in

Molecular characterisation of the invasive terrestrial nemertean Geonemertes pelaensis: long and complex mitogenome and presence of NUMTs


Abstract

The complete mitochondrial genome of the invasive terrestrial nemertean Geonemertes pelaensis Semper, 1863 (Nemertea: Prosorhochmidae) was sequenced from two specimens collected in geographically distant French overseas territories—Martinique in the Caribbean and New Caledonia in the South-West Pacific. In both specimens, the mitogenome contained 13 protein-coding genes, two rRNA genes, and 21 tRNA genes, and was unusually large, approaching 32 kb. The two genomes differed by only four single nucleotide polymorphisms and one indel. A comparison with 22 cox1 sequences available in GenBank confirmed this high level of genetic conservation, suggesting a recent introduction from related source populations. The extraordinary length of the mitogenome was largely attributable to two extended regions comprising only tRNA genes and long intergenic sequences. These results were contrasted with data from an unpublished SRA sequencing project (SRS20559370) of an unlocalized specimen identified as G. pelaensis; its reconstructed mitogenome was only 18 kb in length (14 kb shorter) and showed extensive sequence divergence. Phylogenetic analyses placed this specimen as the sister lineage to G. pelaensis, highlighting the need for further investigation of this taxon. In the Martinique specimen, several NUMTs (nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes) were also detected, which could complicate future studies relying solely on Sanger sequencing. Sequencing additionally revealed prey DNA from the gut contents of both worms: the New Caledonian specimen had consumed an unidentified noctuid moth, while the Martinique specimen had likely fed on the invasive cockroach Periplaneta australasiae (Fabricius, 1775), itself an introduced species.

Data availability

Reads are available on the Sequence Reads Archive (SRA) under BioProject PRJNA1223316, BioSamples SAMN46813856 (for MNHN JL402) and SAMN50810529 (for MNHN JL632), SRA accession numbers SRR32329171, SRR32329172, SRR35157170 and SRR35157171.

References

  1. Fourcade, Y., Winsor, L. & Justine, J. Hammerhead worms everywhere? Modelling the invasion of bipaliin flatworms in a changing climate. Divers. Distrib. 28, 844–858. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13489 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Justine, J.-L., Winsor, L., Gey, D., Gros, P. & Thévenot, J. Giant worms chez moi! Hammerhead flatworms (Platyhelminthes, Geoplanidae, Bipalium spp., Diversibipalium spp.) in metropolitan France and overseas French territories. PeerJ 6, e4672. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4672 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Justine, J.-L., Winsor, L., Gey, D., Gros, P. & Thévenot, J. Obama chez moi! The invasion of metropolitan France by the land planarian Obama nungara (Platyhelminthes, Geoplanidae). PeerJ 8, e8385. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8385 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Justine, J.-L., Gastineau, R. & Winsor, L. Land flatworms (Tricladida: Geoplanidae) in France and French overseas territories: Ten years of research. Zoologia (Curitiba) 41, e24004. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-4689.v41.e24004 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shinobe, S., Uchida, S., Mori, H., Okochi, I. & Chiba, S. Declining soil Crustacea in a World Heritage Site caused by land nemertean. Sci. Rep. 7, 12400. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12653-4 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Moore, J. The distribution and evolution of terrestrial nemertines. Am. Zool. 25, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/25.1.15 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Moore, J., Gibson, R. & Jones, H. D. Terrestrial nemerteans thirty years on. Hydrobiologia 456, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013052728257 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Morffe, J., García, N. & Breugelmans, K. First record of the terrestrial nemertean Geonemertes pelaensis Semper, 1863 (Hoplonemertea: Prosorhochmidae) for Cuba. BIR 9, 399–407. https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2020.9.2.26 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moore, J. & Gibson, R. The evolution and comparative physiology of terrestrial and freshwater nemerteans. Biol. Rev. 60, 257–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185x.1985.tb00716.x (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gastineau, R. et al. The invasive land flatworm Arthurdendyus triangulatus has repeated sequences in the mitogenome, extra-long cox2 gene and paralogous nuclear rRNA clusters. Sci. Rep. 14, 7840. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58600-y (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gastineau, R., Murchie, A. K., Gey, D., Winsor, L. & Justine, J.-L. The terrestrial flatworm Microplana scharffi (Geoplanidae, Microplaninae): mitochondrial genome, phylogenetic proximity to the Bipaliinae and genes related to regeneration. Zootaxa 5523, 211–221. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5523.2.4 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Justine, J.-L. et al. Hammerhead flatworms (Platyhelminthes, Geoplanidae, Bipaliinae): mitochondrial genomes and description of two new species from France, Italy, and Mayotte. PeerJ 10, e12725. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12725 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Justine, J.-L. et al. A new species of alien land flatworm in the Southern United States. PeerJ 12, e17904. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.17904 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gordon, D. & Green, P. Consed: a graphical editor for next-generation sequencing. Bioinformatics 29, 2936–2937. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt515 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mateos, E. & Giribet, G. Exploring the molecular diversity of terrestrial nemerteans (Hoplonemertea, Monostilifera, Acteonemertidae) in a continental landmass. Zool. Scr. 37, 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.2008.00324.x (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Andrade, S. C. S. et al. Disentangling ribbon worm relationships: multi-locus analysis supports traditional classification of the phylum Nemertea. Cladistics 28, 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00376.x (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sun, W.-Y. & Sun, S.-C. A description of the complete mitochondrial genomes of Amphiporus formidabilis, Prosadenoporus spectaculum and Nipponnemertes punctatula (Nemertea: Hoplonemertea: Monostilifera). Mol. Biol. Rep. 41, 5681–5692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-014-3438-5 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Inward, D., Beccaloni, G. & Eggleton, P. Death of an order: a comprehensive molecular phylogenetic study confirms that termites are eusocial cockroaches. Biol. Lett. 3, 331–335. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0102 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ma, J. et al. Complete mitochondrial genomes of two blattid cockroaches, Periplaneta australasiae and Neostylopyga rhombifolia, and phylogenetic relationships within the Blattaria. PLoS ONE 12, e0177162. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177162 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kinkar, L. et al. Nanopore sequencing resolves elusive long tandem-repeat regions in mitochondrial genomes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 1811. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22041811 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shen, C. & Shi-Chun, S. Mitochondrial genome of Micrura bella (Nemertea: Heteronemertea), the largest mitochondrial genome known to phylum Nemertea. Mitochondrial DNA Part A 27, 2899–2900. https://doi.org/10.3109/19401736.2015.1060429 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Moore, J. & Gibson, R. The Geonemertes problem (Nemertea). J. Zool. 194, 175–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1981.tb05768.x (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gibson, R. & Moore, J. Further observations on the genus Geonemertes with a description of a new species from the Philippine Islands. Hydrobiologia 365, 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003199031726 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Moore, J., Moore, N. W. & Gibson, R. Land nemertines of Rodrigues. J. Zool. 237, 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1995.tb02761.x (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hookabe, N., Ueshima, R. & Miura, T. Postembryonic development and lifestyle shift in the commensal ribbon worm. Front. Zool. 21, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-024-00533-3 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Parr, R. L. et al. The pseudo-mitochondrial genome influences mistakes in heteroplasmy interpretation. BMC Genomics 7, 185. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-7-185 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Song, H., Buhay, J. E., Whiting, M. F. & Crandall, K. A. Many species in one: DNA barcoding overestimates the number of species when nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes are coamplified. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 13486–13491. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803076105 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gerlach, J. The behaviour and captive maintenance of the terrestrial nemertine (Geonemertes pelaensis). J. Zool. 246, 233–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1998.tb00151.x (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Justine, J.-L., Gey, D., Thévenot, J., Gastineau, R. & Jones, H. D. The land flatworm Amaga expatria (Geoplanidae) in Guadeloupe and Martinique: New reports and molecular characterization including complete mitogenome. PeerJ 8, e10098. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10098 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bonfils, J. Catalogue Raisonné des Insectes des Antilles Françaises. Dictyoptera Blattaria et Mantida. Annales de Zoologie et d’Écologie Animale 1(2), 107–120 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bourgade, M. Présence d’Evania appendigaster (Linné, 1758) à Trinité Martinique (Hymenoptera, Evaniidae). hal-04682394 (2024).

  32. Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y. & Gu, J. fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34, i884–i890. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bankevich, A. et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 19, 455–477. https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Camacho, C. et al. BLAST+: Architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform. 10, 421. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sun, W.-Y. et al. Complete mitochondrial genome sequences of two parasitic/commensal nemerteans, Gononemertes parasita and Nemertopsis tetraclitophila (Nemertea: Hoplonemertea). Parasit Vectors 7, 273. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-273 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kolmogorov, M., Yuan, J., Lin, Y. & Pevzner, P. A. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 540–546. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Walker, B. J. et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS ONE 9, e112963. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112963 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bernt, M. et al. MITOS: Improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol. Phylogenet. Evolution. 69, 313–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2012.08.023 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Laslett, D. & Canbäck, B. ARWEN, a program to detect tRNA genes in metazoan mitochondrial nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 24, 172–175. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm573 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Benson, G. Tandem repeats finder: A program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 573–580. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/27.2.573 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ontiveros-Palacios, N. et al. Rfam 15: RNA families database in 2025. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D258–D267. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae1023 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Thollesson, M. & Norenburg, J. L. Ribbon worm relationships: A phylogeny of the phylum Nemertea. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270, 407–415. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2254 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Helfenbein, K. G., Brown, W. M. & Boore, J. L. The complete mitochondrial genome of the articulate brachiopod Terebratalia transversa. Mol. Biol. Evolut. 18, 1734–1744. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003961 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Knudsen, B., Kohn, A. B., Nahir, B., McFadden, C. S. & Moroz, L. L. Complete DNA sequence of the mitochondrial genome of the sea-slug, Aplysia californica: Conservation of the gene order in Euthyneura. Mol. Phylogenet. Evolut. 38, 459–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2005.08.017 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Boore, J. L. Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of Urechis caupo, a representative of the phylum Echiura. BMC Genomics 5, 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-5-67 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zhong, S., Huang, L., Liu, Y., Huang, G. & Chen, X. The complete mitochondrial genome of Phascolosoma similis (Sipuncula, Phascolosomatidae) from Beibu Bay. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 5, 1263–1264. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802359.2020.1731378 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Capella-Gutiérrez, S., Silla-Martínez, J. M. & Gabaldón, T. trimAl: A tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25, 1972–1973. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Smith, S. A. & Dunn, C. W. Phyutility: A phyloinformatics tool for trees, alignments and molecular data. Bioinformatics 24, 715–716. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm619 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Darriba, D. et al. ModelTest-NG: A new and scalable tool for the selection of DNA and protein evolutionary models. Mol. Biol. Evolut. 37, 291–294. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msz189 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Minh, B. Q. et al. IQ-TREE 2: New models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 1530–1534. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa015 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Maslakova, S. A. & Norenburg, J. L. Revision of the smiling worms, genera Prosadenoporus Bürger, 1890 and Pantinonemertes Moore and Gibson, 1981 and description of a new species Prosadenoporus floridensis sp. nov. (Prosorhochmidae; Hoplonemertea; Nemertea) from Florida and Belize. J. Nat. Hist. 42, 1689–1727. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930802130286 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was co-financed by the Minister of Science under the “Regional Excellence Initiative” Program for 2024–2027 (RID/SP/0045/2024/01). Claude Lemieux and Monique Turmel were supported by grant RGPIN-2017-04506 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). Brian Boyle and Christian Otis were supported by the “Programme d’appui aux plateformes technologiques stratégiques” from the Ministère de l’Économie, de l’Innovation et de l’Énergie Québec.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Collection of the samples by M.C., D.G.H., B.P.L., I.R. Taxonomic identifications by J.L.J., L.W. Sequencing by C.O., B.B., R.G.L., S.M. Bioinformatic analyses by R.G., C.L. and M.T. First draft written by R.G. Draft edited by L.W., I.R., B.P.L., C.L., J.L.J. All authors read and approved the final draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Romain Gastineau.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Supplementary Material 3

Supplementary Material 4

Supplementary Material 5

Supplementary Material 6

Supplementary Material 7

Supplementary Material 8

Supplementary Material 9

Supplementary Material 10

Supplementary Material 11

Supplementary Material 12

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gastineau, R., Coulis, M., Otis, C. et al. Molecular characterisation of the invasive terrestrial nemertean Geonemertes pelaensis: long and complex mitogenome and presence of NUMTs.
Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-33230-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-33230-0


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Bending back the curve of shark and ray biodiversity loss

Discovery of Goethe’s amber ant: its phylogenetic and evolutionary implications

Back to Top