862–1878 (2020).
Google Scholar
Rillig, M. C. et al. The role of multiple global change factors in driving soil functions and microbial biodiversity. Science 366, 886–890 (2019).
Google Scholar
Mueller, K. E. et al. Impacts of warming and elevated CO2 on a semi-arid grassland are non-additive, shift with precipitation, and reverse over time. Ecol. Lett. 19, 956–966 (2016).
Google Scholar
Zhou, L. et al. Responses of biomass allocation to multi-factor global change: a global synthesis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 304, 107115 (2020).
Google Scholar
Giardina, C. P. & Ryan, M. G. Total belowground carbon allocation in a fast-growing Eucalyptus plantation estimated using a carbon balance approach. Ecosystems 5, 487–499 (2002).
Google Scholar
Harrison, S. P. et al. Eco-evolutionary optimality as a means to improve vegetation and land-surface models. New Phytol. 231, 2125–2141 (2021).
Google Scholar
Carol Adair, E., Reich, P. B., Hobbie, S. E. & Knops, J. M. H. Interactive effects of time, CO2, N, and diversity on total belowground carbon allocation and ecosystem carbon storage in a grassland community. Ecosystems 12, 1037–1052 (2009).
Google Scholar
Zeng, W., Zhang, J., Dong, L., Wang, W. & Zeng, H. Nonlinear responses of total belowground carbon flux and its components to increased nitrogen availability in temperate forests. Sci. Total Environ. 715, 136954 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gherardi, L. A. & Sala, O. E. Global patterns and climatic controls of belowground net carbon fixation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 20038–20043 (2020).
Google Scholar
Li, F. et al. Trade-off in the partitioning of recent photosynthate carbon under global change. Glob. Change Biol. 30, e17110 (2024).
Google Scholar
Eastman, B. A. et al. Altered plant carbon partitioning enhanced forest ecosystem carbon storage after 25 years of nitrogen additions. New Phytol. 230, 1435–1448 (2021).
Google Scholar
Giardina, C. P., Ryan, M. G., Binkley, D. & Fownes, J. H. Primary production and carbon allocation in relation to nutrient supply in a tropical experimental forest. Glob. Change Biol. 9, 1438–1450 (2003).
Google Scholar
Lyu, M., Giardina, C. P. & Litton, C. M. Interannual variation in rainfall modulates temperature sensitivity of carbon allocation and flux in a tropical montane wet forest. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 3824–3836 (2021).
Google Scholar
Andresen, L. C. et al. in Advances in Ecological Research Vol. 55 (eds Dumbrell, A. J. et al.) 437–473 (Academic, 2016).
Reich, P. B. & Hobbie, S. E. Decade-long soil nitrogen constraint on the CO2 fertilization of plant biomass. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 278–282 (2013).
Google Scholar
Van Sundert, K. et al. When things get MESI: The Manipulation Experiments Synthesis Initiative—a coordinated effort to synthesize terrestrial global change experiments. Glob. Change Biol. 29, 1922–1938 (2023).
Google Scholar
Schindlbacher, A. et al. Soil respiration under climate change: prolonged summer drought offsets soil warming effects. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 2270–2279 (2012).
Google Scholar
Liang, G. et al. Soil respiration response to decade-long warming modulated by soil moisture in a boreal forest. Nat. Geosci. 17, 905–911 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wan, S., Norby, R. J., Ledford, J. & Weltzin, J. F. Responses of soil respiration to elevated CO2, air warming, and changing soil water availability in a model old-field grassland. Glob. Change Biol. 13, 2411–2424 (2007).
Google Scholar
de Vries, F. T. et al. Changes in root-exudate-induced respiration reveal a novel mechanism through which drought affects ecosystem carbon cycling. New Phytol. 224, 132–145 (2019).
Google Scholar
Karlowsky, S. et al. Land use in mountain grasslands alters drought response and recovery of carbon allocation and plant-microbial interactions. J. Ecol. 106, 1230–1243 (2018).
Google Scholar
Du, Y., Wang, Y.-P., Hui, D., Su, F. & Yan, J. Significant effects of precipitation frequency on soil respiration and its components—a global synthesis. Glob. Change Biol. 29, 1188–1205 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ford, C. R., McGee, J., Scandellari, F., Hobbie, E. A. & Mitchell, R. J. Long- and short-term precipitation effects on soil CO2 efflux and total belowground carbon allocation. Agric. For. Meteorol. 156, 54–64 (2012).
Google Scholar
Litton, C. M., Raich, J. W. & Ryan, M. G. Carbon allocation in forest ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 13, 2089–2109 (2007).
Google Scholar
Reich, P. B., Hobbie, S. E. & Lee, T. D. Plant growth enhancement by elevated CO2 eliminated by joint water and nitrogen limitation. Nat. Geosci. 7, 920–924 (2014).
Google Scholar
Tang, X. et al. Global patterns of soil autotrophic respiration and its relation to climate, soil and vegetation characteristics. Geoderma 369, 114339 (2020).
Google Scholar
Schindlbacher, A. et al. Increased belowground carbon allocation reduces soil carbon losses under long-term warming. Glob. Change Biol. 31, e70561 (2025).
Google Scholar
Dijkstra, F. A., Zhu, B. & Cheng, W. Root effects on soil organic carbon: a double-edged sword. New Phytol. 230, 60–65 (2021).
Google Scholar
Schmidt, E. L. in Nitrogen in Agricultural Soils (ed. Stevenson, F. J.) 253–288 (American Society of Agronomy, 1982).
Dijkstra, F. A., West, J. B., Hobbie, S. E., Reich, P. B. & Trost, J. Plant diversity, CO2, and N influence inorganic and organic N leaching in grasslands. Ecology 88, 490–500 (2007).
Google Scholar
Kishimoto-Mo, A. W. et al. Contribution of soil moisture to seasonal and annual variations of soil CO2 efflux in a humid cool-temperate oak-birch forest in central Japan. Ecol. Res. 30, 311–325 (2015).
Google Scholar
Laliberte, E. & Legendre, P. A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. Ecology 91, 299–305 (2010).
Google Scholar
Bates, D. et al. lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R version 1.1-13 https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html (2017).
Long, J. A. interactions: comprehensive, user-friendly toolkit for probing interactions. R version 1.2.0 https://cran.r-project.org/package=interactions (2019).
Adams, D. C., Gurevitch, J. & Rosenberg, M. S. Resampling tests for meta-analysis of ecological data. Ecology 78, 1277–1283 (1997).
Google Scholar
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020).
Chen, X. Data and R codes for ‘Long-term multiple global change interactions amplify belowground carbon allocation’. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.31321399 (2026).
Funding
X.C. acknowledges support from the National Key R&D Program of China (2024YFF1309000), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32401546) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China’s Excellent Young Scientists Fund (overseas). P.B.R. was supported by the US National Science Foundation’s ASCEND Biology Integration Institute (NSF-DBI-2021898) and by grants from the US National Science Foundation Long-Term Ecological Research Program since 1982 (including DEB-2425352 and DEB-1831944).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
P.B.R. designed the TeRaCON experiment and, along with K.W., was responsible for its implementation. X.C. and P.B.R. were responsible for the conception and design of this particular study project. P.B.R. planned and K.W. orchestrated all measurements. X.C. and K.W. compiled other data. X.C. analysed the data and wrote the first draft of the paper. X.C., K.S.R., H.Y.H.C., L.Z. and P.B.R. contributed to the review and editing of the paper. P.B.R. supervised the work. All authors approved the final article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Climate Change thanks Baig Abdullah Al Shoumik, Jian Song and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 Three-way interaction effect of CO2 enrichment, N addition and experimental year on belowground C stocks change rate (n = 48 plots; three plots per treatment combination).
Points show model-estimated means; error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. The difference between groups was significant if 95% CIs of their coefficients did not overlap the other’s mean. The Namb and Nenrich represent ambient N and added N, while Camb and Cenrich represent ambient and elevated CO2. Experimental year was analyzed as a continuous variable but illustrated here based on the meaningful three levels of breakpoints (2012, 2017, 2022). The significance (P) is reported for each term tested, with P values calculated using a two-sided F test.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Total belowground C allocation (TBCA) in relation to root biomass C stock and aboveground biomass C stock when considered together.
a) root biomass C stock; b) aboveground biomass C stock. The black line and grey shaded areas represent the fitted regression and its bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals. The significance (P) is reported for each term tested, with P values calculated using a two-sided F test.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Total belowground C allocation (TBCA) in relation to community functional composition.
a) community-weighted mean of plant height (CWMHeight); b) community-weighted mean of leaf N content (CWMLeafN); c) community-weighted mean of root N content (CWMRootN). Black line shows the fitted mean relationship; grey shaded band indicates the 95% confidence interval around the fitted mean. The significance (P) is reported for each term tested, with P values calculated using a two-sided F test.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Total belowground C allocation (TBCA) in relation to soil carbon stock at different soil depths.
a) 0 – 20 cm; b) 20 – 40 cm; c) 40 – 60 cm. Black line shows the fitted mean relationship; grey shaded band indicates the 95% confidence interval around the fitted mean. The significance (P) is reported for each term tested, with P values calculated using a two-sided F test.
Extended Data Fig. 5 Total belowground C allocation (TBCA) in relation to soil N mineralization processes.
a) net soil N mineralization; b) net soil ammonification; c) net soil nitrification. Black line shows the fitted mean relationship; grey shaded band indicates the 95% confidence interval around the fitted mean. The significance (P) is reported for each term tested, with P values calculated using a two-sided F test.
Extended Data Fig. 6 Two-way interaction effect of warming and total belowground C allocation (TBCA) on net soil N mineralization.
Black and grey lines show the fitted mean relationship for each warming treatment, and grey shaded bands indicate the 95% confidence interval around the fitted mean. The significance (P) is reported for each term tested, with P values calculated using a two-sided F test. The Tamb and Telv represent ambient temperature and elevated temperature.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information (download PDF )
Supplementary Tables 1 and 2.
Reporting Summary (download PDF )
Peer Review File (download PDF )
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, X., Chen, H.Y.H., Rocci, K.S. et al. Long-term multiple global change interactions amplify belowground carbon allocation.
Nat. Clim. Chang. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-026-02678-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-026-02678-x
Source: Ecology - nature.com

