in

Neglected positive role of inactivating antibiotic resistance genes in the environment


Abstract

Water environments serve as critical sources and conduits for antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The complex water cycle facilitates the transmission of antibiotics, resistant bacteria and resistance genes that have been released through anthropogenic activities, thereby reshaping AMR dynamics across different environmental compartments. Among these resistance determinants, inactivating antibiotic resistance genes (inactivating ARGs) encode enzymes that degrade or modify antibiotics to reduce their bioactivity. They play a complex and dual role bridging environmental reservoirs and clinical risk. While they can threaten the therapeutic effectiveness of antibiotics when transferred horizontally to pathogens, they also act as cooperative traits that lower local concentrations of bioactive antibiotics and relax selection for resistance. In turn, reduced antibiotic exposure can enhance ecosystem functions and stability in both host-associated and environmental microbiomes through ecosystem resilience and community protection. Inactivating ARGs represent a crucial intersection between AMR challenges and microbial community stability. Here we discuss the risks and ecological benefits of inactivating ARGs, and present intervention strategies aiming to both protect ecological resilience and limit resistance development in pathogens.

Access through your institution

Buy or subscribe

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Dual roles of inactivating ARGs, from molecular mechanisms to ecological consequences.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 2: The neglected roles of inactivating ARGs in microbial communities under antibiotic pressure.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

Genetic compatibility and ecological connectivity drive the dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes

Assessing antimicrobial resistance connectivity across One Health sectors

Mitigation potential of antibiotic resistance genes in water and soil by clay-based adsorbents

References

  1. Djordjevic, S. P. et al. Genomic surveillance for antimicrobial resistance—a One Health perspective. Nat. Rev. Genet. 25, 142–157 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  2. Larsson, D. G. J., Gaze, W. H., Laxminarayan, R. & Topp, E. AMR, One Health and the environment. Nat. Microbiol. 8, 754–755 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hernando-Amado, S., Coque, T. M., Baquero, F. & Martínez, J. L. Defining and combating antibiotic resistance from One Health and Global Health perspectives. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 1432–1442 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rodriguez-Mozaz, S. et al. Occurrence of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in hospital and urban wastewaters and their impact on the receiving river. Water Res. 69, 234–242 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  5. Larsson, D. G. J. & Flach, C.-F. Antibiotic resistance in the environment. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 20, 257–269 (2022). This review synthesizes the environmental dimensions of antibiotic resistance, establishing a framework for understanding the origins, evolution and transmission of resistance determinants that involves the external environment.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kraupner, N. et al. Evidence for selection of multi-resistant E. coli by hospital effluent. Environ. Int. 150, 106436 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao, Y. et al. Antibiotic resistome in the livestock and aquaculture industries: status and solutions. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 2159–2196 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berglund, F., Ebmeyer, S., Kristiansson, E. & Larsson, D. G. J. Evidence for wastewaters as environments where mobile antibiotic resistance genes emerge. Commun. Biol. 6, 321 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ashbolt Nicholas, J. et al. Human health risk assessment (HHRA) for environmental development and transfer of antibiotic resistance. Environ. Health Perspect. 121, 993–1001 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  10. World Health Organization. Guidance on Wastewater and Solid Waste Management for Manufacturing of Antibiotics (World Health Organization, 2024); https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240097254

  11. United Nations Environment Programme. Bracing for Superbugs: Strengthening Environmental Action in the One Health Response to Antimicrobial Resistance (Unied Nations, 2023); https://www.unep.org/resources/superbugs/environmental-action

  12. Yurtsev, E. A., Chao, H. X., Datta, M. S., Artemova, T. & Gore, J. Bacterial cheating drives the population dynamics of cooperative antibiotic resistance plasmids. Mol. Syst. Biol. 9, 683 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sorg, R. A. et al. Collective resistance in microbial communities by intracellular antibiotic deactivation. PLoS Biol. 14, e2000631 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lee, D.-H. et al. Colistin-degrading proteases confer collective resistance to microbial communities during polymicrobial infections. Microbiome. 10, 129 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bottery, M. J., Pitchford, J. W. & Friman, V.-P. Ecology and evolution of antimicrobial resistance in bacterial communities. ISME J. 15, 939–948 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dantas, G., Sommer, M. O. A., Oluwasegun, R. D. & Church, G. M. Bacteria subsisting on antibiotics. Science 320, 100–103 (2008).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  17. Allen, H. K. et al. Call of the wild: antibiotic resistance genes in natural environments. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8, 251–259 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wright, G. D. The antibiotic resistome: the nexus of chemical and genetic diversity. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5, 175–186 (2007).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  19. Benveniste, R. & Davies, J. Aminoglycoside antibiotic-inactivating enzymes in actinomycetes similar to those present in clinical isolates of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 70, 2276–2280 (1973).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  20. D’Costa, V. M. et al. Antibiotic resistance is ancient. Nature 477, 457–461 (2011).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  21. Van Goethem, M. W. et al. A reservoir of ‘historical’ antibiotic resistance genes in remote pristine Antarctic soils. Microbiome 6, 40 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  22. Boolchandani, M., D’Souza, A. W. & Dantas, G. Sequencing-based methods and resources to study antimicrobial resistance. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20, 356–370 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  23. Darby, E. M. et al. Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance revisited. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 21, 280–295 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  24. Blair, J. M. A., Webber, M. A., Baylay, A. J., Ogbolu, D. O. & Piddock, L. J. V. Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13, 42–51 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  25. Meredith, H. R., Srimani, J. K., Lee, A. J., Lopatkin, A. J. & You, L. Collective antibiotic tolerance: mechanisms, dynamics and intervention. Nat. Chem. Biol. 11, 182–188 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vega, N. M. & Gore, J. Collective antibiotic resistance: mechanisms and implications. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 21, 28–34 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bush, K. & Bradford, P. A. Epidemiology of β-lactamase-producing pathogens. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 33, e00047-19 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tao, W. et al. Inactivation of chloramphenicol and florfenicol by a novel chloramphenicol hydrolase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 6295–6301 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  29. Dhindwal, P. et al. A neglected and emerging antimicrobial resistance gene encodes for a serine-dependent macrolide esterase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2219827120 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fillgrove, K. L., Pakhomova, S., Newcomer, M. E. & Armstrong, R. N. Mechanistic diversity of fosfomycin resistance in pathogenic microorganisms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 15730–15731 (2003).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gasparrini, A. J. et al. Tetracycline-inactivating enzymes from environmental, human commensal, and pathogenic bacteria cause broad-spectrum tetracycline resistance. Commun. Biol. 3, 241 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ma, X. et al. Molecular mechanism of chloramphenicol and thiamphenicol resistance mediated by a novel oxidase, CmO, in Sphingomonadaceae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 89, e0154722 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  33. Huang, Y. et al. Strain-level diversity in sulfonamide biodegradation: adaptation of Paenarthrobacter to sulfonamides. ISME J. 18, wrad040 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chen, Z. et al. Deglycosylation inactivation initiated by a novel periplasmic dehydrogenase complex provides a novel strategy for eliminating the recalcitrant antibiotic kanamycin. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 4298–4307 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  35. Liu, L.-K. et al. The structure of the antibiotic deactivating, N-hydroxylating rifampicin monooxygenase. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 21553–21562 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  36. Olaitan, A. O. et al. Decoding a cryptic mechanism of metronidazole resistance among globally disseminated fluoroquinolone-resistant Clostridioides difficile. Nat. Commun. 14, 4130 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  37. Crofts, T. S. et al. Discovery and characterization of a nitroreductase capable of conferring bacterial resistance to chloramphenicol. Cell Chem. Biol. 26, 559–570.e556 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  38. Löffler, P., Escher, B. I., Baduel, C., Virta, M. P. & Lai, F. Y. Antimicrobial transformation products in the aquatic environment: global occurrence, ecotoxicological risks and potential of antibiotic resistance. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 9474–9494 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hu, J., Lyu, Y., Chen, H., Li, S. & Sun, W. Suspect and nontarget screening reveal the underestimated risks of antibiotic transformation products in wastewater treatment plant effluents. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 17439–17451 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bhattacharya, A. & Khare, S. K. Utilizing the β-lactam hydrolyzing activity of ß-lactamase produced by Bacillus cereus EMB20 for remediation of β-lactam antibiotics. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 168, 105363 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  41. Gal, M. & Brazier, J. S. Metronidazole resistance in Bacteroides spp. Carrying nim genes and the selection of slow-growing metronidazole-resistant mutants. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 54, 109–116 (2004).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  42. Li, Q. et al. Positive contribution of antimicrobial biodegradation in mitigating conjugative transfer of antibiotic resistance genes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 59, 21645–21656 (2025). This study provides direct experimental evidence that antimicrobial biodegradation can reduce conjugative transfer of ARGs to high‑risk pathogens, highlighting how antibiotic fate processes can modulate AMR dissemination risk across microbiotas.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  43. Robicsek, A. et al. Fluoroquinolone-modifying enzyme: a new adaptation of a common aminoglycoside acetyltransferase. Nat. Med. 12, 83–88 (2006).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  44. Majewsky, M. et al. Antibacterial activity of sulfamethoxazole transformation products (TPs): general relevance for sulfonamide TPs modified at the para position. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 27, 1821–1828 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  45. Halling-Sørensen, B., Sengeløv, G. & Tjørnelund, J. Toxicity of tetracyclines and tetracycline degradation products to environmentally relevant bacteria, including selected tetracycline-resistant bacteria. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 42, 263–271 (2002).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  46. Deng, Y. et al. Microbiome assembly for sulfonamide subsistence and the transfer of genetic determinants. ISME J. 15, 2817–2829 (2021). This study links sulfonamide subsistence to the sadA gene and shows that this genetic capability is evolutionarily conserved with limited spread beyond the Micrococcaceae boundary, helping to constrain concerns about widespread horizontal transfer of this inactivating ARGs.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  47. Qi, M. et al. Microbial interactions drive the complete catabolism of the antibiotic sulfamethoxazole in activated sludge microbiomes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 3270–3282 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ma, X. et al. Novel pathway for chloramphenicol catabolism in the activated sludge bacterial isolate Sphingobium sp. CAP-1. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 7591–7600 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  49. Woappi, Y., Gabani, P., Singh, A. & Singh, O. V. Antibiotrophs: the complexity of antibiotic-subsisting and antibiotic-resistant microorganisms. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 42, 17–30 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  50. Deng, Y., Li, B. & Zhang, T. Bacteria that make a meal of sulfonamide antibiotics: blind spots and emerging opportunities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 3854–3868 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ebmeyer, S., Kristiansson, E. & Larsson, D. G. J. A framework for identifying the recent origins of mobile antibiotic resistance genes. Commun. Biol. 4, 8 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  52. Poirel, L., Kämpfer, P. & Nordmann, P. Chromosome-encoded Ambler class a β-lactamase of Kluyvera georgiana, a probable progenitor of a subgroup of CTX-M extended-spectrum β-lactamases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46, 4038–4040 (2002).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  53. Klümper, U. et al. Selection for antimicrobial resistance is reduced when embedded in a natural microbial community. ISME J. 13, 2927–2937 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  54. Wen, X., Langevin, A. M. & Dunlop, M. J. Antibiotic export by efflux pumps affects growth of neighboring bacteria. Sci. Rep. 8, 15120 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  55. Denk-Lobnig, M. K. & Wood, K. B. Spatial population dynamics of bacterial colonies with social antibiotic resistance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2417065122 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  56. Laborda, P., Gil-Gil, T., Martínez, J. L. & Hernando-Amado, S. Preserving the efficacy of antibiotics to tackle antibiotic resistance. Microb. Biotechnol. 17, e14528 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  57. Bottery Michael, J., Wood, A. J. & Brockhurst Michael, A. Selective conditions for a multidrug resistance plasmid depend on the sociality of antibiotic resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 60, 2524–2527 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  58. Nicoloff, H. & Andersson, D. I. Indirect resistance to several classes of antibiotics in cocultures with resistant bacteria expressing antibiotic-modifying or -degrading enzymes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 71, 100–110 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  59. Bottery, M. J. et al. Inter-species interactions alter antibiotic efficacy in bacterial communities. ISME J. 16, 812–821 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kelsic, E. D., Zhao, J., Vetsigian, K. & Kishony, R. Counteraction of antibiotic production and degradation stabilizes microbial communities. Nature 521, 516–519 (2015). This study reveals that antibiotic-degrading species, unlike intrinsically resistant ones, can robustly stabilize microbial communities against species loss even under high dispersal rates by attenuating inhibitory interactions, highlighting a fundamental role for degradation-mediated resistance in maintaining ecosystem diversity and stability.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  61. Chen, J., Chen, X., Zhu, Y., Yan, S. & Xie, S. New insights into bioaugmented removal of sulfamethoxazole in sediment microcosms: degradation efficiency, ecological risk and microbial mechanisms. Microbiome 12, 43 (2024). This study shows that bioaugmentation with sulfonamide degraders (including a sadA-encoded ipso-hydroxylation pathway) can accelerate sulfamethoxazole removal while reducing the abundance of key sulfonamide resistance genes (for example, sul1 and sul2) and lowering overall community ARG and MGE loads, highlighting the potential for antibiotic-inactivating functions to mitigate broader resistome burden at the community level.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  62. Frost, I. et al. Cooperation, competition and antibiotic resistance in bacterial colonies. ISME J. 12, 1582–1593 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  63. Yurtsev, E. A., Conwill, A. & Gore, J. Oscillatory dynamics in a bacterial cross-protection mutualism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 6236–6241 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  64. Estrela, S. & Brown, S. P. Community interactions and spatial structure shape selection on antibiotic resistant lineages. PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1006179 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  65. Meredith, H. R. et al. Applying ecological resistance and resilience to dissect bacterial antibiotic responses. Sci. Adv. 4, eaau1873 (2018). This study establishes a quantitative ecological framework to dissect bacterial responses to antibiotics, highlighting how antibiotic-degrading traits (specifically β-lactamase activity) significantly enhance population resilience by accelerating recovery after antibiotic stress, in contrast to target modification mechanisms that primarily improve resistance but not recovery speed.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  66. Allen, H. K. & Stanton, T. B. Altered egos: antibiotic effects on food animal microbiomes. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 68, 297–315 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  67. Hou, L. et al. Effects of sulfamethazine on denitrification and the associated N2O release in estuarine and coastal sediments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 326–333 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  68. Wepking, C. et al. Prolonged exposure to manure from livestock-administered antibiotics decreases ecosystem carbon-use efficiency and alters nitrogen cycling. Ecol. Lett. 22, 2067–2076 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  69. Pathak, A., Angst, D. C., León-Sampedro, R. & Hall, A. R. Antibiotic-degrading resistance changes bacterial community structure via species-specific responses. ISME J. 17, 1495–1503 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  70. Cubillos-Ruiz, A. et al. An engineered live biotherapeutic for the prevention of antibiotic-induced dysbiosis. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 6, 910–921 (2022). This study demonstrates a therapeutic application of inactivating ARGs by engineering a Lactococcus lactis strain to express a β-lactamase in the gut, effectively protecting the microbiome from antibiotic-induced dysbiosis without interfering with systemic antibiotic efficacy.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  71. Fishbein, S. R. S., Mahmud, B. & Dantas, G. Antibiotic perturbations to the gut microbiome. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 21, 772–788 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  72. Kaleko, M. et al. Development of SYN-004, an oral β -lactamase treatment to protect the gut microbiome from antibiotic-mediated damage and prevent Clostridium difficile infection. Anaerobe 41, 58–67 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  73. He, Q. et al. Designing a reengineered probiotic yeast to spontaneously degrade residual antibiotics in gut during antimicrobial therapy. J. Clean. Prod. 483, 144177 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  74. Zhang, L. et al. Complementary biotransformation of antimicrobial triclocarban obviously mitigates nitrous oxide emission toward sustainable microbial denitrification. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 7490–7502 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  75. Wang, H. et al. Mechanisms linking triclocarban biotransformation to functional response and antimicrobial resistome evolution in wastewater treatment systems. Water Res. 260, 121909 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  76. Wei, Y. et al. Synergistic control of trimethoprim and the antimicrobial resistome in electrogenic microbial communities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 58, 2847–2858 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  77. Langdon, A., Crook, N. & Dantas, G. The effects of antibiotics on the microbiome throughout development and alternative approaches for therapeutic modulation. Genome Med. 8, 39 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  78. Ebmeyer, S., Kristiansson, E. & Larsson, D. G. J. Unraveling the origins of mobile antibiotic resistance genes using random forest classification of large-scale genomic data. Environ. Int. 198, 109374 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  79. Lund, D. et al. Genetic compatibility and ecological connectivity drive the dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes. Nat. Commun. 16, 2595 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  80. Parras-Moltó, M. et al. The transfer of antibiotic resistance genes between evolutionarily distant bacteria. mSphere 10, e00114–e00125 (2025).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was supported financially by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants nos. 52322007 and 52321005), the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (no. 2023B1515020077), Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (nos. GXWD20231129112832001, JCYJ20240813105125034, and KCXFZ20240903092800002) and the State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology (no. 2024TS08). D.G.J.L. also thanks the Swedish Research Council VR (no. 2022-00945) and the Swedish State under an agreement between the Swedish Government and the county councils, the ALF-agreement (ALFGBG-965785), for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L.-Y.Z. drafted the manuscript. B.L., D.G.J.L. and A.-J.W. conceptualized the Perspective, set the overall direction and framework, and helped to balance and refine the viewpoints. H.-L.C. proofread the manuscript and revised the language. Q.L., K.S. and S.-H.G. contributed to discussion of the content and provided comments and revision suggestions. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to
D. G. Joakim Larsson, Ai-Jie Wang or Bin Liang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Water thanks Amy Pruden and the other, anonymous, reviewer for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, LY., Cui, HL., Li, Q. et al. Neglected positive role of inactivating antibiotic resistance genes in the environment.
Nat Water (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-026-00640-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-026-00640-x


Source: Ecology - nature.com

GNN-ML-FRL: a graph-enhanced meta-adaptive federated learning framework for scalable pest identification and ernvironmental modeling

Timing matters for plants and their herbivores