Abstract
Climate change is driving a global redistribution of marine biodiversity. As habitats shift, oceanographic connectivity (the transport of dispersive stages via ocean currents) becomes a critical, yet poorly understood, factor that can either facilitate or hinder species’ expansions into new areas. To quantify this influence, we developed a framework linking species distribution models with biophysical connectivity models to examine the redistribution of 467 marine forest species (seagrasses and brown macroalgae) under end-of-century climate change scenarios. Our projections show substantial habitat loss for both groups, reaching up to 50% (seagrasses) and 58% (brown macroalgae) of current habitats under higher emissions. Despite potential poleward expansions, oceanographic connectivity emerges as a major limiting factor. Accounting for average dispersal duration, range expansions are reduced by up to 38% in area (seagrasses) and 48% (macroalgae), and by up to 64% and 72% in distance, respectively. This reduction significantly increases the percentage of species facing a net loss of suitable habitat. Notably, well-defined dispersal barriers restrict expansions into highly suitable regions (e.g., the Okhotsk Sea, New Zealand, and the Arctic). Our findings underscore the need to explicitly integrate both habitat suitability and oceanographic connectivity to accurately predict marine biodiversity redistribution and inform effective conservation strategies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Projected loss of brown macroalgae and seagrasses with global environmental change
Coastal oceanographic connectivity at the global scale: a dataset of pairwise probabilities and travel times derived from biophysical modeling
Potential negative effects of ocean afforestation on offshore ecosystems
Introduction
Climate change is projected to significantly shift global marine biodiversity patterns and community structure1,2,3,4,5,6,7. While range expansions into newly suitable habitats can partially offset the negative impacts of projected range losses1, oceanographic connectivity may constrain the extent of future changes4. This connectivity is the outcome of the complex interaction between ocean current patterns and species’ dispersal potential, which can vary significantly, from a few hours to hundreds of days5,6. Depending on its alignment with climate shifts, oceanographic connectivity can either create barriers that isolate populations (increasing extinction risk as populations fail to track shifting conditions) or support persistence by facilitating range displacement into newly suitable habitats4,7,8,9. Despite the recognized role of ocean currents in shaping marine species’ responses to climate change, the extent to which they restrict or facilitate species redistributions remains a critical and largely unquantified gap in our understanding. This gap is especially critical for marine forest species of seagrass and brown macroalgae, critical ecosystem-restructuring species for which high-emission scenarios project drastic poleward and depth distribution shifts10,11 and whose dispersal relies heavily on passive transport by ocean currents12. Given the crucial ecological and economic services provided by these marine forests – including coastal protection, food security, and carbon sequestration13,14,15 – anticipating their potential redistribution under future climate changes has far-reaching implications for ecosystem services and conservation policy.
Current distribution models projecting future species distributions often rely on oversimplified assumptions of marine connectivity, such as unlimited dispersal to new suitable habitats, complete restriction, or distance-based criteria (see for a discussion of alternatives16). Overall, these assumptions fail to capture the asymmetric and highly variable nature of ocean currents, which are shaped by complex oceanographic (e.g., gyres, eddies, tidal forces, and fronts) and topographic features17,18. Additionally, ocean current patterns interact with species-specific dispersal potential (e.g., the duration of viable propagules) to create highly variable connectivity patterns that ultimately shape species’ ability to track shifting climates. To address these limitations, advancements in modeling now call for sophisticated biophysical models that integrate high-resolution, time-varying oceanographic data alongside relevant biological traits. By simulating the trajectory of propagules advected by ocean currents, these models offer more realistic predictions of dispersal pathways and potential settlement locations19,20. Importantly, in the case of marine forests, oceanographic connectivity derived from biophysical models has been shown to systematically explain patterns of population genetic differentiation12,21,22, providing strong empirical support for their use in capturing the influence of ocean currents on species redistributions.
In this study, we quantify the extent to which oceanographic connectivity restricts future range expansions of seagrasses and brown macroalgae across contrasting climate scenarios. We couple habitat-suitability projections from species distribution models (SDMs) with connectivity estimates from biophysical models (BMs) to calculate net distribution changes and pinpoint regions where ocean currents systematically shape barriers to dispersal. By revealing where and to what extent ocean currents limit – or facilitate – the colonization of newly suitable habitats under climate change, our approach delivers crucial insights for biodiversity assessments and management strategies that incorporate the dynamic interplay between shifting climates and complex oceanographic processes.
Results
Species habitat changes under future climate change
Higher emission scenarios intensified habitat loss, affecting brown macroalgae to a higher extent (Supplementary Data 2; LMM and Tukey tests in Supplementary Data 3). Specifically, under the lower emission scenario (SSP1-1.9), seagrasses lose 34.75% of their habitat, while brown macroalgae lose 37.01%. Under the higher emission scenario (SSP3-7.0), these losses increased to 50.39% for seagrasses and 58.22% for brown macroalgae (Fig. 1; Supplementary Data 4). Habitat gains also depended on the emission scenario, both in terms of area and expansion distance, but were independent of taxon (Supplementary Data 2–3). Under the unlimited dispersal assumption, similar area gains varied between 4.79 and 21.02%, and between 8.80 and 25.01%, for seagrass and brown algae, respectively, while expansion distances varied between 69.06 and 194.97 km, and between 74.04 and 234.22 km (SSP1-1.9 vs. SSP3-7.0; Fig. 1; Supplementary Data 4).
Unrestricted versus restricted dispersal by oceanographic connectivity to newly suitable habitats with the 5th percentile, mean, and 95th percentile of propagule duration (PD) periods of each taxonomic group. Habitat suitability loss and gain in percentage area change. Potential range expansions in distance. Number of stepping-stone connectivity events to newly suitable habitats. Net change in suitable habitats in percentage area. Solid vertical lines over boxplots depict the average of each metric. Data per species, climate scenario, and dispersal restrictions are available in Supplementary Data 2.
Impact of oceanographic connectivity on species range shifts
Incorporating oceanographic connectivity substantially restricted dispersal potential to future suitable habitats, with no detectable differences between estimates based on the mean and 95th percentile of propagule durations (Supplementary Data 3). Thus, subsequent analysis and discussion focus solely on the results based on the 5th percentile and the mean of propagule duration. For seagrasses, incorporating oceanographic connectivity under the mean propagule-duration scenario restricted expansions by 17.78 and 39.52% in area and by 59.88 and 56.70% in distance (SSP1-1.9 vs. SSP3-7.0, respectively). Under the 5th-percentile propagule duration scenario, restrictions were stronger, with expansions reduced by 28.54 and 51.93% in area and by 66.85 and 64.77% in distance (SSP1-1.9 vs. SSP3-7.0). For brown macroalgae, connectivity under the mean propagule-duration scenario restricted expansions by 25.49 and 47.89% in area and by 59.88 and 56.70% in distance (SSP1-1.9 vs. SSP3-7.0; Fig. 1). Under the scenario of 5th percentile scenario, reductions again increased, to 48.40 and 71.75% in area and by 66.85 and 64.77% in distance (SSP1-1.9 vs. SSP3-7.0; Fig. 1).
Under restricted oceanographic connectivity, successful range expansions for seagrasses involved an average of 11.91–15.23% stepping-stone connectivity events under the mean propagule-duration scenario (SSP1-1.9 vs. SSP3-7.0), compared with the substantially lower range of 8.63–10.71 events under the 5th percentile. For brown macroalgae, the reduction was even more pronounced: expansions involved an average of 11.07–12.60 events under the mean propagule-duration scenario, but only 3.78–4.37 events under the 5th percentile (Fig. 1).
Overall, accounting for restricted dispersal under the mean propagule duration reduced the net change in suitable habitats up to 28.28% for seagrasses and 35.40% for brown macroalgae (SSP3-7.0; Fig. 1), increasing the percentage of projected species experiencing negative net changes by up to 13.16% for seagrasses and 11.99% for brown macroalgae. Under the 5th percentile, the magnitude of the impact increased further, with net changes reduced by up to 37.16% for seagrasses and 53.38% for brown macroalgae, and the percentage of projected species experiencing negative net changes increased by up to 18.42 and 21.44%, respectively.
Present-day biodiversity hotspots for seagrasses (>15 species) were concentrated in the Indo-Pacific, particularly within the Coral Triangle and the South China Sea, as well as along the West African, Northwest and Southeast Australian coastlines (Fig. 2). Brown macroalgae hotspots (>50 species) also included the Indo-Pacific and Australia, as well as the West Mediterranean/adjacent Atlantic, British Isles, and the Northwest Pacific Ocean (Fig. 3). Under projected climate change, the Indo-Pacific is projected to face the most pronounced habitat losses, with the China Sea, Philippine Sea, Java Sea, and along the Eastern Australian coastline potentially losing more than 10 seagrass species (Fig. 2) and more than 40 brown macroalgae species (Fig. 3). Additional moderate losses extend across the tropical Western Pacific Ocean. Without dispersal limitations, the Okhotsk Sea, southern Australia, New Zealand, and southern Angola coastlines showed the greatest potential for seagrass range expansions (Fig. 2). For brown macroalgae, unrestricted range expansions are higher in the Okhotsk Sea and New Zealand. Additional areas of moderate expansions include the temperate Northeast Pacific, the Arctic, the central Mediterranean Sea, the Persian and Aden Gulfs (Fig. 3). Oceanographic connectivity, both under the mean and the 5th percentile of propagule duration, is expected to limit future range expansions in the Okhotsk Sea and southern New Zealand. Specifically for seagrass, additional limitations to range expansions were identified in southern Australia and southern Angola, while for brown macroalgae in the Arctic, and to a lesser extent in the central Mediterranean, and the temperate Northeast Pacific (Figs. 2 and 3).
Present-day patterns of a species richness and projected habitat b, c losses and d, e gains under climate change. Regions of restricted range expansion to newly suitable habitats owing to the effect of oceanographic connectivity under the f, g mean and the h, i 5th percentile of propagule duration. Maps aggregated to a coarser resolution of 150 km for better visualization (refer to data availability statement for high-resolution maps).
Present-day patterns of a species richness and projected habitat b, c losses and d, e gains under climate change. Regions of restricted range expansion to newly suitable habitats owing to the effect of oceanographic connectivity under the f, g mean and the h, i 5th percentile of propagule duration. Maps aggregated to a coarser resolution of 150 km for better visualization (refer to data availability statement for high-resolution maps).
Discussion
Our study demonstrates that oceanographic connectivity is a major limiting factor in the climate-induced range shifts of marine forests. By integrating species distribution and biophysical models, we show that while there is potential for marine forests to shift their distributions poleward and partially offset range losses, well-defined dispersal barriers created by ocean currents emerge as a critical bottleneck, significantly constraining these movements. Under the most conservative scenarios, these barriers can reduce expansions into future suitable habitats by 51.93% for seagrasses and 71.75% for brown macroalgae, leaving regions with broad suitable habitats in the future potentially uncolonized. This restriction on dispersal has profound implications for the overall net change in suitable habitats, increasing the proportion of species facing negative impacts. These findings underscore the critical need to consider projected habitat shifts alongside oceanographic connectivity when assessing the vulnerability and resilience of marine biodiversity under climate change.
SDM reveals present-day biodiversity hotspots for seagrasses in the Indo-Pacific, West Africa, and Australia, while for brown macroalgae in the Indo-Pacific, Australia, Northeast Pacific, west Mediterranean/adjacent Atlantic, and along the British Isles. These estimates at the regional scale align with previous studies and reflect established evolutionary hypotheses of species radiation and diversification10,23,24. Future projections indicate substantial range contractions for both groups, particularly under the high emissions scenario (SSP3-7.0), a pattern consistent with projections performed for additional taxa10,25,26. The Indo-Pacific region is a particularly vulnerable area, with severe declines in the East China Sea, Philippine Sea, Java Sea, and along the Eastern Australian coastline. Additional moderate contractions are projected across tropical and temperate regions globally. These range losses, adding up to ongoing declines reported for marine forests27,28,29, threaten to disrupt essential ecosystem services, such as carbon sequestration, coastline protection, and the provision of nursery grounds and habitat for diverse marine life13,14,30,31. Even if functionally similar species replace the lost ones, maintaining regional levels of biodiversity, cascading effects on community composition and trophic interactions can still occur, compromising overall ecosystem health and resilience32.
Without dispersal limitations, SDMs suggest wide poleward range expansions into newly suitable habitats. Hotspots of range expansions include the Okhotsk Sea, southern Australia, and New Zealand, as well as additional areas like southern Angola coastlines, the temperate Northeast Pacific, the Arctic, the central Mediterranean Sea, and the Persian and Aden Gulfs. Despite potential ecological shifts in these regions, with new species established impacting community composition and trophic interactions33, range expansions can partially offset the negative impacts of range losses at the species level. However, oceanographic connectivity is shown here as a crucial factor restricting expansions and, therefore, negatively impacting distribution net changes under climate change. Previous studies hypothesized that oceanographic connectivity may modify the coupling between climate change and biogeographical shifts4. Our study is the first to quantify the extent to which this connectivity may restrict species range displacements in the ocean. This limitation is particularly pronounced under higher emissions, and its magnitude is strongly dependent on the dispersal scenario considered. Crucially, moving from the mean to the conservative 5th percentile of propagule duration increases the restriction on range expansions by 31.40% for seagrasses and by 49.82% for brown macroalgae. Under such restricted dispersal conditions, populations may become strongly isolated, unable to track shifting climates, ultimately increasing their risk of extinction. Vast regions of future suitable habitats, like the Okhotsk Sea, southern New Zealand, southern Angola, the Arctic, the Mediterranean, and the temperate Northeast Pacific, may remain uncolonized due to dispersal barriers created by oceanographic connectivity.
Oceanographic connectivity may have strong implications for future range shifts; however, restrictions on range expansions were on the same order of magnitude for both seagrasses and brown macroalgae, despite variations in propagule duration periods (both between groups and between the mean, 5th, and 95th percentile estimates). This suggests that ocean currents create strong dispersal barriers that even longer-lived propagules cannot reliably cross34. These barriers may thus apply to additional passively dispersed marine taxa. The impact of these barriers is evident in the observed multigenerational stepping-stone connectivity, which averaged up to 15.23 events for seagrasses and 12.60 events for brown macroalgae, far below the simulated potential of 80 events, which aimed at ensuring that every candidate colonization sequence could unfold within the 2020–2100 period. This aligns with previous studies demonstrating the skewed, non-linear relationship between ocean currents and population connectivity6, which often results in significant genetic differentiation levels, even for species with high dispersal potential35,36,37. Correspondingly, oceanographic connectivity can impact future diversification and speciation processes34,38,39. Where dispersal barriers consistently restrict population connectivity, vicariant processes can drive the divergence of once-homogeneous genetic lineages34,38. Conversely, highly connected populations can interbreed through time, increasing their genetic diversity levels and, therefore, their resilience and adaptability potential under climate change40 (but see outbreeding depression41). Where future range expansions are supported, founder effects at the leading edge of colonization can significantly reshape genetic structures42, particularly well reported for marine forest species43,44. Recognizing the complex interaction between oceanographic connectivity and evolutionary processes is key to anticipating the resilience and adaptive capacity of marine biodiversity in the face of climate change.
Integrating BM and SDM estimates has shown to provide valuable insights into the role of oceanographic connectivity in shaping potential range dynamics under climate change. However, it is crucial to acknowledge a set of inherent uncertainties. First, the BM integrates ocean current data at a resolution of 1/16° 45, meaning that finer-scale nearshore processes might be unresolved46. These can be important for short-distance dispersal events (e.g., seeds and spores), reshaping local connectivity patterns47,48. Second, the current velocity fields utilized in BM are restricted to the surface of the ocean, potentially underestimating the connectivity of deep cryptic populations. While most marine forests are found within the mixed layer depth (down to ~45 meters), some species (e.g., Laminaria ochroleuca or Macrocystis pyrifera) can thrive in offshore seamount environments, where clear, nutrient-rich water extends their distributions to greater depths34,49. There, deeper currents may shape different dispersal patterns than those predicted by the surface-based model. Third, the BM is based on present-day ocean currents. While future climate change scenarios project shifts in ocean circulation that may alter dispersal pathways and barriers50, analyses are constrained by data resolution. Earth System Models used to project changes in ocean currents have a coarse resolution that cannot yet resolve the critical nearshore oceanographic processes necessary for accurate coastal dispersal modeling51,52. Fourth, the highly variable propagule duration data available in the literature, along with gaps for many species in our dataset (31 species with data for a total of 467), further introduces uncertainty. The use of mean and 95th percentile durations aimed at providing a general perspective of dispersal kernels53,54. However, propagule durations are species-specific (Supplementary Information), potentially leading to an underestimation of dispersal limitation. The inclusion of the most restrictive 5th percentile PD scenario provides a conservative estimate of range shift limitations, directly addressing the potential for high early-stage mortality55, as well as low propagule durations linked to high settling velocity or reduced rafting potential35,56,57. The variability and uncertainty related to species dispersal potential highlight the need for further research to refine modeling frameworks58. Finally, the SDM were built strictly with climatic variables, neglecting the availability of suitable substrate (e.g., sandy bottoms for seagrass and rocky reefs for macroalgae), and the potential for important biotic interactions (e.g., competition for available space59), which together can further influence the ability of species to colonize newly suitable habitats3. However, detailed, high-resolution global datasets on substrate type or biotic interactions are not currently available on a global scale. Integrating such data remains a major challenge for global-scale projections of marine biodiversity. It is important to consider these uncertainties when interpreting the model outputs, particularly if these are considered in conservation strategies under a changing climate.
Overall, our findings highlight the need for a paradigm shift in marine biodiversity assessments and conservation strategies to effectively address the challenges of climate-driven species redistribution. Planning the future based solely on projected habitat suitability (i.e., climate-smart conservation60) might be insufficient, as oceanographic connectivity may significantly restrict range expansions for marine species. These results have strong implications for climate-adaptation and mitigation of activities that depend on marine resource utilization, as human populations along vast coastlines across the globe base their subsistence highly on marine biodiversity associated with marine forests. Furthermore, the important role played by oceanographic connectivity demonstrates that scales of biodiversity management go beyond political borders, as even the best local management practices can be ineffective if along oceanographic dispersal pathways external threats block connectivity. For conservation, we emphasize the importance of incorporating connectivity estimates into SDM-based marine conservation planning; a feature abundantly recognized in terrestrial conservation61. For instance, marine protected areas (MPAs) strategically placed within, or along future dispersal pathways, can safeguard species movements under climate change62. On the other hand, prioritizing areas where ocean currents create major dispersal barriers can help mitigate the risk of isolation and potential extinction for vulnerable populations63. By integrating knowledge of oceanographic connectivity alongside habitat suitability64 conservation strategies can be tailored to promote assisted colonization efforts, restoration initiatives65, and the design of well-connected networks of MPAs66, in line with the 2020 Global Biodiversity Framework aimed at protecting 30% of the oceans by 203067,68. Overall, our findings underscore the urgent need for a paradigm shift in marine biodiversity assessments and conservation strategies to effectively address climate-driven species redistribution.
Methods
Theoretical framework
To assess how oceanographic connectivity might limit the range shifts of seagrasses and brown macroalgae under future climate change, we developed a framework that combines species distribution models (SDMs) with biophysical connectivity models (BMs). We used the SDMs to project shifts in suitable habitats from present-day conditions to the end of the century under various climate scenarios. Concurrently, we used BMs to simulate species’ dispersal potential, using long-term ocean current patterns and propagule durations (PDs). By comparing scenarios of restricted and unrestricted dispersal, our framework quantifies the extent to which marine forests may be unable to colonize newly suitable habitats.
Species distribution models
Species distribution maps of 58 seagrass species (order Alismatales; Supplementary Data 1) and 409 brown macroalgae species (orders Chordales, Desmarestiales, Fucales, Laminariales, and Tilopteridales; Supplementary Data 1) under present-day conditions (decade 2010-2020) and end-of-century (decade 2090–2100) Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) scenarios of future climate change were acquired from a published dataset69. This dataset provides distribution maps at 0.05 degrees resolution (~5 km) based on high-performance SDM generated with an ensemble of advanced machine learning techniques, which fitted expert-curated species’ occurrence records70 against biologically relevant, high-resolution environmental variables51, such as ocean temperature, nutrient conditions (e.g., nitrate), sea ice cover, wave energy, and salinity. To consider the potential range of future changes, we considered the lower emission scenario of sustainable development, aligned with the Paris Agreement (SSP 1-1.9), and the high emission scenario of inequality development (SSP3-7.0). Comparing the habitat suitability maps for the different time periods and climate scenarios allowed identifying regions of range loss and gain per species. Specifically for range gains, we further determined the distance between present-day suitable habitats and the nearest future suitable habitats. Additionally, the number of species that might gain or lose suitable habitats was determined per ocean cell for the two SSP scenarios10.
Biophysical connectivity models
Oceanographic connectivity estimates were acquired from coastalNet, a dataset45 providing BM predictions of global dispersal pathways. The dataset was built by simulating population connectivity of passively dispersed species using 21 years of daily data on the direction and intensity of ocean currents derived from the Global Ocean Physics Reanalysis (EU Copernicus Marine Service)35. The main output of the BM is probabilities of connectivity between coastal sites globally, which have been widely benchmarked against population genetic and demographic differentiation patterns for numerous marine forest species6,12,34,35.
Seagrass and brown macroalgae dispersal stages comprise propagule durations that can vary considerably34,53,71. To incorporate this variability into the BM, a database of empirical propagule duration records was acquired from literature53,54. This database comprises 31 species (13 seagrasses and 18 brown macroalgae; Supplementary Information)55,71. Due to the scarcity of species-specific data, we summarized the database into the 5th percentile, the mean, and the 95th percentile of propagule duration for each group (e.g. 53,54), thereby providing a comprehensive gradient of dispersal potential. The 5th percentile PD serves as a conservative scenario; the mean PD represents the most frequent, typical cross-species dispersal potential; and the 95th percentile PD captures the less common events associated with episodic long-distance dispersal71. Seagrasses exhibited a mean propagule duration of 12.53 ± 8.12 days (5th percentile of 2.60 days and 95th percentile of 24.80 days), while brown macroalgae exhibited a longer mean propagule duration of 19.94 ± 35.74 days (5th percentile of 0.85 days and 95th percentile of 59.05 days; Supplementary Information).
The connectivity estimates were assembled into a global, coast-wide directed graph (i.e., network analysis/graph theory). Each node corresponds to a coastal site, and its edges to the probability of a marine forest propagule dispersing from a source site to a destination site within the group-specific mean and 95th percentile propagule-duration windows. The graph was filtered per species to determine the connectivity potential from sites with present-day suitable habitats to sites with newly end-of-century habitats. These pathways were found using Dijkstra’s algorithm, and the number of intermediate sites within each path was counted; this count represents the number of “stepping-stones” required for whole colonization pathways across generations. Kelp and seagrass species typically reach reproductive maturity within a single growing season – usually in less than one year after establishment72,73,74,75. We therefore treat one stepping-stone as 1 year, and retain only colonization pathways comprising ≤ 80 steps, ensuring that every candidate colonization sequence could unfold within the 2020–2100 simulation window, matching the SDM projections.
Impact of oceanographic connectivity on species range shifts
To quantify the relative impact of oceanographic connectivity on species range expansions, we compared unrestricted versus restricted by oceanographic connectivity (refer to example on Fig. 4). Specifically, we fitted a linear mixed-effects models (LMM) with (1) range expansion in area, (2) range expansion in distance, (3) net change in range expansion in area, and (4) number of stepping-stones used across putative colonization pathways as model responses, taxonomic group (seagrass vs. brown macroalgae) and scenario (SSP1-1.9 vs. SSP3-7.0) as fixed effects, and a random intercept to account for repeated measures across species. Tukey tests (p-values adjusted) were used to determine the significance of multiple pairwise comparisons.
Comparison of unrestricted versus restricted dispersal by oceanographic connectivity using a propagule duration period of 20 days, within the reported range of the species’ dispersal potential56,71.
Data availability
The range maps used to produce the results are permanently available at: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27075493.
Code availability
The code used to produce the results is permanently available at: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27075493.
References
Pecl, G. T. et al. Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: Impacts on ecosystems and human well-being. Science 355, eaai9214 (2017).
Google Scholar
Garciá Molinos, J. et al. Climate velocity and the future global redistribution of marine biodiversity. Nat. Clim. Chang. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2769 (2016).
Pinsky, M. L., Selden, R. L. & Kitchel, Z. J. Climate-driven shifts in marine species ranges: scaling from organisms to communities. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 12, 14–32 (2020).
Google Scholar
Molinos, J., Burrows, M. T. & Poloczanska, E. S. Ocean currents modify the coupling between climate change and biogeographical shifts. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–9 (2017).
Treml, E. A. et al. Reproductive output and duration of the pelagic larval stage determine seascape-wide connectivity of marine populations. Integr. Comp. Biol. 52, 525–537 (2012).
Google Scholar
Gouvêa, L. P. et al. Oceanographic connectivity explains the intra-specific diversity of mangrove forests at global scales. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, 14 (2023).
Google Scholar
Razgour, O. et al. Considering adaptive genetic variation in climate change vulnerability assessment reduces species range loss projections. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 10418–10423 (2019).
Google Scholar
García Molinos, J. et al. Climate, currents and species traits contribute to early stages of marine species redistribution. Commun. Biol. 5, 1329 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hiddink, J. G., Burrows, M. T. & García Molinos, J. Temperature tracking by North Sea benthic invertebrates in response to climate change. Glob. Chang. Biol. 21, 117–129 (2015).
Google Scholar
Assis, J., Fragkopoulou, E., Gouvêa, L., Araújo, M. B. & Serrão, E. A. Kelp forest diversity under projected end-of-century climate change. Divers Distrib. 33, e13837 (2024).
Google Scholar
Gouvêa, L., Fragkopoulou, E., B. Araújo, M., Serrão, E. A. & Assis, J. Seagrass biodiversity under the latest-generation scenarios of projected climate change. J. Biogeogr. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.15021 (2024).
Legrand, T. et al. Unravelling the role of oceanographic connectivity in the distribution of genetic diversity of marine forests at the global scale. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13857 (2024).
Pessarrodona, A. et al. Global seaweed productivity. Sci. Adv. https://www.science.org (2022).
Eger, A. M. et al. The value of ecosystem services in global marine kelp forests. Nat. Commun. 14, 1894 (2023).
Google Scholar
Fourqurean, J. W. et al. Seagrass ecosystems as a globally significant carbon stock. Nat. Geosci. 5, 505–509 (2012).
Google Scholar
Fordham, D. A. et al. How complex should models be? Comparing correlative and mechanistic range dynamics models. Glob. Chang. Biol. 24, 1357–1370 (2018).
Google Scholar
Klein, M. et al. High interannual variability in connectivity and genetic pool of a temperate clingfish matches oceanographic transport predictions. PLoS ONE 11, e0165881 (2016).
Google Scholar
Buonomo, R. et al. Habitat continuity and stepping-stone oceanografic explain population genetic connectivity of the brown alga Cystoseira amentacea. Mol. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.dk563 (2016).
Lett, C. et al. A Lagrangian tool for modelling ichthyoplankton dynamics. Environ. Model. Softw. 23, 1210–1214 (2008).
Google Scholar
Assis, J., Fragkopoulou, E., Serrao, E. A. & Araújo, M. B. Coastal oceanographic connectivity at the global scale: a dataset of pairwise probabilities and travel times derived from biophysical modeling. Sci. Data 12, 737 (2025)..
Almada, C., Santos, R., Pearson, G. A. & Serrao, E. A. Seagrass connectivity on the West Coast of Africa supports the hypothesis of grazer-mediated seed dispersal. Front. Mar. Sci. 9, 1–13 (2022).
Buonomo, R. et al. Habitat continuity and stepping-stone oceanographic distances explain population genetic connectivity of the brown alga Cystoseira amentacea. Mol. Ecol. 26, 766–870 (2016).
Google Scholar
Fragkopoulou, E. et al. Global biodiversity patterns of marine forests of brown macroalgae. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13450 (2022).
Gouvêa L., Fragkopoulou E., Araújo M. B., Serrão E. A. & Assis J. Seagrass biodiversity under projected climate change. J. Biogeogr. 52, 172–185 (2024).
Gouvêa, L. P. et al. Global impacts of projected climate changes on the extent and aboveground biomass of mangrove forests. Divers Distrib. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13631 (2022).
Martins, M. R., Assis, J. & Abecasis, D. Biologically meaningful distribution models highlight the benefits of the Paris Agreement for demersal fishing targets in the North Atlantic Ocean. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13327 (2021).
Assis, J. et al. Major shifts at the range edge of marine forests: the combined effects of climate changes and limited dispersal. Sci. Rep. 7, 44348 (2017).
Google Scholar
Coleman, M. A. et al. Loss of a globally unique kelp forest from Oman. Sci. Rep. 12, 5020 (2022).
Google Scholar
Dunic, J. C., Brown, C. J., Connolly, R. M., Turschwell, M. P. & Côté, I. M. Long-term declines and recovery of meadow area across the world’s seagrass bioregions. Glob. Chang. Biol. 27, 4096–4109 (2021).
Google Scholar
Pessarrodona, A. et al. Carbon sequestration and climate change mitigation using macroalgae: a state of knowledge review. Biol. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12990 (2023).
Unsworth, R. K. F., van Keulen, M. & Coles, R. G. Seagrass meadows in a globally changing environment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.02.026 (2014).
Teagle, H. & Smale, D. A. Climate-driven substitution of habitat-forming species leads to reduced biodiversity within a temperate marine community. Divers. Distrib. 24, 1367–1380 (2018).
Google Scholar
Krause-jensen, D. et al. Imprint of climate change on Pan-Arctic marine vegetation. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 1–27 (2020).
Google Scholar
Assis, J. et al. Past climate changes and strong oceanographic barriers structured low – latitude genetic relics for the golden kelp Laminaria ochroleuca. J. Biogeogr. 45, 2326–2336 (2018).
Google Scholar
Assis, J. et al. Ocean currents shape the genetic structure of a kelp in southwestern Africa. J. Biogeogr. 49, 822–835 (2022).
Google Scholar
Abecasis, D. et al. Multidisciplinary estimates of connectivity and population structure suggest the use of multiple units for the conservation and management of meagre, Argyrosomus regius. Sci. Rep. 14, 873 (2024).
Google Scholar
Gandra, M., Assis, J., Martins, M. R. & Abecasis, D. Reduced global genetic differentiation of exploited marine fish species. Mol. Biol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa299 (2020).
Assis, J. et al. Past climate-driven range shifts structuring intraspecific biodiversity levels of the giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera) at global scales. Sci. Rep. 13, 12046 (2023).
Google Scholar
Neiva, J. et al. rans-Arctic asymmetries, melting pots and weak species cohesion in the low-dispersal amphiboreal seaweed Fucus distichus. Front. Ecol. Evol. 12, 1356987 (2024).
Google Scholar
Torda, G. & Quigley, K. M. Drivers of adaptive capacity in wild populations: Implications for genetic interventions. Front. Mar. Sci. 9, 947989 (2022).
Google Scholar
Aitken, S. N. & Whitlock, M. C. Assisted gene flow to facilitate local adaptation to climate change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135747 (2013).
Excoffier, L., Foll, M. & Petit, R. J. Genetic consequences of range expansions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 481–501 (2009).
Google Scholar
Neiva, J., Pearson, G. A., Valero, M. & Serrão, E. A. Surfing the wave on a borrowed board: range expansion and spread of introgressed organellar genomes in the seaweed Fucus ceranoides L. Mol. Ecol. 19, 4812–4822 (2010).
Google Scholar
Neiva, J., Assis, J., Fernandes, F., Pearson, G. A. & Serrão, E. A. Species distribution models and mitochondrial DNA phylogeography suggest an extensive biogeographical shift in the high-intertidal seaweed Pelvetia canaliculata. J. Biogeogr. 41, 1137–1148 (2014).
Google Scholar
Assis, J., Fragkopoulou, E.,., Serrao, E. A. & Araújo, M. B. Coastal oceanographic connectivity at the global scale: a dataset of pairwise probabilities and travel times derived from biophysical modeling. Sci. Data 12, 737 (2025).
Google Scholar
McWilliams, J. C. Submesoscale currents in the ocean. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2016.0117 (2016).
Ward, S. L., Robins, P. E., Owen, A., Demmer, J. & Jenkins, S. R. The importance of resolving nearshore currents in coastal dispersal models. Ocean Model. 183, 102181 (2023).
Google Scholar
Saint-Amand, A., Lambrechts, J. & Hanert, E. Biophysical models resolution affects coral connectivity estimates. Sci. Rep. 13, 9414 (2023).
Google Scholar
Assis, J. et al. Deep reefs are climatic refugia for genetic diversity of marine forests. J. Biogeogr. 43, 833–844 (2016).
Google Scholar
van Gennip, S. J. et al. Going with the flow: the role of ocean circulation in global marine ecosystems under a changing climate. Glob. Chang. Biol. 23, 2602–2617 (2017).
Google Scholar
Assis, J. et al. Bio-ORACLE v3.0: pushing marine data layers to the CMIP6 Earth System Models of climate change research. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 33, e13813 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ward, N. D. et al. Representing the function and sensitivity of coastal interfaces in Earth system models. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16236-2 (2020).
Assis, J. et al. Weak biodiversity connectivity in the European network of no-take marine protected areas. Sci. Total Environ. 773, 1–24 (2021).
Google Scholar
Assis, J. et al. Potential biodiversity connectivity in the network of marine protected areas in Western Africa. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 1749 (2021).
Google Scholar
Arrontes, J. Mechanisms of range expansion in the intertidal brown alga Fucus serratus in northern Spain. Mar. Biol. 141, 1059–1067 (2002).
Google Scholar
Reed, D. C., Schroeter, S. C. & Raimondi, P. T. Spore supply and habitat availability as sources of recruitment limitation in the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera (Phaeophyceae). J. Phycol. 40, 275–284 (2004).
Google Scholar
Neiva, J., Pearson, G. A., Valero, M. & Serrão, E. A. Fine-scale genetic breaks driven by historical range dynamics and ongoing density-barrier effects in the estuarine seaweed Fucus ceranoides L. BMC Evol. Biol. 12, 78 (2012).
Google Scholar
Jahnke, M. & Jonsson, P. R. Biophysical models of dispersal contribute to seascape genetic analyses. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0024 (2022).
Kubisch, A., Poethke, H. J. & Hovestadt, T. Density-dependent dispersal and the formation of range borders. Ecography 34, 1002–1008 (2011).
Google Scholar
Arafeh-Dalmau, N. et al. Incorporating climate velocity into the design of climate-smart networks of marine protected areas. Methods Ecol. Evol. 12, 1969–1983 (2021).
Google Scholar
Alagador, D., Cerdeira, J. O. & Araújo, M. B. Climate change, species range shifts and dispersal corridors: an evaluation of spatial conservation models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 853–866 (2016).
Google Scholar
Stralberg, D., Carroll, C. & Nielsen, S. E. Toward a climate-informed North American protected areas network: Incorporating climate-change refugia and corridors in conservation planning. Conserv. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12712 (2020).
Jacquemont, J., Blasiak, R., Le Cam, C., Le Gouellec, M. & Claudet, J. Ocean conservation boosts climate change mitigation and adaptation. One Earth https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.09.002 (2022).
Alagador, D. et al. Linking like with like: optimising connectivity between environmentally-similar habitats. Landsc. Ecol. 27, 291–301 (2012).
Google Scholar
Eger, A. M. et al. Global kelp forest restoration: past lessons, present status, and future directions. Biol. Rev. 97, 1449–1475 (2022).
Google Scholar
Abecasis, D., Fragkopoulou, E., Claro, B. & Assis, J. Biophysical modelling and graph theory identify key connectivity hubs in the Mediterranean marine reserve network. Front. Mar. Sci. 9, 1000687 (2023).
Google Scholar
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). First Draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (UN Doc. CBD/WG2020/3/3, 5 July 2021). Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Canada. Available at https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/914a/eca3/24ad42235033f031badf61b1/wg2020-03-03-en.pdf (2021).
Leadley, P. et al. Achieving global biodiversity goals by 2050 requires urgent and integrated actions. One Earth https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.05.009 (2022).
Gouvêa, L., Fragkopoulou, E., Legrand, T., Serrão, E. A. & Assis, J. Range map data of marine ecosystem structuring species under global climate change. Data Brief https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.110023 (2024).
Assis, J. et al. A fine-tuned global distribution dataset of marine forests. Sci. Data 7, 119 (2020).
Google Scholar
Batista, M. B. et al. Kelps ’ long-distance dispersal: role of ecological/oceanographic processes and implications to marine forest conservation. Diversity https://doi.org/10.3390/d10010011 (2018).
Epstein, G. & Smale, D. A. Undaria pinnatifida: a case study to highlight challenges in marine invasion ecology and management. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3430 (2017).
Westermeier, R., Murúa, P., Patiño, D. J., Muñoz, L. & Müller, D. G. Holdfast fragmentation of Macrocystis pyrifera (integrifolia morph) and Lessonia berteroana in Atacama (Chile): a novel approach for kelp bed restoration. J. Appl. Phycol. 28, 2969–2977 (2016).
Google Scholar
Malm, T. et al. Reproduction and recruitment of the seagrass Halophila stipulacea. Aquat. Bot. 85, 345–349 (2006).
Google Scholar
Santamaría-Gallegos, N. A., Sánchez-Lizaso, J. L. & Félix-Pico, E. F. Phenology and growth cycle of annual subtidal eelgrass in a subtropical locality. Aquat. Bot. 66, 329–339 (2000).
Google Scholar
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the Horizon Europe Framework Programme through project MPAEurope (HORIZON-CL6-2021-BIODIV-01-12) and by the Portuguese National Funds from FCT – Foundation for Science and Technology through contracts UID/04326/2025 (https://doi.org/10.54499/UID/04326/2025), UID/PRR/04326/2025 (https://doi.org/10.54499/UID/PRR/04326/2025) and LA/P/0101/2020 (https://doi.org/10.54499/LA/P/0101/2020)., the EU BiodivRestore-253 (FCT: DivRestore/0013/2020), and the Individual Call to Scientific Employment Stimulus 2022.00861.CEECIND/CP1729/CT0003 (https://doi.org/10.54499/2022.00861.CEECIND/CP1729/CT0003). Research by M.B.A. is funded through BIOFUTURES: Modelling the Future of Biodiversity From Individual Species to Communities” (CSIC Intramural project: 202630E50) and partly conducted while visiting the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv).
Funding
Open access funding provided by Nord University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.A. coordinated and produced the results, developed the code, and wrote the original draft. E.F. co-wrote the original draft. E.S. and M.B.A. supervised all phases of production and article writing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information (download PDF )
Supplementary data 1 (download XLSX )
Supplementary data 2 (download XLSX )
Supplementary data 3 (download TXT )
Supplementary data 4 (download XLSX )
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Assis, J., Fragkopoulou, E., Serrão, E.A. et al. Oceanographic connectivity strongly restricts future range expansions of critical marine forest species.
npj biodivers 5, 10 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44185-026-00123-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44185-026-00123-y
Source: Ecology - nature.com
