Search

Menu
Search
in Ecology

Melanophore and fluoroleucophore photo-protect the Arabian killifish, Aphanius dispar, embryo from ultraviolet light

76 Views


Abstract

Pigment cells in fish species play crucial roles in forming colour patterns of each species and other physiological characteristics, including photoprotection. Research on animal pigment cells’ photoprotection has primarily concentrated on black pigment cells, known as melanophores. However, the roles of other pigment cells on UV protection remain poorly understood. In addition, UV sensitivity/resistance mechanisms have been studied in a small number of selected model organisms, and difference of UV sensitivity has not been fully investigated in different species. In this study, we use the Arabian killifish embryos as a novel model for studying the mechanisms of UV protection by different pigment cells. This species features highly fluorescent pigment cells called fluoroleucophores and black pigment cells melanophores. The fluorescent pteridine pigments and black melanin pigments are generated by genes gch (GTP cyclohydrolase) and tyr (tyrosinase), respectively. We generated gch-/- and gch-/-tyr-/- double mutant lines using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing and examined the UV sensitivity of WT and these mutant embryos. Firstly, we have observed that Arabian killifish embryos showed higher UV resistance to the one in zebrafish from which majority of UV toxicity studies was conducted in fish species so far. Secondly, both morphology and gene expression data revealed that the gch-/-tyr-/- double mutant line exhibited the highest UV sensitivity, and the gch-/- line also demonstrated a greater stress response compared to wild type (WT). The study revealed a diversity of UV resistance between fish species and also identified the roles of black and fluorescent pigment cells in providing effective UV protection from the early stages of embryonic development.

Data availability

The datasets generated during the current study are available in the Genbank (accession numbers, PQ588425 for *gch* and PQ588426 for *tyr, * respectively).

References

  1. Maan, M. E. & Sefc, K. M. Colour variation in cichlid fish: developmental mechanisms, selective pressures and evolutionary consequences. Semin Cell. Dev. Biol. 24, 516–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2013.05.003 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Miyamoto, K. Effects of body color luminance and behavioral characteristics on predation risk in salmonid fishes. Hydrobiologia 783, 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-015-2573-x (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hoglund, E., Balm, P. H. & Winberg, S. Behavioural and neuroendocrine effects of environmental background colour and social interaction in Arctic Charr (Salvelinus alpinus). J. Exp. Biol. 205, 2535–2543. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.205.16.2535 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kelsh, R. N. Genetics and evolution of pigment patterns in fish. Pigment Cell. Res. 17, 326–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0749.2004.00174.x (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Parichy, D. M. & Spiewak, J. E. Origins of adult pigmentation: diversity in pigment stem cell lineages and implications for pattern evolution. Pigment Cell. Melanoma Res. 28, 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/pcmr.12332 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fujii, R. Cytophysiology of fish chromatophores. Int. Rev. Cytol. 143, 191–255 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sugimoto, M. Morphological color changes in fish: regulation of pigment cell density and morphology. Microsc Res. Tech. 58, 496–503. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.10168 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hirata, M., Nakamura, K., Kanemaru, T., Shibata, Y. & Kondo, S. Pigment cell organization in the hypodermis of zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 227, 497–503. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.10334 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Parichy, D. M. Evolution of pigment cells and patterns: recent insights from teleost fishes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 69, 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2021.02.006 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fujii, R. The regulation of motile activity in fish chromatophores. Pigment Cell. Res. 13, 300–319. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0749.2000.130502.x (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frohnhofer, H. G., Krauss, J., Maischein, H. M. & Nusslein-Volhard, C. Iridophores and their interactions with other chromatophores are required for stripe formation in zebrafish. Development 140, 2997–3007. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.096719 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kimura, T. et al. Leucophores are similar to xanthophores in their specification and differentiation processes in Medaka. P Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 111, 7343–7348. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1311254111 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hamied, A. et al. Identification and characterization of highly fluorescent pigment cells in embryos of the Arabian killifish (Aphanius dispar). iScience 23, 101674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101674 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Frenkel, V. & Goren, M. Factors affecting growth of killifish, Aphanius dispar, a potential biological control of mosquitoes. Aquaculture 184, 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00326-9 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Esmaeili, H. R., Asrar, T. & Gholamifard, A. Cyprinodontid fishes of the world: an updated list of taxonomy, distribution and conservation status (Teleostei: Cyprinodontoidea). Iran. J. Ichthyol. 5, 1–29 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Plaut, I. Resting metabolic rate, critical swimming speed, and routine activity of the Euryhaline cyprinodontid, Aphanius dispar, acclimated to a wide range of salinities. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 73, 590–596. https://doi.org/10.1086/317746 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Akbarzadeh, A. et al. Responses of the killifish (Aphanius dispar) to long-term exposure to elevated temperatures: growth, survival and microstructure of gill and heart tissues. Mar. Freshw. Behav. Physiol. 47, 429–434 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Alsakran, A. et al. Stage-by-stage exploration of normal embryonic development in the Arabian killifish, Aphanius dispar. Dev. Dyn. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.738 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Madronich, S., McKenzie, R. L., Björn, L. O. & Caldwell, M. M. Changes in biologically active ultraviolet radiation reaching the earth’s surface. J. Photoch Photobio B. 46, 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1011-1344(98)00182-1 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  20. McKenzie, R. L., Aucamp, P. J., Bais, A. F., Bjorn, L. O. & Ilyas, M. Changes in biologically-active ultraviolet radiation reaching the earth’s surface. Photochem. Photobiol Sci. 6, 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1039/b700017k (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  21. El-Nouby, A. M. Effect of stratospheric Ozone in UVB solar radiation reaching the earth’s surface at Qena, Egypt. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 1, 155–160 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Diaz, S. et al. Ozone and UV radiation over Southern South america: climatology and anomalies. Photochem. Photobiol. 82, 834–843. https://doi.org/10.1562/2005-09-26-RA-697 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dong, Q., Svoboda, K., Tiersch, T. R. & Monroe, W. T. Photobiological effects of UVA and UVB light in zebrafish embryos: evidence for a competent photorepair system. J. Photochem. Photobiol B. 88, 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2007.07.002 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mahmoud, U. M. & Mekkawy, I. A. Sayed Ael, D. Ultraviolet radiation-A (366 nm) induced morphological and histological malformations during embryogenesis of Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822). J. Photochem. Photobiol B 95, 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2009.02.003 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Torres Nunez, E. et al. Molecular response to ultraviolet radiation exposure in fish embryos: implications for survival and morphological development. Photochem. Photobiol. 88, 701–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.2012.01088.x (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zang, L., Shimada, Y., Miyake, H. & Nishimura, N. Transcriptome analysis of molecular response to UVC irradiation in zebrafish embryos. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 231, 113211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113211 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lai, Y. S., Chiue, L. F. & Hsu, T. Low-molecular-weight vitellogenin 1-like proteins are components of a UV-damaged-DNA binding activity highly expressed in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. J. Exp. Zool. Comp. Exp. Biol. 305, 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.a.222 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Strahle, U. & Jesuthasan, S. Ultraviolet irradiation impairs epiboly in zebrafish embryos: evidence for a microtubule-dependent mechanism of epiboly. Development 119, 909–919. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.119.3.909 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rice, M. C. et al. Gadusol is a maternally provided sunscreen that protects fish embryos from DNA damage. Curr Biol 33, 3229-3237.e3224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2023.06.012 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gavriouchkina, D. et al. Thyrotroph embryonic factor regulates light-induced transcription of repair genes in zebrafish embryonic cells. PLoS One. 5, e12542. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012542 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Costa, S. R., Velasques, R. R., Hoff, M. L. M., Souza, M. M. & Sandrini, J. Z. Characterization of different DNA repair pathways in hepatic cells of zebrafish (Danio rerio). DNA Repair. (Amst). 83, 102695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.102695 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Winter, M. J. et al. A combined human in Silico and CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated in vivo zebrafish based approach to provide phenotypic data for supporting early target validation. Front. Pharmacol. 13, 827686. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.827686 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gag, O. et al. UVA/UVB irradiation exerts a distinct phototoxic effect on human keratinocytes compared to human malignant melanoma cells. Life (Basel) https://doi.org/10.3390/life13051144 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shih, T. L., Hsiao, C. A., Lin, Z. Y. & Chen, Y. H. An alternative synthesis of 3’,4’-diaminoflavones to evaluate their antioxidant ability and cell apoptosis of zebrafish larvae. Molecules 17, 8206–8216. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17078206 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Chen, R. Y. et al. UVB irradiation induced cell damage and early onset of Junbb expression in zebrafish. Animals (Basel) https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10061096 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ojeda, F. et al. Ultraviolet exposure of thymocytes: selective Inhibition of apoptosis. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 80, 445–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553000410001702328 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Winckler, K. & Fidhiany, L. Significant influence of UVA on the general metabolism in the growing cichlid fish, Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum. J. Photochem. Photobiol., B. 33, 131–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/1011-1344(95)07238-1 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Svitačová, K., Slavík, O. & Horký, P. Pigmentation potentially influences fish welfare in aquaculture. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 262, 105903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2023.105903 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Funayama, T., Mitani, H. & Shima, A. Ultraviolet-induced dna damage and its photorepair in tail fin cells of the Medaka, Oryzias lutipes. Photochem. Photobiol. 58, 380–385 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Fukunishi, Y. et al. Comparison of UV-B tolerance between wild-type and albino Japanese flounder Paralichthys Olivaceus juveniles. Aquaculture Sci. 65, 149–152 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Aspengren, S., Hedberg, D., Sköld, H. N. & Wallin, M. New insights into melanosome transport in vertebrate pigment cells. Int. Rev. cell. Mol. Biology. 272, 245–302 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nilsson Skold, H., Aspengren, S. & Wallin, M. Rapid color change in fish and amphibians: function, regulation, and emerging applications. Pigment Cell. Melanoma Res. 26, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/pcmr.12040 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Arpigny, J. et al. Factors influencing motile activities of fish chromatophores. Adv. Comp. Environ. Physiology: Volume. 20, 1–54 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sayed, A. E. D. H. & Mitani, H. Immunostaining of UVA-induced DNA damage in erythrocytes of Medaka (Oryzias latipes). J. Photochem. Photobiol., B 171, 90–95 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wagner, J. T. & Podrabsky, J. E. Extreme tolerance and developmental buffering of UV-C induced DNA damage in embryos of the annual killifish, Austrofundulus limnaeus. J. Exp. Zool. Ecol. Genet. Physiol. 323, 10–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1890 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Dutto, I., Tillhon, M., Cazzalini, O., Stivala, L. A. & Prosperi, E. Biology of the cell cycle inhibitor p21(CDKN1A): molecular mechanisms and relevance in chemical toxicology. Arch. Toxicol. 89, 155–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-014-1430-4 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We also thank to Aquatic Resource Facility staff for fish husbandry, and Aaron Geffery for his support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QD, UK

    Maryam Alenize, Rashid Minhas & Tetsuhiro Kudoh

  2. MRC Centre for Medical Mycology, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QD, UK

    Rashid Minhas

  3. Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, 71491 Tabuk, Saudi Arabia

    Maryam Alenize

Authors

  1. Maryam Alenize
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rashid Minhas
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tetsuhiro Kudoh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MA generated the resource and data, and wrote the manuscript draft. RM supported both generation of the resource and data collection. TK generated the resource, supervised the project and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Tetsuhiro Kudoh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alenize, M., Minhas, R. & Kudoh, T. Melanophore and fluoroleucophore photo-protect the Arabian killifish, Aphanius dispar, embryo from ultraviolet light.
Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37311-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37311-6

Keywords

  • Arabian killifish
  • Pigments
  • UV
  • UVC
  • Fluoroleucophore
  • Melanophore
  • Photoprotection

Source: Ecology - nature.com

Distribution patterns and formation mechanisms of stable landslide dams in the Qinghai-Tibet plateau: a preliminary study

Synergistic activity of sunlight protectants on some biocontrol agents as a new approach to control the cotton leaf worm, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval)

This portal is not a newspaper as it is updated without periodicity. It cannot be considered an editorial product pursuant to law n. 62 of 7.03.2001. The author of the portal is not responsible for the content of comments to posts, the content of the linked sites. Some texts or images included in this portal are taken from the internet and, therefore, considered to be in the public domain; if their publication is violated, the copyright will be promptly communicated via e-mail. They will be immediately removed.

Back to Top
Close