Abstract
Offshore wind power, as a crucial component of clean energy, is rapidly expanding globally; however, the long-term impact mechanisms on marine benthic ecosystems remain unclear. This study focuses on four offshore wind farms (South 3, South 4, Site V, and Site U1) in the southern waters of the Shandong Peninsula. Based on benthic organism survey data and multi-source remote sensing environmental data from 2015 to 2024, a remote sensing-in-situ integrated machine learning prediction framework was constructed to systematically assess the spatiotemporal impact of wind farm construction and operation on soft-bottom benthic communities. The study employed the XGBoost model as the main model and the Generalized Additive Model (GAM) as the baseline model, using SHAP interpretability analysis to reveal key driving factors. The results show that the XGBoost model achieved an R² of 0.742 on the test set, significantly outperforming the GAM model (R²=0.625). The years in operation (YSI) was the most important factor affecting benthic community diversity; after a brief disturbance during the initial construction phase, the community showed a significant recovery trend after 2–4 years of operation. The artificial reef effect caused by the conversion to hard bottom near the pile foundations resulted in an approximately 13% increase in the Shannon diversity index and an approximately 40% increase in species richness compared to the control area. This study provides a reproducible methodological framework for the ecological impact assessment of offshore wind farms, and the findings can provide scientific basis for the environmentally friendly layout planning of offshore wind power in China.
Data availability
The processed datasets supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Cha, Y. et al. An interpretable machine learning method for supporting ecosystem management: application to species distribution models of freshwater macroinvertebrates. J. Environ. Manage. 291, 112719 (2021).
Coolen, J. W. et al. Generalized changes of benthic communities after construction of wind farms in the Southern North sea. J. Environ. Manage. 315, 115173 (2022).
Jabeur, S. B., Mefteh-Wali, S. & Viviani, J. L. Forecasting gold price with the XGBoost algorithm and SHAP interaction values. Ann. Oper. Res. 334, 679–699 (2024).
Raoux, A. et al. Benthic and fish aggregation inside an offshore wind farm: which effects on the trophic web functioning? Ecol. Ind. 72, 33–46 (2017).
Wood, S. N. Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. (chapman and hall/CRC, (2017).
Hu, C., Lee, Z. & Franz, B. Chlorophyll aalgorithms for oligotrophic oceans: A novel approach based on three-band reflectance difference. J. Geophys. Research: Oceans https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007395 (2012).
Werner, K. M., Haslob, H., Reichel, A. F., Gimpel, A. & Stelzenmüller, V. Offshore wind farm foundations as artificial reefs: the devil is in the detail. Fish. Res. 272, 106937 (2024).
Parsa, A. B., Movahedi, A., Taghipour, H., Derrible, S. & Mohammadian, A. K. Toward safer highways, application of XGBoost and SHAP for real-time accident detection and feature analysis. Accid. Anal. Prev. 136, 105405 (2020).
Durap, A. Explainable deep learning techniques for wind speed forecasting in coastal areas: integrating model configuration, regularization, early stopping, and SHAP analysis. Neural Comput. Appl. 37, 21219–21257 (2025).
Durap, A. Interpretable machine learning for coastal wind prediction: integrating SHAP analysis and seasonal trends. J. Coastal. Conserv. 29, 24 (2025).
Chen, T. & XGBoost A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Cornell University (2016).
Boutin, K., Gaudron, S. M., Denis, J. & Lasram, F. B. R. Potential marine benthic colonisers of offshore wind farms in the english channel: A functional trait-based approach. Mar. Environ. Res. 190, 106061 (2023).
Gill, A. B. Offshore renewable energy: ecological implications of generating electricity in the coastal zone. J. Appl. ecology 42, 605–615 (2005).
Reynolds, R. W. et al. Daily high-resolution-blended analyses for sea surface temperature. J. Clim. 20, 5473–5496 (2007).
Council, G. W. E. Global offshore wind report 2020. GWEC: Bruss. Belgium. 19, 10–12 (2020).
Marcílio, W. E. & Eler, D. M. in 2020 33rd SIBGRAPI conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images (SIBGRAPI). 340–347 (Ieee).
Jiang, S. et al. Decadal variation and Temporal stability of the macrobenthic community in the Bohai Sea, China. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 207, 116904 (2024).
Hutchison, Z. L., Secor, D. H. & Gill, A. B. The interaction between resource species and electromagnetic fields associated with electricity production by offshore wind farms. Oceanography 33, 96–107 (2020).
Kingma, E. M. et al. Guardians of the seabed: Nature-inclusive design of scour protection in offshore wind farms enhances benthic diversity. J. Sea Res. 199, 102502 (2024).
Shapley, L. S. A value for n-person games. (1953).
Wang, Q., Shi, S. & Liu, X. Functional diversity of macrofaunal assemblages as indicators to assess heavy metal pollution in the Bohai Sea, China. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 185, 114265 (2022).
Ter Hofstede, R., Driessen, F., Elzinga, P., Van Koningsveld, M. & Schutter, M. Offshore wind farms contribute to epibenthic biodiversity in the North sea. J. Sea Res. 185, 102229 (2022).
Mila, C., Mateu, J., Pebesma, E. & Meyer, H. Nearest neighbour distance matching Leave-One‐Out Cross‐Validation for map validation. Methods Ecol. Evol. 13, 1304–1316 (2022).
Li, B., Wang, Q. & Li, B. Assessing the benthic ecological status in the stressed coastal waters of Yantai, yellow Sea, using AMBI and M-AMBI. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 75, 53–61 (2013).
Knorrn, A. H., Teder, T., Kaasik, A. & Kreitsberg, R. Beneath the blades: marine wind farms support parts of local biodiversity-a systematic review. Sci. Total Environ. 935, 173241 (2024).
Valavi, R., Elith, J., Lahoz-Monfort, J. J. & Guillera-Arroita, G. An r package for generating spatially or environmentally separated folds for k-fold cross-validation of species distribution models. Biorxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/357798 (2018).
Dannheim, J. et al. Benthic effects of offshore renewables: identification of knowledge gaps and urgently needed research. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 77, 1092–1108 (2020).
Schoonemann, J., Nagelkerke, J., Seuntjens, T. G., Osinga, N. & van Liere, D. Applying XGBoost and SHAP to open source data to identify key drivers and predict likelihood of Wolf pair presence. Environ. Manage. 73, 1072–1087 (2024).
Roberts, D. R. et al. Cross-validation strategies for data with temporal, spatial, hierarchical, or phylogenetic structure. Ecography 40, 913–929 (2017).
Reubens, J., Degraer, S. & Vincx, M. The ecology of benthopelagic fishes at offshore wind farms: a synthesis of 4 years of research. Hydrobiologia 727, 121–136 (2014).
Mangalathu, S., Hwang, S. H. & Jeon, J. S. Failure mode and effects analysis of RC members based on machine-learning-based SHapley additive explanations (SHAP) approach. Eng. Struct. 219, 110927 (2020).
Lundberg, S. M. & Lee, S. I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances Neural Inform. Process. Systems 30 (2017).
Wilhelmsson, D. & Malm, T. Fouling assemblages on offshore wind power plants and adjacent substrata. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 79, 459–466 (2008).
Pham, B. T. et al. Performance evaluation of machine learning methods for forest fire modeling and prediction. Symmetry 12, 1022 (2020).
Glarou, M., Zrust, M. & Svendsen, J. C. Using artificial-reef knowledge to enhance the ecological function of offshore wind turbine foundations: implications for fish abundance and diversity. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 8, 332 (2020).
Ploton, P. et al. Spatial validation reveals poor predictive performance of large-scale ecological mapping models. Nat. Commun. 11, 4540 (2020).
Fowler, A. M. et al. Environmental benefits of leaving offshore infrastructure in the ocean. Front. Ecol. Environ. 16, 571–578 (2018).
Li, C. et al. Offshore wind energy and marine biodiversity in the North sea: life cycle impact assessment for benthic communities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 6455–6464 (2023).
Meyer, H. & Pebesma, E. Predicting into unknown space? Estimating the area of applicability of Spatial prediction models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 12, 1620–1633 (2021).
Ester, M., Kriegel, H., Xu, X. & XGBoost A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22Nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Miningvol, pg 785, GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS (2022). (2016).
Farr, H., Ruttenberg, B., Walter, R. K., Wang, Y. H. & White, C. Potential environmental effects of deepwater floating offshore wind energy facilities. Ocean. Coastal. Manage. 207, 105611 (2021).
Lindeboom, H. J. et al. Short-term ecological effects of an offshore wind farm in the Dutch coastal zone; a compilation. Environ. Res. Lett. 6, 035101 (2011).
Cooper, K. & Barry, J. A big data approach to macrofaunal baseline assessment, monitoring and sustainable exploitation of the seabed. Sci. Rep. 7, 12431 (2017).
Langhamer, O. Artificial reef effect in relation to offshore renewable energy conversion: state of the art. Sci. World J. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/386713 (2012).
Elith, J. & Leathwick, J. R. Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 677–697 (2009).
Funding
This research was supported by the Open Fund of Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Ecological Environment and Disaster Prevention and Mitigation (202309).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L.W. and Y.Z. conceived and designed the study. L.W., L.Z., and H.Z. performed the experiments. L.W., K.S., and X.G. analyzed and interpreted the data. L.W., X.G. and C.Z. drafted the manuscript. Y.Z. supervised the project, provided critical revisions, and acquired funding. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary Material 1
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Gu, X. et al. Machine learning-based assessment of offshore wind farm impacts on soft-bottom benthic communities in the Shandong Peninsula.
Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38939-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38939-0
Keywords
- Offshore wind power
- Benthic community
- Machine learning
- XGBoost
- SHAP analysis
- Artificial reef effect
- Shandong peninsula
Source: Ecology - nature.com
