in

LumbriCyc: towards metabolic modelling of earthworms


Abstract

Until Charles Darwin published his book on earthworms in 1881, their role in the soil was largely unclear. By now, the importance of earthworms for soil fertility has been recognized and their phenomenology is being studied for various purposes. The investigation of earthworm molecular biology is, however, comparatively underdeveloped. This study describes the creation of BioCyc pathway genome databases for the two earthworms Lumbricus rubellus and Lumbricus terrestris, together with the first genome-scale metabolic models of these species.

Data availability

The PGDBs can be downloaded from Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16021633) or via the Pathway Tools Registry. The PGDBs can also be accessed at https://lumbricyc.mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de/. The scripts for creating Pathway Tools input and the metabolic models are available on GitHub (https://github.com/cnapy-org/earthworm-models) together with the models themselves.

References

  1. Darwin, C. The Formation of Vegetable Mould, Through the Action of Worms, with Observations on Their Habits (John Murray, 1881).

  2. Groenigen, J. W. et al. Earthworms increase plant production: a meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 4, 6365 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stürzenbaum, S. R., Andre, J., Kille, P. & Morgan, A. J. Earthworm genomes, genes and proteins: the (re)discovery of Darwin’s worms. Proc. Biol. Sci. 276, 789–797 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Peijnenburg, W. J. G. M. & Vijver, M. G. Earthworms and their use in eco(toxico)logical modeling. in Ecotoxicology Modeling (ed. Devillers, J.) 177–204 (Springer US, 2009).

  5. Holzinger, A. et al. Biodegradable polymers boost reproduction in the earthworm Eisenia fetida. Sci. Total Environ. 892, 164670 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shao, Y. et al. Genome and single-cell RNA-sequencing of the earthworm Eisenia andrei identifies cellular mechanisms underlying regeneration. Nat. Commun. 11, 2656 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Homa, J. Earthworm coelomocyte extracellular traps: structural and functional similarities with neutrophil NETs. Cell Tissue Res. 371, 407 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Edwards, C. A. & Arancon, N. Q. Earthworm physiology. in Biology and Ecology of Earthworms (eds. Edwards, C. A. & Arancon, N. Q.) 33–54 (Springer US, 2022).

  9. Seaver, S. M. D. et al. The ModelSEED Biochemistry Database for the integration of metabolic annotations and the reconstruction, comparison and analysis of metabolic models for plants, fungi and microbes. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D575–D588 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Machado, D., Andrejev, S., Tramontano, M. & Patil, K. R. Fast automated reconstruction of genome-scale metabolic models for microbial species and communities. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 7542–7553 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Capela, J. et al. merlin, an improved framework for the reconstruction of high-quality genome-scale metabolic models. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 6052–6066 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Han, W. et al. AlphaGEM enables precise genome-scale metabolic modelling by integrating protein structure alignment with deep-learning-based dark metabolism mining. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.21.665674 (2025).

  13. Short, S. et al. The genome sequence of the red compost earthworm, Lumbricus rubellus (Hoffmeister, 1843). Wellcome Open Res. 8, 354 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Blaxter, M. L. et al. The genome sequence of the common earthworm, Lumbricus terrestris (Linnaeus, 1758). Wellcome Open Res. 8, 500 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Darwin Tree of Life. https://projects.ensembl.org/darwin-tree-of-life/.

  16. Karp, P. D. et al. The BioCyc collection of microbial genomes and metabolic pathways. Brief. Bioinform. 20, 1085–1093 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rawls, J., Knecht, W., Diekert, K., Lill, R. & Löffler, M. Requirements for the mitochondrial import and localization of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase. Eur. J. Biochem. 267, 2079–2087 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Alberts, B. et al. The mitochondrion. in Molecular Biology of the Cell. 4th edn (Garland Science, 2002).

  19. Yilmaz, L. S. et al. Modeling tissue-relevant Caenorhabditis elegans metabolism at network, pathway, reaction, and metabolite levels. Mol. Syst. Biol. 16, e9649 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gruner, B. & Zebe, E. Studies on the anaerobic metabolism of earthworms. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B Comp. Biochem. 60, 441–445 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ueda, M. et al. Cloning and expression of the cold-adapted endo-1,4-β-glucanase gene from Eisenia fetida. Carbohydr. Polym. 101, 511–516 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kim, D. et al. A novel chitinase from the earthworm, Eisenia andrei. Anim. Cells Syst. 20, 48–51 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gong, P. & Perkins, E. J. Earthworm toxicogenomics: A renewed genome-wide quest for novel biomarkers and mechanistic insights. Appl. Soil Ecol. 104, 12–24 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dyer, S. C. et al. Ensembl 2025. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D948–D957 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kanehisa, M., Sato, Y. & Morishima, K. BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG tools for functional characterization of genome and metagenome sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 428, 726–731 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Karp, P. D. et al. Pathway Tools version 23.0 update: software for pathway/genome informatics and systems biology. Brief. Bioinform. 22, 109–126 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bordbar, A., Monk, J. M., King, Z. A. & Palsson, B. O. Constraint-based models predict metabolic and associated cellular functions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 107–120 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Latendresse, M., Ong, W. K. & Karp, P. D. Metabolic modeling with MetaFlux. Methods Mol. Biol. 2349, 259–289 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hucka, M. et al. The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models. Bioinformatics 19, 524–531 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  30. King, Z. A. et al. BiGG Models: a platform for integrating, standardizing and sharing genome-scale models. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D515–D522 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Moretti, S., Tran, V., Mehl, F., Ibberson, M. & Pagni, M. MetaNetX/MNXref: unified namespace for metabolites and biochemical reactions in the context of metabolic models. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D570–D574 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Steffen Klamt for suggestions on the manuscript. Figure 1 was created in BioRender, cf. https://BioRender.com/70vnz62.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A. v. K. carried out the entire study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Axel von Kamp.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

von Kamp, A. LumbriCyc: towards metabolic modelling of earthworms.
npj Syst Biol Appl (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41540-026-00661-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41540-026-00661-y


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Growth form and lifespan of herbaceous species mediate the role of traits in short-term drought response

Comparative evaluation of QuEChERS and the ‘dilute and shoot’ QuPPe extraction methods coupled with LC-MS/MS for the analysis of mepiquat residue in sweet potatoes: addressing residual soil impact on recovery efficiency

Back to Top