Natural infection of Aedes albopictus with the wAlbB strain and Ae. aegypti with the wPip strain of Wolbachia in Iran

1. Keller, R. P., Geist, J., Jeschke, J. M. & Kühn, I. Invasive species in Europe: Ecology, status, and policy. Environ. Sci. Eur. 23, 1–17 (2011).

   Google Scholar 

2. Sharma, S. et al. Invasive alien species: a threat to biodiversity. (2009).

3. Unit, W. R. B. Aedes genus page. Walter Reed Biosystematics Website, (2025). http://wrbu.si.edu//vectorspecies/genera/aedes, accessed on [date (e.g. 03 February 2020) when you last viewed the site].

4. Lwande, O. W. et al. Globe-trotting Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus: Risk factors for arbovirus pandemics. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 20, 71–81 (2020).

   Google Scholar 

5. Bonizzoni, M., Gasperi, G., Chen, X. & James, A. A. The invasive mosquito species Aedes albopictus: Current knowledge and future perspectives. Trends Parasitol. 29, 460–468 (2013).

   Google Scholar 

6. Egid, B. R. et al. Review of the ecology and behaviour of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in Western Africa and implications for vector control. Curr. Res. Parasitol. vector-borne Dis. 2, 100074 (2022).

   Google Scholar 

7. Mombouli, J. V. et al. Chikungunya virus infection, Brazzaville, republic of Congo, 2011. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 19, 1542 (2013).

   Google Scholar 

8. Bargielowski, I. et al. Widespread evidence for interspecific mating between Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in nature. Infect. Genet. Evol. 36, 456–461 (2015).

   Google Scholar 

9. Kamgang, B. & Wilson-Bahun, T. A. Geographical distribution of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) and genetic diversity of invading population of Ae. albopictus in the Republic of the Congo. Wellcome Open Res. 3, 79. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14659.3 (2018).

   Google Scholar 

10. CDC. Surveillance and control of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in the United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. (2016).

11. Dusfour, I. et al. Management of insecticide resistance in the major Aedes vectors of arboviruses: Advances and challenges. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 13, e0007615 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

12. Rose, N. H. et al. Climate and urbanization drive mosquito preference for humans. Curr. Biol. 30, 3570-3579. e3576 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

13. Willoughby, J. R. et al. Assessing and managing the risk of Aedes mosquito introductions via the global maritime trade network. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 18, e0012110 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

14. Wang, G.-H. et al. Combating mosquito-borne diseases using genetic control technologies. Nat. Commun. 12, 4388 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

15. Montenegro, D., Cortés-Cortés, G., Balbuena-Alonso, M. G., Warner, C. & Camps, M. Wolbachia-based emerging strategies for control of vector-transmitted disease. Acta Trop. 260, 107410 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

16. Sadanandane, C. et al. Studies on the fitness characteristics of w Mel-and w AlbB-introgressed Aedes aegypti (Pud) lines in comparison with w Mel-and w AlbB-transinfected Aedes aegypti (Aus) and wild-type Aedes aegypti (Pud) lines. Front. Microbiol. 13, 947857 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

17. Ahmad, N. A., Vythilingam, I., Lim, Y. A., Zabari, N. Z. A. M. & Lee, H. L. Detection of Wolbachia in Aedes albopictus and their effects on chikungunya virus. The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 96, 148 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

18. Zhang, D., Zheng, X., Xi, Z., Bourtzis, K. & Gilles, J. R. Combining the sterile insect technique with the incompatible insect technique: I-impact of Wolbachia infection on the fitness of triple-and double-infected strains of Aedes albopictus. PLoS One 10, e0121126 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

19. Hugo, L. E. et al. Wolbachia w AlbB inhibit dengue and Zika infection in the mosquito Aedes aegypti with an Australian background. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 16, e0010786 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

20. Ant, T. H., Herd, C. S., Geoghegan, V., Hoffmann, A. A. & Sinkins, S. P. The Wolbachia strain w Au provides highly efficient virus transmission blocking in Aedes aegypti. PLoS Pathog. 14, e1006815 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

21. Darbandsari, M. et al. Isolation and characterization of the midgut microbiota of Aedes albopictus to identify suitable candidates for paratransgenesis. Eur. J. Public Health 35, i60–i65. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae110 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

22. Azari-Hamidian, S. & Harbach, R. E. Keys to the adult females and fourth-instar larvae of the mosquitoes of Iran (Diptera: Culicidae). Zootaxa 1–33 (2009). (2078).

23. Collins, F. H. et al. A ribosomal RNA gene probe differentiates member species of the Anopheles gambiae complex. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 37, 37–41 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

24. Zhou, W., Rousset, F. & O’Neill, S. Phylogeny and PCR–based classification of Wolbachia strains using wsp gene sequences. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 265, 509–515 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

25. Karami, M. et al. Wolbachia endobacteria in natural populations of Culex pipiens of Iran and its phylogenetic congruence. J. arthropod-borne Dis. 10, 347 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

26. Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1547–1549 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

27. Madeira, F. et al. The EMBL-EBI job dispatcher sequence analysis tools framework in 2024. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, W521–W525 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

28. Baldo, L. et al. Multilocus sequence typing system for the endosymbiont Wolbachia pipientis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 7098–7110. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00731-06 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

29. Harbach, R. Mosquito Taxonomic Inventory (https:// (2025). mosquito-taxonomic-inventory.myspecies.info/). available at: https://mosquito-taxonomic-inventory.myspecies.info/valid-species-list?utm_source=chatgpt.com

30. ECDC. (2025). https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/dengue-monthly

31. Alonso, A. C., Stein, M., Matías Hisgen, C. & Micieli, M. V. Abiotic factors affecting the prevalence of Wolbachia (Rickettsiaceae) in immature Aedes albopictus (Skuse) (Culicidae). J. Invertebr. Pathol. 189, 107730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2022.107730 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

32. Yang, Y. et al. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Wolbachia in field-collected Aedes albopictus, Anopheles sinensis, Armigeres subalbatus, Culex pipiens and Cx. tritaeniorhynchus in China. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 15, e0009911 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

33. Das, B., Satapathy, T., Kar, S. K. & Hazra, R. K. Genetic structure and Wolbachia genotyping in naturally occurring populations of Aedes albopictus across contiguous landscapes of Orissa, India. PLoS One 9, e94094. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094094 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

34. Nazni, W. A. et al. Establishment of Wolbachia strain wAlbB in Malaysian populations of Aedes aegypti for dengue control. Current biology 29, 4241–4248. e4245 (2019).

35. Ekwudu, O., Devine, G. J., Aaskov, J. G. & Frentiu, F. D. Wolbachia strain wAlbB blocks replication of flaviviruses and alphaviruses in mosquito cell culture. Parasit. Vectors 13, 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-3936-3 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

36. Flores, H. A. et al. Multiple Wolbachia strains provide comparative levels of protection against dengue virus infection in Aedes aegypti. PLoS Pathog. 16, e1008433. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008433 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

37. Atyame, C. M. et al. Multiple Wolbachia determinants control the evolution of cytoplasmic incompatibilities in Culex pipiens mosquito populations. Mol. Ecol. 20, 286–298 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

38. Calvitti, M., Moretti, R., Skidmore, A. R. & Dobson, S. L. Wolbachia strain wPip yields a pattern of cytoplasmic incompatibility enhancing a Wolbachia-based suppression strategy against the disease vector Aedes albopictus. Parasit. Vectors 5, 254. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-5-254 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

39. Moretti, R. et al. Combining Wolbachia-induced sterility and virus protection to fight Aedes albopictus-borne viruses. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 12, e0006626. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006626 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

40. Correa, C. C. & Ballard, J. W. O. Wolbachia Associations with Insects: Winning or Losing Against a Master Manipulator. Front. Ecol. Evol. 3 https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2015.00153 (2016).

41. Fraser, J. E., O’Donnell, T. B. & Duyvestyn, J. M. Novel phenotype of Wolbachia strain wPip in Aedes aegypti challenges assumptions on mechanisms of Wolbachia-mediated dengue virus inhibition. PLoS Pathog. 16, e1008410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008410 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

42. Guo, Y., Guo, J. & Li, Y. Wolbachia wPip blocks Zika virus transovarial transmission in Aedes albopictus. Microbiol. Spectr. 10, e0263321. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02633-21 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

43. Puggioli, A., Calvitti, M., Moretti, R. & Bellini, R. wPip Wolbachia contribution to Aedes albopictus SIT performance: Advantages under intensive rearing. Acta Trop. 164, 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.10.014 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

44. Moretti, R., Marzo, G. A., Lampazzi, E. & Calvitti, M. Cytoplasmic incompatibility management to support Incompatible Insect Technique against Aedes albopictus. Parasit. Vectors 11, 649. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-3208-7 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

45. Padde, J. R. et al. The impact of environmental and host factors on wolbachia density and efficacy as a biological tool. Decoding Infection and Transmission 1, 100006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcit.2023.100006 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

46. Ross, P. A., Wiwatanaratanabutr, I. & Axford, J. K. Wolbachia infections in Aedes aegypti differ markedly in their response to cyclical heat stress. PLoS Pathog. 13, e1006006. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006006 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

47. Ross, P. A. et al. A wAlbB Wolbachia transinfection displays stable phenotypic effects across divergent Aedes aegypti mosquito backgrounds. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 87, e0126421. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01264-21 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

48. Memish, Z. A. et al. Mass gatherings medicine: Public health issues arising from mass gathering religious and sporting events. Lancet 393, 2073–2084. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30501-x (2019).

    Google Scholar 

49. Reyes, J. I. L., Suzuki, T., Suzuki, Y. & Watanabe, K. Detection and quantification of natural Wolbachia in Aedes aegypti in metropolitan Manila, Philippines using locally designed primers. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 14, 1360438 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

50. Gnankine, O. & Dabire, R. K. Natural occurrence of Wolbachia in Anopheles sp. and Aedes aegypti populations could compromise the success of vector control strategies. Front. Trop. Dis. 5, 1329015 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

51. Martín-Park, A. et al. Recommendations for Implementing Innovative Technologies to Control Aedes aegypti: Population Suppression Using a Combination of the Incompatible and Sterile Insect Techniques (IIT-SIT), Based on the Mexican Experience/Initiative. Insects 15, 987 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

52. WHO. Disease Outbreak News. Dengue – Iran (Islamic Republic of). Available at: (2024). https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2024-DON526#:~:text=Based%20on%20entomological%20surveillance%2C%20to%20date%2C%20Aedes%20aegypti%20and%20Aedes,%2 C%20Khuzestan%2 C%20Mazandaran%20and%20Sistan.

Download references