Multiple introgression events from ghost Rüppell’s fox mitochondrial lineages into red fox

1. Mallet, J. Hybridization as an invasion of the genome. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 20, 229–237 (2005).

   Google Scholar 

2. Taylor, S. A. & Larson, E. L. Insights from genomes into the evolutionary importance and prevalence of hybridization in nature. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 170–177 (2019).

   Google Scholar 

3. Toews, D. P. L. & Brelsford, A. The biogeography of mitochondrial and nuclear discordance in animals. Mol. Ecol. 21, 3907–3930 (2012).

   Google Scholar 

4. Currat, M., Ruedi, M., Petit, R. J. & Excoffier, L. The hidden side of invasions: Massive introgression by local genes. Evolution (N Y) 62, 1908–1920 (2008).

   Google Scholar 

5. Petit, R. J. & Excoffier, L. Gene flow and species delimitation. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 24, 386–393 (2009).

   Google Scholar 

6. Lehman, N. et al. Introgression of coyote mitochondrial DNA into sympatric North American gray wolf populations. Evolution 45, 104–119 (1991).

   Google Scholar 

7. Mercure, A., Ralls, R. K., Koepfli, K. P. & Wayne, R. K. DNA differentiation of swift, kit and Arctic foxes. Evolution (N Y) 47, 1313–1328 (1993).

   Google Scholar 

8. Koepfli, K. et al. Genome-wide evidence reveals that african and eurasian golden jackals are distinct species report genome-wide evidence reveals that african and eurasian golden jackals are distinct species. Curr. Biol. 25, 2158–2165 (2015).

   Google Scholar 

9. von Holdt, B. M. et al. Whole-genome sequence analysis shows that two endemic species of North American wolf are admixtures of the coyote and gray wolf. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501714 (2016).

   Google Scholar 

10. Gopalakrishnan, S. et al. Interspecific gene flow shaped the evolution of the genus Canis. Curr. Biol. 28, 3441-3449.e5 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

11. Basuony, A. E., Saleh, M. & Hailer, F. Mitogenomic analysis of Rüppell’s fox (Vulpes rueppellii) confirms phylogenetic placement within the Palaearctic clade shared with its sister species, the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Mitochondrial DNA. A. DNA Mapp. Seq. Anal. 0, 1–7 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

12. Basuony, A. E. et al. Paraphyly of the widespread generalist red fox (Vulpes vulpes): introgression rather than recent divergence of the arid-adapted Rüppell ’ s fox (Vulpes rueppellii)?. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 138, 453–469 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

13. Geffen, E., Mercure, A., Girman, D. J., Macdonald, D. W. & Wayne, R. K. Phylogenetic relationships of the fox-like canids: Mitochondrial DNA restriction fragment, site and cytochrome b sequence analyses. J. Zool. 228, 27–39 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

14. Leite, J. V., Álvares, F., Velo-Antón, G., Brito, J. C. & Godinho, R. Differentiation of North African foxes and population genetic dynamics in the desert—Insights into the evolutionary history of two sister taxa, Vulpes rueppellii and Vulpes vulpes. Org. Divers. Evol. 15, 731–745 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

15. Hoffmann, M. & Sillero-Zubiri, C. Vulpes vulpes (amended version of 2016 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2021: e.T23062A193903628. (2021).

16. Mallon, D., Murdoch, J. D. & Wacher, T. Vulpes rueppelli. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015: e.T23053A46197483 (2015).

17. Statham, M. J. et al. Range-wide multilocus phylogeography of the red fox reveals ancient continental divergence, minimal genomic exchange and distinct demographic histories. Mol. Ecol. 23, 4813–4830 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

18. Geraads, D. A revision of the fossil Canidae (Mammalia) of North-western Africa. Palaeontology 54, 429–446 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

19. Larivière, S. & Seddon, P. J. Vulpes rueppelli. Mamm. Species 678, 1–5 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

20. Larivière, S. & Pasitschniak-Arts, M. Vulpes vulpes. Mamm. Species 537, 1–11 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

21. Williams, J. B., Muñoz-Garcia, A., Ostrowski, S. & Tieleman, B. I. A phylogenetic analysis of basal metabolism, total evaporative water loss, and life-history among foxes from desert and mesic regions. J. Comp. Physiol. B 174, 29–39 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

22. Rocha, J. L. et al. North-African fox genomes show signatures of repeated introgression and adaptation to life in deserts. Nat. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02094-w (2023).

    Google Scholar 

23. Wang, M. S. et al. Ancient hybridization with an unknown population facilitated high-altitude adaptation of canids. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 2616–2629 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

24. Lipshutz, S. E. Interspecific competition, hybridization, and reproductive isolation in secondary contact: missing perspectives on males and females. Curr. Zool. 64, 75–88 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

25. Chan, K. M. A. & Levin, S. A. Leaky prezygotic isolation and porous genomes: Rapid introgression of maternally inherited DNA. Evolution (N Y) 59, 720–729 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

26. Schuster, M. et al. The age of the sahara desert. Science (1979) 311, 821 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

27. Masojć, M. et al. Saharan green corridors and Middle Pleistocene hominin dispersals across the Eastern Desert. Sudan. J Hum Evol 130, 141–150 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

28. Ghane-Ameleh, S. et al. Mid-Pleistocene transition as a trigger for diversification in the Irano-Anatolian region: evidence revealed by phylogeography and distribution pattern of the eastern three-lined lizard. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 31, e01839 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

29. Sacks, B. N. et al. Pleistocene origins, western ghost lineages, and the emerging phylogeographic history of the red wolf and coyote. Mol. Ecol. 30, 4292–4304 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

30. Edwards, C. J. et al. Ancient hybridization and an Irish origin for the modern polar bear matriline. Curr. Biol. 21, 1251–1258 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

31. Rocha, J. L. et al. African climate and geomorphology drive evolution and ghost introgression in sable antelope. Mol. Ecol. 31, 2968–2984 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

32. Andrews, S. FastQC: A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ (2010).

33. Schubert, M., Lindgreen, S. & Orlando, L. AdapterRemoval v2: Rapid adapter trimming, identification, and read merging. BMC. Res. Notes. 9, 88 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

34. Lopez Colom, R. & O’Brien, M. The genome sequence of the red fox, Vulpes vulpes (Linnaeus, 1758). Wellcome Open Res. 10, 13 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

35. Li, H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. Preprint at arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.3997 (2013).

36. Li, H. et al. The sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

37. Korneliussen, T. S., Albrechtsen, A. & Nielsen, R. ANGSD: Analysis of next generation sequencing data. BMC. Bioinformatics 15, 356 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

38. Lucas, T., Vincent, B. & Eric, P. Translocation of mitochondrial DNA into the nuclear genome blurs phylogeographic and conservation genetic studies in seabirds. R Soc Open Sci 9 (2022).

39. Ronquist, F., van der Mark, P. & Huelsenbeck, J. P. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis using MrBayes. In The Phylogenetic Handbook: A Practical Approach to Phylogenetic Analysis and Hypothesis Testing (eds Lemey, P. et al.) 111–141 (Cambridge University Press, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

40. Darriba, D., Taboada, G. L., Doallo, R. & Posada, D. jModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Methods. 9, 772 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

41. Rambaut, A. FigTree v1.4.4. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ (2018).

42. Rozas, J. et al. DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 3299–3302 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

43. Leigh, J. W. & Bryant, D. PopART: full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 1110–1116 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

44. Kimura, M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16, 111–120 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

45. Kumar, S. et al. MEGA12: Molecular evolutionary genetic analysis version 12 for adaptive and green computing. Mol. Biol. Evol. 41, msae263 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

46. Suchard, M. A. et al. Bayesian phylogenetic and phylodynamic data integration using BEAST 1.10. Virus Evol. 4, vey016 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

47. Gernhard, T. The conditioned reconstructed process. J. Theor. Biol. 253, 769–778 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

48. Drummond, A. J., Ho, S. Y. W., Phillips, M. J. & Rambaut, A. Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLoS Biol. 4, e88 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

49. Perini, F. A., Russo, C. A. M. & Schrago, C. G. The evolution of South American endemic canids: a history of rapid diversification and morphological parallelism. J. Evol. Biol. 23, 311–322 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

50. Bartolini Lucenti, S. & Madurell-Malapeira, J. Unraveling the fossil record of foxes: an updated review on the Plio-Pleistocene Vulpes spp. from Europe. Quat. Sci. Rev. 236, 106296 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

51. De Bonis, L. et al. The oldest African fox (Vulpes riffautae n. sp., Canidae, Carnivora) recovered in late Miocene deposits of the Djurab desert, Chad. Naturwissenschaften 94, 575–580 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

52. Zhao, C., Zhang, H., Liu, G., Yang, X. & Zhang, J. The complete mitochondrial genome of the Tibetan fox (Vulpes ferrilata) and implications for the phylogeny of Canidae. C. R. Biol. 339, 68–77 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

53. Rambaut, A., Drummond, A. J., Xie, D., Baele, G. & Suchard, M. A. Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Syst. Biol. 67, 901–904 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

Download references