Search

Menu
Search
in Ecology

Machine learning-based assessment of soil organic carbon dynamics in soybean–wheat rotations in eastern China

25 Views


Abstract

Soil organic carbon (SOC) is a critical component of agroecosystems, influencing carbon cycling, soil fertility, and structure, thereby affecting crop productivity. This study evaluated the spatial distribution and dynamics of SOC stocks in eastern China under soybean–wheat rotations using advanced machine learning models. Data were collected from Anhui, Hebei, Henan, Jiangsu, Shandong, Tianjin, and Beijing, measuring SOC at two soil depths (0–15 cm and 15–30 cm) before sowing and after harvest during 2022–2024. Among the models tested, Random Forest (RF) provided the most accurate SOC predictions, particularly in the 0–15 cm layer (R2 = 0.89, RMSE = 0.95, PRD = 3.41). Results revealed SOC increases following soybean cultivation and decreases after wheat harvest, with regional variations shaped by environmental factors such as standardized height (standh), NDVI, temperature seasonality (tempSeason), and LS factor. The higher biomass and extensive root system of soybean significantly enhanced SOC, whereas wheat’s lower biomass contributed to SOC depletion. These findings underscore the influence of crop type and management practices on soil carbon stocks, highlighting the potential of soybean-inclusive rotations to improve soil health and mitigate climate change impacts.

Similar content being viewed by others

Climate warming and agronomic practice interactively alter soil carbon stock in dry farmland in China

Article
Open access
03 October 2025

Terraced fields increased soil organic carbon content in croplands of the loess plateau

Article
Open access
15 October 2025

Soil organic carbon modeling in cropland under several climatic scenarios using machine learning in western India

Article
Open access
17 January 2026

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The data of satellite images and digital elevation model are available in the Google Earth Engine platform.

References

  1. Dieleman, C. M., Branfireun, B. A., McLaughlin, J. W. & Lindo, Z. Climate change drives a shift in peatland ecosystem plant community: Implications for ecosystem function and stability. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 388–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12643 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lichtfouse, E. Climate Change, Intercropping, Pest Control and Beneficial Microorganisms. Vol. 2 (Springer, 2009).

  3. Khosravi Aqdam, K., Rezapour, S., Asadzadeh, F. & Nouri, A. An integrated approach for estimating soil health: Incorporating digital elevation models and remote sensing of vegetation. Comput. Electron. Agric. 210, 107922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.107922 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cabral-Alemán, C., López-Santos, A., Padilla-Martínez, J. R. & Zúñiga-Vásquez, J. M. Spatial variation of the relative importance of the soil loss drivers in a watershed of northern Mexico: a geographically weighted regression approach. Earth Sci. Inf. 15, 833–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-022-00768-w (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Caucci, S., Guzman-Molina, J., Al-Qubati, A. & Schellens, M. Vulnerability reduction in post-conflict areas through the Resource Nexus approach (Water–Soil-Food-Atmosphere) to sustainable food production systems: a case study in Colombia. Environ. Earth Sci. 84, 42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-12018-x (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Verma, A., Shukla, J. B. & Arora, M. S. Modeling the impact of awareness programmes on the sustainable use of water resources. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 9, 1725–1739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01572-7 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Faramarzi, S. E., Pazira, E., Masihabadi, M. H., Mohammadi Torkashvand, A. & Motamedvaziri, B. Modeling and estimating the spatial distribution of soil organic matter content in irrigated lands. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19, 7399–7410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-03909-2 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dadgar, M. & Faramarzi, S. E. Assessing the performance of machine learning models for predicting soil organic carbon variability across diverse landforms. Environ. Earth Sci. 83, 657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-11960-0 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eswaran, H., Van Den Berg, E. & Reich, P. Organic Carbon in Soils of the World. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57, 192–194. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1993.03615995005700010034x (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Khosravi Aqdam, K., Asadzadeh, F., Rezapour, S. & Nouri, A. Comparative assessment of soil fertility across varying elevations. Environ. Monit. Assess. 195, 1007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11610-1 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smith, P. Agricultural greenhouse gas mitigation potential globally, in Europe and in the UK: what have we learnt in the last 20 years?. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02517.x (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lassaletta, L. & Aguilera, E. Soil carbon sequestration is a climate stabilization wedge: Comments on Sommer and Bossio (2014). J. Environ. Manag. 153, 48–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.038 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Li, H., Qiu, J., Wang, L. & Yang, L. Advance in a terrestrial biogeochemical model—DNDC model. Acta Ecol. Sin. 31, 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chnaes.2010.11.006 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Khosravi Aqdam, K. et al. Comparison of the uncertainty of soil organic carbon stocks in different land uses. J. Arid Environ. 205, 104805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2022.104805 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao, H. et al. Immediate and long-term effects of tillage practices with crop residue on soil water and organic carbon storage changes under a wheat-maize cropping system. Soil Till. Res. 218, 105309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2021.105309 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brar, B. S., Singh, K., Dheri, G. S. & Balwinder, K. Carbon sequestration and soil carbon pools in a rice–wheat cropping system: Effect of long-term use of inorganic fertilizers and organic manure. Soil Till. Res. 128, 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2012.10.001 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sapkota, T. B. et al. Soil organic carbon changes after seven years of conservation agriculture in a rice–wheat system of the eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains. Soil Use Manag. 33, 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12331 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tao, F., Palosuo, T., Valkama, E. & Mäkipää, R. Cropland soils in China have a large potential for carbon sequestration based on literature survey. Soil Till. Res. 186, 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.10.009 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Qiu, B. et al. Maps of cropping patterns in China during 2015–2021. Sci. Data 9, 479. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01589-8 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Abbaszad, P., Asadzadeh, F., Rezapour, S., Khosravi Aqdam, K. & Shabani, F. Evaluation of Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2 vegetation indices to predict soil organic carbon using machine learning models. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 10, 2581–2592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-023-01916-x (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cochran, W. G. Sampling Techniques. (Wiley , 1977).

  22. Blake, G. Bulk density. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1 (1986).

  23. Walkley, A. & Black, I. A. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 37, 29–38 (1934).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Deng, L., Sweeney, S. & Shangguan, Z. Long-term effects of natural enclosure: carbon stocks, sequestration rates and potential for grassland ecosystems in the Loess plateau. Clean: Soil, Air, Water 42, 617–625. https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201300176 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Barrena-González, J., Antoneli, V., Contador, J. F. L. & Fernández, M. P. Assessing how grazing intensity affects the spatial distribution of soil properties. Earth Syst. Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-024-00539-1 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. McBratney, A. B., Mendonça Santos, M. L. & Minasny, B. On digital soil mapping. Geoderma 117, 3–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00223-4 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  27. RCoreTeam. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2016).

  28. Liu, F. et al. High-resolution and three-dimensional mapping of soil texture of China. Geoderma 361, 114061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.114061 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hazelton, P. & Murphy, B. Interpreting Soil Test Results: What Do All the Numbers Mean? (CSIRO Publishing, 2016).

  30. Malone, B. P., Minasny, B. & McBratney, A. B. In Using R for Digital Soil Mapping (eds Malone, B. P. et al.) 1–5 (Springer International Publishing, 2017).

  31. Wilding, L. Spatial variability: its documentation, accommodation and implication to soil surveys. (1985).

  32. Khosravi Aqdam, K., Yaghmaeian Mahabadi, N., Ramezanpour, H., Rezapour, S. & Mosleh, Z. Selecting environmental factors to predict spatial distribution of soil organic carbon stocks, northwestern Iran. Environ. Monit. Assess. 193, 713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09502-3 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Song, D. et al. Organic amendment regulates soil microbial biomass and activity in wheat-maize and wheat-soybean rotation systems. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 333, 107974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2022.107974 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ferreira, A. C. S., Pinheiro, É. F. M., Costa, E. M. & Ceddia, M. B. Predicting soil carbon stock in remote areas of the Central Amazon region using machine learning techniques. Geoderma Reg. 32, e00614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2023.e00614 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang, X. et al. Modelling the spatiotemporal dynamics of cropland soil organic carbon by integrating process-based models differing in structures with machine learning. J. Soils Sediments 23, 2816–2831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-023-03516-9 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Azamat, S. et al. Assessing and mapping of soil organic carbon at multiple depths in the semi-arid Trans-Ural steppe zone. Geoderma Reg. 38, e00855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2024.e00855 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rezapour, S., Siavash Moghaddam, S., Nouri, A. & Khosravi Aqdam, K. Urbanization influences the distribution, enrichment, and ecological health risk of heavy metals in croplands. Sci. Rep. 12, 3868. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07789-x (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Duval, M. E., Galantini, J. A., Capurro, J. E. & Martinez, J. M. Winter cover crops in soybean monoculture: Effects on soil organic carbon and its fractions. Soil Till. Res. 161, 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.04.006 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zinn, Y. L., Lal, R. & Resck, D. V. S. Changes in soil organic carbon stocks under agriculture in Brazil. Soil Till. Res. 84, 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2004.08.007 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bao, Y. et al. Dynamic modeling of topsoil organic carbon and its scenarios forecast in global Mollisols regions. J. Clean. Prod. 421, 138544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138544 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yang, Y. et al. Drivers of soybean-based rotations synergistically increase crop productivity and reduce GHG emissions. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 372, 109094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2024.109094 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ojeda, J. J., Caviglia, O. P. & Agnusdei, M. G. Vertical distribution of root biomass and soil carbon stocks in forage cropping systems. Plant Soil 423, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3502-8 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Duan, F., Peng, P., Yang, K., Shu, Y. & Wang, J. Straw return of maize and soybean enhances soil biological nitrogen fixation by altering the N-cycling microbial community. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 192, 105094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.105094 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Six, J., Elliott, E. T. & Paustian, K. Soil macroaggregate turnover and microaggregate formation: a mechanism for C sequestration under no-tillage agriculture. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32, 2099–2103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00179-6 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Novelli, L. E., Caviglia, O. P. & Piñeiro, G. Increased cropping intensity improves crop residue inputs to the soil and aggregate-associated soil organic carbon stocks. Soil Till. Res. 165, 128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.08.008 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Cai, W. et al. The carbon sequestration potential of vegetation over the Tibetan Plateau. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 207, 114937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114937 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Information Engineering, Liaoning Vocational College of Light Industry, Dalian, 116100, Liaoning, China

    Zhi Yu

Authors

  1. Zhi Yu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Zhi Yu, Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, data curation, Methodology, Software, writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Zhi Yu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All authors have read, understood, and have complied as applicable with the statement on “Ethical responsibilities of Authors” as found in the Instructions for Authors and are aware that with minor exceptions, no changes can be made to authorship once the paper is submitted.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, Z. Machine learning-based assessment of soil organic carbon dynamics in soybean–wheat rotations in eastern China.
Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38105-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38105-6

Keywords

  • Crop rotation
  • Soil organic carbon
  • Random forest
  • Soybean–wheat
  • Spatial modeling

Source: Ecology - nature.com

Statistical downscaling reproduces high-resolution ocean transport for particle tracking in the Bering Sea

Biodiversity conservation has an evidence problem — it’s time to fix it

This portal is not a newspaper as it is updated without periodicity. It cannot be considered an editorial product pursuant to law n. 62 of 7.03.2001. The author of the portal is not responsible for the content of comments to posts, the content of the linked sites. Some texts or images included in this portal are taken from the internet and, therefore, considered to be in the public domain; if their publication is violated, the copyright will be promptly communicated via e-mail. They will be immediately removed.

Back to Top
Close